Riverbrian

I'm not questioning his sources. I have no reason to believe that Buxton wouldn't waive his no trade clause if the team fits his hopes and dreams. I also personally believe that inflexibility (will never waive it) is probably something nobody should ever do in any walk of life. What I'm saying is that a single sentence in an article ranking the 40 best players who are possible trade candidates doesn't mean we should start saying our goodbyes to Byron this morning. Especially when the plugged in guy himself is listing the probability at 35%.

When the discussion turns to just trading everything not nailed down. There is something in the CBA... that states that you must spend 1.5 the amount received in your revenue sharing allotment or the players association will file a grievance. I don't know what the Twins will receive in revenue sharing dollars. I read last year that the A's did a payroll push to avoid this potential grievance.

I read that. The exact wording of the sentence. Buxton is willing to waive his no-trade clause -- and not just for Atlanta (he's a Georgia native) It was placed in an article co-authored by Kiley McDaniel ranking the best players POSSIBLY available for trade. The odds by either Passan, McDaniel or both are listed at 35%. Which states that Passan, McDaniel or both would not bet the house on it. From that sentence. The internet will explode with other people taking this sentence and turning it into... Buxton is on Zillow right now. I'm denying what?

Dan Hayes stated that Buxton may be willing to waive his no trade clause back in November 12th. We all know the possibility is out there if he's willing to waive it and apparently he is if Hayes and Passan both are hearing this from Byron's agent or Byron himself. That's puts him on a list of possible trade candidates that Passan then ranks based on his personal ranking of talent. What am I denying? That Passan's 35% means 100%?

They casually announce news like this all the time because it isn't news yet. In the article... Passan ranks Buxton as the 5th best trade consideration. Skubal #1 He also places the chances of the Twins trading Buxton at 35%. He places the chances of #1 Skubal being traded at 10%. #5 35% 10% Are all numbers made up by Passan.

No Buxton should retire a Twin! He should take on a role with the organization after he retires if he chooses. #25 should be placed between #14 Hrbek and #28 Blyleven. He should have a statue built in the plaza His children Brix, Blaze and Baire should grow up in Minnesota and proudly walk by Dad's statue every time they go to a game. He's one of us. That is what should happen. The statue should be rounding 2nd doing the Buck Truck thing.

Weather Joe Ryan should be traded is certainly worthy of debate. He could be extended... traded at the deadline or next off season or remain a Twin for the next two seasons. On that subject. I respect the opinions of others. However, I strongly feel that the time to trade him is this off-season. His value will never be higher. BBTV isn't the be all end all in terms of value since value is in the eye of the beholder. However... using BBTV trade value as a guide... it suggests that Joe Ryan has similar value to Walter Jenkins. He would have to have a better year than he had last year... significantly better in order to maintain current trade value at the deadline. He would have to be Tarik Skubal like to maintain his current trade value next off-season with one year left at double the arb pay. Currently... BBTV has Skubal and Ryan at similiar value because of the extra year of control. And of course... a significant arm injury this year could potentially wipe all of his current value to zero. That injury nightmare scenario would be the same as just losing Walter Jenkins for nothing. Many won't see that but if his trade value is similar to Walter Jenkins. He would get a Jenkins type talent back. If you don't trade Ryan for that Jenkins type talent. If injury wipes out his trade value... it's the same as losing Jenkins for nothing. And of course... The Twins have holes to fill and nobody can fill a hole (or two) like Ryan could. This leads to the question... If you Trade Joe Ryan. Do you go for a single Walter Jenkins (or close to) type player. Or do you take a package with multiple players/prospects. In regards to the current roster. Their are 3 current infielders on the 26 man roster that could stand some serious upgrading. One of Fitzgerald or Kreidler will get a 26 man roster spot for SS depth. Yes Culpepper can break camp with a major league job but I don't see that happening immediately. Clemens and Julien would probably both get roster spots if this was the roster out of spring training. If you bring in a SS... Fitzgerald or Kriedler would lose a 26 man spot. If you bring in a 1B... Either Clemens or Julien would have to be removed from the 26 man. Fitzgerald is the only one of those 4 players that have options remaining... So... Kriedler, Clemens and Julien would be exposed to other clubs if that matter to anyone. I would love to hear everyone's thoughts. Myself... I think they should go for the biggest major league ready-ish prospect they can land to bring another Jenkins type prospect into the mix. Burridge with the Giants is similar value to Ryan and Jenkins according to BBTV. Vientos and Jett Williams and Christian Scott with the Mets would be an example of multiple players adding up to similar value to Ryan and Jenkins. What would you do?

@arby58 makes some great points... the quick return from reliever to starter is something seldom done. However... I agree with you completely. Just roster your best arms. Sort it out. Can you hang zeroes? How Many? The ones that hang more... those are your starters.

McCusker could easily be dropped to open up a pre rule-5 roster spot.

Please No! Where do I stand to picket? I will take Fitzgerald over a one year rental. Fitzgerald has years of control if he somehow... someway... makes himself worth more years. However... one of the most important things for the front office to do this off-season is remove Fitzgerald from any 26 man projections. Trade Ryan or Jeffers or James Outman if you can spare him and bring in a young close to major league ready SS... Please! If you looking at free agents... look in the bullpen aisle stay clear of the sale priced one year position player freezer section.

Agreed but if he maintains his infield possibility. It will open the door to Emma, GG or Jenkins to be the first call up if an injury happens anywhere on the diamond besides catcher. That possible flexibility could serve the Twins well even if there is a defensive hit playing infield.

Hope it works!

Anointing Austin Martin the everyday LF would be a tragic mistake. That is nothing against Austin Martin despite his light hitting ways. I think he can help us. I acknowledge that you don't want a team full of Martin types because I agree that slugging gets you further down the road quicker in comparison to simple batting average. Having one or two of them on the team can create a different way of winning a ball game. Players like that can even be inspirational... if they play the game hard. However... Every Day? That would be a tragic mistake because: A. They can't say that Martin is better than what Roden will be or is now. They can't even say that Martin will be better than Outman in the near future... if they fix Outman this off-season. Keep going down the list. Other than Jenkins... nobody is a guarantee to what they will become. You are just guessing on the margins and opportunity is what will determine success, failure and everything in between. Giving one player (Martin) a full time gig... forsaking others is just compromising your timeline. 156 innings of solid baseball is still a pretty small sample... you can't commit full time playing time to 156 innings of achievement. If anyone thinks the coaching staff, scouts, manager, front office know... I think it's fair to say that they don't. If they knew... they would make no mistakes and we don't know either. B. Martin can also provide an unforeseen value to this club. I know the passionate defensive minded posters on TD will not like this idea but... here goes anyway: Martin should primarily be OF but... he needs to keep that infield glove nearby and get the occasional infield tune-up. OK... deep breath everyone. Martin's infield ability will allow... almost guarantee... that your favorite outfield prospect is the first call up... even if the injured player that provides the opportunity to be called up is an infielder. Only Buxton should play every day. He is the only one who has earned it. The other 4 outfielders on the roster (Whoever they might be) can split up playing time for 3 spots (LF, RF, DH). 4 players... 3 spots. Development on HIGH.

Martin platoon? Short Side? If that's the plan... just take him out back and throw him off a cliff. He will have no future value to the club. He will actually immediately become a detriment to our future. Martin will no longer matter. A future pinch running option that will be destined to be replaced by a younger pinch running option. If our development plan with the current batch of prospects is to continue strip mining these players for parts just like we did with the last batch. Let's just stop any type of thinking that this front office can develop players. They can't and won't. Might as well throw the front office and manager off the same cliff. The 2026 Twins roster should not contain specialists in any form or fashion. If the front office thinks they can cobble together role players and think they can contend with marginal gains using a little of this, little of that. They will fail and fail spectacularly.

In order to be specific on the perfect off-season trade suggestions when I prefer general such as get a SS and a 1B using Ryan and Jeffers. I just matched up value according to BBTV. BBTV suggests that Ryan and Aiden Miller matchup decently... maybe the Phillies throw in a reliever according to BBTV. The reason I keep throwing his name out is just the speed and power combo that he is showing. As far as 1B... Casas does seem to be a bit polar with the TD crowd. He's got the pop I'd like to see at the position. He has years of control but his injury history is horrible. Basically I'm just looking for a BBTV match to fill the 1B spot. I'm open to refinement.

I'm ok with refinement to my suggestions. All I have to work with in regards to prospects is the pile of stats that they have accumulated and the projections made by other people. In general... I just think they have to Trade Joe Ryan and Ryan Jeffers. Have to... I really think it would be a mistake not to... and what I would desperately like back is a young SS and young 1B and the combo of those two things leads to my specific ideas but I'm ok with any refinement suggestions. I agree talent accumulation is the primary goal so I'm OK with a really talented OF like Clark but my first priority would be to get Fitzgerald off the 26 man roster so we can maximize the utilization from as many 26 man roster spaces as possible... that's why I went with Miller. In regards to Larnach. Yeah I have no idea what will interest who or who will interest what... But if a team is going to be interested in Trevor... the Padres would have to be near the top of that interest meter and they are also a team that has accumulated nice bullpen depth. If we have to sweeten the deal to get someone like Bradgley. OK... We got some depth to throw in but in the end... I was just trying to matchup the BBTV suggested value of Larnach. As you know... if we keep Larnach... I'd be perfectly fine with that.

I prefer generally, But I know I have to be specific. So please... consider my specificity in a general type consideration. I think they have to trade Ryan and Jeffers or at the very least extend Jeffers. I know that BBTV isn't the be all end all but the website does well enough to take somewhat seriously the suggestion that Joe Ryan's trade value is similar to the trade value of Walker Jenkins. If that is his current trade value... he will bring back a Walker Jenkins type player. That's potential superstar type value and it's too big a risk to not cash that in. If Joe Ryan has a serious injury(not out of the question)... his trade value gone and it's like losing a Walker Jenkins. Too big a risk... you have to trade him. Try to extend Jeffers but if I'm Jeffers... I'm betting on myself. Jeffers could be one of the best free agent catchers in 2027... if not thee best catcher available. He will get paid. If you can't extend him... you must trade him now or you get no value from him. He walks away... leaving trade value behind. Just Jackson and whoever your way through the position. Any offense will help... but... you just try to load up on offense everywhere else. So specifically... meant to be generally. For example. Trade Joe Ryan to the Phillies for Aiden Miller. Trade Ryan Jeffers to the Red Sox for Triston Casas and Conner Wong. Trade Trevor Larnach to the Padres for Bradgley Rodriguez. Yes... as much as I've fought for Larnach... I will trade him if we get a decent return back. I don't know much about Bradgley but he's 22 and he hits 100 from time to time. So... Big Arm Reliever. Larnach would be a good fit with the Padres. With the ownership in flux. There is no way they will have much if any money to spend on Kyle Tucker types and even if they did... they got a lot of holes to fill. Someone like Larnach would help them and we get an upper 90's 22 year old arm. Arm for the bullpen. A young SS about major league ready. A 1B with Pop... If he stays healthy and a catcher that was decent a couple of years ago looking for a rebound. Something like that would make it a perfect off season for me.

And by not marketing the narrative. They don’t control the narrative. The fans do. Youth means losses. Youth means Cheap Owners.

I kept watching. I didn’t check out. IMO the main difference post deadline was pitching. Bullpen was completely untrustworthy while starters like Ryan and Ober were struggling. Offensively. They looked the same without Correa, Bader and France. Looked better once they started running the bases.

Yes Especially when you look at the rest of the roster.

Your call Mike… Not Mine. You lost me when you said “Basement”.

This Article articulates the very reason I have said over and over again in regards to Larnachs continued presence on this roster. Trevor Larnach is not the place to start!

They never do

I don't know anything about Jordan or Rumfield so I won't advocate one or the other. I'll just repeat what MLR said "If ever there was a year". The current condition of our 1B depth chart is almost impossible to achieve and it should be studied at Ivy league universities. The addition of Jordan would most likely cost us Julien or Clemens because there wouldn't be 26 man room for all 3. Jordon or Julien?

This a good post and this is a marketing issue. On Twinsdaily... We know who Walker Jenkins is? The average Joe who buys tickets? Not so much. If they are calling up Gabriel Gonzalez... sell it. I mean sell it. Make it seem like it's important. If they do that... the winds on the roads they travel will become less stiff. People will know who Jenkins is and why he matters.