Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Offseason Primer: Can Minnesota Mimic Milwaukee's Success?


    Nick Nelson

    There are more things tying the Twins and Brewers together than geographic proximity.

    Both are mid-market teams with finite resources. Both have struggled in recent years to get over the hump in their respective divisions. And in attempting to do so, both franchises have reinvented themselves, under the leadership of baseball's two youngest head executives.

    This year, we've seen Milwaukee's vision come to fruition. As general manager David Stearns and the Brewers extend their run into late October, Derek Falvey and the Twins are looking on.

    Image courtesy of Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    This story helps set the stage for a truly pivotal offseason ahead. It's just a taste of what you'll find in the 2019 Offseason Handbook, which is currently available for preorder. If you wanna learn more about it, and the benefits of preordering, check out our FAQ. Also, we just shared our list of guest contributors you might find familiar.

    ~~~

    In December of 2011, the Cleveland Indians named Falvey and Stearns – both still in their mid-20s – co-directors of baseball operations. One year later, Stearns would be fished away by the Houston Astros, who made him their assistant GM under Jeff Luhnow. And after three years in that role, Milwaukee hired Stearns to run its front office.

    Falvey, still holding a pivotal role in Cleveland's baseball ops, was promoted to assistant GM in 2016. One year later the Twins poached Falvey from their division rivals and named him Chief Baseball Officer. They even went through the same search firm (Korn Ferry) that aided the Brewers in finding Stearns.

    Milwaukee's results in Years 1 and 2 under Stearns were nearly identical to Minnesota's under Falvey – one non-competitive season and one fairly competitive season that showed promise. Here in Year 3, it all came together for Stearns' Brewers: they won 96 games and now they're playing for a World Series bid.

    Next year will be Falvey's third in Minnesota. Can the Twins take a similar step forward under his guidance?

    In addressing this question, let's reflect on some components of Milwaukee's 2018 rise and how the Twins are implementing them in their own ways.

    Major Makeover

    In his first offseason at the helm, Stearns overturned half of Milwaukee's 40-man roster, a thorough house-cleaning in the wake of a 94-loss campaign.

    Falvey's initial tweaking was not quite as aggressive, in part because his early focus was more on changes behind the scenes, but two years after taking the job he and GM Thad Levine have reshaped the roster plenty.

    These newly hired execs weren't equipped for a complete overhaul out of the gates, due to inherited commitments. But with Joe Mauer, Brian Dozier and Ervin Santana presumably moving on, the team will be forging an entirely new identity.

    It seems likely next year's Opening Day 40-man roster will feature, at most, seven holdovers from the version Falvine took on two years ago: Max Kepler, Eddie Rosario, Byron Buxton, Miguel Sano, Jorge Polanco, Kyle Gibson and Trevor May.

    Innovative and Malleable Manager

    Like Stearns, Falvey kept his incumbent manager rather than replacing him, in what was more or less a mandate from ownership. Milwaukee's Craig Counsell, who'd been tabbed during the season to replace Ron Roenicke, was an internal hire with no formal managerial experience, much like Paul Molitor. But at 45, Counsell was considerably younger, and only a few years removed from his playing days.

    It's nigh impossible to quantify or definitively analyze a manager's impact, but Counsell sure seems to be a positive difference-maker. He embraces a discerning new-school mentality (we've seen plenty of creative tactics deployed here in October, especially with pitching usage), and perhaps most importantly, strikes a note of relatability and resonance with his players, having been in their shoes not so long ago.

    That's a trend we see around the game. Look at the other playoff teams and you see several skippers with profiles similar to Counsell: recently retired players with zero formal experience in the role. Dave Roberts (Los Angeles), Alex Cora (Boston), Aaron Boone (New York) are all under 50, and all stopped playing within the past decade. The same is true of guys like Gabe Kapler (Philadelphia) and Kevin Cash (Tampa), whose underdog squads exceeded expectations and flirted with contention.

    Now that Falvey and Co. finally have the chance to handpick their own man for the job, I suspect we'll see them follow this emerging paradigm.

    Relentless Bullpen

    One thing that's enabled Milwaukee's stunning success – especially here in October – is a deep and cleverly utilized relief corps. It helps offset an unspectacular rotation, and places the Brewers on even footing with today's high-powered bullpen units. They have perhaps the game's most dominant reliever in Josh Hader, and complement him with plenty of other high-caliber arms like Jeremy Jeffress, Corey Knebel, Dan Jennings, Brandon Woodruff, Corbin Burnes and Joakim Soria.

    In the playoffs, Counsell has been leveraging this depth to prevent his starters from seeing lineups multiple times, or even bypassing them completely – Milwaukee went with a full-on bullpen game in the first NLDS contest, defeating Colorado on the strength of its six best relievers.

    The Twins have a long way to go before boasting such bullpen strength, but they've at least got some key pieces in place. Falvey and Levine demonstrated their seriousness last winter by signing Addison Reed to the largest contract for a free agent reliever in franchise history, and while that one hasn't worked out so well, they'll doubtlessly be active again on this acquisition front.

    Subtle Additions Add Up

    Whereas deadline waffling was a signature characteristic of the Terry Ryan era, this new front office has proven bold and decisive. Taking honest stock of teams that lacked championship viability, Falvey and Levine have repeatedly seized opportunities to capture intriguing talent from other organizations.

    Stearns has benefitted hugely from one such move that took place before his arrival – in July of 2015, his predecessor Doug Melvin dealt Carlos Gomez and Mike Fiers to Houston in exchange for, among others, Hader and slugging outfielder Domingo Santana. (Ironically, Stearns was assistant GM for the Astros at the time.)

    Since taking over, though, Stearns has savvily acquired key pieces through many avenues. He claimed Junior Guerra off waivers from the White Sox. He picked up top prospect Lewis Brinson from Texas at the 2016 deadline, in exchange for Jonathan Lucroy and Jeffress, then later flipped Brinson into the headliner of the Christian Yelich trade. Stearns signed Eric Thames out of Korea, landing a cost-effective top-tier slugger. He acquired young standout starter Freddy Peralta from Seattle in the low-key Adam Lind trade of December 2015.

    "Opportunistic" is a credo that Falvey recites often, and his regime has largely lived it. That same mindset has served Stearns and the Brewers well, and as we've seen, the payoff can be huge even if not immediately apparent.

    Key Offseason Pickups

    Stearns also has some marquee acquisitions under his belt, and a couple of slam dunks last offseason have largely fueled his team's elevation here in 2018. Maybe it's just a short memory, but I have a hard time recalling two players immediately moving the needle in their first year with a new team like Yelich and Lorenzo Cain have.

    Both are credible candidates for National League MVP. Yelich is actually the odds-on favorite, having led the NL in WAR (7.6). Cain was close behind in fourth place (5.7). That's more than 13 wins added by two additions, according to FanGraphs; if the Twins were somehow able to inject a similar boost while receiving at least modest turnarounds from their internal core, a leap from 78 wins to 90+ is very feasible.

    Milwaukee's high-profile acquisitions were of a sort that Minnesota could realistically pull off this winter.

    Cain was a free agent, signed by the Brewers to a five-year, $80 million contract that now looks beyond reasonable in hindsight. The Twins have plenty of spending flexibility for such a move.

    Yelich came in a trade, which required Stearns to part with some of his most prized minor-league talent – Brinson was Milwaukee's top prospect, and among the highest-ranked in the game, while Monte Harrison and Isan Diaz also were among the organization's Top 10 – but in return the Brewers got a 26-year-old superstar under reasonable control through 2022.

    The Twins possess one of the best farm systems in the game, with premier talent at the top and plenty of depth throughout. They are well positioned to deal from this cache for assets that can make both immediate and long-term impacts. During his late-August interview with Baseball Prospectus at Target Field, Levine suggested that this route was appealing to him:

    "As we sit here today, it’s not to say we’re not going to get aggressive in this free agent market, but we may actually shift our attention to the trade market. This might not be the perfect time for us to invest in a guy who’s 30 years old and would need to perform today in order for us to realize his true potential."

    In Yelich, Milwaukee got the best of both worlds.

    As far as free agents and trade targets go, there are plenty of big names out there this offseason, making for a wealth of intrigue given Minnesota's circumstances. You'll be able to explore all of the possibilities in our 2019 Offseason Handbook, which is available for preorder. Claim your copy now, get it before its official release. Today we revealed the front cover and our star-studded lineup of guest authors.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Zero long term contracts last off season, one minor trade. No big effort to add to the team last trade deadline, just a tweak here and there. What evidence is there that they will take risks? Until they do, they haven't. So far, they've only taken the risk of trading away players for minor league players.....

     

    Thank you for answering even better than I could have. 

     

    Zero long term contracts last off season, one minor trade. No big effort to add to the team last trade deadline, just a tweak here and there. What evidence is there that they will take risks? Until they do, they haven't. So far, they've only taken the risk of trading away players for minor league players.....

    By all accounts they made an adamant effort to sign the top free agent on the market, to what would've been the biggest FA contract in franchise history. They DID sign Addison Reed to the largest RP contract. I don't really think there's any question that the willingness is there.

     

    By all accounts they made an adamant effort to sign the top free agent on the market, to what would've been the biggest FA contract in franchise history. They DID sign Addison Reed to the largest RP contract. I don't really think there's any question that the willingness is there.

     

    They weren't even close on Darvish. And, signing a RP to a 2 year deal is risk taking? That seems like a pretty low bar

     

    By all accounts they made an adamant effort to sign the top free agent on the market, to what would've been the biggest FA contract in franchise history. They DID sign Addison Reed to the largest RP contract. I don't really think there's any question that the willingness is there.

     

    Agree to disagree on this being "taking a risk"

     

    They weren't even close on Darvish. And, signing a RP to a 2 year deal is risk taking? That seems like a pretty low bar

    They reportedly offered $100M+ and he signed for $126M. How is that not close? (Also, as it turns out, they were wise to draw a line and stand their ground, despite all the immense grumbling around here.)

     

    Acting like that's not a significant step, nor committing $17M to a free agent reliever, just completely ignores the context and history of this franchise. Yes, it is a low bar, but that's just what it is. Let's be clear: the past regime never made that kind of plunge on the RP market and would've never dreamed of being a serious bidder on someone like Darvish. Do you disagree?

     

    They reportedly offered $100M+ and he signed for $126M. How is that not close? (Also, as it turns out, they were wise to draw a line and stand their ground, despite all the immense grumbling around here.)

     

    Acting like that's not a significant step, nor committing $17M to a free agent reliever, just completely ignores the context and history of this franchise. Yes, it is a low bar, but that's just what it is. Let's be clear: the past regime never made that kind of plunge on the RP market and would've never dreamed of being a serious bidder on someone like Darvish. Do you disagree?

     

    I'm not sure a 26% difference is all that close. And, let's be honest.....if it was a real effort, no, they were not "right" about the years, they were lucky they didn't bid the most. Because if we are saying they are lucky to avoid he injury, it happened in year 1, not year 4 or 5 or 6.....

     

    I don't really care about the context of Ryan and his unwillingness (or the ownership's) to spend money. They aren't competing against Terry Ryan, they are competing against the other teams in MLB. We'll know a lot more after this off season. 

     

    but, I'm not sure how anyone can look at the first two years and say this FO is risk takers.

    Edited by Mike Sixel

     

    They reportedly offered $100M+ and he signed for $126M. How is that not close?

     

    Let's be clear: the past regime never made that kind of plunge on the RP market and would've never dreamed of being a serious bidder on someone like Darvish. Do you disagree?

     

    That's EXACTLY the kind of thing the old regime did. Offer something they know won't win the bid, then tell the media how close they were or how hard they tried. 

     

    I'm not saying you are wrong in your analysis, but this new regime really hasn't proven to do anything bold as of yet. They've traded away guys that weren't coming back next year. Signed short term deals for low dollar amounts on Free Agents and traded one potential stud relief pitcher. 

     

    Maybe they will, this offseason is huge for them. 

    They reportedly offered $100M+ and he signed for $126M. How is that not close? (Also, as it turns out, they were wise to draw a line and stand their ground, despite all the immense grumbling around here.)

     

    Acting like that's not a significant step, nor committing $17M to a free agent reliever, just completely ignores the context and history of this franchise. Yes, it is a low bar, but that's just what it is. Let's be clear: the past regime never made that kind of plunge on the RP market and would've never dreamed of being a serious bidder on someone like Darvish. Do you disagree?

    Darvish wasn't going to sign without a player opt out. Any offer that didn't include one wasn't particularly close.

    Aside from that, $26 million is a pretty huge difference.

     

    Darvish wasn't going to sign without a player opt out. Any offer that didn't include one wasn't particularly close.
    Aside from that, $26 million is a pretty huge difference.

    Well, not so much when you consider the Cubs deal was for 6 years and MN's offer was most likely 5. Darvish bet against himself by very possibly taking less annually for a longer deal, and insisting on an opt-out. It was a terrible contract for Chicago and I was glad the Twins said no thanks. Said so at the time.

     

    But that is all beside the point because again, by all accounts, they were quite serious in their pursuit of the top free agent on the market.

     

    (Also, the only thing I've seen reported is that the Twins offered $100M+, why are we just assuming it was exactly 100 and running with that number? To suit the argument?)

     

     

    but, I'm not sure how anyone can look at the first two years and say this FO is risk takers.

    Well, no one said that. The original statement in question was that they are unwilling to take chances or risks. I find it dubious. They were deep in Dozier trade talks their first offseason and they were in on Darvish all of last winter.

     

    They just weren't going to take a risk that didn't make sense, and given how things have played out, I hardly think it's something to be criticized.

    If Twins FO were to follow the Brewer’s blueprint, the closest thing to the Yelich trade that they could replicate is if they were to make a trade for the D’backs’s SS/3B/2B Ketel Marte, who like Yelich, has the tools to be an All-Star (probably not MVP tho).

     

    Hypothetically, a deal for Marte would probably require giving up Stephen Gonsalves, Wander Javier, and maybe even Lamonte Wade.

    Also, if the Twins were to follow the Brewer blueprint on handling Alcala the same way the Brewers handled Hader, that would mean promoting Alcala in mid-2020 after Alcala makes a dozen starts at AAA with a 5 ERA and 6 walks per 9, in other words, so wild that he’s ineffective. And then the Twins would have to move Alcala directly to the bullpen after the promotion, and Alcala would be successful there.

     

    Seems unlikely the Twins would do something like that for a guy who “can’t find the strike zone” in AAA, or have it work out if they did.

    Edited by Hosken Bombo Disco

    Yeah the Twins could mimic the Brewers' success.... IF they acquire 2 MVP candidates and build a dominant bullpen. It's gonna take more than a few modest FA signings to live up to what the Brewers have done.

     

    In fairness, though, the Twins do have a better rotation, so the team will be built a little different. However, too much needs to get done for them to realistically turn it around that drastically in one offseason.

     

    The Twins could very well be better than 78-84 next year, but 95 wins doesn't seem particularly realistic.

    Well, not so much when you consider the Cubs deal was for 6 years and MN's offer was most likely 5. Darvish bet against himself by very possibly taking less annually for a longer deal, and insisting on an opt-out. It was a terrible contract for Chicago and I was glad the Twins said no thanks. Said so at the time.

     

    But that is all beside the point because again, by all accounts, they were quite serious in their pursuit of the top free agent on the market.

     

    (Also, the only thing I've seen reported is that the Twins offered $100M+, why are we just assuming it was exactly 100 and running with that number? To suit the argument?)

     

     

    Well, no one said that. The original statement in question was that they are unwilling to take chances or risks. I find it dubious. They were deep in Dozier trade talks their first offseason and they were in on Darvish all of last winter.

     

    They just weren't going to take a risk that didn't make sense, and given how things have played out, I hardly think it's something to be criticized.

    Perhaps they thought they were serious. But again, without a player opt out, it wasn't. Darvish wanted a player opt out, and someone was going to give him one.

     

    Yeah the Twins could mimic the Brewers' success.... IF they acquire 2 MVP candidates and build a dominant bullpen. It's gonna take more than a few modest FA signings to live up to what the Brewers have done.

     

    In fairness, though, the Twins do have a better rotation, so the team will be built a little different. However, too much needs to get done for them to realistically turn it around that drastically in one offseason.

     

    The Twins could very well be better than 78-84 next year, but 95 wins doesn't seem particularly realistic.

     

    I think 95 wins is very plausible.  For one, Cleveland is about to lose their two best players from an already weak bullpen.  Their starting staff is still awesome, but they can be challenged.

     

    For two, the team has the trade assets in the minors to supplement any signings with trade value.  In fact, of the additions they make to improve, I hope the majority come from trade.  The FA signings should hopefully fill in the gaps/bullpen.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...