Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

NYCTK

Verified Member
  • Posts

    2,633
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by NYCTK

  1. Yes and no. We all knew the twins weren't actually near the best in the league last season. There are teams that try to just squeeze into the playoffs and get lucky, and there are teams that actually try to be the best. The Twins have long been the former, never the latter.
  2. Trust me, I love hating on the pohlads. Nothing I love more basically. The Twins are a loser organization striving to do nothing more than just be good enough. I will not spend a dime on the twins until the sale goes through.
  3. This isn't some big strike against Keirsey. It's not like Rule 5 picks are even common. Is the argument then that no team has ever misevaluated their own internal talent?
  4. Or the Twins decision makers are just humans that are no less likely to be stupid or incompetent. No grand conspiracy necessary.
  5. I guess technically so. But they are a long, long ways from being an actual contender.
  6. The Twins trading for Margot just showed their front office doesn't even know how to build a roster. Adding an OF that can't hit or play OF and with no options. Great job guys.
  7. I feel really bad for Keirsey. Last year was his chance and for some reason his bosses gave the opportunities to terrible baseball players Margot and Martin instead. Seriously, those two pure junk players got 600 Plate Appearances while Keirsey got 14? No wonder the team stunk to high heavens. He could get more chances but last season and his age suggests he won't.
  8. Marco Raya at #5 makes me laugh at this idea that the Twins currently possess a top farm system. He's a good prospect. But he's a dime a dozen if we're being honest. I wouldn't be at all disappointed to see him traded away for major league talent.
  9. I don't understand some fans desire for far more rigidity in the team. If you can't pitch your best reliever in the 7th inning because he's a head case that pouts about not getting a light show, you should either spend more on sports psychiatry department, or trade his bum ass away. I'm not even saying this is the case with Duran, but this is what many Twins fans believe about him, or at least here.
  10. Some things I've heard about complained here constantly: 1. Position flexibility - The Dodgers move people around the field constantly. This is what good teams do. Having a lot of players with positional flexibility is not a weakness. 2. Set Bullpen Roles - The Dodger had a good bullpen that was made better because of Roberts ability to use the better relievers in high leverage spots regardless of their innings. Take a look at Phillips and Treinen's usage and it's not limited to the 8th and 9th innings. Criticizing Rocco for managing in a way that made the Dodgers better is foolish. The players failed him more than he failed the players. And most importantly, the Dodgers got rid of Manuel Margot before he played a single game with them. Sadly, the Twins did not follow their lead :-(
  11. Yankees were clearly the class of the AL, and Dodgers were clearly the class of the NL. Kind of cool that we get to see the best teams from each respective league in the World Series for the first time in a long time. That said the NL was so much stronger than the AL this year and I expect the Dodgers to outclass the Yankees, even with their weak Starting rotation. Dodgers in 5. Side note, I want desperately for the Yankees to lose and for Soto to leave in the offseason.
  12. Trading for Margot was the moment the season was lost. More specifically, in ST when they realized he couldn't play defense anymore and knew they had no actual 4th OF and didn't make any effort to patch that massive hole. Everything else could be argued to be bad luck. But counting on Margot to be a contributing player for a team was when this team lost.
  13. You don't get the luxury of a stable job as a marginal mlb player. That's part of the deal. You play well enough, that's when you get a set position, not before. Austin is just not good enough of a player to leave at one position and hope he becomes playable.
  14. I don't think parity drives success for these leagues, and I don't buy that the NBA has more parity than MLB, mostly due to the fact that one superstar can literally win championships. We saw the same NBA Finals on repeat for this reason. The NBA is successful because it's cool and exciting for children. Thanks to its superstars. I think the Ohtani obsession is over the top, but it might be just what the league needs to bring in a new generation of fans. Lastly, the Twins don't suck because the Yankees spend more money. The Twins have sucked because they care only about money.
  15. You think the NBA was ever upset LeBron (regardless of team) or those super teams in Golden State made the finals? Absolutely not. It was great for the sport, and great for the league. Basketball fans weren't disappointed they didn't get to see the Minnesota Timberwolves... Same thing with baseball. This World Series will be the most watched, perhaps in decades, and a great thing for the sport of baseball. Ohtani, the best player in history, in the World Series is great for baseball.
  16. Hoping a 25 year old suddenly figures out how to play defense is a great way to waste time. Austin Martin is a bad player and will never be worthy of a major league role.
  17. Most watched recent finals were LeBron vs Steph so thank you for making my point for me.
  18. I stand by it. A super team is good. Two super teams in the World Series helps grow the sport way more than, for example, last year's dull Rangers vs Diamondbacks series that no one watched. People are going to be watching Yamamoto, Ohtani, Betts, Judge, Soto, and Cole and be reminded that baseball is great actually. And this is good for every single team in the league. Even if the diehards hate these two teams and will not watch.
  19. True, true. But the commentary with the graphic wasn't accurate, which is why my, and I assume others, reading of it was wrong.
  20. But we saw them not win last year and there was no real drop off. So...what are you talking about? There is such a thing as changing the culture of an organization, changing the market for a club. Similarly, the Twin Cities are, rightfully, done with the cheap Pohalds. They're done with the bitchass billionaires exploiting them for everything they're worth with no respect to the product on the field. A new owner has a chance to come in and make the Twins cool again, like Seidler accomplished with the Padres.
  21. Coming back to this chart, it's probably right, but ignores that MLB is sharing the 48% outside of the white Central Revenue. So, its entirely worthless in terms of comparison to the NBA and NFL. It points out that those leagues ARE more central, with better national contracts, but doesn't mean anything in terms of haves and have nots.
  22. We don't know that. Let's say they did increase payroll by $50 million last offseason instead of slashing it by $40 million. It's impossible to guess how that team would look. They might have been in the ALCS. They could potentially be playing on Friday. They could have drawn 35K every night and made up for the payroll in revenue. It's impossible to say. But thankfully the Pohalds were able to right size their business so they could maintain healthy profits, winning be damned. Glory be!
  23. I don't think forcing a great player to remain in a terrible organization is best for the game. As much as you may hate it, it's actually quite good for the sport that Ohtani left a terrible organization and now we have a Judge vs Ohtani battle in a NY vs LA World Series. The late 90s Yankees were awful and I hated them...and they were incredibly good for the sport of baseball. I am actually fine increasing Luxury Taxes. Teams aren't actually eligible for this revenue sharing unless they're making efforts to increase their own team, and like you pointed out, like half it funds MLBPA efforts. If I'm not mistaken, the Twins will receive none of that money because they're so poorly run as a business. And that's good. But miss me with pro owner BS like a salary cap or limiting player rights in any way.
  24. Define "low revenue". Because to me that just sounds like **** organization. Why are we suddenly concerned about saving **** organizations that have made no effort to improve their brand? That's why I am viewing it through the lens of their market size, because that's something that's not up for the owners to change. So you're looking at the bottom 10? No, they aren't small market. It features some, but also features New York and Detroit. And this terrible analysis ignores the success of Cleveland, Milwaukee and St. Louis.
×
×
  • Create New...