Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Baseball Gods to Tom Pohlad: 'Aight, Bet'

    This spring, Tom Pohlad went out of his way to proclaim his intention to invest in the 2026 Twins if they earned that kind of reinforcement. They've earned it. Your move, Tom.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of Jeffrey Becker-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    It wasn't equivocal, and it wasn't compulsory. This April, as part of a slow-motion goodwill tour in which he's tried to rebuild the fan base's faith in (or even tolerance for) his family, Tom Pohlad piped up. He gave Dan Hayes of The Athletic a quote that left little wiggle room. That even seemed to be by design. You can't gain much goodwill by going halfway.

    "As we go throughout the year and more opportunities present themselves for us to put action to words, so long as we do that, I’ll be happy," Pohlad said. And later: "We owe it to our fan base as much as we owe it to [Derek Shelton], [Jeremy Zoll] and the players, to do everything we can to improve our team at that point.”

    We should presume he meant it, because whatever goodwill (and time) it did buy him was nowhere near worth the backlash he'll receive if he goes back on that asseveration. However, it was an easy time to say those words. The Twins were 13-17 when Hayes's article ran, which was right on schedule; most fans, pundits and projection systems forecasted a losing season for them. In fairness, they're still sub-.500, too. Since that day, however, they've gone 40-37, and they find themselves right in the thick of the race for the AL Central, as well as a possible Wild Card berth. They've proved themselves resilient, and they've played near the top of their spectrum of possible outcomes based on their talent. Unequivocally, this team is in position to buy at next week's MLB trade deadline.

    It's time, in other words, for Pohlad to pony up. In fact, the baseball gods have offered him no quarter. Although this team (frankly) is not all that good, they're also plainly not bad, and they're playing in one of the weakest divisions and leagues in recent memory. They have a glaring need for pitching help, and a strong farm system with which to pursue it. They have, by any reasonable reckoning, plenty of money to spend. The stars all aligned. The dictate is clear, and Pohlad's own words have painted him into a corner.

    Admittedly, it would be strange (and ill-advised) for the team to go all-in and trade top prospects to bolster this squad. They're just entering a competitive window, not peaking or trying to maximize the final phase of a cycle. They can get better easily, though, and Pohlad's money can do a lot of that work. Here are five guys they could acquire, for whom the prospect cost could be minimized if the Twins take on the salaries involved.

    Quote

    Kevin Gausman, Blue Jays

    RHP Blue Jays Age: 35 FA: Nov 2026 Sal: $23m
    There are days when, as they say, the splitter ain’t splittin’, and on those days, Gausman gets frighteningly hittable in a hurry. The rest of the time, though, he’s as steady and sturdy as a starter comes these days. He fills up the zone and gets ample swings and misses, especially with that splitter. He can dominate, and he has a solid postseason track record. The Blue Jays, who look unlikely to emerge from the quagmire into which they’ve sunk in the standings, are likely to deal Gausman, rather than let him walk for free this winter. His salary is substantial, but Toronto is one team who should be willing to eat the money to maximize the return they realize in a trade. There are many harder-throwing starters a team might pursue this month, but few who are as likely to have a positive impact on a postseason run.

    Kevin Gausman is a tough, durable veteran starter—someone who could start a playoff game and give the Twins a chance to win even against a tough lineup. He's an impending free agent and is still owed over $7 million. If the Twins are willing to take on that money, he wouldn't cost that much, and he could be a difference-maker for them both in the regular season and come october.

    Quote

    Luke Weaver, Mets

    RHP Mets Age: 32 FA: Nov 2027 Sal: $9.5m
    A well-established high-leverage reliever having his best year on a massively disappointing team, Weaver is just about perfectly situated to be traded for a haul and to be a main character come October. He’s always had good swing-and-miss stuff, and is filling up the strike zone better than ever, working with a simple three-pitch mix and excellent command. The Mets are slated to pay him $12.5 million in 2027, and for them, that’s a drop in the bucket, so they might even pay down some of his salary to maximize the return in a trade. Neither on this year’s moribund club nor on next year’s is he likely to have a greater impact on the organization’s fortunes than he can have as a trade chip on a market starved for top-flight right-handed relievers.

    A major bullpen upgrade is the most obvious way the Twins could get better this week. Weaver is under contract for 2027, too, so while he would cost a good prospect or two, he could help them not only this year, but next. He's an ideal fit for their situation, as long as Pohlad is willing to shell out the relatively high financial cost for a non-closer.

    Quote
     

    Antonio Senzatela, Rockies

    RHP Rockies Age: 31 FA: Nov 2026* Sal: $12m
    Quick, someone rescue this guy from Coors Field and see if there’s even more to unlock. After a career full of promise (enough so that he signed a long-term deal with the Rockies in 2021) but often sidetracked by injuries and/or pitching at elevation, Senzatela has embraced a move to the bullpen and taken off this year. He still throws 97 with his four-seam fastball, but now, he pairs that with a vicious cutter in the 92 MPH range, which both misses some bats and induces ample weak contact. If he never (or very rarely) had to pitch in Colorado, his four-seamer might even turn out to be the good pitch everyone briefly hoped it would turn out to be. He’s stuffed the strike zone and begun manipulating swings better by simply relying on power out of the pen. A team picking him up would have a chance to benefit from his experience working multiple innings come September and October, and in November, they’d even have a chance to retain him for $14 million in 2027. That’s a high price for a middle reliever, but if he shows you two months of relief ace-caliber work after escaping Colorado, you might give that a shot—or even move him back to the rotation at age 32.

    It's a similar situation to that of Weaver, but Antonio Senzatela offers the bonus of not being obligated to pay up for 2027. The salary taken on for this season wouldn't be terribly onerous, and if it pans out well, the team could elect to bring him back at a moderate price.

    Quote

    Dustin May, Cardinals

    RHP Cardinals Age: 28 FA: Nov 2026* Sal: $12.5m
    It’s great to see May come through a multi-year run of miserable injury luck to pitch the way many long believed he could. Not has his good season with the Cards been solely about being available. He’s throwing more strikes, thanks in part to a rejiggered approach that favors four-seamers, cutters and changeups at the expense of sinkers and sweepers. He still has an extremely lively arm, and his stuff is playing better this season, thanks to his newfound ability to fill up the zone. As an impending free agent on a team that still views itself as building for a future brighter than its present, though, he’s a strong candidate to be dealt. Unless the Cardinals can strike a deal with him this month to convert his mutual option for 2027 into a multi-year commitment, he’ll be on the market, and should slot nicely into the back half of a playoff-caliber rotation.

    Dustin May could be a huge upside play for the Twins, and although the mutual option on his deal for 2027 is almost certain not to be mutually exercised, even a fistful of starts that get the team over the hump and into the postseason could be a huge windfall. The Cardinals will want something good for May, but his salary does give the Twins leverage, if they're willing to eat that money.

    Quote

    Andrew Kittredge, Orioles

    RHP Orioles Age: 36 FA: Nov 2026 Sal: $9m
    It’s not a trick they were hoping to turn, but the Orioles just might get something in return for Kittredge for a second year in a row. After trading him to the Cubs last summer and watching him dominate for Chicago down the stretch and into the playoffs, the O’s reacquired the righty so they could exercise the club option on his deal for 2026. Unfortunately, he’s missed some time, and the results aren’t especially pretty even when he’s been on the mound. Meanwhile, the team is floundering for a second consecutive summer. The stuff remains good; he’s still inducing ground balls; and he’s throwing strikes, so Kittredge still has trade value. There’s little reason for Baltimore not to move him again and look ahead to 2027.

    This should, at this point, be the bare minimum. The Twins need help in the bullpen. Andrew Kittredge is one of several available right-handed hurlers who could assume a high-leverage role for them and slightly upgrade the relief corps, and who are making somewhere between $7 million and $12 million. If the Twins don't at least trade for someone like Kittredge, Pohlad will have failed to keep his promise to the fan base and to the team.

    The good news is that this team is in the hunt. The even better news is that the season has left much less uncertainty than one might have worried it would even a month ago. The only bad news is for Pohlad, and then only for his bottom line. He said he wants to help Zoll make this team better. Now, he gets to prove that he meant it.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Carson Tinney

    Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A, C
    On Tuesday, Tinney went 2-for-5 with two home runs for Fort Myers. He hit a 2-run homer in the 3rd inning, and then he hit a 2-run walkoff homer in the bottom of the ninth!

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    50 minutes ago, amjgt said:

    I think it's a little silly to assume Zoll is philosophically just like Falvey, just because he hired him a few years back. 

    For a variety of reasons I find it unlikely that the duo of Tom P and Zoll will act like the previous duo of Joe P and Falvey, but who knows.

    We've learned almost nothing about how Zoll will operate, in the last 6 months, since he took over. Not only will we learn about Tom Pohlad this deadline, but also Jeremy Zoll. 

     

    Zoll has been with the organization since 2017 and per Falvey a key decision maker in personnel decisions for at least the last 5 years.  He is obviously invested in and agrees with the philosophies that Falvey has implemented or he would not have stayed.

    And Falvey was not operating in a vacuum, his staff was advising and assisting in all the moves being made the last 10 years.  None of those people have changed, the only change is Zoll is the now the final decision maker.

    Tom P should not be making any personnel decisions other than to approve additional budget or he could potentially say no to a trade for Ryan or Buxton for example for business reasons.  But it is Zoll's show and he has no experience as the top guy and so far he is following the same template as Falvey.

     

    Joe Ryan's tradeability took a complete beating with his arm fatigue diagnosis. It's going to scare the heck out of any suitor.

    It's such an unusual trade deadline scenario. How do owners view 2027? How confident are owners that baseball will be played or a new CBA will include a $150MM+ floor and full rev share? What will Arb 3 look like?

    Everything staying the same as the current CBA (I think that's kind of the best I can assume), I think Joe Ryan's value is probably $45MM, minus his outstanding salary for 2026 plus his projected Arb 3 salary. He's making $2MM the rest of this year, plus $20MM next year (have to assume that value in Arb3 based on Skubal). Forget about the mutual option. Ryan is not taking $12MM after the Skubal ruling. That'd be absurd.

    So surplus around $23MM? The rest is market thirst. Figure the +20% surcharge for market thirst equivalent to Berrios' deal and best case scenario, you're looking at a $30MM surplus and a deal similar to prospect in the 30-60ish range or mayyyybe two fringe top 100s. Exclude any team's top org prospect. Joe Ryan WAS worth more than double what he is now at last years deadline.

    9 minutes ago, GNess said:

    ...Last related point - the weakness of the division in 2026 is not a flaw it is an opportunity.

    It's a trap. Believing a mediocre team that makes the playoffs has a legitimate chance to make, let alone win, a World Series is a trap. If the organizational goal is "World Series" then lightly chasing a division title with virtually no hope of advancing is a trap which will undermine the future of the franchise.

    USAFChief
  • Twins Daily Contributor
  • Posted (edited)

    6 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    It's a trap. Believing a mediocre team that makes the playoffs has a legitimate chance to make, let alone win, a World Series is a trap. If the organizational goal is "World Series" then lightly chasing a division title with virtually no hope of advancing is a trap which will undermine the future of the franchise.

    The 88 win 2021 Atlanta Braves won a WS.

    The 88 win 2014 San Francisco Giants won a WS.

    The 83 win 2006 St Louis Cardinals won a WS.

    A Twins postseason team would be underdogs. But a WS wouldn't be impossible. 

     

    Edited by USAFChief

    Slightly off topic, but the claim that the AL Central is a horrible division is just wrong. The horrible division is the West, with just one team (barely) above .500  and two of the three really bad teams in the AL. Collectively, they are 42 games under .500, while the Central is 17 games under .500.

    11 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    It's a trap. Believing a mediocre team that makes the playoffs has a legitimate chance to make, let alone win, a World Series is a trap. If the organizational goal is "World Series" then lightly chasing a division title with virtually no hope of advancing is a trap which will undermine the future of the franchise.

    The Twins do not have to mortgage the future add a piece or two that would make them more competitive in 2026.

    All teams that qualify. for the postseason have a shot especially in 3, 5 or even 7 game formats to determine who advances/wins.

    7 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    The 88 win 2021 Atlanta Braves won a WS.

    The 88 win 2014 San Francisco Giants won a WS.

    The 83 win 2006 St Louis Cardinals won a WS.

    A Twins postseason team would be underdogs. But a WS wouldn't be impossible. 

     

    The Twins could win the World Series this year after trading Joe Ryan and Byron Buxton for prospects. It's not "impossible."

    3 hours ago, arby58 said:

    Slightly off topic, but the claim that the AL Central is a horrible division is just wrong. The horrible division is the West, with just one team (barely) above .500  and two of the three really bad teams in the AL. Collectively, they are 42 games under .500, while the Central is 17 games under .500.

    Happy Joel Mchale GIF by ABC Network

    10 hours ago, Rufus said:

    The time to make major trade deadline deals is when your team has a legitimate shot at a winning it all.  Not when your team might sneak into the playoffs.  At this point the Twins should look at their strengths and trade from them to fill weaknesses (catching for pitching).  They should not be trading any top prospects for expiring contracts.  

    I know it doesn't happen often in Minnesota it seems, but if your team DOES make the playoffs, then your team DOES have a chance of winning it all. 

    4 hours ago, GNess said:

    I agree with Matthew Trueblood's view.

    The Twins have been to three world series since moving to Minnesota. I would suggest the 87 version that won the world series was not considered to be a serious contender until. they actually won some games in the postseason!

    If a team makes it into the postseason it has accomplished something. that the majority of teams failed to do. You have to be in the postseason to. compete for a title. it's an opportunity that doesn't occur most seasons.

    60+ years of Minnesota Twins baseball. Two world series titles. Three trips in total to the world series. 14 playoff seasons since 1969 resulting in two world series, 43 seasons since 1969 of no playoffs and no world series appearances.

    it's a very difficult challenge unless you are a franchise with deep pockets and a willingness to spend.

    Last related point - the weakness of the division in 2026 is not a flaw it is an opportunity.

    I'm being tongue-in-cheek in this thread, but we really have to be careful comparing the playoffs from 1987 to now.  The gauntlet is not anywhere close to the same thing.  

    We all want a winner, but we also want the team to make wise decisions.  Let's say you're some kid playing for Nicollet.  You DOMINATE the football field.  You're so confident you have a chance at the NFL you take "an opportunity" to put yourself in debt to buy a brand new car.  Dumping assets in it because you feel so good and want so badly to be an NFL player.  What you have refused to look at is the quality of your competition and the way it is lulling you into a false sense of security.  That shiny new car feels good now...but the bill will come due.  A wise person should ask if the path to the reward is really paved the way you believe before taking such a risk.

    It's been called a "trap" in this thread.  That's the right word.  Especially since you are part of that weakness.

    4 hours ago, amjgt said:

    I know. But it's my personal belief that he was still below Falvey on the decision tree and that a Falvey philosophy would win out over a Zoll philosophy (if there were differences)

    Yes it is a fact he reported to Falvey.  But Falvey didn't make the moves by himself, Zoll was his top assistant and advised him.  How many times do you think Falvey said to him, get out of my office that was a dumb idea.  Falvey was at the top laying out the vision and Zoll implemented that vision because he believed in it.  He worked for Falvey for almost 10 years, he believed in what his vision was.

    How many times have you worked in a job and didn't believe in the way your boss wanted things done and stuck around anyway.  And my guess at Zoll's level salary is not an issue like it might be for others.

    25 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

    t's been called a "trap" in this thread.  That's the right word.  Especially since you are part of that weakness.

     

    I get you prefaced your post by noting it was tongue in cheek.

    Your analogy comparing playing at Nicolett and playing in the NFL falls short as if that reflects in any meaningful way the differences between any MLB teams particularly those that qualify for the playoffs.

    Yes, 87 was a shorter postseason, but the Twins were underdogs vs Detroit and St Louis. (4-1 vs Detroit in the ALCS and 4-3 in the World Series)

    As far as being part of the weakness simply because my view differs from yours is nonsense. I am just sharing my opinion on TD. I can't imagine how my or your words here would have any bearing whatsoever on the course of action the Twins will take at the trade deadline.

    1 hour ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    I know it doesn't happen often in Minnesota it seems, but if your team DOES make the playoffs, then your team DOES have a chance of winning it all. 

    If I buy lottery tickets,  I have a chance to win.  But I am not going to sell the farm to buy tickets. 

    Just now, Rufus said:

    If I buy lottery tickets,  I have a chance to win.  But I am not going to sell the farm to buy tickets. 

    And you shouldn't. 

    But still, winning the powerball has the same odds as getting struck by lightning twice in your lifetime. One of 12 teams that make the playoffs win it every year. Of course some teams have more experience or more talent or are built more for playoff success. But it's still getting there that gives you a chance, and that's certainly higher odds than any lottery.

    Plus, there is nothing saying the Twins will sell the farm to get to the playoffs. They have a very deep prospect pool by comparison, and frankly a LOT of left handed hitting outfielders to hopefully add some pitching talent here in the next week or so.

    31 minutes ago, GNess said:

    I get you prefaced your post by noting it was tongue in cheek.

    Your analogy comparing playing at Nicolett and playing in the NFL falls short as if that reflects in any meaningful way the differences between any MLB teams particularly those that qualify for the playoffs.

    Yes, 87 was a shorter postseason, but the Twins were underdogs vs Detroit and St Louis. (4-1 vs Detroit in the ALCS and 4-3 in the World Series)

    As far as being part of the weakness simply because my view differs from yours is nonsense. I am just sharing my opinion on TD. I can't imagine how my or your words here would have any bearing whatsoever on the course of action the Twins will take at the trade deadline.

    My jokes about wishing for a losing streak and being forsaken are tongue in cheek.  My analogy absolutely fits - you're taking big risks with a false sense of security premised on a refusal to look at your "success" or "opportunity" with context.  

    I didn't mean to imply you personally were a weakness.  The "you" in that case was the Twins.  The Twins are part of the "weakness" of the AL.  They suck just as much as the rest.  Being slightly less weak than the rest of the weaklings IS the context you should be considering.  Slightly less weak isn't the same as strong.

    One of my biggest issues is people keep saying "The AL is weak, let's pounce".  Yeah....it is weak.  We're part of that problem!  We're not good.  I get investing in a "good" team.  We're not good!!!

    Crazy thought for Tom P. to act on……….trade for Sandy Alcantara. Make a strong playoff push!

    Wallner - Emma - Raya & an A Ball arm……& maybe a AA arm……...maybe Ober…… any of the prospects other than Houston - Culpepper - Jenkins - & this year’s #1 & 2 picks.

    Marlins have lost 12 straight & he costs $21M next year. If Tom wants to spend to be competitive, he could be the guy!

    Trade Bell & Caratini or Jeffers. Any two of those guys pay for Alcantara, plus, for this year’s cost.

    Lopez - Alcantara - Ryan would cost $56M  next year …… if there is a spending floor, these guys are $$ well spent against that total. Those 3 with Bradley & Abel (or whoever) would be the best rotation in baseball!

    Prielipp or Rojas & Matthews to the PEN in ‘27.

     

    OR

     

    Put a package together for Luis Arraez! He goes to 2B and hits 3rd every day. He protects Buxton and plays solid 2B now. Clemens & Keaschall settle in playing LF & RF every day. Larnach moves to DH and Keaschall is DH v. lefties w/Martin in corner OF.

    Bell/Wallner/one of the Catchers with a pitching prospect or two - somehow, they need to bring back a reliever.

    Take a BIG SWING Tom!!

    1 hour ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    And you shouldn't. 

    But still, winning the powerball has the same odds as getting struck by lightning twice in your lifetime. One of 12 teams that make the playoffs win it every year. Of course some teams have more experience or more talent or are built more for playoff success. But it's still getting there that gives you a chance, and that's certainly higher odds than any lottery.

    Plus, there is nothing saying the Twins will sell the farm to get to the playoffs. They have a very deep prospect pool by comparison, and frankly a LOT of left handed hitting outfielders to hopefully add some pitching talent here in the next week or so.

    Can’t trade Jenkins. Everyone agrees.

    Emma is continually hurt so his value sucks……he’s averaged around 54 games/year for last 4 years. Can’t imagine any team being excited about him.

    Mendez? Wallner? Roden? ……..other than this group, I don’t know who else is interesting and hits left handed? Bell & Caratini & Jeffers are all possibilities to obtain a shot in the arm.

    I too hope some reliever - even one, can be brought back in a trade.

    2 hours ago, TheLeviathan said:

    I'm being tongue-in-cheek in this thread, but we really have to be careful comparing the playoffs from 1987 to now.  The gauntlet is not anywhere close to the same thing.  

    We all want a winner, but we also want the team to make wise decisions.  Let's say you're some kid playing for Nicollet.  You DOMINATE the football field.  You're so confident you have a chance at the NFL you take "an opportunity" to put yourself in debt to buy a brand new car.  Dumping assets in it because you feel so good and want so badly to be an NFL player.  What you have refused to look at is the quality of your competition and the way it is lulling you into a false sense of security.  That shiny new car feels good now...but the bill will come due.  A wise person should ask if the path to the reward is really paved the way you believe before taking such a risk.

    It's been called a "trap" in this thread.  That's the right word.  Especially since you are part of that weakness.

    "Calling it a trap was tongue in cheek.

     

    But I'm gonna repeat it."

    12 minutes ago, JD-TWINS said:

    Crazy thought for Tom P. to act on……….trade for Sandy Alcantara. Make a strong playoff push!

    Wallner - Emma - Raya & an A Ball arm……& maybe a AA arm……...maybe Ober…… any of the prospects other than Houston - Culpepper - Jenkins - & this year’s #1 & 2 picks.

    Marlins have lost 12 straight & he costs $21M next year. If Tom wants to spend to be competitive, he could be the guy!

    Trade Bell & Caratini or Jeffers. Any two of those guys pay for Alcantara, plus, for this year’s cost.

    Lopez - Alcantara - Ryan would cost $56M  next year …… if there is a spending floor, these guys are $$ well spent against that total. Those 3 with Bradley & Abel (or whoever) would be the best rotation in baseball!

    Prielipp or Rojas & Matthews to the PEN in ‘27.

     

    OR

     

    Put a package together for Luis Arraez! He goes to 2B and hits 3rd every day. He protects Buxton and plays solid 2B now. Clemens & Keaschall settle in playing LF & RF every day. Larnach moves to DH and Keaschall is DH v. lefties w/Martin in corner OF.

    Bell/Wallner/one of the Catchers with a pitching prospect or two - somehow, they need to bring back a reliever.

    Take a BIG SWING Tom!!

    Lewis and a mid tier guy  for Arraez. Put Clemens at first. Add in a prospect of you want to expand the deal. 

    7 hours ago, USAFChief said:

    The 88 win 2021 Atlanta Braves won a WS.

    The 88 win 2014 San Francisco Giants won a WS.

    The 83 win 2006 St Louis Cardinals won a WS.

    A Twins postseason team would be underdogs. But a WS wouldn't be impossible. 

     

    You do realize that they would have win against the equivalent of the Dodgers?

    Right?

     

    1 hour ago, Old Twins Hat said:

    You do realize that they would have win against the equivalent of the Dodgers?

    Right?

     

    Well yes, the AL representative to the WS might have to play the Dodgers.

    As I understand it, the AL representative plays a National League team every year in the WS.

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...