Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Otto von Ballpark

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,665
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Otto von Ballpark

  1. It's not a matter of them being conniving. It's just a matter of comfort. And once we establish there is a need to go outside, they might be most comfortable with the outside hire who is interested in making the least amount of waves. (Again, that's not my take on Falvey yet, but that's how I understand that concern.)
  2. Don't worry, the Twins still have a week to make the significance of the 100 loss threshold seem quaint by comparison.
  3. It's not a binary, either-or thing. There are degrees of maintaining the status quo, and one of those degrees would be hiring a less aggressive outside candidate. I don't share that particular fear of Falvey at this point, however.
  4. I was planning on attending Sunday, so I was rooting for them to win Saturday and stay at 99 for another day. Unfortunately, the 100 loss vibe Sunday was skewed by the Vikings win...
  5. HR and RBI were huge in that vote, but Dawson probably also got major bonus points for narrative in 1987: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Dawson#Chicago_Cubs
  6. That's fair. I'm on record as believing neither guy was that interested in this POBO position for a variety of reasons, so I guess it wouldn't have to be anything particularly damning to dissuade them from even a curiosity interview to satisfy mild interest. Something about their past budgeting, for example. Or more recently, maybe you hear something from the search firm that suggests the team isn't sure what it wants in POBO, etc.
  7. Maybe I'm the only one, but I am actively rooting against the Cubs. They might be a historical underdog, but they're certainly not an underdog in 2016. And the "Cubs as lovable losers" image is quite possibly the biggest constant in the sport, and I'd rather keep it that way.
  8. Personally, that would cheapen the victory for whoever prevailed. Like a recent Twins-Oakland postseason matchup.
  9. I don't think that quite works at this high level, though. The Twins aren't some random unfamiliar company to Cherington and Anthropolous, even if they've never met with the owner before. Add in what they probably heard from the search firm and other industry contacts recently, and they probably have enough information to be comfortable making a judgement without an interview.
  10. I'm not shocked. Neither of them "needed" this job -- they've been there before, presumably they have some money in the bank. Moreover, reports suggest we didn't reach out to Cherington until recently, when he was already pretty far along with Toronto. I still share some of your worry, though. Hopefully we don't see a guy like McLeod turn us down, that would be a bad sign.
  11. Derek Falvey, assistant GM with Cleveland, is a "finalist" (suggesting a decision soon?): http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/09/twins-considering-indians-agm-derek-falvey-for-front-office-job-finalist.html
  12. Any situation is a "total blank slate" if you are willing to completely clear house and you are allowed to do so. It's also a lot of work to completely clear house, and not particularly desirable work. Anthropolous and Cherington never had to do that before either -- they spent a number of years in the Toronto and Boston front offices, respectively, before ascending to those GM spots.
  13. Obviously every situation is different, but it seems a lot of K-5/6 schools merge around grade 7 anyway, and again 6/7-8 middle schools merge at grade 9. And as a non-athlete, I found that a lot of my preferred extracurriculars didn't start in earnest until grade 9 too. So most moves before grade 9 could be weathered just fine. Moving between grades 9-12 would be tough.
  14. The team really making a "push" is the Mariners. 8 straight wins, now within 1.5 games of Toronto for the second wild card spot (with only Detroit between them, although the Yankees are just behind Seattle too).
  15. Or did we take too long to pursue him? We probably should have called Cherington even before we fired TR -- back when we decided to tell TR he wouldn't be returning in 2017. Could have possibly had a more orderly transition too?
  16. Judging by her current position with MLB, Ng is probably more of an administrative type, which can be useful but probably isn't what the Twins need right now.
  17. And more to the point, I don't think the Twins current front office probably has any idea. What benchmark does Terry Ryan and Rob Antony have for judging Goin's performance? They've never worked with another analytics department. Goin's department should be up for serious review by the new hire as much as any.
  18. That makes some sense on opening day 2016. Not so much by June and July...
  19. Here's the PP story: http://www.twincities.com/2016/09/09/alex-anthopoulos-out-of-running-for-twins-gm/
  20. Personally, I'd just rather the POBO served as his own acting GM. Nothing against Antony, but he hardly needs to be evaluated further given the prominent position he's had in this organization since 2007, and how our performance over that time has already gotten two other GMs dismissed.
  21. Cherington has Boston 1999-2015 on his resume, which looks awfully nice, even if he was only GM for the last few years. Anthropolous did some nice work in Toronto, but their overall body of work during his tenure (2005-2015, 2009-2015 as GM) isn't nearly as impressive. Either would seem like a pretty impressive hire for the Twins, but it does seem like Cherington's background might be better suited to building a sustained winner (even their couple recent losing seasons seemed to be springboards to more winning). Obviously it's more likely to come down to, who is willing to come here (if either one of them is).
  22. Johnson's original deal with Arizona was only 4 years with an option. And from my link, the Dodgers outbid them, and a few other teams matched them. Not without risk at his age, but not really comparable to the Greinke situation, where Arizona had to outbid everyone for a longer term (and for a lesser pitcher, albeit a few years younger). And Schilling wasn't that big of a risk when you consider all that they had to give up in trade was mostly suspects rather than prospects. Not really comparable to the Shelby Miller deal at all. (Schilling's salary at the time wasn't cheap, but it wasn't that notable -- for some context, consider that Radke signed a 4/36 deal the same year Schilling was traded to Arizona.)
  23. Interestingly, the Dodgers likely bid more for Johnson, but he chose Arizona instead: http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/03/free-agent-retrospective-randy-johnson.html As compared to Greinke, where it sounds like Arizona had to over-bid to get him. Also, looking back, the Diamondbacks got Schilling pretty cheaply in trade (I don't recall his contract situation, though). Travis Lee was busting, Omar Daal had a 7.22 ERA at the time, and Nelson Figueroa was a journeyman in the making. Vicente Padilla turned out to be an OK rotation piece for a few seasons but was hardly anything worth losing sleep over. Nothing like the Shelby Miller deal, really. (Additionally, although Schilling was older, he had a much better track record than Miller. Johnson was older but better than Greinke too.)
  24. Hey, they got a 4th year of control when Miller pitched so badly, they were justified in sending him to the minors! It was definitely a steep price, and flipping a #1 overall pick so quickly is almost unprecedented.
  25. The Tigers have spent and been aggressive, but I guess I would put them in a different class than the Dodgers, Red Sox, Yankees, etc. (And the Giants in terms of consistent success.)
×
×
  • Create New...