Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. doing what with Buxton, Hicks, Rosario? there is no financial implication to playing Joe less, they pay him if he plays, or doesn't play. The key is to play the best players......
  2. Bruce and something else.....and something else.
  3. I gotta say, we don't agree on a lot on politics, but I agree, Trump is no Tea Party member....
  4. And, if they had dealt him.....instead of saying "all good prospects must be kept"......but yes, it is a huge surprise to most everyone.
  5. He could just slide feet first, and give up that 1-2 times a year it will matter, to stay in the lineup.
  6. And put in no backup plan in case it didn't work. Ryan could have had a backup plan.....and not put Hicks' in that situation. Either way, awesome it is clicking now.
  7. then why do we read all the time that it is hard for a tall pitcher to repeat his delivery, and it takes longer for them to develop? There is a difference.
  8. He did deal for Shannon Stewart, didn't he? You'd think that when it works, you'd maybe try it again....
  9. clearly Hunter placed his ability into Hicks' body this month, in some kind of freaky Friday thing.....
  10. We'll just disagree. And I'm ok with that. And no, your last paragraph does not logically follow from the theory.
  11. Agree with every word in this post. Other than the Meyer thing, which ain't happening (and I know you said if).
  12. they placed a very bad bet, given what we know about tall pitchers, imo. As I said at the time, the idea is good, but needs to be judged on how good Meyer turns out. Had I known the history of tall pitchers, I would have ripped it mercilessly at the time.
  13. Uh, that Astros trade was great for the Astros. They have no CF, and their OF defense is suspect. They are loaded with young talent already. He's controlled past this year. They also got a controlled pitcher, who will pitch out of the bullpen this year, with spot starts. He can step into the rotation next year if they don't sign another guy.
  14. Why the bleep would you deal those guys for Upton? Mind. Boggling.
  15. Meyers is 6 foot 9. List the players not named Randy Johnson that have been good pitchers at that height........I'll wait.
  16. No chance the Reds do that. I'm not sure that is enough for even 1 of those players, let alone 2. Wheeler will go to the Reds for Bruce and something else. Wheeler.......
  17. Two real trades in that whole list. I'm not holding my breath here. I do agree with Ryan on one thing, trading a legit prospect for a rental this year is now a bad idea. Everyone else around them is trying hard to get elite players, and has amassed real talent. I don't think their quickly evaporating games in hand are enough to hold them all off. Of course, this is a self-fulfilling prophecy, sitting around and losing ballgames while the bullpen implodes, then saying they weren't good enough to add players that matter.....
  18. What does Graham do now that May has his job of not mattering?
  19. Sorry, that was my prediction for a Ryan quote........
  20. His point is that Ackley was once an untouchable prospect.......who could have at one time been traded for a real player.....but you can never trade prospects......
  21. I may need to rethink my appreciation of Hughes as a lock for good part of the future.......
×
×
  • Create New...