Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    What Would an Eiberson Castellano Trade with the Philadelphia Phillies Look Like?


    Cody Schoenmann

    The Rule 5 Draft pick has impressed early in spring training. However, the Twins bullpen is filled with high-leverage talent and depth, so he could be the odd pitcher out. That doesn't necessarily mean he must be returned to the Philadelphia Phillies, though. What would it take to acquire the 23-year-old's services unconditionally?

    Image courtesy of © Chris Tilley-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Rule 5 Draft selection Eiberson Castellano has impressed early this spring training. Showcasing a four-seam fastball hovering around 96-97 MPH with a plus curveball and serviceable changeup, the 23-year-old right-handed hurler has netted a 31.3% strikeout rate and a .167 opponent batting average over just four 2/3 innings pitched. His 7.71 ERA, 6.36 FIP, and modest seven-to-five strikeout-to-walk ratio needn't raise alarm; spring results mostly don't matter. His plus stuff and 4.59 xFIP suggest he is demonstrating flashes of the potential that prompted Twins decision-makers to take a flier on the relatively unknown arm.

    Veterans Jhoan Durán, Griffin Jax, Cole Sands, Brock Stewart, Danny Coulombe, and Michael Tonkin are locked into bullpen roles as the season nears. Louis Varland has impressed early in camp while pitching in one-inning bursts, giving the flame-throwing righty (perhaps) the inside track for the seventh spot in the bullpen. That leaves Castellano competing with Justin Topa, Jorge Alcalá, and Kody Funderburk for the eighth and final role in the unit. Topa is already nursing a shoulder injury, which could force the team to shelve him for the start of the season and ease this crunch, but only slightly.

    Nevertheless, spring training is still in its infancy. More injuries or significant performance concerns could arise over the next three weeks, making today's speculation moot. For now, though, Castellano being returned to Philadelphia to award Topa, Alcalá, or Funderburk the final bullpen spot is a reasonable outcome. That being the case, Twins decision-makers could attempt to work out a trade with the Phillies front office to avoid losing the promising righty altogether. While post-Rule 5 Draft trades are rare, they aren't entirely unchartered waters; the two clubs could come to a deal before the season begins. So, what could it look like? Let's take a look at the most recent examples.

    Clubs immediately trading players selected in the Rule 5 Draft to different organizations is a common occurrence. However, these transactions will be omitted, as they don't accurately represent what would occur between Minnesota and Philadelphia. With this stipulation in place, we must travel back to 2019, where three trades occurred between the drafting team and the prospect's original organization. The first instance involves the Kansas City Royals and Tampa Bay Rays. Kansas City selected pitcher Stephen Woods Jr. with the fourth pick in the 2019 Rule 5 Draft. The Royals were likely to return Woods Jr. to Tampa Bay. However, the two organizations quickly worked out a trade to remove the restrictions on his roster status with Kansas City.

    In return, the Royals sent outfield prospect Michael Gigliotti (ranked 13th on MLB Pipeline) to Tampa Bay. Interestingly, Woods Jr. was absent from the MLB Pipeline's Rays' Top 30 prospect list; it's fair to say that Tampa's farm system was much better than the Royals' at the time. Neither player ever appeared in a major-league game. However, this swap sets a precedent for what a player-for-player swap might look like for Minnesota and Philadelphia. Castellano ranks 16th on MLB Pipeline's Twins Top 30 Prospects list. Here are the four prospects positioned closest to Castellano on MLB Pipeline's list:

    Like every top prospect ranking list, MLB Pipeline is flawed. Nevertheless, it accurately represents which players could be involved in a prospect-for-prospect swap. Doncon, Olivar, or Gonzalez are reasonable candidates to be sent back to Philadelphia. Pitching prospects Travis Adams, Christian MacLeod, and Jose Olivares are viable candidates, too, with C.J. Culpepper being the upper echelon of what the organization should be comfortable parting ways with. Nevertheless, a prospect-for-prospect swap is an unlikely outcome, evidenced by the other two post-Rule 5 trades that occurred in 2019.

    Later in the 2019 Rule 5 Draft, the Cincinnati Reds poached outfield prospect Mark Payton from the Oakland Athletics. Cincinnati returned Payton to Oakland. Like Kansas City and Tampa, though, the two clubs then struck a deal, sending Payton back to Cincinnati for cash considerations or a player to be named later. It turned out to be the former. Two picks later, the Chicago Cubs grabbed right-handed pitching prospect Trevor Megill from the clutches (or lack thereof) of the San Diego Padres. Chicago returned Megill to San Diego. However, San Diego also sent him back in exchange for cash considerations or a player to be named later. San Diego, too, chose the cash.

    Given what occurred in 2019, the Twins could reasonably acquire Castellano for cash considerations or a player to be named later. However, the prospects made available to Philadelphia would undoubtedly possess less present-day value than Castellano. The wrinkle is that the process of returning Castellano to Philadelphia comes with a separate set of risks. He has to clear waivers first, and there might well be other teams who would be more able and willing to carry him after seeing how he's looked this spring—teams without the Twins' exceptional depth in the relief corps. Now that he's been taken in the Rule 5, a trade can't lift the Rule 5 roster restrictions unless every other team passes on having him with those restrictions in place.

    Acquiring Castellano from Philadelphia would be a wise decision for Minnesota, as they could continue to develop him as a starting pitching prospect rather than wedging him into the eighth reliever spot for an entire season with the risk of losing him. Castellano had yet to pitch past Double A in the Phillies system. Yet, he was named the organization's Minor League Pitcher of the Year after generating a 3.99 ERA, 3.40 FIP, and a 136-to-29 strikeout-to-walk ratio over 103 2/3 innings pitched between High A and Double A last season. Allowing Castellano to continue to develop as a starter in the minors under the Twins' superb pitching development program would be the ideal outcome, as the young righty could quickly join Marco Raya, Andrew Morris, and Cory Lewis as the organization's most intriguing starting pitching prospects in the high minors. It's just a tough needle to thread.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    On 3/10/2025 at 2:04 AM, Matthew Trueblood said:

    IMPORTANT: No, this isn't true. I've had a hard time running down whether it's the result of a change to the process or whether it's always been this way and some combination of gentlemen's agreements or circumstances allowed previous deals to happen, but I've confirmed this with a high-ranking baseball official. The player DOES have to pass through waivers and (technically) first be returned to the original team before a trade to remove their Rule 5 restrictions can be executed. No workaround. The ONLY way for Rule 5 restrictions to lift is if the player clears waivers.

    The rule then would be as it has always been. The Twins could trade Castellano to another team if they so chose. The same rule 5 restrictions would continue to apply to him in that he would have to be a 40 man roster. If a team wishes to send a player to the minors, they have to offer him back to the Phillies.  The Phillies can accept him back or work out a trade. .

    What seems to e lost in the discussion is what the Phillies want in trade.  With Castellano he was their minor league pitcher of the year. They do have like 3-4 near major league pitching prospects that had to be protected or risk losing. These prospects have neither proved they belong at the major league level, nor have they disproved it.  Castellano does not appear to be near major league ready. The Phillies gambled and momentarily lost. They had an open spot o the 40 man. They used it to draft a player that the traded to Tampa for cash.  I suspect they do not foresee anyone stashing Castellano. The reasons have been fairly well covered They have the leverage in a trade negotiation.. They do not have to take garbage back in trade. They would want an equivalent player back.  A high ceiling pitching prospect that does not have to be on the 40 man roster. Those are not readily available, which would be why the Twins picked Castellano in the first place. That could reasonably be why a trade has not happened. Nor will happen. 

    1 hour ago, old nurse said:

    The rule then would be as it has always been. The Twins could trade Castellano to another team if they so chose. The same rule 5 restrictions would continue to apply to him in that he would have to be a 40 man roster. If a team wishes to send a player to the minors, they have to offer him back to the Phillies.  The Phillies can accept him back or work out a trade. .

    Yes, except two clarifications:

    1. 26-man active roster, not 40-man roster; and

    2. At no point can he be offered directly and solely back to the Phillies. That's always how it's been phrased, in public, which is weird, because it's not how it works or has ever worked. What has to happen is that he has to be waived, and clear waivers, AND THEN be offered back to the team. Often, the difference is functionally nil, because these guys are (by definition) not in high demand. Their own team already declined to put them on the 40-man after several years in the organization, and now they come with this extra burden if you do claim them. But just so we all understand that part, the Phillies don't get to jump the line to get him back if the Twins don't want him. The other 28 teams get a chance to take him instead, if they're dealing with injuries or something and like what they've seen.

    If we hang on to him as a Rule V and he excels then he's pitching well for us in MLB and that's awesome. If he does not excel then his value will be lower than it is today and it might be easier to move him through whatever channels are required. If there are some guys like Tonkin that don't have options then we may lose them, but the injury bug has bitten enough folks that we can delay that choice via the IL.

    I don't understand the hype here. I guess if the staff feels there's hidden potential here, ok. Try to work out a trade.

    But this seems to me much ado about nothing, and they sure as heck shouldn't try to carry him on the roster all season unless he's somehow ready to assume that the role of contributing member.  And that seems to me pretty optimistic. 

     

    21 hours ago, USAFChief said:

    I don't understand the hype here. I guess if the staff feels there's hidden potential here, ok. Try to work out a trade.

    But this seems to me much ado about nothing, and they sure as heck shouldn't try to carry him on the roster all season unless he's somehow ready to assume that the role of contributing member.  And that seems to me pretty optimistic. 

     

    IKR! Optimism on this site is rarely permitted without intense scrutiny! It’s a pretty cheap way to take a flier on a kid that has a 98mph fastball and decent off speed stuff.  

    PHI probably asked for one of these non-roster prospects you mentioned or even higher. I'd trade any one of those you mentioned, because I don't think any of them will make it to the Twins club. They are no more than trade bait. But Twins are prospect huggers, they'll hang unto them for dear life. They'll jeopardize Castellano's development to keep them & gain another in Castellano. Castellano is a keeper but is he worth keeping while jeopardizing his development & Twins' chances to win the division? That is debatable. I'm leaning yes. It's better if they give up a reasonable prospect instead but if that's not possible then I'd try to hide him with mop up duties. I don't like to play chicken with Castellano's development, but I think the odds are on our side & we have nothing to lose.  




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...