Jump to content
Our first free agents ranking has launched, click here to see the top 40+ names in free agency! ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    25,657

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. nicksaviking
    You're not really going to start insisting on reasonable doubt? Did another club benefit from Santana last year? The Braves are under budget and were needing pitching going into the off season. The probably made no effort to sign him because they knew.
  2. nicksaviking
    Ryan can't be blamed for Santana taking steroids, but he can be blamed for signing a 32 year old pitcher with a torn UCL to a four year deal. It's not just armchair fans who were critical of the move, most pundits nationally couldn't figure out why a team on the verge of promoting its young talent would do that to the roster.
  3. nicksaviking
    The Braves should not be benefitting from a draft pick when they were the team benefitting from Santana's cheating.
  4. nicksaviking
    In the business world they call it inside information. In the underground gambling world they call it losing at Russian Roulette.
  5. nicksaviking
    I don't like the idea that the local homer media types will now use this as an excuse for the Twins front office, ignoring every national publication that predicted a terrible 2015 for the Twins before the Santana incident. They're just not making wise decisions. The poor decision to sign an aging pitcher was bad, but now they are making bad auxiliary moves in reaction to it. I know plenty of front office supporters would even agree. I like the men in charge as actual human beings, but this can't continue. Why is this team so damn old after so many losing seasons? What will it take to get new people in charge who will sacrifice the now for the future?
  6. nicksaviking
    What?! I thought we agreed to riot if Milone got the job over May. I was wondering where all you guys were.
  7. nicksaviking
    While I think we are all hoping for this, that means there's a ton of players to clear off the 25-man. Unless we're talking a ton of significant injuries, it wouldn't seem to me the front office would be comfortable losing 11 players even if many of the posters here may. Sano alone would seem to make Plouffe, Hunter, Arcia, Mauer or Vargas have to move. We're not even talking about the cutable guys like Herrmann, Schaffer or Robinson. Then make room for ten more guys? I don't think the team is OK with this much in season turnover.
  8. nicksaviking
    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/division-preview-al-central/ Well technically they predict the Twins to improve as they don't give them 90 losses, but... "With no great teams and only one franchise not really trying to contend this year," Zing! "Unfortunately, the Twins have spent nearly every other position on the field not making similar bets, so instead of high-upside gambles, Hughes and Dozier are surrounded by aging mediocrities like Ervin Santana, Ricky Nolasco, Torii Hunter, and Kurt Suzuki." Double zing! "Minnesota probably should have taken some more fliers on upside plays rather than trying to limit their downside potential" Yowza! "The resulting combination is a team that will not be good nor likely very interesting" Burn!
  9. nicksaviking
    But I could care less if Plouffe and Dozier start losing velocity due to the natural decline that comes with a build up of innings and age.
  10. nicksaviking
    I find using FICO scores are the most accurate. Have you seen them? Not pretty.
  11. nicksaviking
    I feel the same way, yet in all honesty, there's really nothing I actually inherently dislike about them. During the WS I had a teacher ask the class who everyone was cheering for, six kids said the Braves. One maybe two kids may have had a legit claim to fandom, but six? Hell no, they just wanted to be contrarians in Twins Nation and provoke an indignant outburst from Twins faithful the teacher surely wasn't expecting when presenting the question. Through no fault of the team, those kids turned the Braves rotten for me since. I have little ill will toward the Cardinals, and probably only because I had a teacher who had the foresight not to turn her English lesson into a barstool debate in 1987.
  12. nicksaviking
    Not a banner class. There's a few there that must be added, but a majority are still to uncertain, raw or lacking upside to need to worry about losing. Of course the team always tends to have a different vision for who gets added than we do.
  13. nicksaviking
    I agree, except I think you're being generous to Fein. Andrew Miller and Wade Davis certainly would take exception.
  14. nicksaviking
    I'm interested in Brown as he's a former top propsect who lost his luster but can play CF. On the other hand, that's basically Aaron Hicks last year, and Jordan Schaffer a couple years before that and Shane Robinson before that. Add him to the collection and then snag Joe Benson when the Braves eventually DFA him too.
  15. nicksaviking
    So runners on 2nd and 3rd no outs in a tie game in the 7th and the only guys available who have good enough stuff to reasonably hope for a strike out is the Rule V rookie or the closer?
  16. nicksaviking
    Of equal concern to me: Who can get righties out?
  17. nicksaviking
    Very true, but Bryant and Boras were taking the expected Boras hard line and did take negotiations right to the wire. The Cubs probably at that time had a good idea what cards they were being dealt should they want to talk extension later. Those cards likely being a duece and a seven. However on the otherhand, Appel signed early and at a discount. He was/is also represented by Boras. That might indicate to a team he would be willing to sign an extension down the road. Of course now that I listed those two different examples from the same draft, it may indicate that the player is more to blame than the agent. Which makes me want to delete this post, because I'm not much for defending Boras.
  18. nicksaviking
    Mauer will be fine if he goes ahead and makes a concerted effort in beating the Mauer shift, he always was a good enough hitter to do what he wanted with the ball anyway. However it was clear last year that he needed to adjust, and he didn't, so I'm not sure he's willing or able to adjust any longer.
  19. nicksaviking
    To keep it in the division I picked the White Sox, however I would have also been happy picking the Yankees, Red Sox or Cubs, basically any team that ESPN and other national outlets tell me that I'm supposed to care about.
  20. nicksaviking
    The Twins love their soft-tossing lefties, though I guess not enough to protect this one. It's getting a little crowded at Rochester and the big club though, I would have thought the Twins would have been more than willing to work out a trade with the Mets, but the fact that the Mets are keeping him may indicate that there were some discussions and the Twins told them to suck it. Anyway, I'm good with any outcome that keeps 88 mph meatballers out of the system.
  21. nicksaviking
    Yup, this is really the true issue with Boras. Are owners greedy? Duh, it's a given and won't change. But this isn't an issue of greed, it's an issue of keeping a player for as long as the CBA allows, why wouldn't every team and every fan want to do that? Like you said, the Cubs may be receptive to brining Bryant up if he had an agent that was willing to discuss an early career extension. He doesn't.
  22. nicksaviking
    They could change the formula completely. Something along your second idea would be easy enough. Service time is tied to calendar years, starting in August or perhaps September. Any player called up prior to August/September, no matter how many games played, has his clock start that season. Players called up after August 1st/September 1st will be considered 1st year players for the following season. Team's aren't going to be likely to keep MLB ready players down nearly all year then, the temptation will then be to screw with service time around July for any mid-season call up, however that's when teams are still trying to position themselves for playoff runs and thinking about the trade deadline.
  23. nicksaviking
    I like it, the Joe Benson kerfuffle was a pretty hot topic here on TD for quite awhile. I can't believe it was only 2013 when this Benson business all happened though, it seems like ages ago. Nothing worng with a walk down memory lane. I would be just as amused with a Michael Restovich comeback thread, a guy I was more incredulous about losing. Ha silly past me, getting all worked up over nothing. Good thing present me is more rational Besides most people seem to be taking this thread lightly as was clearly your intention. Edit: I guess I hadn't read page 2 yet.
  24. nicksaviking
    I'm for getting the young guys to the majors, but if it's Buxton and Sano I delay them two weeks to save a year. Plus, I love seeing Boras get dirt kicked in his face, no one wants to see the richest kid in the room get everything he wants all the time. Yeah, I have issues, I know. Seems like a pretty easy fix for the Players Union, that is if they gave a damn about the guys who only dream about being in the union one day.
  25. nicksaviking
    For pitchers, I'm very on board for limited innings at the upper levels. Again, not sure what they can learn in the minors they can't at the majors.
×
×
  • Create New...