Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Nine of twelve

Verified Member
  • Posts

    6,784
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Nine of twelve

  1. I had a Gray Duck childhood. What is it with you people who spell it grey??
  2. Well, I don't know if the Metrodome turf would have been a major issue. He would have spent the bulk of his time DH'ing so it would only have been while baserunning that it would have come into play.
  3. There's more to it than just this, and analytics should be able to give an answer, at least in theory. Does the new stance actually result in more wild pitches and passed balls? Does the new stance reduce the number of baserunners as the result of (presumably) changing the ratio of strikes to balls? Does the new stance decrease the number of pitches thrown? Does the new stance impact the catcher's ability to field his position and to throw out runners attempting stolen bases? Are catchers more likely to incur injuries as the result of the new stance?
  4. Beginning with the 1986 season through the 2021 season they have made the postseason twice in the last 36 seasons.
  5. At the risk of veering too far off-topic, the word is bogeyman. Variations in spelling have arisen over the years.
  6. I don't recall hearing this before either. Obviously the OP has. From where, I don't know. Maybe he just made it up.
  7. Again, I apologize for inaccurately expressing my thoughts. I think Buxton's past incaution in certain situations, such as running into fences, increased his risk of injury. During the last three seasons he appears to have learned from his past and to have become more aware of putting himself at higher risk, and I don't think that any of his injuries during the last two seasons were the result of incaution. Nor do I believe future injuries he may suffer are likely to be due to this. He has also taken steps to improve his physical conditioning. I have seen no data to suggest that Buxton is physiologically injury prone. If you believe that to be the case, the burden is on you to produce data to support that hypothesis. Again, keep in mind that it is invalid to use population-based statistics to prove or disprove an hypothesis about an individual. If you are unable to produce this data you should refrain from making such an assertion. Due to the absence of data to suggest that Buxton is physiologically injury prone and due to his having taken steps to reduce his injury risk, it appears to me that bad luck is the biggest factor in his missing as many games as he has in recent seasons.
  8. You obviously missed my point, and I believe I am at fault for not making it clear. Please accept my apology. It appears that you are using faulty logic. The fact that some people get injured more than others due physiological reason(s) does not mean that everyone who has more frequent injuries suffered them because of those reasons. Only if Buxton is demonstrated to be in the subset of people with those conditions can it be stated that this contributed to his injuries. Therefore the only data that will support your hypothesis are data collected from Buxton himself. Also, I did not state that every injury Buxton suffered was purely due to luck. I only specifically cited three injuries. And I certainly never stated that "injuries are purely luck".
  9. Please post data on Buxton's collagen proteins, bone-mineral density genetic markers, and genetic protein structures. That way you can prove that your hypothesis is correct and not just an attempt to apply a general statement to a specific individual. And while you're at it, please do an analysis of the collision that resulted in a concussion in 2014 and show that "another player, perhaps with better genetic protein structures, may have walked away uninjured". I've provided the video for you.
  10. How does this apply to a concussion when being crashed into by another player, a broken hand on a HBP, and a broken toe on a foul ball? (Answer: it doesn't.)
  11. If Buxton repeatedly suffered the same type of injury then yes, it's legitimate to say that he's injury prone. In Donaldson's case, he has a long history of leg muscle injuries and it's expected for that to continue. Buxton does not have a history of multiple instances of a particular type of injury. That leads me (and most people) to conclude that his injuries are a statistical anomaly. In other words, bad luck. Edit: I didn't read Chief's post before I posted this. Great minds think alike.
  12. I've said a million times not to exaggerate.
  13. If the injuries were due to something Buxton does on a day-to-day basis then there is some basis to predict the future. But they are not. Hence, it's just as legitimate, probably more so, to say that the odds are that he is due for a few injury-free seasons. But in either case past results are no guarantee of future performance.
  14. This is an agree to disagree moment. Watching him during the last month or two I think he has closer stuff and has developed a bit of swagger that comes from confidence. Subjective observations but I think he has grown to the point where he can do it. I'm making him a pick to click for next season. Even if we trade him.
  15. With all due respect to Taylor Rogers, Duffey should be our closer. It's better to have a righty in that role, and Rogers and Alcala can mix and match for the 7th and 8th. Now we just need to find a way to get through the first 6 innings...
  16. I tire of reading posts that reference Buxton's injuries as if every one was his fault and that project him to continue to spend significant time on the IL for the rest of his career.
  17. It is a necessity to keep him. Bear in mind we are talking about the league MVP for the next 2-3 years.
  18. Do not trade a catcher who is ready and able to play in the major leagues. Unless you get a really good offer. And then don't do it.
  19. That nuance is a valid point, and I think in retrospect that 2011 and this year probably were more disappointing than 2016. In fact, bottoming out so badly in 2016 probably has a silver lining in that it spurred a complete retooling of the entire organization.
  20. No discussion of 2016? Very few people expected an outstanding team but I don't think anyone expected total system failure and 103 losses.
  21. My post was not intended to compare Wade and Rooker as players. It was intended to compare their situations regarding the 40-man and the possibility of a trade.
  22. This thread reminds me of LaMonte Wade, Jr. He was viewed as minor league depth, we had a surplus of left-handed bats in the outfield, so we traded him for a bullpen hopeful. It seemed like the right thing to do at the time, but how did that work out? I just hope that if we trade Rooker away we win the trade instead of repeating the Wade trade.
  23. Keeping in mind the state where this team is based, this makes sense. (And not fashion sense.)
  24. Two good and insightful points. Regarding Balazovic gettin pulled, we must keep in mind that the purpose of the minor league system is to produce major league players, not necessarily to win games and certainly not to pad personal stats.
  25. Ryan's sample size is simply too small to generate a reliable extrapolation. As an example, back in 2013 Andrew Albers had better results in his first two starts major league starts than Ryan did in his.
×
×
  • Create New...