If Kirilloff could be the centerpiece, as this article started off having me thinking was the suggestion, I'd be all for it. Corner outfielders are valuable but not critical to a team's plans. And this team's rosters have been sclerotic for several years because of an overabundance of corner types - "and if that doesn't work out, he can always DH". You can only have one DH per game, and the roster gets clogged. We saw it in The Ryan Doumit Era, we still see it now. Up-the-middle prospects are a different story, and starting pitching in particular is the coin of the realm. And I'll keep repeating, IMO a stud catcher is a luxury for only the richest or most complete teams. The best catcher in the world doesn't play every game, and if he's that good then you'll want to DH him for his days off, and then you can't house a full-time DH, and pretty soon you're juggling the 25-man roster, with 3 catchers as the end-game the manager wants to reach. A stud catcher is great, but needs to be the final piece to the puzzle, such that the rest of your roster is good enough that he can be benched on his days off - and a part-timer being paid full-time wages is, as I said, a luxury.