Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Twins up. By four.......still too close for May to come in?
  2. Getting Buxton back is better than any trade I could have made.......
  3. He has a plan, it just want working. Zunino was supposed to be good. Two top pitchers got hurt. Every FA he acquired is a been blech. Ya, he is bad......
  4. Seattle is bad.......and will not blow it up. Nice win tonight. I like wins.
  5. Why would you want to lead people that expect you NOT to help them? Wouldn't you want them to expect an addition, that you have their back?
  6. Polanco at SS.....yes. Escobar as DH? Is this a different Escobar?
  7. Very low level prospects, but then, why don't the Cubs want more than that? I am not convinced he is good.
  8. Pelfrey has not been good for 5 years. May might be good.......
  9. Norris will be in their rotation next year. This isn't some a ball pitcher with massive question marks. They got a great, near term, prospect. If anything, it shows they are serious about the near term.
  10. I notice other teams trading multiple prospects from the same position, for proven MLB players with more than 1 year left on their contract. They aren't waiting to see which ones are good/bad first.......should Ryan be doing that?
  11. Smith vs Ryan.....blah, blah, blah...... the question is, is Ryan the right guy to build this team, and then get the team over the hump? Here are the assets he's added for the long term that I like: Hughes May Ervin Santana that's it, in 3+ years, since draft picks are about losing......and the head scout......
  12. I'm not sure I know what I'd do if I was them. It really depends on how they feel about the big man's injury. to me, this indicates they are less optimistic than we are led to believe.
  13. Well, they just got a prospect back as good or better than Berrios, oh, and they just freed up $20MM. It is likely, as long as this owner is alive, that THEY will re-invest that money in an elite player, imo.
  14. No one is saying Smith can't be criticized...no one. We are asking why everything is his fault, and nothing is Ryan's fault.....why trading your SP depth away for the former #3 overall prospect is bad, but trading all your CF depth away for nothing so far is "great process, bad result. Not his fault it didn't work".
  15. I am in love with this thread.
  16. I only like the first part, I hate the second part.....no way I'd re-sign him. None.
  17. I'm with you Nick. His signings have been pretty much useless in flipping for a rebuild. I'm still waiting for someone to tell me what great rebuilding has been done so far. In 3-4 years, we have 3 players to show for the future competitive years that aren't draft picks.
  18. Fair, I misunderstood your stance. I'd rather they deal for long term present/future assets, but I have my doubts that happens. As for next year, also fair.
  19. They paid him more than 10MM a year, gave him a no trade clause, moved Arcia out of RF, and didn't expect him to be a full time starter? That's........hard to believe.
  20. why? You are on the "they aren't that good this year" side, right? What value does he add if they aren't making the playoffs?
  21. They really don't seem to like Arcia, though. And, he's out of options after this year. He's either here full time next year, or on another roster (or hurt, I guess).
  22. Anyone feel differently today? They are losing ground, Toronto and Texas just added players, and Perkins isn't exactly awesome in the 2nd half, again. I say if you can get a big time prospect, you deal him.
  23. Looks like they got a great prospect, probably. As USAFChief points out, it never hurts to acquire talent, if you use it, then deal it.
  24. Right, this package is bigger last year, or last off season, imo. It's also why Perkins should be dealt, imo.
  25. I agree, they look like sellers now, don't they. I only deal Plouffe for a SS or C of the present/future. The others, whatever is of real value.
×
×
  • Create New...