Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    How the Twins Are Building a Matchup Machine

    Minnesota’s roster construction is starting to be less about stars and more about leverage.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Raymond Carlin III-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    For much of the last decade, the Twins have quietly tried to squeeze every marginal win out of their roster. Sometimes that has meant platoons. Other times, it has meant defensive flexibility or depth over star power. This offseason, a clear pattern is emerging. Minnesota appears to be leaning harder than ever into matchup play and lineup optimization.

    The most obvious signal came with back-to-back investments in switch hitters. Josh Bell and Victor Caratini were added for their overall production, their fit in the roster, and because they eliminate problems. A switch-hitter erases the need to protect a lineup spot when the opposing starter changes handedness, and that matters for a team that wants to play the percentages every night. This approach stretches well beyond those two signings and into how the entire roster fits together.

    Minnesota is under an owner-imposed payroll limit, which makes it challenging to field the best lineup. Without the ability to add star-caliber players in free agency, the front office must pivot to attempt to find a market inefficiency. So, are the Twins trying to make up for a dearth of talent with really good matchup-proofing? The short answer is probably yes, at least in part.

    The Twins do not have the payroll or the top-end depth to roll out nine everyday bats who are immune to matchups. What they do have is a collection of hitters who can be deployed strategically. Keeping Trevor Larnach at $4.475 million in arbitration fits that logic. On the surface, Larnach looks expendable. In practice, he is a valuable strong-side platoon option who can punish right-handed pitching. Last season was a down year for Larnach, but he still posted a .759 OPS against righties, matching his career total.

    A left field pairing of Larnach and Austin Martin is not flashy, but it is efficient. Larnach gets the favorable matchups where he has shown real damage potential. Martin handles left-handed pitching and adds defensive versatility and speed. In fact, Martin was one of the team’s lone bright spots in the second half last season, helped in part by his .884 OPS against southpaws. Together, they approximate a more expensive everyday option.

    That same philosophy is visible across the infield. Left-handed bat Kody Clemens can be deployed aggressively against right-handed starters. Right-handed options like Luke Keaschall, Royce Lewis, and Eric Wagaman can take on left-handed pitching without forcing the Twins to accept bad matchups elsewhere. Orlando Arcia, a veteran right-handed hitter, was brought in on a minor-league deal and has a chance to make the Opening Day roster. Brooks Lee, a switch-hitting shortstop, serves as a stabilizer, keeping the lineup from tilting too far in either direction. The Twins have options at nearly every spot.

    Even the outfield depth reflects this thinking. The left-handed group of Larnach, Matt Wallner, Alan Roden, and James Outman pairs naturally with right-handed or right-leaning options like Byron Buxton, Martin, Ryan Kreidler, and eventually Gabriel Gonzalez. Other top prospects like Walker Jenkins and Emmanuel Rodriguez are also expected to join the left-handed hitting group at some point in 2026. This is not about finding the best nine hitters. It's about finding the best nine hitters for a specific opponent each day.

    Against right-handed starters, Minnesota can stack lefties and switch hitters.

    • C: Caratini (S)
    • 1B: Clemens (L)
    • 2B: Tristan Gray (L)
    • 3B: Lewis (R)
    • SS: Lee (S)
    • LF: Larnach (L)
    • CF: Buxton (R)
    • RF: Wallner (L)
    • DH: Bell (S)

    The alignment above leaves Lewis and Byron Buxton as the lone right-handed bats.

    Against left-handed starters, the picture flips.

    • C: Jeffers (R)
    • 1B: Bell (S)
    • 2B: Keaschall (R)
    • 3B: Lewis (R)
    • SS: Lee (S)
    • LF: Martin (R)
    • CF: Buxton (R)
    • RF: Wallner (L)
    • DH: Caratini (S)

    This gives the Twins a right-leaning core. Right field becomes the lone spot needing a lefty, with Wallner the apparent choice. There will also be injuries that arise, requiring the Twins to shift pieces around. None of this screams overwhelming talent. It does scream intention.

    So, is this what we have seen in the past from the Twins, or is this a new twist? Platoons are not new in Minnesota. The Twins have lived in this space for years, especially during their recent competitive window. What feels different now is how deliberately the roster is being built around that concept, rather than falling into it out of necessity.

    In the past, platoons often existed because the Twins lacked better options. Now, they appear to be acquiring players specifically because they enable matchup flexibility. Switch hitters like Bell and Caratini are cheap fixes and targeted solutions. Keeping Larnach rather than clearing his salary suggests the team values optionality over simplicity.

    There is also more lineup insulation than before. Multiple switch hitters and right-handed bats who can move around the field reduce the risk of being exposed by a single pitching decision. This is less about reacting to matchups and more about dictating them. That shift suggests an organization leaning fully into modern roster construction. The Twins may not win many talent comparisons on paper, but they are trying to win the decision-making battle that happens before the first pitch.

    The Twins appear to be building a roster designed to win at the margins. By prioritizing switch-hitters, platoon advantages, and lineup flexibility, Minnesota is attempting to turn matchup management into a competitive edge. Whether that approach can compensate for a lack of star power remains an open question, but the plan itself is becoming increasingly apparent.


    Is this smart optimization that will squeeze extra wins out of a flawed roster, or does it place too much pressure on perfect lineup management to succeed over a full season? Leave a comment and start the discussion. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    14 minutes ago, stringer bell said:

    Even with the switch hitters, there isn't room to have a time-share at every position. Further, three right handed hitters figure to be in the lineup much more than half the time against right handed pitching--Lewis, Keaschall and Jeffers. Beyond that, Martin might be the best choice for left field most of the time. Adding the switch hitters, it looks like there are six or seven positions with a nominal "regular" and only a spot or two would be more of a platoon.  I think only two of Kreidler, Clemens, Wagaman, Roden, Green, Julien and Outman can make the team if no moves are made. It's still pretty much of a jumbled mess with only a few spots nailed down.

    I’d maybe add Buxton as a righty who would likely play every day. 😀

    2 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    Agree with giving Austin Martin a strong run as the left fielder. I also agree that Larnach-Wagaman could be a decent platoon at DH. There are already 2 pure DH guys though in Josh Bell and Matt Wallner. So somehow the glut at DH needs to be figured out. There are at least 4 DH players and this doesn't even consider the occasional usage of Buxton, Lewis, Jeffers, Caratini, or someone else (Keaschall maybe) needing time at DH from time to time.

    I propose the "glut" at DH be remedied by giving the job to whomever can produce runs.  A DH's only job.

    Then I remember that to some the RBI is a meaningless statistic.

    So confusing.

    Cody, I appreciate the general nature of your OP, but what I strongly disagree with is the implementation of HOW the Twins have built the 2026 roster to achieve better matchup situations. 

    Caratini was my IDEAL #2 catcher option. I just never expected the Twins to spend the $6-7M that it took to get him. I had thought someone like McCann for $3-4M was more likely. I honestly think, overall, catcher is stronger going in to 2026.

    I like Bell. I actually like him quite a bit. I think there's gas still in the tank! But I like him at DH, with the ability to play a little 1B once in a while.

    HERE is where I think the Twins have dropped the ball. Nathaniel Lowe is still sitting out there. He's not a GREAT player, but he's solid, and has been for most of his career. Even in a down 2025 he provided 44 XBH which included 18HR, and he still produced 84 RBI. Those would have been WELCOME numbers for the Twins in 2025. Further, he's at least a decent 1B. Even FURTHER, he's a LH hitter with SOLID career splits against LHP. Still sitting out there coming of a mediocre/poor '25 and only 30yo, might he be had for around $10M? Maybe even a 2yr deal? Take away Larnach's $4.5M, the Twins would only need to spend an additional $5.5M to bring him on board. 

    Imagine a COMPETENT 1B with solid splits, solid career numbers including a solid career .771 OPS, and generally producing 45-50 XB power. Your entire lineup suddenly changes on the 75% against RHP:

    1] Keaschall 

    2] Buxton

    3] Bell

    4] Wallner

    5] Lewis

    6] Lowe

    7] Jeffers/Caratini

    8] Lee

    9] Roden/Martin 

    LF defense is vastly improved with Martin/Roden working some sort of combination there. And Roden is at least competent in CF to give Buxton a day off. Martin is a seldom used #3 option. And you've added a competent 1B option with a history of not only being available, but is solid against LHP. Bell and Caratini are switch hitters who's career split numbers are solid.

    NOW you have, potentially, a pretty good lineup. And with a solid pair of switch hitters in Bell, and Caratini, PLUS a generally neutral hitting 1B, you've ACTUALLY achieved balance and depth, along with improved defense at TWO positions. 

    Clemens...if he only replicates 2025...is a decent LH bat with power who can play 5 spots. (He needs to get back to playing some 3B just because). And the only real hole is the 13th spot of utility player. Right now, that's Gray or Kreidler. Gray appears to be able to hit .200. Kreidler not so much. Kreidler reportedly has a great glove at SS, and can play a quality CF. Great. But if he can't hit his way out of a paper bag, maybe Gray is the better option to begin 2026. But if that was the Twins biggest issue, position player wise, it's almost a non-issue.

    Personally, I'd still be looking for a small deal, even a MILB deal, to look for a Newman, Punto type of deal and HOPING I might stumble on to  Castro type of acquisition for some 26yo who just needs a chance.

    But removing Larnach by himself for a prospect, or combined with a decent prospect of our own for a solid, potential arm for the pen, simply allows the Twins to make ONE MORE MOVE that really changes the complexion of the team.

    The math isn't hard. A rough $105M minus $5M gives the Twins $20M to spend to ONLY reach the ENDING 2025 payroll. And even that is about a $2-3M stretch. So you add Lowe for approximately $10M and add the defense, offense, and better balance I've mentioned. And you have the "luxury" of $10M left to spend on the bullpen. If Rogers was available for only $2M...that might be partially emotional...what might a couple decent, solid, RH options cost? What the Twins need is a solid, experienced arm or two to be a bridge. What if Hendricks, as an example, was healthy and wanting to prove himself again? LeClerc and Philips might be options. I have no idea of what's left on the market that might be smart additions on the temporary. But I do know nobody left is worth some $7M type deal.

    BUT I DO KNOW that you SET a lineup that ACTUALLY MAKES SENSE with a $120M payroll.  And you HAVEN'T blocked ANY prospects from debuting at any time.

    Falvey has a habit of pushing the payroll a bit. I don't always agree with his choices, but he does seem to have some "nudge' ability. I'd tell him to "nudge" the HELL out of Tom Pohlad for a $120M payroll, move Larnach for whatever in whatever scenario, SIGN Lowe, and grab the best 1 or 2 RHRP you can as bridge options.

    This really isn't that hard if ownership will just agree to a slightly less payroll than they ended in 2025. It might even be an 85 or so win team.

     

    18 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    Mr. Burns: You! Strawberry! Good effort today. Take a lap and hit the showers. I'm putting in a right-handed batter.

    Darryl Strawberry: Pinch-hitting for me?

    Mr. Burns: Yes. You're a left-hander and so is the pitcher. If I send up a right-handed batter it's called playing the percentages. It's what smart managers do to win ball games.

    Darryl Strawberry: I've got nine home runs.

    Mr. Burns: You should be very proud. Sit down. Simpson! You're batting for Strawberry.

    Homer Simpson: I am? 

    Too bad we don't have Straw.  Yeah he must be 60-ish and likely won't pass a drug test, but he is still our best corner OF.

    Back to my breakfast gin...

    On 1/20/2026 at 8:04 AM, Cody Christie said:

    Against right-handed starters, Minnesota can stack lefties and switch hitters.
    C: Caratini (S)
    1B: Clemens (L)
    2B: Julien (L)
    3B: Lewis (R)
    SS: Lee (S)
    LF: Larnach (L)
    CF: Buxton (R)
    RF: Wallner (L)
    DH: Bell (S)
    The alignment above leaves Lewis and Byron Buxton as the lone right-handed bats.

    Against left-handed starters, the picture flips.
    C: Jeffers (R)
    1B: Bell (S)
    2B: Keaschall (R)
    3B: Lewis (R)
    SS: Lee (S)
    LF: Martin (R)
    CF: Buxton (R)
    RF: Wallner (L)
    DH: Caratini (S)
    This gives the Twins a right-leaning core. Right field becomes the lone spot needing a lefty, with Wallner the apparent choice. There will also be injuries that arise, requiring the Twins to shift pieces around. None of this screams overwhelming talent. It does scream intention.

    Ladies and Gentleman. Please welcome to the stage... the short side platooners,.. Ryan Jeffers, Luke Keaschall and Austin Martin. 

    Finding an article this dumb online indicates we've reached the stage of winter when boredom and incomplete rosters is leading to frustration and hallucinations. I recommend staying away from the Submit button until Feb 10 when Truck Day articles are due, maybe getting some exercise, and lighting a candle for Derek Falvey so that he's able to complete his work without this noise in the background.  

    I'm too cheap to subscribe to a source that would provide the information, but it is my belief that in general right handed hitters are far less vulnerable to same-side pitching than left handed hitters. Putting together a roster with a number of right handed regulars and a couple of switch hitters really shouldn't be bad the majority of time against right handers and would be decent vs. lefties. That is what the Twins have with as many as five "regular" right handed hitters and three switch hitters. Having a lefty hitter or two who could rest one of several of the regulars against RH starters would be ideal. The Twins could definitely use Clemens in that role if he hits like he did last year and Caratini could cover three positions as well. 

    Back of the napkin estimates for playing time--Clemens 30 starts at first vs. RH pitching (Bell mostly to DH), 30 starts at second (Keaschall to bench), twenty assorted starts in outfield corners and third base. Caratini 60 starts behind the plate, Jeffers to DH vs. lefties, 30 starts at first base and perhaps a few DH starts. Roden 40 starts in left vs. RH pitching, 30 starts in center for Buxton rest days. Add in injuries and these guys would play even more. 

    I've said it before, but barring injury I don't see a roster spot for Julien, Outman or Jackson despite all three being out of options and not much role for Larnach either.

    17 hours ago, stringer bell said:

    I'm too cheap to subscribe to a source that would provide the information, but it is my belief that in general right handed hitters are far less vulnerable to same-side pitching than left handed hitters. Putting together a roster with a number of right handed regulars and a couple of switch hitters really shouldn't be bad the majority of time against right handers and would be decent vs. lefties. That is what the Twins have with as many as five "regular" right handed hitters and three switch hitters. Having a lefty hitter or two who could rest one of several of the regulars against RH starters would be ideal. The Twins could definitely use Clemens in that role if he hits like he did last year and Caratini could cover three positions as well. 

    Back of the napkin estimates for playing time--Clemens 30 starts at first vs. RH pitching (Bell mostly to DH), 30 starts at second (Keaschall to bench), twenty assorted starts in outfield corners and third base. Caratini 60 starts behind the plate, Jeffers to DH vs. lefties, 30 starts at first base and perhaps a few DH starts. Roden 40 starts in left vs. RH pitching, 30 starts in center for Buxton rest days. Add in injuries and these guys would play even more. 

    I've said it before, but barring injury I don't see a roster spot for Julien, Outman or Jackson despite all three being out of options and not much role for Larnach either.

    2025 All Players on all teams:

    LHH VS RHP: PA 65,309 - PBP .326 - SLG .421 - OPS .747

    RHH VS LHP: PA 34,499 - OBP .316 - SLG .405 - OPS .721 

    RHH VS RHP: PA 67,870 - OBP .308 - SLG .396 - OPS .703

    LHH VS LHP: PA 15,248 PA - OBP .299 - SLG .365 - OPS .664

    Staffing a roster ultimately comes down to individuals not the collective averages. Just get hitters who can hit period. However, From the above numbers we can make conclusions. 

    1. RHH vs RHP is the most frequent combination in baseball. It is the 3rd most profitable. 

    2. By adding the PA's on line 1 and line 3 together you get 133,179 plate appearances against right handed pitching. By adding the PA's on lines 2 and 4 together you get 49,747 plate appearances against left handers. add those numbers together and we have a total of 182,926 across the major leagues. From that league total it can be determined that LHP was on the mound for 27% of all PA's. This means 73% of all PA's were against RHP. 

    This is where I ask everyone to do the math. You have 13 roster spots and 9 starting positions. Knowing that 73% of all pitching is Right handed. Using the averages posted above. What is the optimal allocation of right handed/left handed hitters on a roster?

    If you have 13 left handed hitters. That's a .747 OPS 73% of the time and a .664 OPS 27% of the time. What will the total add up to?

    If you have 13 right handed hitters. That's a .703 OPS 73% of the time and a .721 OPS 27% of the time. What will the total add up to?

    You can only platoon 4 spots. What is the optimal allocation of right handed hitters and left handed hitters?

    Does it make sense to focus on that .664 27% of the time? Can you focus on that .664 and not ignore the .747 73% of the time. 

    By OPS... The Twins were 14th against left handers in 2025. 22nd in OPS against right handers. Is there correlation between the top OPS teams facing right handed pitching and top OPS teams in baseball. 

     

     

     

    On one hand, it's hard to build a lineup of non-platoon players when you don't have the budget to do so in free agency.

    On the other hand, wait, nope there is no other hand because you can build a lineup of non-platoon players if you develop them yourselves, but the Catch-22 is that they won't be non-platoon players if you don't let them ever hit same-handed pitching.

    The Twins just completed two crappy years in a row, and during those two years when nobody was watching and nobody cared about the team anymore, the Twins still insisted on not letting the young lefties practice against MLB left handed pitching.

    Thanks for the research @Riverbrian. There's a lot to chew on and big numbers tend to take out anomalies. We can say that in general, left handed hitters have more severe platoon splits than right handers, so the best matchup is LHH vs. RHP and the worst is LHH vs. LHP. How to avoid the latter and maximize the former is what a manager gets paid to do. If you have a team of Shohei Ohtanis or Freddie Freemans you don't worry about it. You'd rather see Freeman or Ohtani up against any lefty than see Ryan Kreidler. So get the best hitters and play them as much as you can. It's the Matt Wallners and Trevor Larnachs that need to be paired with a different handed alternative, especially Larnach (.151 OPS difference last year, .174 lifetime) without being lashed to that player. Having alternates that can rest more than one guy (Kody Clemens, Victor Caratini) gives much more flexibility in getting good matchups.

    Also, switch hitters always have the platoon advantage, but it is really worthless if they are lousy from one side. Last year Bell was dreadful against LHP, but his career OPS is a solid .751. Caratini had pretty neutral splits last year, but lifetime he's a better against RHP.

    Finally, hitting isn't everything. A player who is a superior defender and base runner can make up for hitting deficiency. Austin Martin's play after the big selloff is an example. My hope is that he can save a run or two with his glove and add some value on the bases. I can't say that about Larnach or Wallner or several other players on the roster.  

    47 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    On one hand, it's hard to build a lineup of non-platoon players when you don't have the budget to do so in free agency.

    On the other hand, wait, nope there is no other hand because you can build a lineup of non-platoon players if you develop them yourselves, but the Catch-22 is that they won't be non-platoon players if you don't let them ever hit same-handed pitching.

    The Twins just completed two crappy years in a row, and during those two years when nobody was watching and nobody cared about the team anymore, the Twins still insisted on not letting the young lefties practice against MLB left handed pitching.

    I disagree with one paragraph Nick. The Twins were in position to make postseason in '24 until August and through half of June they were relevant in 2025. It is not like they were perceived as hopeless in either season. Wallner went from facing lefties 16% of the time to 25% in 2025. Larnach went from facing lefties from 6% in 2024 to 21% in 2025. When the Twins made the playoffs in '23, they protected Kirilloff, Julien and Larnach/Wallner, but two of the three alternates (Solano and Farmer) were okay to very good. Not so much Margot.

    23 hours ago, stringer bell said:

    Thanks for the research @Riverbrian. There's a lot to chew on and big numbers tend to take out anomalies. We can say that in general, left handed hitters have more severe platoon splits than right handers, so the best matchup is LHH vs. RHP and the worst is LHH vs. LHP. How to avoid the latter and maximize the former is what a manager gets paid to do. If you have a team of Shohei Ohtanis or Freddie Freemans you don't worry about it. You'd rather see Freeman or Ohtani up against any lefty than see Ryan Kreidler. So get the best hitters and play them as much as you can. It's the Matt Wallners and Trevor Larnachs that need to be paired with a different handed alternative, especially Larnach (.151 OPS difference last year, .174 lifetime) without being lashed to that player. Having alternates that can rest more than one guy (Kody Clemens, Victor Caratini) gives much more flexibility in getting good matchups.

    Also, switch hitters always have the platoon advantage, but it is really worthless if they are lousy from one side. Last year Bell was dreadful against LHP, but his career OPS is a solid .751. Caratini had pretty neutral splits last year, but lifetime he's a better against RHP.

    Finally, hitting isn't everything. A player who is a superior defender and base runner can make up for hitting deficiency. Austin Martin's play after the big selloff is an example. My hope is that he can save a run or two with his glove and add some value on the bases. I can't say that about Larnach or Wallner or several other players on the roster.  

    How much attention should you give to 27%? Yes... Left Handed Hitters vs left handed hitters is the worst matchup for a hitter out of the 4 possibilities. Left Handed Hitters vs Right Handed pitching is the best matchup for a hitter out of the 4 possibilities and this matchup occurs 73% of the time. If you are playing matchups... Why wouldn't you want 9 left handed hitters in the lineup vs that 73%? I'm not saying that they should have 9 left handed hitters but if you are going to play the splits... isn't the 73% the right way to play the split. If you do the math. Just using the major league averages. 73% at .747 and 27% at .646 adds up to a bigger number than the right handers post at .703 73% and 721 27% of the time. Here are the numbers: The Left Handed hitter on average will hit .725 against both hands and the right handed hitter will hit .707 against both hands. 

    Now it still comes down to the player. These are just averages. However... if you are going to play the split. PLAY THE SPLIT. Who hits right handed pitching... more of them on the roster please if you have to choose.  

    The top ten teams in OPS in 2025 is the exact same top ten in team OPS vs Right handed pitchers and it's because of the 73%. Why should a team with 8 right handed hitters on the 26 man roster be searching for a right handed hitting outfielder like the Twins were doing the past three years? 

    Detroit was 2nd against left handed pitching with a team .774 OPS. They were 21st with a .712 against right handers. This created a .729 overall. The 27% doesn't drive that needle through the roof because it's only 27%. 

    On the other siide of that the Mets were 2nd against RHP with a .777. They had a .696 against LHP. That made up a .753  overall... the needle doesn't fall through the floor. 

    Why does Wallner need to be platooned. 18-46-44 and 85 plate appearances vs lefties during the development years of age 24,25,26 and 27. He got to 85 after being starved for 2 years and his stats didn't produce a huge split differential? If you increase the sample size and the numbers go up...What was the purpose of only 108 plate appearances three years prior? Is Wallner better for it? Does it compromise his development? Does he have more trade value as a player who hits both hands or as a player that requires a 4 million dollar handcuff. Has the Twins organization really thought about the future trade value of Matt Wallner during his existence? Did it matter or was strip mining for parts the sensible thing to do... create enough value to trade him for a reliever down the road when the team goes into sell mode?

    Was Kyle Schwarber a lefty killer in his early days? How do you become Kyle Schwarber? 

    I'll stick my head in the lions mouth in regards to Larnach. 118 Plate appearances against lefties and his numbers got better. Yeah I get it... .600 OPS against lefties is well below average and everyone is dragging his body into the ditch at the moment but it appears that his number is higher with more AB's then it was with barely any AB's. I don't know... I'm just of the impression that exposure is helpful and I also assume that coaches do something? 

    Both Wallner and Larnach had more AB's last year against left handed pitchers than they had in their entire career. It wasn't a disaster. The Twins were ranked 14th against left handed pitching. They were 22nd against right handed pitching. The Twins were absolutely willing to give Brooks Lee 487 AB's for a .655 OPS. Why were they willing to do that. They assume he will get better so you let him work through it. I don't have a problem with this... but if you are willing to Brooks Lee work through it for 487 AB's. What exactly is the damage done by .600 OPS vs left handers 27% of the time? Royce Lewis is allowed to OPS .671 for 376 AB's. That's OK... Royce can use these moments to get better... more comfortable... we will give him another a year of that if he needs it. It's OK... we will counter those two struggling by pinch hitting for Wallner in the 5th inning. 

    I loved Solano he saved us from Gallo. However... while his splits were neutral his plate appearances were not. 254 AB's against Right Handers - 140 vs Left Handers. 

    I hated Margot. 159 AB's against right handers - 156 vs Left Handers. So what exactly is the virtue of rostering a short side specialist. 

    Are we going to keep spending 4 million for these guys... Are we going to Kill a developing Austin Martin and hold him to short side platoon duties. Maybe a 50-50 split like Margot put togethes. 

    And one last consideration. Injuries. What happens when your right handed short sider gets hurt. Are the Twins now obligate or pot committed to call up Fedko instead of Erod because your right hander went down? Do you call up GG and make him a short sider to fill that role so Larnach doesn't have to hit left handers. If you don't call up Fedko... that guy you have been sheltering has got to face left handers all of sudden. Theoretically will a left handed hitter be more comfortable facing Chapman in the 9th inning in September or the playoffs with a decent number of AB's against left handers during the season or constant pinch hitting or bench time when the lefties are on the mound?  

    I sound anti-platoon. I'm not totally... I've just become jaded watching the Twins make the platoon split the primary split in regards to playing time. 

    All of this is budget related. All of things that they I type about over and over again are budget related. The Twins can't afford Joc Pederson and Randall Grichuk because it will leave no money left over to sign Pete Alonso. The only way they will be able to afford Pete Alonso is if they are able to develop a large number of young players making the minimum. We are not doing that. We took every developing left hander, strip mined them for parts and developed them to the point that they must be paired with Margot or Solono. The Twins will not become what we want them to become until they start giving young players full commitment to major league development. Lately... you only get that if you are right handed because of our strange fear of that 27%.  

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...