Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Tom Pohlad Is on a Mission to Rebuild Trust. A Critical Juncture Lies Ahead.

    The Twins have openly promised ambition and aggression this offseason. Now comes an important opportunity to show fans those promises mean something.

    Nick Nelson
    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    You don't build trust by saying things. Well, not on its own, anyway. You build trust by saying things and then doing them. It conditions people to believe what you say. It demonstrates conviction.

    To his credit, Tom Pohlad seems to recognize this. The team's alignment of messaging and approach at the trade deadline was seemingly guided by an edict to re-establish trust and credibility. In the weeks and days leading up, general manager Jeremy Zoll was surprisingly open about Minnesota's intention to add impact talent, specifically in the bullpen. 

    This was a stark contrast from the vague double-speak we often heard from Derek Falvey, and the team's actions at the deadline also represented a departure from Falvey's hem-hawing front offices in recent years. The Twins did exactly what they said they were going to do, assertively adding three pitchers who performed very well, although it wasn't enough to keep the club from falling out of contention.

    All in all, a good first step. But only a first step. Now the real work begins, coming off a second straight losing season where attendance fell to a new 25-year low. At Tuesday's season-ending press conference at Target Field, Pohlad called this offseason "another opportunity for us to put action to words" and adding "I’m really excited about the month ahead."

    There's little that can happen from a team-building standpoint before the World Series ends, so I assume what Pohlad was really referencing is the one-month window in November where the offseason is underway, before a CBA lockout shutdown commences at the start of December. If the Twins want to demonstrate some genuine initiative, they need to strike with at least one big move during what is anticipated to be an active stretch of Hot Stove action.

    Pohlad insisted, in no uncertain terms, that's the plan. "We are going to be aggressive when free agency starts," he told reporters. Follow through on that, and he'll have another drop in the trust bucket. As that bucket fills, rancor toward ownership subsides and fans can once again start to buy in. 

    When asked about his expectations for payroll, Pohlad shied away from specifics but ended with some remarks I find interesting: “Let me just say, I have been very vocal about what our ambitions are. I have been vocal, and to some degree critical, of where we’ve been. And so you can take some comfort in the fact that, with payroll, wherever we land is cognizant of both those things and will be commensurate with what we’re trying to accomplish.”

    I'm not sure anyone is going to take comfort in words. Not yet. The Twins have spent too many years conditioning fans to wait for the catch, the qualifier or the retreat. Pohlad has correctly identified that rebuilding trust requires breaking that cycle, and the trade deadline offered a promising start.

    Now comes a much bigger test. If the Twins are truly ambitious about restoring credibility and building a winner, November presents their first real opportunity to prove it. Pohlad has said they will be aggressive. He has said payroll will reflect their ambitions. At this particular moment, matching those words with action would carry weight well beyond whatever player they acquire or dollars they spend. It would give fans another reason to believe that, when this version of Twins ownership tells them something, they can actually trust it.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Walker Jenkins

    Minnesota Twins - MLB, OF
    The outfielder was named to the International League Postseason All Star team. He hit .308/.407/.532 (.939) with 17 doubles, three triples and 12 homers.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    People keep saying this but take a look at the roster of successful modest revenue teams.  Trading for established players has a miniscule role in building contenders among teams in the bottom half of revenue.  Milwaukee, Tampa, and Cleveland have a sum total of zero players that produced 1.5 WAR that were acquired via trade as an established player. 

    You are looking at it in terms of a small sample though. They HAVE all traded for established players at some point in the last decade right? I mean, Milwaukee getting Christian Yelich (who is still on the team) WAS a big deal at the time. Cleveland added Foster Griffin this deadline as well as Nathaniel Lowe, and both would look good here.

    I'm not even saying the Twins need to trade and add their BEST player via trade. I just don't love the free agent list for established middle of the order types. So they'll have to be creative.

    2 minutes ago, MeleMouth said:

    Of the 30 teams in MLB, the Twins' relative ticket sales in 2026 were 26th in the league, the lowest they have been in the 21st Century. Whether it's because of anger, frustration, or being tired with a team that is usually not good and without a clear plan to become good, that shows a fan base is turned off. Nice words aren't going to bring them back.

    And that's with structuring their ticket deals like the Twins Pass thing to goose up attendance figures as much as they could.  To me, it illustrates the short-sightedness of their strategy ever since Tom took over, from the insistence that they'll be competitive without any investment to quixotically buying at the deadline when contention was a pipe dream, all was done with the primary goal of an immediate increase in attendance. 

    Well, their attendance still went down, and they're in a worse position moving forward than they otherwise would've been had they made an honest assessment of where they stood and what it would take to win fans back. 

    I still don't think they really understood how poorly they'd allowed their relationship with the fanbase to erode.  It was always going to take multiple years of committed investment to win fans back over time; it was never going to happen in one year, especially with the paltry amount of investment actually made (they basically fully recoup the investment made at the deadline by not tendering Ober).  They operated as if that would be enough to fix it immediately

    I really want to believe things will be different, but I'm having a hard time believing ownership truly understands the nature of the problem and what it actually takes to solve it.   They say they need to win, but they have yet to demonstrate that they understand what it actually takes to win

    Blah Blah Bored GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Tom "Pohlad: "(The offseason is) another opportunity for us to put action to words. I’m really excited about the month ahead." #MNTwins"

    15 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

    Why are you guys under the impression that ownership has changed philosophy just because the figurehead of the ownership group has changed? 

    Joe Pohlad is much maligned here, and rightfully so, but people need to realize HE didn't cut the Twins payroll after 2023...the Pohlads did. 

    Do we really think Tom has power over his uncles? 

    What do you mean? He already failed spectacularly in year 1!

    No Half Measures Tom took half measures and the team stunk all the same. 

    I understand the skepticism. The family still has majority ownership of the team, and changing the person at the top doesn’t automatically mean a change in philosophy. But it doesn’t mean the leadership change is meaningless, either.

    Having owned and operated businesses, I’ve seen how different leaders can set different priorities, even within the same ownership structure. Family businesses aren’t always of one mind. Neither of us knows exactly how much authority Tom has or how those internal decisions are being made.

    I also don't think you can fairly criticize his first year. When did he take over? February or March? I’m not arguing that he’s earned unquestioning trust; I’m arguing that he deserves to be judged on his own decisions and follow-through. Calling him a figurehead assumes the very thing we’re debating.

    This offseason is an opportunity to show whether his stated intentions translate into meaningful action. If they don’t, criticism is warranted. My optimism isn’t a blank check, it’s a willingness to give him a reasonable chance.

    I'll bow out after this post. 

    Go Twins in 2027!

    Man this thread confuses me.  Several people keep asserting that actions by Tom have "rebuilt" trust and been "good steps".  By what metric?  Did attendance increase after their "bold" deadline?  Have casuals starting tuning in to more games?  Have they seen a surge in season ticket purchases?  On what basis should I believe this rhetoric?  By all means, enlighten me on what basis these claims are made.

    It feels, to me, especially when people go to length to refer to other fans as "fans" that this becomes a battle where diehards, who are easily bought off, are lecturing others on why they should be bought off as well when all they're doing is demanding something more than words and organizational tactics that result in continued mediocrity.  Congrats to you "diehards" in here, but that framing isn't a positive.  All I see is a bunch of cope and people who are far too easily pandered too.  High expectations aren't something to frown upon, yet here we are with diehards - who would cheer for this team no matter what putrid product they put out - are insulting people who are demanding more than that.  I won't kowtow to that BS.

    To Tom's actual claims: What part of this free agent class screams "this is the guy who could help make a big difference!  Go get him!".  Are we suggesting we're fishing in the Skubal waters?  What is the actual thing you think is going to happen based on these claims that would rise to the expectations that this rhetoric is setting up?  Seriously, what do you think they're going to do?  Resign AJ Minter and declare victory?

    It all feels like the deadline all over again.  Several people have suggested we did the "right" thing at the deadline.  I mean, that's cute to believe that (congrats on being bought off easily) but that move failed.  It failed miserably.  That's not an opinion, that's a fact.  Not only did it fail in the immediate outcomes, we're likely going to feel the sting of the lost opportunities for quite some time as well.  8 million and a couple relievers was enough for people to feel emboldened?  

    My god, if that's all it takes for some of you to roll over and start heaping optimism on the god damn Pohlad family, then you might as well scroll down about 3/4 of the way down that free agent list and take a gander at your future Twins.  That's all they'll need to do to get your devotion again.  This "fan" would rather root for an organization that makes wise decisions and appears to have a clear vision and purpose.

    This?  This feels like a billionaire trying to sucker us into believing in him long enough to get his sale price and bail.  I hope most of us - fans, "fans", casuals alike - reject this.

    7 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    People keep saying this but take a look at the roster of successful modest revenue teams.  Trading for established players has a miniscule role in building contenders among teams in the bottom half of revenue.  Milwaukee, Tampa, and Cleveland have a sum total of zero players that produced 1.5 WAR that were acquired via trade as an established player. 

    Yeah, but Christian Yelich has been a pretty vital player in the Brewers recent sustained success. 

    5 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    People keep saying this but take a look at the roster of successful modest revenue teams.  Trading for established players has a miniscule role in building contenders among teams in the bottom half of revenue.  Milwaukee, Tampa, and Cleveland have a sum total of zero players that produced 1.5 WAR that were acquired via trade as an established player. 

    The teams that you mentioned have made a habit of trading away established players and gaining back great value, not trading for. Management needed to realize that 2026 was not the year and make moves like these other organizations have. They blew this chance. By blowing this they miss the chance not only at how long the next group will be good but in how good they could have been. For a 77 win season.

    Count me as one of the few who is not in favor of getting in a bidding war for Jeffers for his longtime service. Yes he's a fine player. But the short-term benefit will not likely outweigh the long-term cost.

    22 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

    Why are you guys under the impression that ownership has changed philosophy just because the figurehead of the ownership group has changed? 

    Joe Pohlad is much maligned here, and rightfully so, but people need to realize HE didn't cut the Twins payroll after 2023...the Pohlads did. 

    Do we really think Tom has power over his uncles? 

    What do you mean? He already failed spectacularly in year 1!

    No Half Measures Tom took half measures and the team stunk all the same. 

    It really is incredible how low the bar is for some diehards. A Pohlad with just a little bit of self awareness that they’re hated in the state and spending $8 million at the deadline got them hooked again. 

    1 hour ago, MeleMouth said:

    The only difference between Lopez, Ryan, and Jeffers and the "veteran players with uncurable warts" available in free agency is that they are already your veteran players with uncurable warts.

    Trevor Rogers, Casey Mize and Freddie Peralta tend to be considered the top arms available after Skubal. Those guys aren't upgrades. And Jeffers is on everybody's top ten free agent list, and considering catcher is is the offense's biggest hole if he departs, I'd rather have Jeffers over anyone than Skubal and maybe Seiya Suzuki.

    And that's not taking into account that the Twins don't have to convince these guys to come here, because they already are here; they're the bird in the hand. Jeffers is a bit different as he can and should refuse the Qualifying Offer, but that still leaves the Twins the exclusive window to make him an offer he'd struggle to say no to.

    Getting rid of what we have for other free agents isn't even a lateral move, it's taking a step backwards.

    5 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said:

    It really is incredible how low the bar is for some diehards. A Pohlad with just a little bit of self awareness that they’re hated in the state and spending $8 million at the deadline got them hooked again. 

    Pfft...what a "fan" you are.

    6 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    Trevor Rogers, Casey Mize and Freddie Peralta tend to be considered the top arms available after Skubal. Those guys aren't upgrades. And Jeffers is on everybody's top ten free agent list, and considering catcher is is the offense's biggest hole if he departs, I'd rather have Jeffers over anyone than Skubal and maybe Seiya Suzuki.

    And that's not taking into account that the Twins don't have to convince these guys to come here, because they already are here; they're the bird in the hand. Jeffers is a bit different as he can and should refuse the Qualifying Offer, but that still leaves the Twins the exclusive window to make him an offer he'd struggle to say no to.

    Getting rid of what we have for other free agents isn't even a lateral move, it's taking a step backwards.

    All 3 of those starters are very much upgrades over our 5th best starter, no? I mean, like you know you'll get a baseline with any of them, and that's never a bad thing. Peralta is someone I like because he is known as a good clubhouse guy. Adding someone like him helps the rotation and helps the clubhouse.

    Trevor Rogers is very much statistically a pretty big upgrade too. I can't imagine anyone arguing otherwise.

    Case Mize this year was more fine than great. But would I take him over Dean Kremer and Bailey Ober? Yes I very much would.

    For goodness sake Zoll was talking today about how he hasn’t decided whether to tender Jeffers the QO.  What more sample size do you need, Jeremy?  The season is over.  We know who is in the system and who the FAs are.  Jeffers is the best option available, at a position of need, in a very thin FA crop.  
     

    As Yoda once said “Do or do not.  There is no try.”  The Twins need results to back words.  

    23 minutes ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    You are looking at it in terms of a small sample though. They HAVE all traded for established players at some point in the last decade right? I mean, Milwaukee getting Christian Yelich (who is still on the team) WAS a big deal at the time. Cleveland added Foster Griffin this deadline as well as Nathaniel Lowe, and both would look good here.

    I'm not even saying the Twins need to trade and add their BEST player via trade. I just don't love the free agent list for established middle of the order types. So they'll have to be creative.

    Here are the Twins' top prospects: Jenkins, Lackey, Culpepper, Houston, Tait, Quick, Rojas, ERod.

    Which of those would you be willing to trade and who would be an example of a player you think they can get for them?

    They are probably willing to trade Tait and Quick, and perhaps Rojas and ERod, but it's unclear what they collectively could fetch. Arizona would probably be happy to trade Ketel Marte for pennies on the dollar, but he might have the right to reject trades. Maybe they could buy relatively low on Anthony Volpe. Perhaps if the Twins took payroll back, they could get more, such as Corbin Burnes, also from Arizona.

    My bias, before and now, would have been to assemble a lot of great prospects, but it seems like that possibility is gone. Tom wants to make the gesture, perhaps a big gesture.

    2 minutes ago, MeleMouth said:

    Here are the Twins' top prospects: Jenkins, Lackey, Culpepper, Houston, Tait, Quick, Rojas, ERod.

    Which of those would you be willing to trade and who would be an example of a player you think they can get for them?

    They are probably willing to trade Tait and Quick, and perhaps Rojas and ERod, but it's unclear what they collectively could fetch. Arizona would probably be happy to trade Ketel Marte for pennies on the dollar, but he might have the right to reject trades. Maybe they could buy relatively low on Anthony Volpe. Perhaps if the Twins took payroll back, they could get more, such as Corbin Burnes, also from Arizona.

    My bias, before and now, would have been to assemble a lot of great prospects, but it seems like that possibility is gone. Tom wants to make the gesture, perhaps a big gesture.

    I'd be curious what major league player they could get for a return of Joe Ryan. Mostly because I have this assumption that he wouldn't want to be extended here. 

    Maybe there is a team that has a decent power hitting type player that's not fully formed yet who would be open to trade him for Joe Ryan. For example, I don't think the Cubs would trade him now, but if there is a player somewhere like Michael Busch was a couple of seasons ago when he was traded by the Dodgers who had been blocked, is there a player like that somewhere that could be available for someone like Ryan?

    Otherwise, of the players you mentioned, I truly don't see Jenkins or Culpepper or Lackey moved. But I don't think that means moves can't be made otherwise. 

    7 minutes ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    All 3 of those starters are very much upgrades over our 5th best starter, no? I mean, like you know you'll get a baseline with any of them, and that's never a bad thing. Peralta is someone I like because he is known as a good clubhouse guy. Adding someone like him helps the rotation and helps the clubhouse.

    Trevor Rogers is very much statistically a pretty big upgrade too. I can't imagine anyone arguing otherwise.

    Case Mize this year was more fine than great. But would I take him over Dean Kremer and Bailey Ober? Yes I very much would.

    Which pitcher are you benching for one of those guys? 

    1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Which pitcher are you benching for one of those guys? 

    I don't see Ober back. Otherwise, IF Ryan and Lopez and Bradley and Abel and Kremer are healthy and ready to go opening day, I'd be ok with Abel or Prielipp starting out as the 6th starter and piggyback. You never have enough pitching.

    But I'm not certain that Ryan will be back either, and we have to find out if Lopez and Abel both will be fully ready to go opening day.

    If you can give me Peralta on a 3 or 4 year deal, that's a good problem to figure out.

    2 hours ago, TL said:

    Based on his words I have to think he’s intending to add at least $25MM to payroll and maybe more. If not then credibility is burned and he knows that.

    He purposely doesn't put a number on it, but you decide to.  Is so you can be upset if he doesn't hit your perceived number.  Let's see where it ends up and who it gets us, then we might have a reason to get upset, but setting a preconceived goal when he didn't is a set up to be angry later.

    30 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    Trevor Rogers, Casey Mize and Freddie Peralta tend to be considered the top arms available after Skubal. Those guys aren't upgrades. And Jeffers is on everybody's top ten free agent list, and considering catcher is is the offense's biggest hole if he departs, I'd rather have Jeffers over anyone than Skubal and maybe Seiya Suzuki.

    And that's not taking into account that the Twins don't have to convince these guys to come here, because they already are here; they're the bird in the hand. Jeffers is a bit different as he can and should refuse the Qualifying Offer, but that still leaves the Twins the exclusive window to make him an offer he'd struggle to say no to.

    Getting rid of what we have for other free agents isn't even a lateral move, it's taking a step backwards.

    I don't disagree, but none of these will make the Twins a great team.

    10 minutes ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    I don't see Ober back. Otherwise, IF Ryan and Lopez and Bradley and Abel and Kremer are healthy and ready to go opening day, I'd be ok with Abel or Prielipp starting out as the 6th starter and piggyback. You never have enough pitching.

    Going with 6 starters just shortens the bullpen and the way bullpens are used now, you can't do that.  Just make a starter the long man to get length when you need, don't preordain it.  And it really should be Kremer.

    1 minute ago, HarmonK03 said:

    Going with 6 starters just shortens the bullpen and the way bullpens are used now, you can't do that.  Just make a starter the long man to get length when you need, don't preordain it.  And it really should be Kremer.

    Sounds good to me.

    That said, Abel and Prielipp and Zebby all have the option to go to the minors if needed. Which totally works for me as you can never have enough pitching. 

    Just now, Cory Engelhardt said:

    Sounds good to me.

    That said, Abel and Prielipp and Zebby all have the option to go to the minors if needed. Which totally works for me as you can never have enough pitching. 

    I just don't want Kremer in front of them though.  I think Preilipp and Zebby have earned the right to be in the rotation at the beginning of spring training.  Having a 30 something as your 5th starter is just the same middle of the road approach.  Give the young guys a chance to develop and see if they can take the next step.

    1 minute ago, HarmonK03 said:

    I just don't want Kremer in front of them though.  I think Preilipp and Zebby have earned the right to be in the rotation at the beginning of spring training.  Having a 30 something as your 5th starter is just the same middle of the road approach.  Give the young guys a chance to develop and see if they can take the next step.

    And yeah, if Abel is truly healthy and ready to go, then I don't see Kremer ahead of him.

    I just think planning for a 162 game season, you need lots of arms. 

    But yeah, if you could promise me that each of their 5 starters would make 31 starts next year, then that's a different conversation.

    It also could be that Zebby is moved to the bullpen and Ryan and Ober are traded, and then there is just room.

    Just throwing it out; I don't know what Houston would want for Isaac Paredes, but with him being a free agent after 2027, I very much would trade something for him and then extend him.

    I think his pull power would look really good at Target Field, and I think he can play a solid 1B along with being available to play 3B in a pinch if needed. 

    He is someone I would personally target in trade that I don't think would NEED one of Lackey or Jenkins or Culpepper to acquire. 

    49 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

    It feels, to me, especially when people go to length to refer to other fans as "fans" that this becomes a battle where diehards, who are easily bought off, are lecturing others on why they should be bought off as well when all they're doing is demanding something more than words and organizational tactics that result in continued mediocrity. 

    The one thing I have zero interest in is Twins fans going after Twins fans. If you're actually spending valuable time at TwinsDaily, chances are you're a fan. Congratulations, you're in the club.

    Some of us still have some optimism left in the tank and some of us don't. I'm fine with that. Not a single one of the Twins' problems have anything whatsoever to do with the fandom.

    "The Twins did exactly what they said they were going to do,"

    "All in all, a good first step."

    NO. IT. WAS. NOT. 

    Credit is not given for doing exactly what you say you are going to do when what you did demonstrated a complete misunderstanding of your team's talent and position.

     

    3 minutes ago, LastOnePicked said:

    The one thing I have zero interest in is Twins fans going after Twins fans. If you're actually spending valuable time at TwinsDaily, chances are you're a fan. Congratulations, you're in the club.

    Some of us still have some optimism left in the tank and some of us don't. I'm fine with that. Not a single one of the Twins' problems have anything whatsoever to do with the fandom.

    It is the lowest form of sports discussion.  The absolute worst.  You've lost whatever position you hold the moment you start that lecture.  




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...