First off ... by time I wasn’t referring to lock him up ... but some form of punishment, such as community service, an appropriate numbers of it. And yes, he obviously needs help. But until he gets it and can prove that he will no longer be a menace to society he should be on a sexual offender list. And yes, he should be subject to every civil suit out there. What he did IS a crime, and I don’t think it should be treated less just because it’s 'only a misdemeanor’ and/or he needs help. he should be subject to punitive consequences AS WELL AS get help. He KNEW what he did was wrong and could have gotten help for it long ago. Instead he used his clout to intimidate silence. But let’s not get into the mental health discussion here and confuse it. It’s too easy for people to lump crime and mental health together when I don’t think that’s most often the case, especially violent crime. Yeah, we all think that there has to be something wrong with individuals who do things like this, but that is not the definition of mental illness. As to violent crime, those committing violent crimes are those who have likely been victims themselves. It stems more from past abuse and issues of anger more than mental illness. Yes, a mental health component could certainly help, no doubt, and that availability and accessibility is certainly a plus. But we have become too quick to blame mental health for crime, and I think that’s a bit of excuse making and tends to label those with mental health issues into the wrong category. I think you are trying to conflate crime and mental health.