Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

mikelink45

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,087

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mikelink45

  1. mikelink45
    I find it hard to rate like you've done that takes a lot of work so thanks. Of course I don't agree with all the rankings and that's easy to do when you don't have to start from scratch. The biggest takeaway I have is that the twins based on history get two of the players in your 50 and they're probably going to be in the range of 25 to 35. Who they are I don't know but I think that they will spend money but not going to spend outrageous money and I don't blame them. I see the top shortstops aging and moving to second base. The best thing we can do is get a young shortstop from our own prospects and also avoid old arms like Verlander and Scherzer. We need to build for more than one year.
  2. mikelink45
    I am in except for Kepler
  3. mikelink45
    Kaat's average innings pitched is misleading in that his last three innings he was a relief pitcher and spot starter. Without those years he averaged 198 innings per year!
  4. mikelink45
    When I watched this team there was no one that was consistent over the enjoy season. ERA is not a stat I look at in RP. If they come in and give up the runners on base, then get three ours they have a 0.00 era even though they cost the team two runs. If they put runners on and the next pitcher gets outs without letting them score they have an era of 0.00. I want dependable and durable. Colome is released, but he had two different seasons - beginning and ending months were very different, but I did not like seeing him come in and now he has been released. Duffey was our most reliable over the year, but TD articles consistently talked about how much he lost in his best pitches yet he would get my best grade and not an A. Minaya was a shooting star. He looked great for part of a season, but so did Colome. No I would not give any A's to members of this years pen.
  5. mikelink45
    I have been seeing Mauer's name pop up more and more in articles about Posey. That must be a help to him because it creates a recognition that could carry over to the HOF vote. I would put both in as catchers. Mauer was hurt by the concussion in more ways than changing position and it has to be considered when the vote is made. It is not Mauer's fault that he could not continue catching until the end of his career.
  6. mikelink45
    Nobody on this team deserves an A or any version of an A. Nothing destroyed the season more than the pen and a short term good performance does not merit a full season A. This group was bad and the best of the group gets a C.
  7. mikelink45
    I hope not, but bad teams seldom release good players if they intend to improve.
  8. mikelink45
    If I am not mistaken the Rangers were another losing team. By WAR (fangraphs) Texas only beat out Arizona with a total of 4.5 We were 24th, five above the Rangers. I thought bad teams raided the good teams, not the worse teams.
  9. mikelink45
    Good essay that is sure to spark a lot of controversy (it should). I think Larnach can reclaim and prosper, but after his second half plunge he needs time to regain his confidence. But then who? I don't know. Can Miranda play in the OF? Can Celestino play LF? Not Rooker and his glove and K's. Not Arraez who never was an OF candidate. This is a weakness that is seldom discussed. Thanks for bringing it up. But please - not Cave or Refsnyder or Garlick.
  10. mikelink45
    I agree, but the players on this all-star team do not have the feeling of future MLB stardom except for Miranda and a couple pitchers and of course a few pitchers would really make a difference. In fact, since the Tampa Bay team is always a model - they do not sign FA, they keep bringing up young pitchers and succeed.
  11. mikelink45
    That was really good. I am disappointed to see Drew Maggi the top SS. We need a SS, but a player who will be 33 and never a MLB starter is not what I am hoping for. Overall it is not a strong group until you get to pitching and I really like what the arms look like. Other than Miranda we will have to wait on the bats, but Miranda looks like he might be the real deal for the Twins and if we have one big bat make it that will be a success as long as those pitchers come through.
  12. mikelink45
    I can only say no. Amazing isn't it that we try to sign someone who is as good as Berrios - let's just sign Jose again.
  13. mikelink45
    Kiriloff - too short a season, another injury prone player. I can only give him a C - your grade is based on hope. Buxton a B- and that is generous. I know we project that he would have a complete season like his 61 games, but we have seen players flirt with 400 for half a season. It is not unknown to have fabulous half seasons - Buxton had a fabulous 1/3 season. It is hard to give a complete grade for an incomplete year. Kepler D. It is time to produce. His RF defense can be replaced. His OBP is terrible and he was leadoff the first half of the season. We hope for him, but he has had one great season - again, many players had one season that stood out. We should expect multiple seasons of good production. Luis Arraez C. You made the case when you said, "When he’s not roping singles or walking, it’s hard to justify keeping Arraez in the lineup. He can be a liability defensively with very little power." Larnach C. That is for effort, for the fact that he was called up before he was ready, But I am tempted to drop this down because he showed not ability to adjust after the pitchers adjusted to him. Rooker D. I agree with your right up, but not sure where the + came from. Cruz A. This is a no doubter, but I have a hard time thinking of him as an OF. Astudillo B. Not that he is a good player, but he is a good team players. He would do whatever was asked. He tried and played with spirit. He also made some surprisingly good plays in the field. I see him as a utility man, not an OF so if he is graded just in OF I give him a D. This does not mean he makes next years team, but we tend to undervalue these fill in pieces. My grades are lower than yours with the exception of Astudillo and he really does not count. The low grades are a reflection of the fact that the team stunk as a whole and the OF with Refsnyder, Garlick and Cave none of whom are graded on your page was a contributing factor to the losing season.
  14. mikelink45
    I talk Wallner over Sabato. Steer is the only one on this list that I really like. I am looking for a pitcher to join Wallner nad Steer on my list and hope that one of the prospects really jumps ahead of the competition.
  15. mikelink45
    Yes, I will be disappointed. I just do not see the great glove that the metrics claim. I saw a player who was indifferent at times, who missed opportunities that would not show in the statistics. I still use the eye test, and he failed my vision.
  16. mikelink45
    Nice choices. I will add that to see ex=Twins in the playoffs which made them much more interesting.
  17. mikelink45
    Wallner has left Sabato in the dust - not just here, but all season. The others do not look like real prospects to me.
  18. mikelink45
    It is a fun article and the team looks good. Of course I have things I don't like - Kluber! I would see our rookies being better than him. Finally I would have Miranda in the lineup.
  19. mikelink45
    It depends on what is offered. For me, anyone can be traded if the team improves by the trade. I only question his value to other teams - who would want him and how much would they give. His BA slipped this year, his fielding is average, and the league is power hungry. I do not see much return even though I personally like him a lot.
  20. mikelink45
    I don't know. Defensive choices are always questionable. No one has come up with a truly excellent defensive metric and I do not know if we overrate him here in Twins land.
  21. mikelink45
    I agree, but I do not know if the Twins will limit him to 1B. I am confused about how they are going to use their assets this year.
  22. mikelink45
    Eddie has given me post season pleasure - imagine Eddie getting a walk! Tonight he did and scored the first run for Atlanta in a 2 - 0 game. Love the way he plays. So much fun. Cruz is admirable. Love the outdoor adventures. Keep it going.
  23. mikelink45
    This is great and yes it is time. The other players that we don't have always seem so good but in reality our players have the potential to be exactly what we need
  24. mikelink45
    How will this work? Will you put up a topic or will the topics come from the posters? If I say, and believe, the baseball is sliding down to the level of hockey public support and interest does that constitute the beginning? I am really worried about our sport. I'm sitting in the Portland airport and just talked with Dave bartender here and his response when I said that I was looking forward to the world series tonight was "I do not interested in baseball anymore it's just the pitcher and the batter and nothing else counts. Length of game lack of action, lack of drama, and people are leaving the sport that have watched it as a general interest viewing over the years. I know that baseball is trying to react, but it's too slow and the question is is it too late.
  25. mikelink45
    Yes, but you also forgot garver in that list. Letting your catchers have more at bats without getting behind the plate is an advantage. I see Rooker is the odd man out in this. He just hasn't shown that he's going to grow and he's already at the age that should be his peak
×
×
  • Create New...