Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Right. That's so far from fair it's ridiculous.
  2. I think this is a fair take, but I disagree. This team can't win as built, and the FO has indicated, by action and words, that they won't change the offense. They have zero OF on the current MLB roster that will be on the roster next year. Given their track record, I don't trust them to fix that. So I sell. I get others disagree, and I'm not sure who's right.
  3. Rooker is terrible since April. Brutal. To answer the OP..... Nowhere. The FO has been very clear they are going with this lineup, that can't score. I'd fire them, three years in a row without playoffs, and the lack of willingness to make in season adjustments is enough for me. Yes, they could make the playoffs this year, but we all know that doesn't mean they are actually good.
  4. I have no idea what Rocco wants, he doesn't have Wallner up to even choose. The only way Wallner comes up is if an OF goes down or out.
  5. Zero people have made that claim. Or, if one or two have, that's about it.
  6. 40 in all of baseball means easy to find? How many teams are there? And you expect one team to have three? That's your stance?
  7. That's not angst....I have no angst with the quality they have vs what's available. It's numbers. I could be wrong, but didn't you say they take one or two at the end?
  8. A couple days in Oslo to get over the flight, a couple in Bergen, a few on a boat to the fjords and to the Lofoten islands, five there, including golfing in the Arctic circle.
  9. That's the literal definition of sunk cost. I'm not expecting them to do anything, not sure how to make that more clear. I'm saying what I'd do.
  10. Wait, so as time goes on, things change with more data and more playing? I'm confused why this is an issue. I'm confused by what anyone would gain if the FO said he wasn't playing there this year, or that he might? What would change for anyone?
  11. .280? I don't think you have any idea there......14 qualified outfielders (including cf) have that high an average right now. 14. Total.
  12. They are spending the money either way.....ownership doesnt care if they add 500K to the payroll.. There is no evidence this ownership group or FO is cheap. They have their highest payroll ever, and just signed CC to a massive deal.
  13. Ya, catching isn't about more prospects at this point, most likely, but that they need someone to catch at the lower levels.....
  14. Again, we agree. I have no interest in Keuchel, but I'm not the FO that signed him.....
  15. Guess I was wrong on catcher in the first three picks. No shocker there....that I was wrong, I mean. What do I know?
  16. What difference does the money make? If htey call up a rookie, they are adding less than half a million to the payroll. I don't think money has anything to do with this at all.
  17. I thought he was clear it would be Gallo and/or Kepler. No one that understands positions is saying send down Miranda and call up an OFer......that makes zero sense.
  18. None of those are on the MLB roster which I thought was clear, but I guess not. And, Larnach and Wallner are sitting in AAA while Gallo produces the 26th worst fWAR among LFers.....so, they must not love them much. Not to mention 3 bad years from Kepler. Celestino might or might not be ready next year, but again, we have no idea if he can hit MLB pitching. Gordon is, at best, a backup.
  19. Too bad you can 't filter out HS kids from the MLB draft tracker....as I can't see any of them being taken at this point...
×
×
  • Create New...