Siehbiscuit

Walker JenkinsEmmanuel RodriguezKaelen CulpepperMarek HoustonEduardo TaitRiley QuickKendry RojasHendry MendezDasan HillBrandon WinokurCharlee SotoQuentin YoungYasser MercedesKhadim DiawBilly AmickGabriel GonzalezRyan GallagherJames EllwangerEduardo BeltreEnrique Jimenez

Walker JenkinsLuke KeaschallEmmanuel RodriguezEduardo TaitMick AbelKaelen CulpepperConnor PrielippDasan HillKendry RojasCharlee SotoGabriel GonzalezMarek HoustonRiley QuickMarco RayaKyle DeBargeBrandon WinokurAndrew MorrisQuentin YoungCJ CulpepperKhadim Diaw

Walker JenkinsLuke KeaschallKaelen CulpepperConnor PrielippEmmanuel RodriguezDasan HillGabriel GonzalezCharlee SotoMarco RayaBrandon WinokurMarek HoustonRiley QuickAndrew MorrisKyle DeBargeKhadim DiawCJ CulpepperBilly AmickQuentin YoungEduardo BeltreRicardo Olivar

I look at the underlying metrics being talked about (launch angle, exit velo, etc) vs the result of the at-bat is similar to what I do at work. I have been in sales for 20+ years and IMO, the salespeople that deliver the best results are those that consistently demonstrate the most consistent behavior. WARNING: Over-simplification coming - If two salespeople each closed 5 deals last month, how can I predict/forecast what each one can or will produce next month? You look at the behaviors of what they are doing (calls made, appointments set, etc). By tracking "leading indicators" and pairing them with the lagging indicators, you can better predict future outcomes. These are similar to the metrics that are being talked about. Players that have a higher barrel rate will tend to get more hits. They'll get unlucky, sure, but more often than not when evaluating multiple things or players the underlying numbers (leading indicators) add more predictive value than just the lagging indicators alone (batting average, OBP, hits, BB, etc).

I am in the camp that potentially elite game changers don't want to come to Minnesota and are borderline unattainable via free agency. So, when the opportunity knocks and the chance to secure a face of the franchise-type player arises. You HAVE to lock him up. I'd give Buxton a 6 year, 90M guaranteed contract (including 2022's $7.5M) with incentives of $2M & $2M at 450 PA & 550 PA and $3M for top 5 MVP voting and $3M for Gold Glove (bonus $1M for Platinum Glove). All in all, 550 PA in a season he could earn $26M per season.

My point was to defend the initial posters (the one you originally resounded to) thoughts on 2020 roster. He made some additions and you made the comment that the Twins would still be leaving a lot of money on the table. If the Twins had plans to tie up that money in extensions for several of their young players, payroll could be similar to this year’s.

Cutting spending should definitely not happen. While I don’t think this regime, will likely ever carry a $15M reliever, they do have several young players to consider locking up to extensions and that could eat up an additional $18-25M in payroll. Giving out contracts like Polanco’s and Kepler’s (young and under control) are far more likely to maximize ROI than 30+ year olds hitting free agency. Personally, I’d prefer to lock up Berrios, Sano and even roll the dice on Buxton extensions this off-season. Everyone has their own methods, but outside of Jon Singleton, young players getting extended, tend to work out better than FA.

I’ll go mid-season, because I am eternal optimist (don’t most Twins fans have to be to keep hanging on?). 1 - Buxton ® 2 - Polanco (S) 3 - Cruz ® 4 - Sano ® 5 - Rosario (L) 6 - Schoop ® 7 - Kepler (L) 8 - Cron ® 9 - Castro (L)

I agree that McCutchen and Brantley can definitely improve the Twins team. But to make that move, the team would essentially be punting on Kepler. If the Twins can move him for a valuable piece, then an OF makes some sense. After watching a punchless Twins team in 2018, I’d love to have a very good power bat in the middle of the lineup. I love the idea of a versatile defense and roster and those are great components to build a winning team. Normally, I would say that DH should be filled by guys needing days off and marginal defenders, but if a .850-900+ OPS-type bat is available and he needs that spot 140+ times a year. I think you make room for that production. Just my opinion.

Nelson Cruz has been a mainstay for nearly a decade and has had a SLG% over .500 EVERY season but one injury-plagued season 6 years ago. Logan Morrison had ONE good season, and the Twins signed him for next to nothing. He tanked. I would think the track record would matter in a legitimate discussion.

Cruz doesn’t provide versatility, but we need ‘A’ list hitters, period. Cruz would be a legit .260/.350/.510, 40ish HR guy. Regardless if its full-time DH we could use a professional slugger like him. Power as a tool, usually ages well.

Shameless plug warning! I have coached college and HS basketball for 17 years and how I would best define character in an athlete is this: Character is showing consistency in doing the right things on and off the court (field). It’s getting your school work done, being in class, being at practice, respecting your parents and teachers and those in authority over you. Are you the kind of kid that would break up a fight if you saw the school yard bully taking someone’s lunch money because it’s the right thing to do?Doing what is ‘right’ is subjective in certain areas, but for the most part most of us quantify it the same way. Those that consistently display and do the right thing (they don’t have to be perfect) are those that I feel have high character. These types of people are the ones you WANT on your team to help build a programs culture, be leaders, as others will gravitate towards them. Character counts, and those that have it, definitely do stand out. The best news is that it is something that can be developed, but you have to be intentional about your choices and be willing to be held accountable. The fact that these two have had their character lauded at such young ages tell me that had great structure and support growing up. Not everyone has great leadership as a youth. Character is simply making right choices on a consistent basis.

Overall, numbers for Stewart in 2018 are somewhat misleading. Like a closer (see Rodney’s April from last year or 2018) and one game or two can really skew numbers. Kohl had a clunker in his 3rd start this year (1.2 IP, 6 H, 6 ER, 1 BB, 1 SO and the loss). If games are 1 game at a time, his team has won 5 of his 6 starts and his average line is looking really good. He is averaging (per start) 5.1 IP, 5 H, 1.6 Runs allowed (2.73 ERA), 1 BB, 5.6 K, 1.13 WHIP, 9.65 K/9 Looks like promise to me.

What does being a two-sport athlete have to do with spreading the signing bonus out over 5 years?

It’ll be amazing to see Nolasco pitch against the Twins 2 or 3 times in 2018.