NYCTK
Verified Member-
Posts
2,633 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
News
Minnesota Twins Videos
2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking
2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
The Minnesota Twins Players Project
2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by NYCTK
-
I feel really bad for Keirsey. Last year was his chance and for some reason his bosses gave the opportunities to terrible baseball players Margot and Martin instead. Seriously, those two pure junk players got 600 Plate Appearances while Keirsey got 14? No wonder the team stunk to high heavens. He could get more chances but last season and his age suggests he won't.
-
Twins Daily's Top 20 Minnesota Twins Prospects: #5 Marco Raya
NYCTK replied to Steve Lein's topic in Twins Minor League Talk
Marco Raya at #5 makes me laugh at this idea that the Twins currently possess a top farm system. He's a good prospect. But he's a dime a dozen if we're being honest. I wouldn't be at all disappointed to see him traded away for major league talent. -
4 Ways Twins Can Learn from Dodgers' 2024 World Series Win
NYCTK replied to Cody Christie's topic in Twins Minor League Talk
I don't understand some fans desire for far more rigidity in the team. If you can't pitch your best reliever in the 7th inning because he's a head case that pouts about not getting a light show, you should either spend more on sports psychiatry department, or trade his bum ass away. I'm not even saying this is the case with Duran, but this is what many Twins fans believe about him, or at least here.- 24 replies
-
- derek falvey
- matt borgschulte
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
4 Ways Twins Can Learn from Dodgers' 2024 World Series Win
NYCTK replied to Cody Christie's topic in Twins Minor League Talk
Some things I've heard about complained here constantly: 1. Position flexibility - The Dodgers move people around the field constantly. This is what good teams do. Having a lot of players with positional flexibility is not a weakness. 2. Set Bullpen Roles - The Dodger had a good bullpen that was made better because of Roberts ability to use the better relievers in high leverage spots regardless of their innings. Take a look at Phillips and Treinen's usage and it's not limited to the 8th and 9th innings. Criticizing Rocco for managing in a way that made the Dodgers better is foolish. The players failed him more than he failed the players. And most importantly, the Dodgers got rid of Manuel Margot before he played a single game with them. Sadly, the Twins did not follow their lead :-(- 24 replies
-
- derek falvey
- matt borgschulte
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yankees were clearly the class of the AL, and Dodgers were clearly the class of the NL. Kind of cool that we get to see the best teams from each respective league in the World Series for the first time in a long time. That said the NL was so much stronger than the AL this year and I expect the Dodgers to outclass the Yankees, even with their weak Starting rotation. Dodgers in 5. Side note, I want desperately for the Yankees to lose and for Soto to leave in the offseason.
- 26 replies
-
- shohei ohtani
- juan soto
- (and 5 more)
-
Trading for Margot was the moment the season was lost. More specifically, in ST when they realized he couldn't play defense anymore and knew they had no actual 4th OF and didn't make any effort to patch that massive hole. Everything else could be argued to be bad luck. But counting on Margot to be a contributing player for a team was when this team lost.
- 30 replies
-
- jorge alcala
- byron buxton
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
They were both terrible and neither should be opening day major leaguers.
- 54 replies
-
- austin martin
- brooks lee
- (and 6 more)
-
You don't get the luxury of a stable job as a marginal mlb player. That's part of the deal. You play well enough, that's when you get a set position, not before. Austin is just not good enough of a player to leave at one position and hope he becomes playable.
- 54 replies
-
- austin martin
- brooks lee
- (and 6 more)
-
I don't think parity drives success for these leagues, and I don't buy that the NBA has more parity than MLB, mostly due to the fact that one superstar can literally win championships. We saw the same NBA Finals on repeat for this reason. The NBA is successful because it's cool and exciting for children. Thanks to its superstars. I think the Ohtani obsession is over the top, but it might be just what the league needs to bring in a new generation of fans. Lastly, the Twins don't suck because the Yankees spend more money. The Twins have sucked because they care only about money.
-
You think the NBA was ever upset LeBron (regardless of team) or those super teams in Golden State made the finals? Absolutely not. It was great for the sport, and great for the league. Basketball fans weren't disappointed they didn't get to see the Minnesota Timberwolves... Same thing with baseball. This World Series will be the most watched, perhaps in decades, and a great thing for the sport of baseball. Ohtani, the best player in history, in the World Series is great for baseball.
-
Hoping a 25 year old suddenly figures out how to play defense is a great way to waste time. Austin Martin is a bad player and will never be worthy of a major league role.
- 54 replies
-
- austin martin
- brooks lee
- (and 6 more)
-
I stand by it. A super team is good. Two super teams in the World Series helps grow the sport way more than, for example, last year's dull Rangers vs Diamondbacks series that no one watched. People are going to be watching Yamamoto, Ohtani, Betts, Judge, Soto, and Cole and be reminded that baseball is great actually. And this is good for every single team in the league. Even if the diehards hate these two teams and will not watch.
-
Moneyball: Recreating Willi Castro in the Aggregate
NYCTK replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
But we saw them not win last year and there was no real drop off. So...what are you talking about? There is such a thing as changing the culture of an organization, changing the market for a club. Similarly, the Twin Cities are, rightfully, done with the cheap Pohalds. They're done with the bitchass billionaires exploiting them for everything they're worth with no respect to the product on the field. A new owner has a chance to come in and make the Twins cool again, like Seidler accomplished with the Padres. -
Coming back to this chart, it's probably right, but ignores that MLB is sharing the 48% outside of the white Central Revenue. So, its entirely worthless in terms of comparison to the NBA and NFL. It points out that those leagues ARE more central, with better national contracts, but doesn't mean anything in terms of haves and have nots.
-
We don't know that. Let's say they did increase payroll by $50 million last offseason instead of slashing it by $40 million. It's impossible to guess how that team would look. They might have been in the ALCS. They could potentially be playing on Friday. They could have drawn 35K every night and made up for the payroll in revenue. It's impossible to say. But thankfully the Pohalds were able to right size their business so they could maintain healthy profits, winning be damned. Glory be!
-
I don't think forcing a great player to remain in a terrible organization is best for the game. As much as you may hate it, it's actually quite good for the sport that Ohtani left a terrible organization and now we have a Judge vs Ohtani battle in a NY vs LA World Series. The late 90s Yankees were awful and I hated them...and they were incredibly good for the sport of baseball. I am actually fine increasing Luxury Taxes. Teams aren't actually eligible for this revenue sharing unless they're making efforts to increase their own team, and like you pointed out, like half it funds MLBPA efforts. If I'm not mistaken, the Twins will receive none of that money because they're so poorly run as a business. And that's good. But miss me with pro owner BS like a salary cap or limiting player rights in any way.
-
Define "low revenue". Because to me that just sounds like **** organization. Why are we suddenly concerned about saving **** organizations that have made no effort to improve their brand? That's why I am viewing it through the lens of their market size, because that's something that's not up for the owners to change. So you're looking at the bottom 10? No, they aren't small market. It features some, but also features New York and Detroit. And this terrible analysis ignores the success of Cleveland, Milwaukee and St. Louis.

