Jump to content
The Twins open a weekend set with the Rays! Come join our game thread! ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Richmond Dude

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    75

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Richmond Dude

  1. Richmond Dude
    Interesting point about tradition and the nature of the buttons on the front of the shirt. If you look back on the 70s and early 80s, the uniforms absolutely lost a lot of tradition. Most teams wore pullovers, looked awful. The White Sox tried out shorts at one point. There was a real snapback to tradition in the mid-to-late 80s. So if you don't care for the patches, there is hope.
  2. Richmond Dude
    There's a whole episode of Ted Lasso devoted to this.
  3. Richmond Dude
    I agree with you on all points. I felt that putting Rodriguez out for the fourth inning was pushing it and maybe even setting him up (or somehow sparing the relievers who you expected to keep around the rest of the season. But there is no game today, weird. And, just as recently as last year, we were reminded of how little connection there is between the first week of the season and how a team actually plays the year out.
  4. Richmond Dude
    Unless, possibly, the Padres viewed Rogers as the single missing piece that would get them over the hump that they seem to have been stuck on in a division with two juggernauts. They underperformed the past two years and the GM was retained while the manager was fired. Teams in that position overpay. Not disagreeing, btw. You're right under regular circumstances. Just giving a different perspective.
  5. Richmond Dude
    Trading Sanchez away is probably the most certain way to ensure that he regains his form and even makes the All-Star game.
  6. Richmond Dude
    Several of these rosters have 16 pitchers and the MLB only allows there to be 15 unless one is a two-way player like Ohtani. And if it is 15, both the players sent down in May have to be pitchers because the max is 13 at that point. In other words, there has to be 13 position players. Oddly, there are currently 13 rostered position players still in camp (+3 NRI). If Godoy gets sent down, somebody has to be removed from the 40-man. My own preference with the way things appear to be shaking out would be for Arraez to be the regular DH, but it looks more like it will be Sanchez. And maybe, if all Sanchez has to worry about is hitting rather than catching, he'll do better at it this year. But that's the kind of hope baseball fans always have in April of each year.
  7. Richmond Dude
    I'm okay with it, but the Twins have a long history of letting these second-chance guys hold on too long. I don't want to watch Happ or Shoemaker again like we did last year. They let those guys go way too late and it hurt the team.
  8. Richmond Dude
    I think your comment is especially valid given the new CBA condition that you can only option a player five times in a year without placing him on waivers. While five seems like a lot, those heavy bullpen days followed by exchanging relievers with the AAA squad will evaporate that very quickly. On the other hand, if you slot in Jax/Thorpe as a tandem 5th starter and tell both they need to go three innings, you haven't lost that much. You could still use them in short relief on some days and one of them would have been the 5th starter anyway.
  9. Richmond Dude
    Thise of us who are Vikings fans have a phrase: Just one before I die.
  10. Richmond Dude
    And that includes trading off Berrios and Cruz and losing Maeda, all key pieces of the team. It is hard to overestimate how badly Colome affected the team early on.
  11. Richmond Dude
    Or the opposite. Baseball fans run to both extremes.
  12. Richmond Dude
    I don't know how this turns out, but here are a few thoughts: Sanchez doesn't DH for us because, while Kiner-Falefa had catching experience, I don't think we have another emergency catcher on the roster (could be wrong, someone will surely let me know if I am, lol). It's interesting to see folks who were mad when we traded for Kiner-Falefa also be mad when we traded him away. What changed in 24 hours? He didn't even report to Ft. Myers. Yankees fans are frustrated that Urshela was traded and fel this was a bad trade for them. Most of the professional baseball commentators seem to agree, grading the Twins higher on the trade than the Yankees (although some probably have factored in money and assumed a major signing). Rortvedt is a risk for the Yankees. I have watched baseball a long time (like many of you). I have a seen a *lot* of players who were great at AAA and projected to be solid major leaguers not be able to make the jump or have a single good season. The difference between the two levels is huge. I wish him well, but about half of these guys who make it don't actually do well. We'll see how it plays out. I'll wait for some actual games to put much effort into judging this one.
  13. Richmond Dude
    I agree, at least in formal statistics. I think his horrendous performance the first two months of the season, and Baldelli's insistence in keeping him in the closer, demoralized the team and resulted in lesser play for most of the season. Once Colome was removed as closer, the team performed better and had a better record.
  14. Richmond Dude
    It's important to remember that last year's Twins team was better in the second half than the first half, particularly once Colome was removed from the closer role, and that Colome alone seriously undermined this team in the first two months of the season, demoralizing them for the rest of the season. I think we're better out of the gate just by him being gone. It's addition by subtraction.
  15. Richmond Dude
    You can argue about the other three, although I think Romo is no longer a good fit for us, but I would enjoy seeing Stewart get a chance to put things together for us.
  16. Richmond Dude
    I'm not sure how this all works out, but I am patient enough to wait for the push to find out. Having said that, I wish they wouldn't do this stuff late on a Sunday night. After reading these stories, I get a headache and need a drink, but I have to work in the morning. Please be more considerate with your timing, Falvine!
  17. Richmond Dude
    That sounds reasonable. The only quibble is that if you are a team that pays into revenue sharing, you can't draft higher than 10th more than a single year in a row, so if you're 7th, you get bumped down to 10. Those that receive money from revenue sharing can't draft higher than 10th more than two years in a row. Which leaves the question of, if you were the worst team, but not eligible for the lottery, do you slot into pick number 10 before or after the lottery (e.g. if it's before, you start at 10, but if six teams behind you win the six lottery slots, you get bumped down to 16; if it's after, you're just 10 no matter who won the lottery). So there's some extra wrinkles there, which results in three issues - you may be in the lottery, you may be out of the lottery, and you may actually be required to be moved down from your position outside of the lottery system.
  18. Richmond Dude
    I'm not sure I like it, but time will tell. This appears to indicate that Lewis will not be ready this year, but Kiner-Falefa has played 3B and C, too, so could be moved around. I will really miss Garver, but we had one too many catchers and too many 1B, too, so no place for all those people to play. Best of luck, GarvSauce.
  19. Richmond Dude
    It is indeed the teams who didn't make the playoffs that are in the lottery. It appears that the worst three teams will have a 16.5% chance in the hopper, whereas the highest ten teams that didn't make the playoffs will each have a 2% chance. I don't know how the two or more rule will affect the chances (e.g. do you still have the same number of balls in the hopper and just get put in 10th if you get picked or do they remove the balls?).
  20. Richmond Dude
    Sorry. I thought I was being funny/snarky, but clearly was too sharp and didn't pull it off.
  21. Richmond Dude
    I don't need to. The data you put up shows my interpretation rather than yours. Attendance is lower for the Twins in April than it is in July. It's right in your link. We all know what the capacity of the stadium is and we all, if we watch the Twins, know that they offer special packages at an exceptionally low ticket price for April and May and still have lower attendance. If attendance is lower in April and higher in July and the average ticket price is lower in April and higher in July, it doesn't take some statistical genius to figure out that it costs more to cancel a game in July than in April, since the salaries and per diem are constant. Additionally, I'm not sure I should have to post the actual game schedule to prove that we don't play *all* 27 games in April at home. I think everyone knows that. But here's a hint if you didn't realize they play half their games away: if you turn on the TV and the Twins are wearing grey, the game is in the other team's stadium.
  22. Richmond Dude
    Two issues here: all of those games wouldn't have been at home and the average attendance includes both lower attendance spring games and often sold-out summer games. The Twins (and most other teams) lose a lot less cancelling April and early May games than they do cancelling June, July, and August games. It's one of the reasons why the Twins several years ago began selling huge mark-down tickets in April, basically saying they'll let you come in for virtually nothing in the hope you'll buy concessions, because the attendance is so low that they're happy for every body they can get.
  23. Richmond Dude
    I don't believe for a second that the Yankees lost $190M that year. They may have made $190M less profit and they may even have lost some money as a result, but I don't believe that they spend that much more on their basic franchise, absent player salaries, than everyone else does.
  24. Richmond Dude
    Gardy really screwed with Harris' head and never gave him a fair shake. The Hardy trade was when I knew that the team was simply not going to be good under Smith.
  25. Richmond Dude
    I'm not sure how to respond to this, I don't think it's accurate and there certainly isn't any evidence to support what you said.
×
×
  • Create New...