TheLeviathan Old-Timey Member Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Honestly, I don't think that matters. There are some reasons Dougie might not be a good manager but that's probably not one of them. A manager's job (I think) it almost universally to keep the team together. Look at Dusty in Washington, Leyland in Detroit, Bochy in SF. All three have been criticized over the years about their level (or lack thereof) of embracing "new stats". In-game managing is massively overrated by us fans mostly b/c that's the only part of managing that we really get a sense of. Look - he may be a great clubhouse guy, but by most accounts so was Gardy. Is it so much to ask that we look for someone with the full picture? I still haven't given up on Molly, but the idea that Doug is "new" could not be more wrong.
bird Verified Member Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 You and I will be going through a flock of crows at the rate the Twins are failing. That would be a MURDER of crows. Look it up.
twinssporto Verified Member Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 An update: a quick glance at B-Ref shows the following 23 teams since 2000 starting 5-14 or worse in their first 19 games: 2015 MIL2014 HOU, ARI2013 HOU, SDP, MIA2012 MIN, KCR, SDP2011 none2010 BAL2009 WAS2008 WAS2007 none2006 PIT, FLA, KCR2005 KCR2004 MON2003 DET2002 DET, TEX2001 DET, TBD2000 DET Note the regular presence of an AL Central team from 2001-2006. Average finish among this group was 65 wins. Best finish was 2000 Detroit with 79 wins. 2006 Marlins reached 78 wins, and the 2012-2013 Padres both got to 76. The remaining 20 teams all lost 90+ games (72 or fewer wins). EDIT: This was just for fun/trivia/curiosity. Some of these teams started worse than 5-14, 5-14 isn't functionally that different than 6-13, etc.So your saying there's a chance!?
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Look - he may be a great clubhouse guy, but by most accounts so was Gardy. Is it so much to ask that we look for someone with the full picture? I still haven't given up on Molly, but the idea that Doug is "new" could not be more wrong.Who has a full picture? Maddon doesn't - he just did what the FO told him. I mean, yeah, search high and low for a replacement. I'm certainly not sold on Dougie but the reasons you suggested for not hiring him were reasons that, I think, are relatively not important in the grand scheme of things.
Mr. Brooks Verified Member Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Honestly, I don't think that matters. There are some reasons Dougie might not be a good manager but that's probably not one of them. A manager's job (I think) it almost universally to keep the team together. Look at Dusty in Washington, Leyland in Detroit, Bochy in SF. All three have been criticized over the years about their level (or lack thereof) of embracing "new stats". In-game managing is massively overrated by us fans mostly b/c that's the only part of managing that we really get a sense of.I think Molitor is proving that last sentence wrong with his baffling incompetent in game moves.
kab21 Verified Member Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Except the Twins are clearly trying to win this year, just like last year. They didn't call up young guys last year to get acclimated for this year, and so far this year, they are going with old guys in the rotation and bullpen (and signed a 29 year old DH, and just cut their only catching depth for a 34 yo OF that can't field).This year and last year are completely different. Last year they were 3 GB of a wild card although they should have made some other moves (like calling up Berrios in the bullpen). This year they could play .500 ball and still be 9 games under .500 at the end June. At that point you would hope that they would start making some moves to a younger team. Park is one of the reasons for optimism regardless that he is 29. But he needs to show that he is a plus MLB player this season.
TheLeviathan Old-Timey Member Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Who has a full picture? Maddon doesn't - he just did what the FO told him. I mean, yeah, search high and low for a replacement. I'm certainly not sold on Dougie but the reasons you suggested for not hiring him were reasons that, I think, are relatively not important in the grand scheme of things. They can be important for lineups and what you emphasize that your players do well. If you're going to get caught up in RBIs and other nonsense for that than I really don't want you as manager. I don't care why Maddon generally approaches things from a smart perspective...I just care that he does. I feel like Dougie would be going back to TK and I'm just done with that kind of thinking. The manager has been an issue so far, but it's the GM we should be talking about.
jokin Old-Timey Member Posted April 27, 2016 Posted April 27, 2016 Everyone is jumping on the seemingly obvious choice of Milone, but hasn't Gibson already made himself (at least) temporarily expendable out of the rotation???: Gibson ERA/xFIP- 6.10/5.54K/BB- 11/12K*9/BB*9- 4.79/5.23 which makes Tommy Milone look "good" by comparison-MiloneERA/xFIP- 5.87/3.71K/BB- 12/4K*9/BB*9- 7.04/2.35 (Does Gibson have an option left? It seems it's either that or a trip to the DL if this continues...) As I was saying... something was definitely wrong this season, especially in Washington. Goes to show there's more than one way to (finally) get their best pitching prospect to the majors-- that way of course being- utter desperation.
Kaelen Culpepper St. Paul Saints - AAA SS At long last, Kaelen Culpepper has been called up to the Twins! Explore Kaelen Culpepper News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.