Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    41,456

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    465

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    He definitely had a very rocky stretch, 7 games, from mid-June to late-July, but then turned things around in his last game of July and was more than solid for those 10 games (aside from his eternally high pitch-counts) the rest of the way. I seem to recall something about a blister or bad fingernail. If so, other teams probably won't shy away too badly.
  2. ashbury
    I'm 100% sure of that. I still don't think he shares the info widely. Probably only in heavily redacted form even to his clients. Only what he chooses to, to us fans. We get snippets, as you suggested, but it's not in the teams' collective interest to paint a clear picture. Neither if they were the high bidder and got snubbed, nor if they were second highest and "missed it by that much." None of these scenarios or a similar one is positive PR. it's only fitting, since none of the sides doing the negotiations offers transparency to any of the others. "This offer isn't going to get it done - I am expecting a higher offer than that this afternoon - but I can present your offer to my client and see what he says. I suggest you add that extra year, though." "We have a couple of other players in mind, if your client is really firm about that additional year." Etc etc yadda yadda. So I retain serious doubts we fans have enough information to know these things. The teams themselves may not know whether they were second or third or whatever, though they at least can compare the particulars of their own offer to what got accepted. I was responding mostly to the utter certainty - probably that word "Period" is what pushed past my inertia and prompted me to reply.
  3. ashbury
    Go on.......?
  4. ashbury
    Well, that's the narrative. I don't think Boras supplies independently verifiable data that lets us conclude this.
  5. ashbury
    So, they switch to Budweiser's recipe. Problem solved.
  6. ashbury
    Got a ways to go in development of teh awesum beard, though. http://www.milb.com/images/663905/t4124/180x270/663905.jpg
  7. ashbury
    I'm no expert in cartography or the charting of waters, but I suspect that $140M looks eerily similar to $130M, in terms of decision-making. Get to $200M and I'll go along with "Here Be Dragons".
  8. ashbury
    Concur. I just did a cursory YouTube search for footage of him in interviews, back with Tampa and then as recently as this past September. He seems about the same, then and now. He always looked faintly miserable, like under the weather, out on the mound, but I think it's just his game face. No reason for me to think he's been counting the days to get out of town.
  9. ashbury
    That definition omits an important aspect, in the context meant when the term was invoked: being paid for doing this.
  10. ashbury
    "You! What PLANET is this?"
  11. ashbury
    Gardy, watch out for certain phrases. For instance "That. Does. Not. Compute." or "Danger. Will. Robinson." which were in common parlance in the 1960s, are considered greatly demeaning in these modern times, and will probably get you a league fine in addition to an ejection. Don't call a person-of-metal "Robby" or "Are Tee Doo Too", either.
  12. ashbury
    Who even brought up dancing? The article was about something else entirely than this. Max Kepler's parents are ballet dancers, but I don't recall hearing anything about Max performing a Jeté after a home run.
  13. ashbury
    No. I don't know where you found tons of emphasis on fun. It certainly wasn't mentioned in the article, and the word shows up once in passing within a reply post. The article went into some detail to describe what I'll summarize as players "being on the same page" about things, by focusing on common ground. Which, to bring in someone else's comment about the Charlie Finley A's, could explain that their chemistry might have been better, or at least more productive, than some folks realized. Uniting around a common enemy, Finley himself in their case, was widely understood as giving them shared motivation.
  14. ashbury
    Good one! Don't let anyone tell you your writing is sub-par.
  15. ashbury
    Cool! Back in Spring 2015, I did a fairly thorough scan through the previous season's stats, and then dug further back to look at prior seasons for the better performers. That summary is here, 30 Twins Prospects I'll Be Watching In 2015. For humorous effect, I left out Buxton and Sano from the list of hitters, since their 2014 seasons had been curtailed for various injuries. (I added them back to the top, in my last paragraph.) Anyway, I ranked the hitters this way: Polanco, Kepler, Harrison. Then some other players. I'm just a guy on the Internet. But maybe you'll be entertained, or whatever. Pleasedtameetcha.
  16. ashbury
    In case someone else is interested in this tangent, I located what I remembered: MiLB.com has it. Here's the one for Garver: http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp?sid=t498&player_id=641598#/career/R/hitting/2019/ALL It mentions a DL stint in June 2014, marked as "Concussion symptoms", and then another in September of that same year, without a notation other than being on the DL. Perhaps it was a recurrence of the symptoms, perhaps not. He then had another trip to the DL in 2016, again without a notation of the cause. The 2018 injury doesn't show up at all(?!?), whereas his ankle injury in 2019 does. Ah, knowing there was an injury in 2016 at Chattanooga led me to this TD article shortly afterward, which stated it was a concussion that year too. So, the running total now is (at least) three: '14, '16, '18. BTW, I also find that the Baseball Cube has a search tool for its transactions database, which includes injury information, and can be used for searches other than for just one player. Unfortunately, such a tool is only as good as the data entry that it was given, and for Garver the information is similarly spotty, so it has to be treated with care.
  17. ashbury
    I think to find this out you need to google just his name, with the word concussion, and then sift through. Most of the links deal with the big one in September 2018, but this one also mentions a 10-day DL stay back in 2014: https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/card/102593/mitch-garver I thought there was another but haven't turfed it up yet. (I used to know of a link where player's injuries through the career were logged, but I seem to have misplaced it.) Because concussion is believed to be a cumulative injury, the length of time between incidents may not be as benign as for something like a pulled hamstring, and may be the reason the incidents are referred to as "multiple".
  18. ashbury
    The Pirates fired their pitching coach. That suggests they would not be very eager to part with Archer cheaply - better (from their POV) to let their new coach try and bring out his best, than to let the Twins' coach try. I imagine Archer could be pried from Pittsburgh, but at the cost of one of our top prospects, like other trade targets mentioned.
  19. ashbury
    I share the uncertainty 2019 might have been a career year at the plate for Garver. The historical examples given were of players with many years of established performance. I would like to give this decision some time.
  20. ashbury
    Eventually he's going to retire, too. Cut him now and save everyone some time. It's fair to disagree that he has any value at 3B right now. But having him at 3B, if he still qualifies as "adequate" or better (as I do see him), does keep open the choice to find a better bat than Cron's at 1B, if that potential exists out there somewhere. Moving Sano to 1B means finding someone with better fielding skills than that, and may be more expensive, in an off-season where (yet again) financial resources need to be directed toward pitching.
  21. ashbury
    If not having Cron leads to Marwin being our 1B starter then I re-cast my ballot. Marwin's 2017 was his career year, and the Marwin we have now does not have near enough the bat for starter's numbers at such an offense-first position.
  22. ashbury
    He's only arb-eligible, thus under team control, so a QO isn't really something to consider for him anyway.
  23. ashbury
    If the larger roster is brought up to suggest that Cron makes it only as a 26th man, it would seem unusual to pay millions in salary for that. He's the wrong half of a platoon, as he was substandard against righties in 2019. OTOH, maybe a bench bat who mashes lefties isn't the dumbest idea for a 26th man... I guess that puts me on the fence but still leaning toward replacing him.
  24. ashbury
    Then I think you're going to be disappointed in Gordon's SS defense, too. My small-sample of observation is that he has a knack for coming up just short of making the difficult plays you expect a major league SS to complete. We have no shortage of MI, but they all skew toward 2B.
  25. ashbury
    I'm cautiously optimistic that the Twins will actually benefit if indeed Rowson moves on. Hadn't had occasion to mention this before. IMO batting coaches have a short half-life in terms of improving individual batters. He's brought a lot of our guys forward and deserves credit. But the Yankees series demonstrated, in my view, that there remains more to be done, to become a truly top-shelf offense. I hope the Twins locate a batting coach who has some additional situational tricks up his sleeve, as we've felt pretty one-dimensional.
×
×
  • Create New...