Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,375

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    Except people aren't saying opinions, they are saying factual stuff, like "he never asks to play". You have been clear here that it is your opinion, but others are clearly stating "facts" that are not so. I'll just let it drop. we have no idea.
  2. Mike Sixel
    Well, Pefrey hasn't been healthy for most of his career, so he fails your test.....
  3. Mike Sixel
    1. Every team has contracts tied up in ST assets, it's how time works. 2. I'm not sure why trading for a 1 year guy is better than signing a 1 year guy. That seems 100% backward, unless you are going all in, or getting rid of a guy you don't want. 3. The Dodgers are not trading for Nolasco, not even to fee up money. 4. Brandon McCarthy, or trade for one of the Reds pitchers if you can get a deal worked out ahead of time. 5. Random other guy (assuming they won't go for one of the big 3/4) that wants a 1 year deal. 6. Big trade for a minor leaguer, but I just don't see it happening.
  4. Mike Sixel
    I'd argue those saying he isn't tough have no idea. They aren't in the locker, they aren't trainers, they don't know if he's asked to stay in games. But, they are certain he's just not tough. I'd guess he's tougher than most here are giving him credit for, but I don't know that.....and I have no faith that Souhan is a reporter. That's not his job.
  5. Mike Sixel
    I'd prefer more likely to be good over offers flexibility.....but I'd prefer flexibility over signing likely to be bad for 3 years.....so I guess this list is ok for second best option. Maybe someday we'll have reason to believe they take the first, best option. There are a lot of questions about Meyer, I'd prefer they work hard to get those answered this year, so they have a better plan.....but I suspect he'll be in AAA, and they'll sign a guy like this and sign Hunter. And the OF defense will continue to be the worst in baseball, and whomever they sign will give up more OF hits (or XB) than they should.
  6. Mike Sixel
    Having broken my leg 16 months ago, I can say the pain varies a ton. Some days I feel none, others I can hardly walk at all. I felt no pain after the first two surgeries, the third was a bear.......I've watched my son be totally stoic with a broken wrist, and almost cry with a mild sprain....
  7. Mike Sixel
    As long as I keep getting older....and can still hike, ski, bike, golf, whatever....I'm willing to get more cootier, as it were.
  8. Mike Sixel
    So it is Vargas that is a future HoF? Ok, I'll buy you dinner if he's a HoF. Or am I still missing the point about not trading a possible HoF for a second time? I admit it, I'm confused right now. Maybe I should go back to bed, and just not work today. On the topic.........I don't think we know with any certainty at all that Esco has a significantly better glove than Santana. And no, he's not close to Gagne. Not. Close.
  9. Mike Sixel
    Athletes, ime, try to play through pain because their coaches are generally macho idiots that think they are soft if they don't. Not all coaches, but I've seen it in grade school, middle school, HS, and college. I've seen it in kids that have real futures, and kids that just want to play sports for fun. I'd guess Souhan has it 100% backward, given the experience I have. If anything, the trainers and coaches need to protect players from themselves.
  10. Mike Sixel
    If Arcia is a HoF, I'll buy you dinner after the induction (assuming I'm still alive in 20 years).....
  11. Mike Sixel
    It was a mistake....but every trade carries that risk. Being afraid to trade a possible future star is going to mean you almost never trade anything of value at all.
  12. Mike Sixel
    that was kind of funny, actually
  13. Mike Sixel
    1. They didn't trade Ortiz, and no one claimed him for months. 2. Yup, every trade involves the risk you trade the wrong guy for the wrong guy.
  14. Mike Sixel
    Good point....if they are wrong about Santana as a SS, it would be great to have a backup plan that they have some confidence in. I see no reason to move Esco right now, none. They won't be blown away with a great offer, and he has good/high value to them. It is time to stop only playing for the future....and play some for now.
  15. Mike Sixel
    Well, certainly, moving Sano to RF and trading Arcia is also an option, but I don't see that one happening. either way, I'd keep Escobar, as the utility guy.
  16. Mike Sixel
    Maddon is not the manager....time to move on and root for Molitor (and for him to make good choices on coaches and FA and how he runs the team).
  17. Mike Sixel
    Huh. I don't know.....but here is what I would do: 1. Santana at SS 2. Sano in AA, but as soon as he looks good, to MLB roster 3. Plouffe gets time in LF in spring training to see if he can handle it 4. If Plouffe can't play LF, start with Plouffe at 3B, Santana at SS, Esco as the utility person, play him 2 or so times a week, giving guys time. 5. If Plouffe can play LF, move him there, and put Esco at 3B until Sano. but, I don't know if any of that is a good idea or not.......but I could see Plouffe as Alex Gordon like.
  18. Mike Sixel
    In rereading the comments, I do like how specific they are.
  19. Mike Sixel
    Shocking, shocking that players whose livelihood is largely controlled by Molitor would say positive things about him in the press. I'm not saying they aren't true, but I am saying I am taking them with a HUGE grain of salt.
  20. Mike Sixel
    Listening to much of the pressor........while they said their was a process, all the other answers to all the other questions made it sound to me like it was Molitor's job to lose all along. No idea if that was true, but that's how it sounded to me. It really, really, sounded like the good old boys club to me.
  21. Mike Sixel
    My theory is that a HUGE percentage of the time when you need a long man, you are very likely to lose that game anyway......so I'd rather not spend MORE money on that. I don't see them cutting Pelfrey, no.
  22. Mike Sixel
    Pelfrey should be the long man, imo. Maybe Milone.
  23. Mike Sixel
    I'd be ok just handing the job to Rosario at this point. Unless they go out and really try to compete this year, I'd rather they just go young. New manager has time to indoctrinate the players in his approach.
  24. Mike Sixel
    So it is ok to hire FA players to take jobs, but not FA managers? That's not how business works. I'm ok with Molitor. I would have been ok with the other guy whose name I can't spell. I would have liked Maddon the most. But at this point, I'm glad they have a manager before FA starts, so the manager and GM can be on the same page.
  25. Mike Sixel
    I think 4 years of 90+ losses earns some cynicism from the fans. I have no idea what the process was, but Molitor being the front runner and everyone else having to "outscore" him by 10 runs to win, does not seem preposterous to me. So, ya, some here are cynical. But, I don't know if they are right or wrong. Also, they are posting "I think", not statements of fact......
×
×
  • Create New...