Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Why Are Projection Systems So High on Jhoan Durán and Griffin Jax?


    Nick Nelson

    FanGraphs expects this reliever duo to be far-and-away the best in the major leagues. Let's dive into the reasons behind the bullish optimism from systems like these.

    Image courtesy of David Richard and Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    You might have heard that the Twins are projected by FanGraphs to have the No. 1 bullpen in baseball this season. It's been a frequent talking point, both because fans have little else to discuss and because there seems to be a broad disconnect regarding the caliber of this unit. Today I wanted to dig a little bit into WHY projection systems view the Minnesota relief corps so favorably, even after they finished 19th in the majors last year with a 4.12 ERA and have made zero additions this offseason.

    When you start parsing out the individual projections, what it comes down to is that systems like these are extremely high on the top two arms in the Twins bullpen: Jhoan Durán and Griffin Jax. For example, FanGraphs projects Durán to be worth 1.7 fWAR this season and Jax to be at 1.3 fWAR. That combined total, 3.0 fWAR, is higher than the projections for the entire bullpens of 17 different teams.

    twinsbullpenDC.png

    Here is the total pool of relief pitchers who are projected by FanGraphs to produce 1.3 fWAR or more in 2025:

    This really puts into context how high-powered the back end of Minnesota's bullpen can be: the Twins boast two of the top 10 projected relievers according to FanGraphs. So, what is it about Durán and Jax that make them such darlings in the eyes of these models, which evaluate based on historical performance, age curves, peripheral stats and predictive analytics? Here's a quick breakdown of the factors influencing each:

    Jhoan Durán

    Durán is among the most dominant relievers in baseball, and projection systems recognize that by weighing multiple key indicators:

    • Elite stuff: Durán's fastball velocity (100+ mph) and splinker movement create extreme strikeout and weak contact tendencies. Stuff+ models (like those from Eno Sarris at The Athletic) grade his arsenal as among the best in MLB.
    • Underlying metrics: Yes, Durán posted an underwhelming 3.64 ERA last year. But he does the things these models want to see. His xERA, xFIP, and SIERA have consistently shown that premier performance is sustainable. His ability to miss bats (30%+ K rate) while limiting walks and home runs keeps his projections strong.
    • Durability and usage: Once plagued by injuries, he has made 58+ appearances in three straight seasons, and has held up well despite a minor dip in velocity.
    • Expected regression to the mean: While relievers often show variance year to year, projection models hedge against outlier seasons. If Durán had a slightly "off" year in 2024 (even by his standards), models would likely expect a rebound.

    Griffin Jax

    Jax has transformed into a high-leverage weapon, and projections recognize him as a valuable setup man:

    • Swing-and-miss arsenal: His overpowering sweeper ranks among the best in baseball in Whiff%, and he tunnels it effectively with his fastball. Projection models reward this ability because it sustains strikeout rates.
    • Improved walk rate: Jax has cut his BB% each year, a trend models favor since control metrics are more stable than pure ERA.
    • FIP and xFIP stability: Even when his ERA has fluctuated, his peripheral stats (FIP, xFIP, SIERA) remain strong, indicating he’s not overperforming by luck. 
    • Leverage role: The Twins trust him in high-leverage situations, meaning he’ll consistently get innings in the 7th and 8th with high strikeout potential. And he's consistently shown he can deliver in those spots.

    The relief pitcher position is highly volatile, with a great deal of year-to-year variance. Naturally, this makes performance difficult to confidently predict. But the bottom line is that Durán and Jax both excel in the areas that drive positive outcomes, and are in their physical primes with strong bills of health. There just aren't many relief pitchers around the league for whom that is true, as the list above indicates. 

    None of this really matters much when the rubber hits the road, of course, but as we look ahead to the 2025 season it's a nice jolt of encouragement. Also, I would note that front offices around the league are using similar metrics and projection systems as FanGraphs, so the fact that both relievers grade out so favorably would seemingly only raise their appeal as trade targets, if in fact that's on the menu. 

    Where do you stand on the top two Twins relievers heading into this season? Do you agree with the models or do you think they're exaggerating the team's strength at the back end. Would the Twins be wise to sell high on either? Let's hear from you in the comments.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, KBJ1 said:

    Yeah the BP looked great on paper last year, and then it wasn't. 

    We had more potential depth last year with all the reclamation project signings. But they all failed and everyone else got hurt or floundered.

    This year we have no Leftys, 3 or more coming back from injury, and no proven backups.

    We still have a huge pipeline of young guys. We only need 2 of about 12 to take a step forward. I like those odds. They will all contribute something in ‘25 and beyond. Most teams would love to have our entire pitching staff and its issues. 

    The problem with bullpens and relief pitching is volatility. The underlying metrics could be good but all it takes is a few unlucky bounces and poorly timed runs given up to lose a game or two. With that said, both Duran and Jax have the stuff to be dominant out of the bullpen.

    On 2/1/2025 at 11:47 AM, Parfigliano said:

    WHIP and inherited runners scoring is how I would judge a relief pitcher.

    If you like WHIP then why not go the next step and Include power, namely OPS-against or something similar?

    19 hours ago, KBJ1 said:

    Yeah the BP looked great on paper last year, and then it wasn't. 

    We had more potential depth last year with all the reclamation project signings. But they all failed and everyone else got hurt or floundered.

    This year we have no Leftys, 3 or more coming back from injury, and no proven backups.

    The bullpen wasn't just great on paper last year, they were legitimately good until the end of the season when you had implosions going on as some of them crapped the bed like almost everyone else on the team. 

    Ask yourself how many teams have proven "backups" in their bullpen at the start of a season? And while we don't have a LHP in the bullpen right now, maybe we're better off letting guys like jax, duran, and sands face more LH hitters rather than run out a guy like Okert who shuts down the lefties, but gives it all back against the righties.

    It's interesting to see people demand that relief pitchers have a "defined role" that only involves specific innings or saves. Can't they also have a role that relates to "if the 2-6 hitters are coming up in the last 3 innings, you're gonna pitch if we have a lead"? While does it have to be so determinative based on innings and saves to supposedly get the best out of guys? because isn't what really happens is that your best relievers get to pad their stats a little by setting down the bottom of the order in late innings, rather than face the best the other team has to offer as much?

    Duran and Jax have shown success in high leverage roles for multiple seasons in a row which certainly suggests that they'll be good again, especially with so many of the peripheral stats being in their favor.

    It'll be interesting to see if Cleveland repeats their success; their bullpen wasn't as dominant in 2023; Gaddis was still starting, Smith hadn't arrived yet, and Herrin wasn't good. Clase was nowhere near as good in 2023 as 2024, but his 2021 & 2022 seasons suggest that he will continue to be good in 2025, even if it's not as insanely good. It's fair to see some potential for regression there. Cleveland also had amazing health in 2024 from their bullpen, and who knows if that will continue into 2025?

    20 hours ago, KBJ1 said:

    Yeah the BP looked great on paper last year, and then it wasn't. 

    We had more potential depth last year with all the reclamation project signings. But they all failed and everyone else got hurt or floundered.

    This year we have no Leftys, 3 or more coming back from injury, and no proven backups.

    I don't really care too much about having a mediocre lefty in the bullpen. I'll take Duran or Jax vs. a LHB before I'd take a mediocre lefty vs. a LHB. Having lefties in the bullpen for LOOGY type matchups just isn't as valuable as it used to be. Sands, Alcala and others are perfectly serviceable vs. LHBs, but there are a couple guys out there who've struggled (Tonkin).

    On 2/1/2025 at 2:53 PM, Fatbat said:

    Im old school. I like wins and losses<-(not so much) saves and holds tell enough for me. Blown saves is a good indicator of things going south with a closer. 

    Wins vs. Losses are tough for me because there's a team component. We all saw how the Twins' lineup was totally inept for large portions of the season. The starter would leave the game after the 5th inning with the score 2-2 or 3-2 and the bullpen would then be tasked with pitching 4.0 scoreless innings because you know the Twins weren't scoring another run. That type of scenario is going to result in a ton of losses, but rarely a "win."

    The Twins were 12th in MLB in WPA through the All Star break, but 26th after that point. A lot of that had to do with the Twins' hitters not showing up.

    Very interesting discussion guys.  Love it!

    Got me thinking of the use and importance of the "inherited runners" stat.  At first glance has a lot of value.  But not all inherited runners are equal.  If Reliever X comes into a lot of games with no outs and a couple guys in scoring position, he is gonna give up some runs.  Reliever Y comes in with a runner on first and two outs, he is much more likely to strand them.  Imagine there is a way for someone in today's world to develop a stat that would both track inherited runners scoring and weigh how likely they should have scored. 

    Don't know if these thoughts have any value to the discussion, but they were passing thru my brain while reading all your comments above.

    On 2/1/2025 at 10:53 AM, Nick Nelson said:

    The Twins ranked second in the AL in bullpen WAR last year, so I would say yes, it did.

    After they got rid of some guys that were originally supposed to be "one of the best pens" key contributors. I don't look at stats as much as results. I watched every game last season and I sure saw a lot of runs and leads, given up.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...