That's sorta the point. And it's the opposite of misleading actually. Any given action/non-action is going to have people right and wrong on it. But I think it's fair, when people want to crow about how right their strategy is, to point out some glaring examples of when they would have been horrifically wrong too. When you only see one side (Verlander) you are being mislead. When see Tulo's thread? Well, that's called having more context, not misleading. Personally, I'd prefer we not bring up old threads about how right we are. So in the spirit of context, the same people who wanted Verlander were willing to give up Berrios for Tulowitski. If you want to drudge up old threads to say "Look how right I am!", it's only fair to point out the threads where you were also laughably wrong. As I said - we're all in that boat. The Twins would be fools to hire any of us with our 50/50 track record on "What should we do?" scenarios.