Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Week in Review: Crisis of Leadership


    Nick Nelson

    Last year, Brian Dozier and Byron Buxton ranked first and second among Twins players in WAR. They were driving forces in the team's playoff push and, with a better supporting cast in place, expected to help propel another step forward for Minnesota in 2018.

    Instead, they've become poster children for a disappointing club that cannot stop tripping over itself at every turn. The past week brought another maddening series of lapses and letdowns.

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Weekly Snapshot: Mon, 5/14 through Sun, 5/20

    ***

    Record Last Week: 2-4 (Overall: 19-23)

    Run Differential Last Week: -4 (Overall: -21)

    Standing: 2nd Place in AL Central (2.5 GB)

    Before we dive into the usual highlights, lowlights, storylines and minor-league updates, let's just get this out there: the Twins are in disarray, and it is the guys who are supposed to be leading that are in fact dragging them down.

    Prior to the season, my bold and optimistic prediction was that Dozier and Buxton would both be Top 5 finishers in the American League MVP voting:

    https://twitter.com/NickNelsonMN/status/978109572304048128

    Call it homerish or pollyannaish if you please, but the take wasn't without solid founding. Dozier and Buxton were among the league's most impactful players in the latter portion of 2017, each earning down-ballot MVP votes.

    This year, circumstances favored big seasons for both: Dozier in a walk year staring down free agency; Buxton with 1,000 MLB plate appearances in the bank, appearing to have legitimately turned a corner with his approach.

    Instead, both players have fallen back into their most frustrating patterns at the plate – Dozier skidding through lengthy stretches of unproductivity with an exploitable swing, Buxton resembling an overwhelmed A-baller trying to fend off peak Pedro Martinez in pretty much every AB.

    Over the past week, the two combined to go 3-for-37 with 13 strikeouts. Dozier is batting .175 in 26 games since the start of the Yankees series. Buxton's OPS is teetering around .400.

    Meanwhile, other top contributors from 2017 who were hoped to be integral cogs in a contending effort – Miguel Sano, Ervin Santana, Jorge Polanco – have been either mostly or entirely absent. And now another is sidelined with Joe Mauer hitting the disabled list this week following an ominous return of concussion symptoms.

    Granted, you can't plan for all the injuries and attrition; I'm sure no one foresaw the Twins with Jake Cave, Ehire Adrianza and Bobby Wilson comprising one-third of their lineup for an important Saturday night game in mid-May. But times like this are when you need your leaders to step up. Right now Dozier and Buxton keep falling down.

    Since moving to 8-5 with an extra-inning victory over Cleveland in Puerto Rico, the Twins have gone 11-18 over the past calendar month. They've been outscored by 31 runs. That's an extended run of performance suggesting this team just isn't very good, which is distressing at a time of such ripe opportunity.

    More than a dozen clubs are actively trying to tank. The Twins conversely have pushed their payroll past historical thresholds in an effort to contend, and they're coming up empty, being outpaced by acknowledged non-factors.

    The good news is there's a lot of season left. The ripeness of this opportunity won't go away too soon. Cleveland has yet to take off, and Minnesota still has plenty of games remaining against the division's dregs to help fuel a rapid climb.

    But before we can even re-enter discussions about their merits as a contender, the Twins actually must first prove they're a quality team. Right now it's very much in question, and urgency is building if they're to prove these aren't their true colors.

    It's time for the leaders to stop lagging and start leading.

    HIGHLIGHTS

    Because he endured such a prolonged slump to open the campaign, it's going to be a while before Logan Morrison's overall numbers broadcast on the Target Field scoreboard look any good. But over the past month he has quietly transformed into the powerful offensive infusion we all hoped he would be.

    Morrison's low point came in April's 16-inning marathon against the Indians, when he went 0-for-7 to drop his average to .068, his OPS to .271. The next game, in Tampa, brought the slugger's first home run as a Twin, and that sparked a healthy uptick. Since going hitless in Puerto Rico, Morrison is slashing .281/.385/.517 with five home runs and 15 RBIs in 27 games. Over the last week he went 6-for-17 and delivered key hits in both victories, a rare bright spot for this sputtering offense.

    (Of course, as things are going, even Morrison couldn't escape the infectious jinx plaguing the team; he was picked off at second after a leadoff double on Saturday night, an absolutely critical error.)

    Now that he's playing up to his ability, we can appreciate the 30-year-old's addition for the majorly impactful move it was by the front office. With Dozier dragging along, Sano absent, and now Mauer gone, Morrison's bat has been life-saving for the lineup.

    This is especially true when you consider Kennys Vargas, who'd have been counted on for the same role if not for LoMo's spring training sign-on, is batting .213 at Triple-A.

    LOWLIGHTS

    While Morrison has come around, another late-offseason free agent addition continues to flounder.

    What is the freaking deal with Lance Lynn?? After a horrendous month of April the veteran righty appeared to be finally getting on track with his first start of May, picking up his first win on six innings of two-run ball against the White Sox. Most notably, he issued zero walks and threw 73% strikes.

    But Lynn regressed in his next start, and further unraveled in his latest effort, lasting only three innings against St. Louis on Wednesday while issuing four walks and throwing only 46 of his egregious 82 pitches in the zone.

    There's a school of thought suggesting the starter's struggles can be attributed to his late start in spring training, and I was sympathetic to that notion for a time, but at this point it's out the window. We're now seven weeks into the season and Lynn has made eight starts. Plus, he came out of the gates firing in his first Grapefruit start, making it clear he was taking care of things on his end while waiting to sign a contract.

    It's possible, maybe even probable, that being thrown out of his routine contributed to Lynn stumbling out of the gates this year. But this no longer qualifies as a viable excuse. With each successive inexplicably erratic dud, it's becoming easier to see why he was forced to settle for a one-year contract in mid-March, despite his impressive career numbers.

    At least to some extent, the league saw this coming.

    Another thing that wasn't too hard to see coming: Jason Castro's absence, like those of so many Twins players to go down with injuries this season, extending beyond than the team's initial timeline. In this case, however, the news is especially bad: upon going under the knife last week, it was determined that Castro needed more extensive surgery than anticipated, and he'll miss the rest of the season.

    This is a bigger loss for the pitching staff than the lineup, but it's a painful one on that front. Castro brought excellent framing skills along with a good arm, and had developed trust and rapport with the staff. Now, the Twins are forced to rely on still-unproven Mitch Garver and 35-year-old minor-league journeyman Bobby Wilson. Not a situation that inspires a lot of confidence.

    TRENDING STORYLINE

    It seems the best hope for the Twins right now is Sano returning to provide a serious jolt that electrifies this sleepwalking lineup. He's on the rehab trail, having played at Rochester on Saturday and Sunday. In those games, Sano went a combined 0-for-4 with three walks and two strikeouts. He committed an error on one of his three chances in the field.

    Rust is understandably a factor, particularly since Sano wasn't looking very sharp before the injury. But as long as that hamstring is sound, the Twins need to get him back in the fold ASAP to try and ignite something, anything, for the offense.

    It sounds like the plan is to take it slow with Sano, who will be in Triple-A at least through Wednesday. Ideally he'll show promising signs in LeHigh Valley early this week, then join the Twins in Seattle next weekend when they kick off a six-game road trip.

    Meanwhile, Trevor May is almost back. The righty stretched out to 58 pitches in a solid four-inning start at Rochester on Thursday. He'll likely work up to ~80 pitches this week and should basically be ready to start in the majors on May 28th, when he's eligible to come off the disabled list. Incidentally, that date (next Monday) coincides exactly with Lynn's turn in the rotation.

    DOWN ON THE FARM

    Things are happening in Cedar Rapids. While the most imminent wave of high-caliber young talent is either in the majors (Fernando Romero) or soon to arrive (Stephen Gonsalves, Nick Gordon), the slightly more distant group terrorizing the Midwest League should have Twins fans licking their chops.

    Right-hander Brusdar Graterol is the most exciting pitcher in the system right now and one of the most exciting in baseball. He dazzled everyone in attendance last Monday with 5 2/3 innings of shutout, two-hit ball. Unleashing numerous 100-MPH heaters, he racked up 10 strikeouts on 21 batters faced.

    In Twins Daily's profile on Graterol when we ranked him as the organization's No. 9 prospect before the season, Tom Froemming laid it out like this: "Graterol is one of the highest ceiling/lowest floor prospects in all of baseball, let alone the Twins’ system. He definitely has true ace potential, already possessing two plus pitches."

    We're seeing the ceiling early on from the 19-year-old flamethrower, and it is towering. We saw the floor a little bit in his fourth start on Sunday, when Graterol issued five walks in five innings, but nonetheless he has a 0.93 ERA and 27-to-6 K/BB ratio through 19 1/3 frames.

    On the same day of Graterol's 10-K masterpiece, Alex Kirilloff was firing up another big week at the plate with a two-hit game. He went on to collect 13 hits in 30 at-bats, and on the season he's batting .324 with seven home runs and a system-leading 34 RBI. Much like Graterol, Kirilloff is finding his stride quickly after losing major time to injury, quickly reaffirming his status as one of the farm's elite talents.

    LOOKING AHEAD

    We'll get our first look at Ron Gardenhire and the Tigers to start the week, then it's off to Seattle for late-night West Coast baseball on Memorial Day Weekend. Afterward, the Twins will head to Kansas City for three games before returning home to face Cleveland four times. That has the potential to be a pivotal mid-season series. Will the Twins be within striking distance by the time it arrives? Not if they keep playing the way they have.

    MONDAY, 5/21: TIGERS @ TWINS – LHP Blaine Hardy v. RHP Jose Berrios

    TUESDAY, 5/22: TIGERS @ TWINS – LHP Matthew Boyd v. RHP Lance Lynn

    WEDNESDAY, 5/23: TIGERS @ TWINS – RHP Michael Fulmer v. RHP Kyle Gibson

    FRIDAY, 5/25: TWINS @ MARINERS – RHP Fernando Romero v. LHP James Paxton

    SATURDAY, 5/26: TWINS @ MARINERS – RHP Jake Odorizzi v. LHP Wade LeBlanc

    SUNDAY, 5/27: TWINS @ MARINERS – RHP Jose Berrios v. RHP Mike Leake

    Catch Up On Twins Daily Game Recaps

    More on Twins Daily

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    See, I don't know if that is a personal shot at all.  Buxton himself said he would be more satisfied with making a game saving catch than a game winning homer.  I guess, like me, Thrylos wonders, what would be the difference so long as the team wins?  That SHOULD be what any player says, in my opinion.  Buxton gave his preference.  Certainly, Buxton is a much better fielder than he is hitter.  I would actually think that hitting a home run would be the better answer for him, but whatever.  Personally, I don't see Buxton's comment as a big deal, but I can see what Thrylos is saying.  He never said Buxton "doesn't care".  He questioned the rationale behind Buxton's answer.  That's all.  I don't read anything mean-spirited in his post.

     

    You can't take someone asking him to rank his favorite thing to do and infer from that he doesn't value the other thing.  

     

    Quick tell me your favorite family member so I can then tell you how much you don't value the other members of your family.  I can give more examples of that really unfair logic, but I'd like to hope it's unnecessary.

     

    You can't take someone asking him to rank his favorite thing to do and infer from that he doesn't value the other thing.  

     

    Quick tell me your favorite family member so I can then tell you how much you don't value the other members of your family.  I can give more examples of that really unfair logic, but I'd like to hope it's unnecessary.

    Unfair logic would be whatever thought process you used to accuse him of attacking Buxton personally.  I saw it as "he needs to concentrate more on hitting than making circus catches".  He can make a circus catch once every ten games, but he takes 25 to 30 at bats a week.

     

    As far as my favorite family member goes, I have no favorite.  Simple answer.  Just as it should have been for Buxton.   How about this:

    "We won the game.  Any way I can help is a good thing"

    And if they press him he could say:

    "Doesn't matter, we win"

     

    I do think Buxton needs to get the mental part of the game down.  HIs mindset seems to be somewhat of a problem.  Is that a bad thing to say?

    Unfair logic would be whatever thought process you used to accuse him of attacking Buxton personally. I saw it as "he needs to concentrate more on hitting than making circus catches". He can make a circus catch once every ten games, but he takes 25 to 30 at bats a week.

     

    As far as my favorite family member goes, I have no favorite. Simple answer. Just as it should have been for Buxton. How about this:

    "We won the game. Any way I can help is a good thing"

    And if they press him he could say:

    "Doesn't matter, we win"

     

    I do think Buxton needs to get the mental part of the game down. HIs mindset seems to be somewhat of a problem. Is that a bad thing to say?

    The inference was that because of that answer he (apparently) does not like to work on hitting. I’m sorry but I think that inference was way off. Buxton answered one question ... game saving catch or game winning home run. That is not asking if you prefer catching balls to hitting balls ... it was a very specific question about one catch vs one at bat, not asking about an overall like or dislike for any portion of his game. Even if he did have a preference over all, it still doesn't mean he doesn't like the other or didn't like to work on it. And the inference came from someone who has a very long history of having a low opinion of Buxton and his talents. Does Buxton need to work on hitting? Of course he does and most have said so. Even I’ve said he needs to get it going or he won’t get far. But we don’t know what he’s working on or not, what his approach is, what his like or dislike is for putting in that work. All we know is he’s far from there and Hope solutions are coming. There is no denying he’s God’s gift to center field, but he needs to find a way to get the other part going if this team is going to have the success we’ve all been hoping for.

     

    Unfair logic would be whatever thought process you used to accuse him of attacking Buxton personally.  I saw it as "he needs to concentrate more on hitting than making circus catches".  He can make a circus catch once every ten games, but he takes 25 to 30 at bats a week.

     

    As far as my favorite family member goes, I have no favorite.  Simple answer.  Just as it should have been for Buxton.   How about this:

    "We won the game.  Any way I can help is a good thing"

    And if they press him he could say:

    "Doesn't matter, we win"

     

    I do think Buxton needs to get the mental part of the game down.  HIs mindset seems to be somewhat of a problem.  Is that a bad thing to say?

     

    C'mon man.  Picking your favorite thing is not a statement of devaluation of other things.  Period.  That's the unfair conclusion that was drawn and what my analogy was meant to show.

     

    If you want to say "Buxton should work on hitting" - ok.  Say that.  Dragging up some quote, making an unfair inference, and using it to go after him is just silly and indefensible.  You're trying to defend it, but you have yourself in a pretzel to do it.  

     

     

    But Nick didn't write an article saying Doze and Buck need to hit, he challenged their leadership and that is bogus. 

    Citing 3-for-37 says all we need to hear about the need to start hitting.

     

    Pretty sure the context of Nick's point was that those guys need to start leading the offense, which is pretty much irrefutable.

    HIs mindset seems to be somewhat of a problem.  Is that a bad thing to say?

    It's not a bad thing until a second person comes along who also claims to know what goes on between the player's ears but has a different conclusion than yours, and then endless bickering is the likely result, with no hope for a resolution.

     

    It's not a bad thing until a second person comes along who also claims to know what goes on between the player's ears but has a different conclusion than yours, and then endless bickering is the likely result, with no hope for a resolution.

    WHy is that a bad thing?  It's a theory.  You say it is OK until a person who also "claims to know" what goes on between his ears comes to a different conclusion.  THat is fine.  Then we discuss it civilly and present evidence.  I am offering my opinion based only off reading, listening, watching. It took a couple of years for me to get there on this.  There is a difference between where I am coming from and being a "hater".  I am not a hater.,  And just so you know, I am not going to have a problem with someone offering a differing opinion so long as they aren't snarky or condescending.  Even then I will try to reach out with a PM in attempt to prevent problems on the board.

     

    I happen to think it's healthy to have discussions like this.  Buxton started off the last three years horribly.  He talked about being nervous last year and the year before.  This year Paul tried to "assure him" that he was not a bad hitter.  I don't think it is off base to wonder about where he stands as far as the mental part of hitting goes.  Lots of people were sure he "figured it out" after last year.  It would appear that was an assumption (or wishful thinking) at this point.

     

    Eventually he is going to need to figure this out and it just might go deeper than mechanics.  I am not going to write a dissertation on mechanics.  I will leave that to the staff writers here.  I am not good with graphics, ect…  I appreciate those articles a whole lot.  However, to assume mechanics is the only possible reason really is closed-minded thinking, in my opinion.  An entire field is dedicated to this kind of thing.  It is called sports psychology and there most certainly is a psychology to the game.  I don't think it is a mere coincidence (or can be explained away by "small sample size") that Buxton is 1-27 vs the Yankees with 17Ks.  He looks and acts very uptight in the box against them.

     

    I literally read everything there is to read about the Twins, for better or worse.  I have read direct quotes from Buxton citing his own "anxiousness" to the point where it is considerable with him compared to so many other young players I have seen come up with the Twins over the years.  I am not pulling this out of the thin air or pretending to know something.  I am reading what he is saying and watching him.  If someone doesn't agree with me then OK.  I took the time to do some searches and in 15 minutes I came up with a number of quotes on his "nervousness" in the box

     

    LeVelle last year with a quote from Molitor:

    Buxton is going to be a power-speed combo guy, I have no doubt of that. But the Twins have to help him settle down, relax and be a little more selective at the plate. "We're trying to get him to just settle in," Molitor said.

    http://www.startribune.com/twins-postgame-thoughts-on-polanco-buxton-and-the-royals/418580463/

    He was a little anxious, trying to see the ball and battle with two strikes. They got him to chase a couple times,” Molitor said

    http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/sports/professional/story/2015/may/05/sizzling-starlookouts-center-fielder-byrbuxtr/302426/

    "He stopped pressing and is not worrying about every swing or every at-bat," Mientkiewicz said.

    Buxton prefers his speed on defense -- "I like taking base hits away from anybody," he said

    http://lacrossetribune.com/sports/local/pro/shipley-no-need-to-bury-twins-buxton-yet/article_2914ec8d-7264-527b-93d6-bdb10be0cf0f.html

    “I think I let the game speed up on me a little bit, which causes me to chase more pitches out of the zone. I just told myself to slow down,” he explained.

     

    “It’s tough,” Buxton said. “It’s very tough. That’s why I’ve got these teammates behind my back to pick me up, but it’s definitely tough starting off the way I do, and then you try to battle and figure things out. ... I’m just too jumpy, too anxious to want to get a hit. I need to slow the game back down and let it come back to me.”

     

    https://www.upi.com/Sports_News/MLB/2018/05/21/Byron-Buxton-hopes-to-get-going-as-Twins-host-Tigers/9411526915237/

    "Just tried to get a feel of where he was at and I tried to affirm him about his ability to hit," Molitor said. "I think he knows it. He knows when he puts too much pressure on himself and tries to do too much and overthinks his at-bats."

     

    With regards to what Thrylos said, yeah.....he made sense to me.  He was not under duress here in a sit down with Torii and he was asked that same question.  What do I read into it?  I don't know, other than he seems to like talking more about his defense.  He explicitly stated it more than once and this time in a very comfortable setting.  IN fact, I would not be shocked if he already saw the questions before TOrii asked.  Maybe, just MAYBE Thrylos is onto something.   Maybe not....but to shut him down completely and tell him he can't think like that?  Do we really need to do that? I guess the mods can control that, but I don't encourage that.

     

     

     

    Another video.....

    Sitting down with Torii and Trout again, and not under duress, both were asked about a weakness.... and Buxton answers his throwing arm?  He LOVES talking about the circus catches, too.  Buxton even mentions "shyness" and overcoming that.  I like that he admits it, but I sure hope that someday he isn't hampered by being "jumpy" in the box

    What is this all about?  It is just a sample things to show that Buxton really does pride himself on his defense.  He is also battles through shyness and nervousness and that shows up in his hitting.  He can rely on his athleticism in the field, but hitting is a science and a psychology.  He is having trouble with it for several reasons.  Part of it is his struggle with mechanics, but no one can tell me that a decent chunk of it CAN'T be mental.  That would be one heck of an assumption, imo.

     

    I hope you don't mind that I tried to explain where I am coming from and why I think concern for Buxton is warranted.  HE has explicitly stated that he is "pressing" "shy" "jumpy" "nervous" "overthinking"

    THat kind of mindset and inner turmoil effects mechanics.  Mechanics are tough to execute as it is.  If you are stepping into the box in a panicked state your mechanics will not be as they should be.  Rhythm, timing, focus, body awareness....all of those things are messed up if you step in the box all choked up.

     

     

     

     

     

    I hope you don't mind that I tried to explain where I am coming from and why I think concern for Buxton is warranted.  HE has explicitly stated that he is "pressing" "shy" "jumpy" "nervous" "overthinking"

    THat kind of mindset and inner turmoil effects mechanics.  Mechanics are tough to execute as it is.  If you are stepping into the box in a panicked state your mechanics will not be as they should be.  Rhythm, timing, focus, body awareness....all of those things are messed up if you step in the box all choked up.

     

    And not a single one of those things implies he doesn't "like" hitting.  Which is what Thrylos said.

     

    All you restated is that Byron struggles more with his offense and it comes less naturally.  That isn't the same thing as not "liking" or "liking to work at it".  (The latter being the real problem, taking someone's preference and turning it into a question of work ethic) You should go back and read the original quote.  You don't even seem to agree with what you're defending.

    Edited by TheLeviathan

     

    And not a single one of those things implies he doesn't "like" hitting.  Which is what Thrylos said.

     

    All you restated is that Byron struggles more with his offense and it comes less naturally.  That isn't the same thing as not "liking" or "liking to work at it".  (The latter being the real problem, taking someone's preference and turning it into a question of work ethic) You should go back and read the original quote.  You don't even seem to agree with what you're defending.

    I read his quote a few times.  It actually made me think a little deeper.

     

    In the video where Hunter interviews him he is asked the same question.  He was not under duress and he probably knew the question was coming.  He also mentioned that famous Jim Edmonds catch and how he really wants to make catches like that.  In the interviews I have seen with Hunter and MLB programs he talks only about defense.  The only time he mentions offense is when he talks about not taking slumps onto the field.

     

    This is all really nice, but two things about that:

    1.  He could end up to be Aaron Rowand 2.0, beat up before his time

    2.  He needs to embrace the language of hitting and start talking about it a little more.  It sure as heck couldn't hurt him.

     

    Thrylos has his take.  I have mine.  You have yours.

    And the world is good.

    Carson Smith, Red Sox reliever, is on the fence about whether he will have to have surgery on his right (pitching) shoulder after suffering a subluxation last week, and seeking a second opinion. Missing the 2016 season, and part of the 2017 with TJ recovery, he suffered the disaster after angrily tossing his glove, showing his emotion over a poor outing.

     

    Some like to see grown men, who, whether they like it or not, are examples for our children and grandchildren, behave like kids having a temper tantrum. We witnessed, when he was pulled, the same behavior from Lance Lynn a couple days ago after 6.2 innings of shutout ball, and it is presented as a video clip in Tom Froemming's always appreciated recap article:

     

    http://twinsdaily.com/_/minnesota-twins-news/minnesota-twins/min-6-det-0-lynn-shows-will-to-win-r6788

     

    Lynn, like Chapman, also missed the 2016 season recovering from TJ. Some see this type of behavior as emotion and passion, passion that can spark a team. Maybe that is true.

     

    Personally, I see it as ridiculous, childish, and unimpressive. A player and a leader can show emotion and passion in so many more advantageous, positive, and more beneficial ways. Over the years, so many players have injured themselves punching walls and coolers, and other needless and unimpressive behavior. In this case, it wasn't even a poor outing for Lynn, it was a great start, a great day, for him and the team! He did the same thing as Chapman. Sure, Chapman's was a freak injury, and it could never happen again, or even to Chapman, except it did and could. Thousands have done the same thing, and no problem, including Lynn during this game. In fact, it is somewhat of a common occurrence. Lynn could have just as well come in the dugout looking for high fives and being exuberant, and he would have been bathed in team spirit and congratulated by the whole team, and created a passionate happy dugout, and fired everyone up with his passion, and even though he has been slow to help his new team, shown some leadership. Instead, he had to mope alone on the bench, and get no love from the rest of the team that basically ignored him then, and let him sit alone in all that misdirected emotion and passion.

     

    I am impressed by the player who, even when they are upset, or slumping, or having a bad outing, still find a way to take a breath and then be a vocal cheerleader and express positive unselfish emotion. And it really isn't about them being an example, it is just that temper tantrums is passion misdirected, and not something that can help anything. Hitting walls, smashing coolers with baseball bats, throwing gloves........ coming out of the dugouts and fighting to have a teammates metaphorical back after he purposely threw a ball at a batter on pupose....... I am not impressed. 

     

    But I was impressed with Lynn's day on the mound..... finally.... and I hope the players notice what happened to Carson Chapman, and that it makes them think hard about doing something that has no reward, and could freakishly take them off the field and away from the game and team, and not let them do what they are so lucky to be doing, and getting paid millions to do it. The leadership and passion and emotion for this team is open for the younger stars to step into, and I hope they gel and really start showing it, and have fun winning 90 plus games. The more positive future leaders becoming leaders now and expressing themselves, the better. This division is open for a leader, and it may as well be the Twins.

    Edited by h2oface

     

    I read his quote a few times.  It actually made me think a little deeper.

     

    In the video where Hunter interviews him he is asked the same question.  He was not under duress and he probably knew the question was coming.  He also mentioned that famous Jim Edmonds catch and how he really wants to make catches like that.  In the interviews I have seen with Hunter and MLB programs he talks only about defense.  The only time he mentions offense is when he talks about not taking slumps onto the field.

     

    This is all really nice, but two things about that:

    1.  He could end up to be Aaron Rowand 2.0, beat up before his time

    2.  He needs to embrace the language of hitting and start talking about it a little more.  It sure as heck couldn't hurt him.

     

    Thrylos has his take.  I have mine.  You have yours.

    And the world is good.

    Honest question since I haven't watched or read all of the interviews with Buxton; does anyone actually ask him about hitting?  If the interviewer is focusing on his glove, why would Buxton talk about hitting?  That would be off topic.  Clearly he's a premier glove and that is definitely something to discuss.  His ability in the field is something fewer players possess.  If the only question that hints at hitting is what he likes better, I'm not sure why he'd talk about hitting at all.  I don't know how a conclusion of any relevance could be derived from that.

     

    It is likely true that if he were hitting he'd be asked about it more.  I don't know how much he was asked about it during the second half of last season when he was on fire.  

    Citing 3-for-37 says all we need to hear about the need to start hitting.

     

    Pretty sure the context of Nick's point was that those guys need to start leading the offense, which is pretty much irrefutable.

    Yeah, ok, I hear ya. We don't NEED Dozier and Buck to lead the offense. The Eddies are doing that and Kep was hot there, and LoMo is getting better. I think it is simplistic to say it all has to start with two guys. The season is long enough for several hot streaks and several cold spells. And that goes for everyone. It is a TEAM sport. Edited by Carole Keller
    Knock it off

     

    Well, part of leadership is producing on the field and coming through for your team.  There are off the field elements also, but if you're one of the players the team is relying on....you sorta need to be reliable at the plate.

     

    Right now Dozier is going on one of his famines and the team needs him to feast.  Part of being a leader is stepping up to fill what the club needs from you.  It's a perfectly fair criticism.

    No, it is not. Hitting does not define leadership. That ball is coming at you in the 90s and moving. You hit it or you don't. Hitting is about athleticism, timing and power.  Leadership indicts character, guts, desire, attitude... all of that. It is a character trait. In fact, leadership is ALLLLL about character. It confuses things to say that getting hot makes you a leader. It doesn't. It gets you on base and produces. And leading the occasional rally is not really it.  Leadership is more, much more.  And Dozier is this team's leader. Period. It was a cheap shot and remains so, despite Nick's delayed attempt at excusifying and ewen's opportunistic piling on

    No, it is not. Hitting does not define leadership. That ball is coming at you in the 90s and moving. You hit it or you don't. Hitting is about athleticism, timing and power.  Leadership indicts character, guts, desire, attitude... all of that. It is a character trait. In fact, leadership is ALLLLL about character. It confuses things to say that getting hot makes you a leader. It doesn't. It gets you on base and produces. And leading the occasional rally is not really it.  Leadership is more, much more.  And Dozier is this team's leader. Period. It was a cheap shot and remains so, despite Nick's delayed attempt at excusifying and ewen's opportunistic piling on

    Everyone has explained to you what Nick meant by leadership in the context of this article. Move on.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...