Wow, page 8 into this thread and lots to say. I have to disagree a bit with you Brock on Sanchez. He's entering his 29 season, so to think he couldn't be a decent value through 5 years is somewhat silly. I get that there's risk there, but much less than say a Grienke or something like that. Also, while Detroit signed him for 5/88, I'm guessing the Twins would have needed to go 5/95 to 5/100 to get him (assuming Detroit was done)... That said, even at 20M/yr, I don't see how he's hamstringing this team. Payroll will go down next year and then start to rise (albeit very slow). He comes off the payroll right when Meyer, Arcia, Hicks, etc. start getting expensive. This doesn't hamstring the team in any way, as most of the team will be making the minimum. Where I'll grant you the risk on a guy like Sanchez is this: Part of rebuilding involves drafting higher and high INT FA bonus amounts because you suck. Spending to buy a few wins will get you those wins (not as many as you might think), but it also lowers your draft position and bonus pools. Another year of sucktitude means that the Twins will still likely be picking in the top 10 next season with a chance to get what would amount to a Manaea type player in a much stronger draft. That does have value that is hard to quantify as it means having another very good player to plug in for an ineffective player or a departing FA. I'm not sure I'm willing to defend the front office. Their pitching decisions were head scratchers... and that's that. Had they gotten Sanchez, they might already have another 3 or 4 wins, not to mention he fills a need that the next wave will likely have. Even if by a miracle the Twins get Gray/Appel, I would argue that odds say that Sanchez would still be a more effective pitcher in 2015/16 than 1 or more of Gray/Meyer/May/Gibson, as at least one of those guys will flop bad and at least 1 will get hurt bad.