Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

jkcarew

Verified Member
  • Posts

    5,339
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jkcarew

  1. Why is doing something within the rules...rules agreed to by the players union...”unethical”. It’s either good for the club in the long term or it’s not. Nothing more, nothing less. The notion that this is any more “unethical” than a player deciding to leave teammates and an organization that have treated him well for any amount of additional money...well, it’s not a terribly objective stance. One is try to maximize long term value to the club...in other words, do their job. The other is doing the best for himself and his family. Nothing unethical about either regardless of whether we like the rule or the outcomes.
  2. You expected to see Celestino last season? As an emergency to temporarily avoid other undesirable player/roster moves, I guess...(as they had to do with Polanco in 2014 and 2015). But Polanco then, like Celestino now, was only on the 40-man due to the ridiculous rule-5 requirements as it relates to promising international signees. Cave and Kepler in center (whether we like it or not)...as has been the case; numerous options in the corners; road trip to Wichita if we want to see Celestino in the summer.
  3. Merrifield’s been a better player than Max. But not by a lot, and they’re at the age where it’s possible, even likely, that Max hasn’t peaked...while Merrifield is just getting to the flip side of that. Tough call.
  4. I like it. If you squint just a bit when you look at Walker and imagine a slightly lower walk rate and a little better durability...you have a really nice #3. Doesn’t answer the ‘true ace’ prayer, but still.
  5. Not thinking it will do anything to maintain his differentiating range in CF as he approaches age 30 either. About the last guy on the team that I thought “getting in better shape” was a key needed to unlock improvement. But then again, who knows. It’s almost spring time.
  6. Way too high. Let’s face it, if Cavaco had been drafted at the bottom of the first round or in the second round somewhere (where consensus projected him to go weeks ahead of the draft), he’d be well outside the top 10. Doesn’t matter if you’re drafted #13 overall, or if you’re raw, or if you’re ‘adjusting’, or if you just turned 18: when you come in with questions on the hit tool and you’re completely overwhelmed by instructional league pitching, even in a short timeframe, to the extent that Cavaco was...you’re a lottery ticket. A very shiny one perhaps, but a lottery ticket.
  7. Agreed. Good depth/numbers regarding quality it seems...but not balanced across positions. I guess that’s where making the right trades...at the right time...come into play. Certainly a unique exercise in ranking coming off a cancelled season. I’d agree with Javier’s slide and the flip at the top. Cavaco too high.
  8. Yeah. So many red flags. The .577 SLG with the .267 OBP...enabled by a ridiculously high HR/FB ratio in a short sample. He’s done lots of nice things in short samples, but the career 91 OPS+ speaks for itself. Hear he’s coming into camp with significantly more muscle. Interesting. If he loses even a step in range, the hitting deficiencies are magnified.
  9. And yet, they rank Lewis high (relative to the other services). The only reasonable conclusion can be that they see Lewis as the next incarnation of Ozzie Smith in the middle of the infield, because if they don’t like Kirilloff’s swing... I guess we should consider ourselves lucky if they’ve got both right...or both wrong.
  10. I’m encouraged that many here feel Buxton has ‘arrived’ offensively. Still, can’t say I’m convinced. Finished last year a complete mess...and posted in the shortened season a completely unsustainable HR/FB. IMO, both Robert and Buxton have much proving yet to do. But one of them will start the season at age 23. The other at 27.
  11. I would like Kirilloff to be the opening day left fielder. But I understand why that might not happen from a business standpoint. I have no issues with the FO taking advantage of rule that was collectively bargained with the players. Still, it’s probably fair to say there is risk with either side of that decision for the FO.
  12. Issues hitting, then a pandemic, and now injuries. So, we’ll likely not see this #1 overall pick until 2023... SIX years after having drafted him...and with the possibility that his best and most reliable tool (speed) will already be in decline. Sigh.
  13. #1 overall, turns 22 in 3 months, will spend next season rehabbing and learning to hit consistently (hopefully). Playing for Twins in 2023 as he turns 24? Sucks for him even more than it sucks for us.
  14. “Semien would be a significant - albeit still below average - upgrade over Polanco defensively while also being a solid upgrade offensively; his OPS is .002 points higher than Polanco’s since 2017...” Huh? .002 of OPS over 4 seasons is a ‘solid upgrade’ offensively?...and when that advantage was built completely on the back of exactly ONE of those 4 seasons? The advantage of Semien over Polanco is completely on the defensive side of things.
  15. If the Twins don’t want Polanco to be their every-day SS, then they should be trading Polanco or Lewis (or Arraez). The instant the Twins acquire one of the new SS options flung around in these threads, at least one of those three immediately loses significant value.
  16. If all of this talk about the Twins wanting a SS are true...and I’m not convinced they are true...then that says the Twins are very far down the path of giving up on Lewis as an every-day major league shortstop. There’s no reason to expect that Lewis...right now...would be materially worse offensively than Baez or Semien were in 2020, or Semien has been every year other than 2019. This will be Lewis’s age 22 season. He was a #1 overall pick. Not a good look to be making significant moves for middle infielders as if he didn’t exist. Unless, of course, the Twins consider him insufficient defensively to fill a full-time super-utility role...or already consider him an outfielder.
  17. How long do you wait for a player that was drafted #1 overall (Lewis). The presumption is that he had the resources, attention, and reps in 2020 to continue his development. This will be his age 22 year. Bring him up or trade him for pitching.
  18. If no Cruz, then two right-handed catchers works IF at least one hits well enough to DH against lefties. I’m not there really with Jeffers (yet) or Garver (anymore)...doesn’t mean the Twins aren’t. A lot of talk on this and other threads recently about corner outfielders and middle infielders. Don’t get it. If none of Lewis, Larnach, and Kirilloff in their age 22, 23, and 23 seasons are ready...they need to be traded, like yesterday. Even big-market contending teams turn their rosters to accommodate prospects...if they believe they’re good. Having said that, I like the idea of Ozuna’s right-handed bat in left field. But he will be very expensive in terms of years. Still, in theory, it could justify packaging Kirilloff or Larnach in a deal for controllable pitching. I expect relievers and a starter in FA. And a move to the next wave of prospects at corner OF/DH/Catcher/super-utility...and to some extent reliever...maybe even starter.
  19. Lewis was a first overall draft pick. He’ll be 22 rears old for the bulk of the upcoming season which is the age at which most high-end players make their debuts (if not earlier). And you trade him now for one year of a player that plays the same position he plays? Makes sense in one scenario and one scenario only...you’ve concluded that Lewis isn’t going to be good.
  20. Didn’t do the deal with Polanco last year for him to become a bench player. In a hypothetical scenario where the Twins have Semien on a multi-year deal, Polanco is the everyday 2nd baseman or he’s traded.
  21. Eddie Bane didn’t knock the Gophers out of the CWS...although he beat them. The Gophers were knocked out by USC (Fred Lynn, Roy Smalley) when USC scored 8 runs in the 9th inning of the semifinal to beat the Gophers 8-7. Kinda hard to forget that one if you happened to be over the age of about 10 when it happened.
  22. There’s a rotation slot and a price I’d give to Odorizzi. They’re both pretty low. Not enough innings and too many pitches...and that’s when he’s NOT getting hit...and when he IS healthy.
  23. There’s another shoe that would need to drop, right? St. Paul would need a league to play in. They’re not a fit geographically with the IL as it currently exists...not by any stretch of the imagination. Especially heading into an era where cost containment in the affiliated minor leagues would seem to be a growing concern. The PCL isn’t as much of a stretch geographically...but, presumably, the PCL isn’t the league looking for a replacement for Rochester. FWIW, I hope the Saints stay independent. It’s a death blow to quality independent ball in the Midwest if they lose St. Paul...and I’d hate to see that.
  24. So, we should put in a rule to further reward batters trying to pull and launch every pitch, in every count, in every at-bat, against any pitcher, in every game situation...bolstering the very strategy that’s at the center of the trend toward ever-lengthening at-bats that culminate without a ball being put in play? What could go wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...