Verlander wasn't really "legitimately trade-able" as a pure salary dump. The Tigers could (and likely would) eat some cash to get back talent/prospects, but they were never going to let him go for salary relief alone. No one is apparently willing to meet that price of talent/prospects, but I don't think that means no one was willing to take Verlander and his contract "for free" -- it simply wasn't an option. (Heck, with Verlander's no-trade clause, he probably was never going to consent to a pure salary relief deal either.) I think the default position for teams on August waiver claims is, if no one has much of a shot of making a deal, you pass. And for all the bluster around Verlander, Stanton, etc., no one has been particularly close to a deal on them. And I don't blame the Twins for not pursuing him either, given the apparent costs (beyond his contract).