History kinda repeats itself. 1958 Senators. Eddie Yost was the All Star third basement and then a kid by the name of Killebrew came along. Plouffe is not quite as good as Yost was, and Sano could be better than Killebrew (already is with the glove...) The Senators never worried about Yost (FWIW, was traded the next season in 1959) when Killebrew moved up. Plouffe can replace Hunter at RF, if needs to be so and call it a day. The Twins will not worry about Plouffe when Sano's time comes (and it better be sooner than later, if this team is still competing this season.) I think that it is telling that the Twins extended Dozier and not Plouffe who actually has a very similar production. As far as the original post goes, yes, Plouffe is driving runs better this season. And I am not talking about ribies (which is a worthless metric anyways.) I really like Fangraphs' "Clutch" metric, which measures how much better (or worse) a hitter does in high leverage situations, vs. content neutral situations. This is the first year that Plouffe has a positive number. Same for Win Probability Added (which is another way of looking at that question, better than RBI, but not quite as good as Clutch...)