Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Cory Engelhardt

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    3,528
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Cory Engelhardt

  1. I think pretty high. Dozier is a valuable commodity, and other teams will be offering similar packages. It's not like the Twins have to GIVE him away (even if I want them to find a good deal.)
  2. But wouldn't it be better to get a 20 or 21 with upside who could be more than a platoon player in 2018 or 2019? Then, if you have that (instead of Van Slyke) you can always sign Rajai Davis (or comparable) to be that guy for this year?
  3. 1) I don't love acquiring older players in a Dozier trade (van slyke is a year older than Dozier is, and if he is just going to be a 4th outfielder, facing only lefties, I'd rather acquire a 21 year old with upside who will be at Cedar Rapids or Fort Myers next year. 2)I also don't love stripling, but if the front office likes him I am good with that. 3) I hate having May back in the bullpen. I think he is a better starter than Gibson and Santiago, and maybe Mejia. I would have high hopes for Berrios and DeLeon (who if this is how it played out, would absolutely be in my rotation day 1, along with May and Santana. 4) I hate the "upgrade" of Avila to catcher. He is worse at pitch framing than Suzuki has been. If the front office wants an upgrade, and they can't get Castro (who, I say, who cares about payroll, get him to whatever contract he wants and figure it out later on) I would rather trade for an Austin Barnes or Derek Norris before going with Avila. 5) I would love an extra signing for the bullpen and for the field, preferably outfield or ss. That's just me. Thanks for putting this out there!
  4. I think they can aim higher, especially than just bullpen guys. I would needYadier Alvarez, and I think you can get Jose De Leon and maybe even another piece, like Yusniel Diaz or Jordan Sheffield.
  5. But even if a catcher can hold their own offensively, if pitch framing and defense are the most important aspects of the catcher position, then are you really ok with one of these guys being the starter? I mean, Geovany Soto was almost league average (-1.0) but even JR Murphy was higher than that, in terms of pitch framing. Avila and Iannetta were far worse than even Suzuki was in that regard.
  6. If we look at JUST pitch framing stats (something I think Falvey will say is important for his catchers) of this tier, Jeff Mathis is the only one who ranked as above average last year with the Marlins. He, at 4.4, is pretty well above average, and I'd be ok throwing him a 1 year deal if the Twins miss out on Castro and/or don't trade for someone else. http://www.statcorner.com/CatcherReport.php Mathis is pretty poor offensively. His 3% walk rate last year makes even Eddie Rosario look good. But, as a backup catcher (are we comfortable having Garver/Murphy be the starter?) he would help mentor on pitch framing at least. That said, I'm still on the sign-Castro train. Hopefully that works out.
  7. Yeah, didn't you say he is having surgery soon and out all year?
  8. I don't understand why you would keep Zack Jones and not Engelb Vielma; simply for his glove he could have a spot somewhere. Jones on the other hand already has been picked and returned; do the Twins really lose much if they lose Jones a 2nd time?
  9. I'm not advocating for a Twins to Sale trade. I'm wanting to trade Dozier for prospects. Other people want the Twins to trade for Sale, and I don't know if that is the right move at this time.
  10. They wouldn't. But they would for Dozier and our top 4-5 prospects.
  11. I would be ALL about this if Chris Sale was pitching for an NL team. Facing Dozier and the prospects they are giving up (which will be plenty) 19 times a year doesn't sound as enjoyable.
  12. You are right, my bad. Still, man, Arizona was pretty dumb in both transactions.
  13. I liked this article. Thank you for posting it. There is always hope. I don't know if the Twins will allow for Rosario and Plouffe to get the available playing time to fully bounce back. If they sign a veteran outfielder, don't you think Rosario is the one to take a platoon/bench spot? And Plouffe, I don't know how much I believe he will be on the team come April, but we'll see. If he is healthy he can contribute, but at what cost to the rest of the roster?
  14. Darren Wolfson, in his most recent podcast, said that the Dodgers and the Braves spoke to the Twins this past week regarding a potential Dozier trade at some point. I've looked at the Dodgers prospects a LOT lately thinking about certain scenarios, but not as much the Braves. What would a Dozier to the Braves trade look like? How about this... 1) Mike Foltynewicz, 25 years old (will be 26 next October) and pitched this year up in Atlanta. He has a HUGE fastball, and would very easily step right into the Twins rotation. 2) Touki Toussant, their #10 overall prospect, and he was a big part of the Shelby Miller trade from AZ. 3) Kyle Muller, their #12 prospect, 2nd round pick in 2016 out of high school. I first take the thought of Dozier to the Braves with a grain of salt, but Jon Heyman is reporting that the Braves have also spoken to the White Sox about Chris Sale. If the Braves are wanting to win-now while moving into a new ballpark, the Twins could really get some good prospects for Dozier. What do you think? Would you go for other prospects than what I listed?
  15. Unless you want to get Soto and pair him with Castro? Soto does hit lefties really well for his career, something Castro does not. Then the twins could give more time to Murphy and Garver in aaa.
  16. I don't see what Geovany Soto adds to this team, other than he was born near the same place in the world that Berrios was. I would be disappointed if this were the twins offseason
  17. That is what will be fun about this offseason. All of us as fans are going in with the hope of upgrading the team. I personally want Castro as I think he will help the pitching staff while also producing a little bit on the offensive side. That said, who knows what direction this front office is going to go. They may look at Murphy and Garver and Turner and everyone else in our current stable of catching prospects and say that none of them are cut out to be in the big leagues, so they could then go out and acquire another catcher to pair with Castro. I don't know what they will do, and that's why I am excited to see what unfolds.
  18. Gibson and Perkins don't have any current trade value, and I would feel pretty bad about trading Dozier for a pitcher who is eligible for free agency after 2017, and a 2nd baseman who is being put at short who is a)not good defensively and b)doesn't walk or get on base, and c) is more expensive than Dozier will cost going forward. If/when they trade Dozier it will be for younger players who have more years of control. I do not like your 2nd trade either. Sano is cheap and controllable for a while, and I am excited for what Jay can do, among others
  19. Here is Castro's stat line from last year when he only faced right handed pitching... 231/331/426 for a .757 OPS. That is really good for a catcher especially. He also had a 12.9% walk rate, something this team could absolutely use more of. He was not good against left handed starters. He hit lefties (as a right handed hitter) to the tune of 149/237/241, with an ops of .478. If Castro starts the majority of games (because there are more right handed pitchers in baseball than left handed) and is paired with another catcher who can hit lefties well, the catching position will be just fine on the offensive side of the ball. What Castro brings to the table in terms of defense and pitch framing makes this a no brainer.
  20. They can sign Castro and not break the bank doing it, and also if Garver or Murphy play and earn time, then they will play. The coaches have seen both of them and scouted both of them for years. If they are not ready, they are not ready. Garver isn't going to magically become Johnny Bench by playing in the pros when he hasn't shown enough in the minors to earn a call-up yet. Plus, you realize, they can spend 20-30 million on Castro, and still not even get close to the amount of resources they have to pursue pitching in every/all avenues. Pursuing a major league caliber catcher (which they don't currently have) doesn't mean they can't also pursue pitching.
  21. The Twins want to find a starting catcher who can help their pitching staff and help be at least average defensively. They don't currently have that guy on the roster. We aren't looking at adding Johnny Bench through free agency, but getting a guy who can help the pitching staff grow and develop, while costing not all that much in terms of current day free agency is a no brainer. Just punting free agency and hoping for the best doesn't always solve everything. I'm not saying Jason Castro is a savior, but I absolutely believe having Castro catch 110 games next year will help in terms of runs allowed and pitcher ERA. Why is that a bad thing? And I would absolutely give Castro a fair contract compared to what others receive in free agency. If that is 12 million or 14 million (or more) per year, whatever it is, the Twins and major league baseball absolutely have the resources to acquire a player that will help their team both in 2017 and for the future. Hopefully he would be able to teach other catchers in the system something about pitch framing as well.
  22. I absolutely disagree with this. Someone like Castro can come in and help the young pitching staff improve over the next two years or so (maybe 3) and then he can also help work with Murphy/Garver etc. It's not like the catcher position is only one guy. But, trusting every single position on your team to young players, especially when they don't have quality veterans to look up to and work with, that doesn't help. Centeno does not belong on a MLB roster.
  23. Garver has had concussion issues (who hasn't, especially if you are a catcher) but he only managed to play in 60 games in 2016 at catcher, and only 77 games in 2015. I hope he can make it as well, but absolutely counting on him to be a full time savior for this time is folly. They NEED to address the position with someone from the outside, and Castro would be an excellent choice.
  24. I don't see why signing Castro would also mean the Twins are giving up on Murphy? Couldn't they work together (or Garver?) as a good tandem? The Cubs used 3 catchers (not that, it always works) but it's not like one guy can catch more than 100-120 games a year in today's game any longer while staying productive.
×
×
  • Create New...