I like how exit velocity could become a really cool measure to study. But I'm with Chief, perhaps we should be a little more cautious in how we talk about it. We are just starting to use the data and see it, it's far from anything to draw sweeping conclusions from.
I liked the first episode and the tone and the weirdness to it are pretty cool. That said, I'm kind of over the gratuitously obnoxious blood balloon type of "action". Twice in that episode it delved into that and i'm really not a fan. Realistic violence I'm ok with and even for two hours (ala Sin City) I can deal with it. But every episode of a show? That might grate on me.
So....you're saying we shouldn't see any ridiculous articles about his weight then? Good for Sano, people really had to look hard to find ways to ding this kid. He's always struck me as being a far more determined player than he's given credit for. And I freaking love his personality - punish the baseball and have fun!
If I'm Sano, I want to see that this is a place worth staying before I ink that. In a year we could just as easily be looking at a mini-rebuild again as we could competing.
I'm really not surprised that steady playing time and work at one position has made these guys better fielders. It really shouldn't surprise anyone. What's surprising is how long it took to get here.....
Plus, this is the same manager that debuted him in the third spot to start the year. If Buxton shows he doesn't need to be pinch-hit for, I'm betting it stops in a hurry.
Well, I suppose that depends on how close to "league average" he is. If he's above or below, how many teams are in the races, injuries, and so many other things are factors. But I think he'll have significant value.
I disagree that reliever depth and starter depth are the same or that one will affect the other. Breslow, so far as I can see, should have no bearing on that.
As a general rule, I think you should exhaust your options to leave a guy in the rotation before you move him to the pen. I'm not sure we've exhausted our options yet with Duffey.
Bit of a small sample to declare those trade wins wouldn't ya say? (And this is from someone that argued vociferously that the deal was a good one at the time) It's not like we spent the Nolasco money this offseason either, so let's not go down that road....
A player you have control over for more than a year+ has tremendous value to your objective as well. At the end of the day, the team needs to be able to identify and acquire the players that will push us to contention. Dealing short term controlled vets in down years seems like one ideal way to do that.
So what has to be the main piece? I feel like you, and some others, say these things but there really isn't much actual substance to it. Or you're well aware your expectations are unrealistic. You demand a return so narrowly defined as acceptable that you basically stack the deck for your skepticism to be warranted. So is your main piece demand based in the real world or are we back to a lot of what it seemed like this offseason with Dozier?
If you're a child of the 90s like me, then I think this will be a wonderful way to spend some time. My god that show was brilliant. Some of the anecdotes and stories in this are just amazing.