Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Are the Twins Ready to Shake Up Their Catching Corps?


    Cody Christie

    Christian Vázquez and Ryan Jeffers have provided stability behind the plate for the Twins over the last two seasons. With the front office looking to shake up the roster, though, is trading a catcher one way to balance the books?

    Image courtesy of © Brad Rempel and Jordan Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    For the past two seasons, the Minnesota Twins have utilized a rotational approach at catcher, splitting time between Christian Vázquez and Ryan Jeffers. This tandem has benefited the team, keeping both players fresh over the grind of a 162-game season. However, the offensive inconsistencies of both players and the team’s payroll limitations have led to growing rumors that the Twins might part ways with one of their catchers. Could this be the offseason where Minnesota reshapes its catching situation?

    The Value of the Rotation
    In 2023 and 2024, the timeshare between Vázquez and Jeffers worked as intended. Vázquez’s veteran presence helped stabilize the pitching staff, while Jeffers showed flashes of his offensive upside, highlighted by a 133 OPS+ in 2023. Their regular availability allowed the team to focus on other areas of the roster and not worry about who was behind the plate on any given day.

    This approach also allowed both catchers to stay healthy, a key factor considering the physical toll catching takes. Jeffers has had his share of injury concerns in the past, but splitting time allowed him to avoid the injured list for two straight seasons. Vázquez, meanwhile, brought stability to the role, though his offensive contributions have continued to decline; he's posted a 62 OPS+ in his two years with the Twins. He has never been considered a strong offensive player, but this is a nearly 20-point drop compared to his OPS+ for his career. 

    Payroll Crunch and Trade Rumors
    While the system has worked defensively, the financial side complicates the picture. Vázquez is set to earn $10 million in 2025, the final year of his contract. For a team already facing payroll constraints, that’s a hefty price for a catcher whose offensive production has dipped. Jeffers is projected to earn $4.7 million in arbitration. He offers a cheaper alternative, but has yet to prove he can handle the full workload of an everyday starter.  

    The Twins are reportedly exploring trade opportunities, and Vázquez’s salary makes him the likelier candidate to be dealt. However, Jeffers has more trade value because he has multiple years of team control, comes at a cheaper cost, and has more offensive upside. But trading either catcher would leave Minnesota with a significant question: Who steps in to fill the void?

    Is Jaír Camargo Ready?  
    Jaír Camargo is the only other catcher currently on the Twins’ 40-man roster, but the team showed minimal trust in him during his brief stints in the majors last season. Despite having multiple stints at the big-league level, Camargo never started a game behind the plate, logging just seven plate appearances across five games. He went 0-for-6 with one walk and three strikeouts in a minimal sample.

    The organization’s hesitation to use him as a catcher speaks volumes. Camargo has a reputation for having a strong arm and plus raw power at the plate, but concerns about his receiving and game-calling abilities likely explain his limited usage. With the Saints, he has worked with many of the organization’s top prospects, like David Festa and Zebby Matthews, so that might help him gain traction at the big-league level. He hit .212/.290/.403 with 16 doubles and 12 home runs in 75 games for Triple-A St. Paul in 2024. Whether the Twins believe those skills will translate to baseball’s highest level is unclear. 

    What's the Catching Plan?  
    If the Twins trade Vázquez, they must trust Camargo to step into a rotational role or acquire another catcher. Internal candidates like Ricardo Olivar or Noah Cardenas could eventually enter the conversation, but neither is likely ready for a significant role in 2025. The free-agent catching market is thin, and any trade involving Vázquez would likely need to include a veteran replacement.  

    Alternatively, the Twins could lean more heavily on Jeffers as the primary catcher while using Camargo sparingly. This strategy would shift Jeffers into a role he has never held at the big-league level. Would the Twins risk such a move in a season where their margin for error feels razor-thin?  

    Trading Vázquez could provide the Twins with financial flexibility to address other roster needs, but it comes with significant risks. Camargo’s readiness is a major question mark, and the Twins can’t afford a step back defensively at catcher. While Jeffers’s emergence as a potential everyday player is intriguing, it’s fair to wonder whether Minnesota’s catching tandem is worth breaking up. The team’s decision this offseason will send a clear message about its priorities heading into 2025.  


    Do the Twins value continuity and defensive stability, or are they willing to gamble on a cheaper option? Will either catcher be traded? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Gabriel Gonzalez

    St. Paul Saints - AAA, OF/1B
    On Friday night at CHS Field, Gabby went 2-for-3 in both ends of the Saints doubleheader. He played 1B in Game 1 and was in Right Field for the second game.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, JD-TWINS said:

    In a perfect world they trade Jeffers - Castro - Matthews - Paddack - Henriquez to AZ for their Catcher (Moreno) and Jordan Montgomery (Twins take on $12M). AZ gets rid of a mutually bad situation with Montgomery and they get value back!

    If we could land Moreno, we'd have our starting catcher. Then we could trade both Jeffers & Vazquez. But I haven't seen any indication that they'd be interested in trading him. One veteran catcher that I have my eye on is Victor Caratini (HOU). IMO he is underrated, he has very good defensive skills & his hitting has improved to above avg. He's HOU's backup catcher, but has the ability to start & has 1 year left. If we bring a very beneficial trade to Hou, they could be persuaded.

     

    2 hours ago, In My La Z boy said:

    Exactly this!
    We have one more year to ride out the Vazquez decision we made 3 years ago. Trying to undo it now opens us up to trouble if Jeffers breaks a leg in April. 

    Trying to undo it is disaster regardless of Jeffer's health.

    1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

    Ty France is 30 years old and he has never caught a single game all the way back to high school. His only experience at "catching" is when the Padres technically designated him as their emergency catcher a few years ago. Like when the Twins designated Eduardo Escobar as their emergency catcher.

    I'd imagine it'd take years for France to get up to speed, but I don't exactly see the problem with giving him a MiLB contract, except he's already had guaranteed MLB offers made to him.

    He caught at the Padres alternate site in 2020. So probably a little more experience than Escobar, but certainly nothing useful. Trying to become an MLB catcher at the age of 30 is pretty desperate, though. His bat fell apart real fast after 2022.

    2 hours ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    Yeah, but Vazquez's framing and defense are superior to what Jeffers has shown. 

    But, but, but......"framing" was the argument for signing Jason Castro. It won't be long until robo umps put those guys out of a job. (and we won't have to put up with a Angel Hernandez type any longer).

    12 minutes ago, Fred said:

    But, but, but......"framing" was the argument for signing Jason Castro. It won't be long until robo umps put those guys out of a job. (and we won't have to put up with a Angel Hernandez type any longer).

    I know, but for today and this season that isn't a thing. That's all. 

    19 minutes ago, Bigfork Twins Guy said:

    If this guy rates higher than Carmago, it may be an easy way to inject some catching that is ready or almost ready into the organization.  The only hitch is as a rule 5 draftee, I think that they'd have to keep him on the major league roster for the entire season or offer him back to SD correct?

    Yup, that's it. So it would definitely be a gamble. 

    I assume they could just trade for him if they liked him between now and the rule 5 draft. That or if they did take him in the draft, and they liked him but didn't want to keep him on the roster, they could work out a trade for him in season.

    15 minutes ago, GNXman said:

    Twins will trade  Vazquez and then half way into the season Jeffers will break down and the Twins will have nothing at catcher. Then they'll wonder what happened....

    I also truly enjoy just planning out for the worst case scenario. Truly a joy to look at life that way :)

    4 hours ago, Heiny said:

    It's not often that a team can go through a full season with two catchers and both staying healthy.  The Twins have done it for two years in a row.  Can that last?  I wouldn't be against keeping both for 2025 for the stability.  But sooner or later they are going to have to come up with some decent catching prospects or pay for a free agent catcher again.  My preference would be to try to trade for Teel(no idea what it would take).  IMO Camargo is AAA for emergency callup only.  Time to start drafting and developing young catchers.  We drafted a couple last year.  Do the Twins feel they will someday be MLB caliber.  I am also on the list of people who think playing both Jeffers and Vasquez at the same time with one being DH is poor managing.  Neither should be DHing, especially Vasquez.  By eating Vaszuez's salary for one more year at least gives us an acceptable catching tandem for 2025 and one more year to figure something else out.  But upgrading for 2025 would be optimal if it's Vasquez they can trade.  The paltry self-imposed salary is the biggest problem.  Maybe we could get a loan from the Dodgers with deferred payments.

    Here's a trade I came up with to give you an idea  https://www.baseballtradevalues.com/trades/177002

    I followed Teel since he was in college. IMO he'll be a great catcher & advocating trading for him since we didn't get him in the draft. Now BOS knows who they have & they're not giving him up. Even in a win now mode, they'll try to fill their needs via FA & trades that don't include him.

    There are other trade MLB-ready prospects, there those who are blocked & those who we can offer Jeffers. Those who are blocked are (MIL) J Quero (LAD) Rushing (SEA) Ford & (BAL) Basallo. Those that'd need Jeffers in the trade is (CO) Romo & Carrigg, (CWS) E Quero & if we have a chance (BOS) Teel.

    We should have been always drafting & developing catchers because they are a premium & expensive to obtain. Our catching depth is a shamble. The best avenue now is trading for one but it'll take serious trade offers. 

    49 minutes ago, Bigfork Twins Guy said:

    The only hitch is as a rule 5 draftee, I think that they'd have to keep him on the major league roster for the entire season or offer him back to SD correct?

    Wait until the draft is over and trade for him if he's undrafted.

    6 hours ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    This might FEEL like digging to the bottom of the barrel. But the Padres left a catcher available in the rule 5 draft named Brandon Valenzuela. He played mostly at AA, and had 27 games at AAA for them this past year. His overall numbers were not strong, but he is apparently known more for his defense than his offense anyway. Fangraphs has him (as of July) as their #6 overall prospect, and MLB has him as their #12. Just thinking, if they were to move on from Vazquez (for example) I'd ALMOST rather than make a move for this guy (or take him in the rule 5 draft) compared to throwing 3 million at someone like Yan Gomes.

    Maybe I'm crazy. Don't answer that.

     

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=valenz001bra

    My impression of Rule 5 is that the guy has to be on MLB roster - maybe wrong? Anyway, $2.5M is well spent v. having a guy that has 75 AAA at bats……..unimpressive AB’s as well ……..,can’t go there.

    Trade for a Catcher - young guy that can play - not a high draft pick that’s “expected to pan out eventually”. Give up players to solve this - trade Jeffers to fill the young guy’s spot in trade partner organization. Pitching & an everyday player - whatever they need to piece together to bring the right guy to the Twins.

    3 hours ago, Doctor Gast said:

    If we could land Moreno, we'd have our starting catcher. Then we could trade both Jeffers & Vazquez. But I haven't seen any indication that they'd be interested in trading him. One veteran catcher that I have my eye on is Victor Caratini (HOU). IMO he is underrated, he has very good defensive skills & his hitting has improved to above avg. He's HOU's backup catcher, but has the ability to start & has 1 year left. If we bring a very beneficial trade to Hou, they could be persuaded.

     

    They don’t have any intention of trading Moreno……that’s why you give them 5 players (3 pitchers of differing value - a solid catcher - an All-star Utility guy) & take Montgomery off their hands. They need to be enticed!

    7 hours ago, In My La Z boy said:

    Great write up! 
    Shaking up the catching corps doesn't feel wise and doesn't feel like it should be a priority. How many other teams made it through 162 last year with their 2 primary catchers playing every game? Probably not many? I understand Vazquez isn't earning his $10M, but to spend $15M between the 2 and cover 162 decently, not spectacularly, but decently, it just seems as if we have many other areas to be concerned with. The catching corps is currently not broken, and if we move either one, we open ourselves up for trouble in my opinion.

    Trade a Veteran catcher to a contender for a young guy that’s ready to play 60 games in ‘25. IMO, either Vazquez or Jeffers could catch 100 games reasonably well. OR, trade one of our Catchers, plus a couple arms for a reasonably established catcher and keep splitting duties 50/50.

    17 minutes ago, JD-TWINS said:

    They don’t have any intention of trading Moreno……that’s why you give them 5 players (3 pitchers of differing value - a solid catcher - an All-star Utility guy) & take Montgomery off their hands. They need to be enticed!

    I like your attitude! 

    9 hours ago, nicksaviking said:

    The difference between a 10M back up catcher and a 1M back up catcher tends to be negligible. Still, getting rid of Vazquez and basically doing nothing with the savings just because ownership has some magic payroll number doesn't turn me on at all.

    I'm not sure why anyone wants to get rid of Jeffers though. Even if he was just average, that's more than fine with this position.

    I'm also not going to assume Camargo can't cut it just because Baldelli refused to use him. Maybe he is terrible, but Baldelli ALWAYS avoids using the young players until he's no longer able to. So his lack of usage means next to nothing.

    Camargo hit .212 in St Paul - he had a .290 something OBP…….he makes Vazquez’ offense look like Yogi Berra. He didn’t play because he’s not a great receiver and he can’t hit. Any sensible MLB Manager would not play him unless forced into it due to unfortunate circumstance.

    The fact that the Twins have no apparent Catcher with upside in their system is hard to imagine. Olivera plays Catcher & OF……doesn’t seem to be a great option either. This is a draft and development issue……nothing to do with the Manager.

    It’s a shame for sure!

    I’d try to lump Jeffers in a trade with an arm or two in order to get back a solid young Catcher. Need to find a trade partner that’s competitive and would value the addition of Jeffers along with pitching g help (Paddack - Matthews - whoever)

    At this time last year I had high hopes for Camargo and Cardenas, but both significantly regressed last season.  Chris Williams continues to show offensive promise but has now given up on the Twins and has chosen free agency.  He will get the obvious invite to spring training someplace, but he has yet to show himself worthy of being trusted defensively at the big league level during games that count.

    It is hard for me to get excited about trade scenarios for Vazquez.  Nobody else is going to want to pay him what the Twins are.  

    9 hours ago, JD-TWINS said:

    Camargo hit .212 in St Paul - he had a .290 something OBP…….he makes Vazquez’ offense look like Yogi Berra. He didn’t play because he’s not a great receiver and he can’t hit. Any sensible MLB Manager would not play him unless forced into it due to unfortunate circumstance.

    Why is he still on the 40 man? Why was he ever on the 26 man? 

    .575 OPS is a bar so low to clear that it is almost under ground. 

    On 12/5/2024 at 10:14 AM, Fire Dan Gladden said:

    Upgrading at Catcher is should be far down the list of priorities for the Twins this offseason.  If something falls into their laps, then they would take a look, but this is probably a non-starter.

    They will scrap-heap another 4A catcher or two this offseason for insurance.

    We have had a problem at catching since '22 Jeffers's trade value bottomed out, We put a Band-Aid on it '23 where Jeffers was put in a supportive role & he excelled & his trade value skyrocketed. In '24 he had an equal tandem role & his production stalled & dipped greatly as his trade value. In '25 if Jeffers is put in a primary role his trade value with his production will bottom out, if put in an equal tandem role his trade value will slightly dip to where he is right now. Jeffers isn't a starting catcher now or ever, we need a starting catcher now & in the future. In '23 was the best time to trade Jeffers & even right now we can still land a future starting catcher with Jeffers in conjunction with others in trade, in the future I doubt it. It also takes time for a catcher to settle in under normal situations. If we wait for it to get really bad it makes it that much worse to break in a new catcher. Very soon Jeffers will want an exorbitant amount to be extended for being a backup catcher. I hope this FO isn't stupid enough to do that. Jeffers has no future here so why wait? 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...