To answer John's original question... I'm one of the ones against the Buxton pick, and so far he's making me look wrong. I do hope that he continues to do so, but I think there needs to be some pause here. First, this is 1 week into the season. Players do what Buxton has done thus far for short periods of time... all the time. While it's nice, he needs to keep the torrid start going for at least a month (if not 2) before he heads to Florida. To answer the other question, my problem with BPA relates to the subjectivity of it. Who would you rather have on your team, Griffey in his prime, or mid 90s pedro in his prime? Personally, I'd lean towards the pitcher, but when you are looking at ceilings, all of these guys are top. You then have to price in risk, floor, and a whole bunch of other factors. To this day, I don't see that much of a difference between Buxton and Appel (or Gausman, Zimmer,etc) as they all had ace type potential and are much closer to the show. Hopefully, the Twins made the right call here. So far, it looks very promising, but we need much more time to make that determination. As regards to this draft, again, I don't think there's going to be some guy that just stands out above the rest. The standout guys right now appear to Appel and Gray. I doubt either are there at 4. They will likely have to choose between one or two OFers, Manaea, and Anderson. In this situation, I'd think long and hard at drafting for need with an underslot pick. If Anderson, for instance, would take 2M, then sign him and take the 2M savings and go after one of the prep bats that are looking to slip due to signability. I seem to remember a HS 3B that was looking like a mid first rounder that was leaning hard towards college. Draft him in a later round and put the 2M on him and see if he bites. That would yield two first rounders with 1 pick.