Of course it matters, as far as comparisons sake.............example , lets say Matt Harvey was drafted 60th overall and both the Mets passed on him at 30 and Twins at 31, but the Mets got him with the next pick, and there 30th pick didnt pan out ,why would that make the Mets better at evaluating if they also missed him with the first pick.........I could have come up with a better example, but i am working and have not draft info in front of me to look up someone who was actually drafted in that range that made a big impact..............Or better yet, I believe May was drafted in the 4th round, so all the teams made a mistake in evaluating???? I think not, some people just mature differently, and some people take to instruction differently..................But really the only evaluating that means much is if you miss badly on a early 1st round selection, if that happens consistently comparably then you have Director of Scouting problems.........I rambled, so hopefully i made sense, i will clarify if anyone has a problem with this LOL