Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Why Minnesota Twins Should Go All In On Building Their Future Around Walker Jenkins

    Twins fans know all to well about the myth of the can't-miss prospect. But Walker Jenkins is one of the closest things you'll find, and at a time where fans need a future to believe in, the 20-year-old phenom is a worthy centerpiece and frontman.

    Nick Nelson
    Image courtesy of Ed Bailey, Wichita Wind Surge

    Twins Video

    A changing of the guard is not just underway, but nearing completion for the Minnesota Twins. In the past three years we've seen the makeup and personality of this team overhauled entirely. It's pretty wild to look back, for example, at photos from the event that took place in November of 2022 where the Twins' new branding and uniforms were unveiled.

    The players featured during this marketing showcase were, at the time, framed as the present core and future foundation of the franchise: Byron Buxton, Jorge Polanco, Jhoan Duran, Luis Arraez. The latter three have been traded. José Miranda, also presented as part of the team's core identity, has sadly sunken to sub-mediocre depths in Triple-A and will likely be moving on in the offseason. 

    twinsuniformunveil.png

    I remember the buzz from that event that players among this group were FaceTiming with Carlos Correa, still in the early stages of his free-agency odyssey that ended with a stunning to return to Minnesota. From that point, he became a chief figurehead of the Twins' identity, both internally and externally. The future looked bright, and only brighter one year later when they celebrated their first postseason win in two decades. We all know what happened next.

    Of the players who were featured in the rebranding promo materials, only Buxton and Joe Ryan remain — Buxton due sheer loyalty, and Ryan because the front office couldn't find the right deal in deadline trade talks, which they'll almost surely revisit in the offseason. While Buxton is beloved and finally getting more of the recognition he deserves, he's also turning 32 this offseason with about a decade of MLB tenure. For better or worse, he's largely associated with the "old guard."

    With their fan base demoralized and starving for hope, the Twins need to prop up a new face of the franchise: a singular player who represents the credible promise of superstardom, capable of leading the next contending core. Some might argue Luke Keaschall can be that player based on the amazing start to his career; with all due respect to his game, I don't think he is quite on that level of talent.

    Walker Jenkins, though, looks up to the task. He's not a good prospect. He's not a great prospect. He's a potentially generational prospect. Very few players who've come through the Minnesota Twins system have earned such a billing, and the track record for those that have is pretty good.

    When you take everything into account — minor-league numbers, rate of progression, rankings from local and national sources — there's a good case to be made that Jenkins is among the top three Twins prospects of this century, alongside Joe Mauer and Buxton. 

    Jenkins, who turns 21 next February, was promoted to Triple-A last week. Aaron Gleeman wrote at The Athletic about the rarity of this achievement; even Buxton and Mauer did not advance to the highest level this quickly. While it guarantees nothing, the distinction of logging significant Triple-A time at age 20 tends to be a very favorable indicator for the future.

    "Triple-A action at 20 has basically meant a 50/50 shot of being an All-Star," Gleeman explained. "That includes MVP winners Mike Trout, Freddie Freeman, Ronald Acuña Jr. and Andrew McCutchen, plus Francisco Lindor, Carlos Correa, Xander Bogaerts, Ketel Marte, Adam Jones, Junior Caminero and Riley Greene."

     

    Is he the real deal? You never know. But the signs are all there and Jenkins is now tantalizingly close to the big leagues. This feels like the right moment in time for an all-in commitment. For a good approximation of how this might play out in practice, simply look across the border to Milwaukee.

    In December of 2023, the Brewers signed a 19-year-old Jackson Chourio — viewed at the time as a consensus top-10 prospect in the game — to an eight-year contract worth $82 million. Not only did this make an emphatic statement about Chourio's place at the heart of Milwaukee's go-forward brand, while offering the potential for big long-term cost savings, but it also negated any service-time implications, and any compulsion to avoid having Chourio on the 2024 Opening Day roster.

     

    Chourio was the Brewers' starting right fielder for the season opener. He went on to produce an excellent season, producing 3.9 fWAR in 148 games to finish third in the Rookie of the Year voting while even earning down-ballot MVP votes. This year he's once again been great and the Brewers are once again in first place, viewed by many as the best team in baseball.

    I'm not saying it's going to go quite so swimmingly for the Twins. The Brewers were in a much better place to begin with, and in fairness, there are plenty of other examples of long-term deals inked before a major-league debut — Jon Singleton, Evan White, Eloy Jiménez, Scott Kingery — but even in the worst cases the ultimate cost was relatively negligible, and the risk is nominal in the context of say, the $70 million that Minnesota just recouped by dumping Correa.

    At this moment in time, I don't think it's appropriate for the Twins to ask their fans to wait and idly hope for better days. They need to take actions and accelerate the arrival of that future. They need to energize their lagging brand. Obviously the timeline must be dictated in part by Jenkins and his readiness — he is off to a slow start in Triple-A (1-for-20), albeit with solid strike zone control — but I don't see much reason to proceed conservatively or dink around with service-time shenanigans. 

    Lock up Jenkins this offseason and give him every chance to win a spot on the Opening Day roster next spring. Heck, consider giving him a cameo in the majors at the end of this season. Show fans that the future is now, and give them something to buy into after the front office completely sold out on the previous core.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    54 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    I guess that wouldn't shock me, but I don't really understand why. The league isn't folding. There's still going to be baseball after 2027. They're still going to have to pay players after 2027. The CBA will account for any contracts that run longer than that for any rules that change drastically. I don't think there's any reason for them to avoid contracts beyond that season. The most likely outcome is that the league comes out with a CBA that's pretty similar or completely and utterly different (salary floor and cap). If it's completely and utterly different, then the CBA will adjust his contract accordingly. If it's pretty similar, then the savings will still be good to have.

    Like I said, them having that thought process wouldn't shock me. But I don't know why it'd be their strategy.

    Because more bad press creates more fan apathy. Meaning they lose more fans and fewer people go to games

    39 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    Because more bad press creates more fan apathy. Meaning they lose more fans and fewer people go to games

    How does signing Walker Jenkins to an extension create bad press? Wouldn't it create the opposite? And having him at a discount means you don't have to lose him later. I don't follow the logic. And not signing anyone to a deal beyond 2027 is bad press.

    5 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    After watching pretty much all of Walker Jenkins plate appearances since he reached AAA and after watching him at AA a ton, I feel confident saying the Twins have not had a prospect anywhere close to Jenkins since Joe Mauer in terms of overall skills. Walker controls the zone and routinely hits the ball hard. If there is one player the Twins should seek out to sign to an extension, it is Walker Jenkins. Use Chourio as a base, go 8/$80-90M and add two options years at $25-30M each. By the end of next year those numbers will no longer be in play.

    It's something we should get done in 2026 spring training. If no extension is agreed to, the earliest he'll be on the team is the exact date when we gain an additional year of control. Late April/Early May?

    13 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    How does signing Walker Jenkins to an extension create bad press? Wouldn't it create the opposite? And having him at a discount means you don't have to lose him later. I don't follow the logic. And not signing anyone to a deal beyond 2027 is bad press.

    The lockout affects fan attendance.  It did big time after the 1994 strike.  If there is a strike / lockout that lasts an entire season you lose a lot more fans.  The uncertainty will keep the Pohlads from committing too much to payroll until there is more certainty on that situation.  If there is no strike/ lockout then yes they will commit more.  I agree that it shouldn’t affect an extension for Jenkins except that payroll could shift downward league wide with an extended strike/ lockout.  And that could be a missed opportunity too.  
     

    Yes, the Pohlads should sign Jenkins to a long-term contract. Will they? No. The Pohlads were so cheap that they dumped Dobnak on the Tigers, taking a lesser prospect in return, so that they could save $3 million. They aren't going to commit $80-100 million to a prospect, no matter how much baseball sense it makes. The commentator who said they might keep him in the minors until 2028 is probably closer to the truth. Anything to save a buck.

    On 9/2/2025 at 1:50 PM, chpettit19 said:

    Then he's going to cost more. That's the risk. Once he establishes that he's a star he's priced out of the Twins payroll and he's gone in either 5 years when they trade him or 6 when he walks for a comp pick. (Under current CBA rules, which may change drastically in 2 years)

    If you're good with that, cool. But waiting until you see how he does means waiting until he and his agent have more leverage. And his agent is really, really good without much leverage so once he has it the Twins are likely out of the Walker Jenkins business. They probably can't get him to sign an extension now because of how good his agent is at his job, but waiting until Walker is lighting up the majors is essentially closing the door on Walker Jenkins being the future face of the Twins because he's leaving in free agency or trade at that point.

    So you give him $120 mil for 6 years and he never comes close to deserving that and you have no money for someone else? I know it's a crap shoot but I don't think we can afford that. And I wouldn't wait too long when he's up here. The Twins have an established pitcher in Ryan yet they only talk about trading him instead of extending him. I guess I should never own an MLB team (except in Strat-O-Matic).

    1 minute ago, twinfan said:

    So you give him $120 mil for 6 years and he never comes close to deserving that and you have no money for someone else? I know it's a crap shoot but I don't think we can afford that. And I wouldn't wait too long when he's up here. The Twins have an established pitcher in Ryan yet they only talk about trading him instead of extending him. I guess I should never own an MLB team (except in Strat-O-Matic).

    Who has said anything about 120 mil for 6 years? That's not a contract anybody has suggested. That'd be an awful contract to hand him. There's literally no reason to ever give a pre-debut player that deal. 

    1. It buys out 0 years of free agency. So, what's the point?
    2. It's like 80-90 mil more than the max he'd make in 6 years if you didn't extend him.

    You give him 8 years and 60-80 mil. If the Twins can't survive 7.5-10 mil of bad money they've cut this payroll below what anyone is hoping for the next 8 years and that extra 7.5-10 isn't saving them anyways if Jenkins doesn't work out.

    The Twins already control Ryan through his age 31 season. Extending him and Jenkins are very, very different things. It's going to cost you 25+ a year at a minimum to extend Ryan into his mid-30s. It's not even a comparable conversation.

    41 minutes ago, twinfan said:

    So you give him $120 mil for 6 years and he never comes close to deserving that and you have no money for someone else? I know it's a crap shoot but I don't think we can afford that. And I wouldn't wait too long when he's up here. The Twins have an established pitcher in Ryan yet they only talk about trading him instead of extending him. I guess I should never own an MLB team (except in Strat-O-Matic).

    The Twins have never discussed trading Ryan. Fans have. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...