It's a difficult job to write ... to identify what you want to write about, put some thought and research/analysis behind it, and be brave enough to put it out there for all to see. It's a tough job and I recognize that and appreciate the output of most all of the writers on this site because I can see the effort that went into it, whether or not I agree with it. It's something that I am not brave enough to do. And this site has done a terrific job putting together writers who do their due diligence and put out thoughtful and though-provoking articles; it's what sets it apart from the STrib comments, from Twitter, from other 'run-of-the-mill', 'fly-by-night' sites. However, the Donaldson article put out today (yesterday) lacked all of what I have come to expect from the output at this site ... thoughtful, due-diligence, effort. There is a huge difference between putting out something that is thought-provoking to inspire response and discussion than putting out something that is nothing more than a Twitter 'post and run' kind of thing. I'm sorry if that seems harsh, but that's what it is. I prefer the 'quality over quantity' that most every writer on this site follows. Articles like the recent Donaldson article, well ... that is something you expect to see in the forums from some random poster (and honestly, most of our posters do better than that) ... not a front-page article.