Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    337

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. if there are questions, they aren't stuff or outcomes....not even close.
  2. the evidence is the huge, vast, nearly every, player that makes AAA does not turn into a good MLB player. There is no "I think" here, that's just the simple math. edit: I like Niko. I think he has a small shot to be useful. But I can't say I am confident he'll be better than existing MLB player just yet.
  3. B.) You did say that Goodrum can't replace the offense Escobar provides. I think I showed pretty conclusively that that's a very low bar to surpass and that Goodrum is a pretty good bet to do it based on performance and age. Thoughts? Ceding the point? minor league numbers are predictive, not conclusive. Until a minor leaguer who isn't a legit bit time prospect actually plays well in the majors, the odds are very, very, very low they will ever do so. I don't think you proved anything at all. You provided some predictive numbers, but no, I am not convinced at all he can hit or play defense in the majors. I mean, if he's so sure to be better, why wasn't he up earlier this year, and Escobar just cut?
  4. plenty of guys coming off. Every year people fret over the 40 man decisions, every year the Twins lose no one of major, or even minor, consequence.
  5. the Twins and other teams are so confident he'll be a MLB player, that he could have signed with anyone last year, anyone..... And no place did I describe Escobar as "awesome" or even close to it.
  6. I doubt Goodrum can "easily" replace the production Escobar has, and will continue to, provide. I seriously doubt it, especially on offense.
  7. no doubter. He should have been on the world team at the ASB. He's a big time legit prospect.
  8. Congrats to Goodrum! Exciting moment for him for sure. And also to the others, even if they've already had their debut. I don't care about Rochester's results, I care about what is 100% best for the Twins. Just once I want to hear them say that.
  9. agreed, sometimes things are coincidence, and sometimes they aren't. But this is likely THE most common fallacy, I'd think....
  10. Definitely less thrilled as the year has gone on. I'm not worried about the splits yet, but the overall results are disappointing.
  11. I'm glad Garver is up and having success. So, SSS, he's a great catcher, right?
  12. 4.25 would give him around the 35th lowest ERA in the game.....among qualifiers. That seems a bit lofty to me...
  13. I wouldn't be shocked either way. I've been a huge supporter, until this year. I have serious doubts, but it's all about numbers (salary and other SP options) at this point. If he's mediocre to good the rest of the way, he's back no doubt, imo. If he reverts to what he's been more often than not, I don't know what they'll do.
  14. I have no idea what the right idea is, I just hope they aren't falling into the one size fits all problems of the past.....which I doubt they are.
  15. six dollars? Man, life is cheaper there....
  16. fair. to answer your other question, I would have used him in relief, like some other teams do with some of their pitchers, that year.
  17. So, 1 time in how many years? Do we think shutting him down that many years ago, or not, matters now?
  18. And the nats haven't been close since......and I was on the angst side for sure.
  19. scoops are part of fWAR, IIRC. I thought Dave or someone said that online this year. did you look?
×
×
  • Create New...