They specifically said that if Appel/Gray were off the board. No one has suggeseted by passing Appel this year. We've been throught this a 100 times, the national consensus is that Buxton was ahead of Appel and Gausman. His high ranking by BA is the highest debut for a Twin since Mauer, a decade ago. It was a good pick. If the top 3 guys are gone, the Twins should take the highest rated guy on their draft board. In this draft, it'll still probably be a pitcher. But if 1-3 are pitchers and 4-8 are the GA kids, SD 3 bagger/slugger and the catching prodigy, it doesn't make sense to reach down for the 9th best player. BPA isn't absolute in that a lot of different places will have them viewed differently. KLaw revealed last year that he knew one team had Appel rated #7 on their draft board and reported that the Twins had Buxton #1, Appel #2 and Zimmer ahead of Gausman. But nearly all teams grab who they perceive as BPA when they pick, especially at the top of the draft. As the draft goes, the difference between players is minimal so the team might take position into account. For example, the Twins probably didn't have much difference between Gallo and Berrios at 33 last year but went with the pitcher. In a weak draft, there might not be much difference between #4 and #9 and in a good draft there might be a ton of difference. A few times teams have famously made non BPA picks - either to save money elsewhere (Pirates drafted Sanchez in 09 to save money to sign intl prospect Sano) or loved the risk of the fast ball (Bal took Hobgood in 09 b/c they wanted a RH fireballer to grow with their LH one).