Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
  • Posts

    32,403
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    328

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brock Beauchamp

  1. To those saying this move was long overdue... How quickly did you expect the front office to willingly jettison $20m+? The guy didn't pitch his first game until April 22nd. He pitched all of two games out of the rotation before the front office put him in the bullpen. In the three weeks since that move, Hughes pitched in only five games. It was certainly time to move on but the front office gave Hughes a brief shot at the rotation, saw he no longer had the stuff to start, then gave him a brief look at relieving, ultimately coming to the same conclusion. Could they have moved a week earlier? Sure. But one week isn't exactly "long overdue".
  2. None whatsoever. I don't know if I'm ready to jump in on Realmuto - it all depends on the price - but there should be something available better than what the Twins have right now in Wilson.
  3. Well, yes, but he's very likely to spend several years in MLB barring injury. He's the one guy I wouldn't move right now. I think he only continues to gain value.
  4. Realmuto has 2+ seasons left before free agency, not 3+ seasons. And the Twins will almost surely get 6+ seasons out of Lewis so you're passing on four seasons of Lewis.
  5. It was a questionable decision but not an indefensible one. We all figured Pelfrey was in way over his head but the bullpen was in pretty miserable shape at the time. The Twins needed a higher upside arm to pitch late innings and May was their best option. Of course, that meant weakening the rotation at the same time. It wasn't an optimal solution but there was no optimal solution available at the time.
  6. That's good in theory but rarely works in practice. You might go 5-6 days of getting 5+ innings out of your starters. You won't give a single reliever three innings in any of those appearances and May rusts on the bench. The reason you don't give one reliever three innings in that situation is because the game is usually close at that point and you want to use matchups to notch another win. If your starter goes 5+ and the game isn't close, you're probably kicking the other team's ass so it doesn't matter. On the other hand, you might get a couple of three inning starts in a 2-3 day span. You can't use the same guy for three innings that close together, either. And if your starter goes three innings, you're probably getting your ass kicked so, once again, it doesn't matter. The reality is that long men don't get regular work. There's a reason why long men are the back of the bullpen and very rarely a good pitcher. You use them when you need innings en masse and don't want to waste all those days off on a pitcher who can actually get hitters out on a regular basis.
  7. I think we’re just disagreeing that a couple of other good young teams existing makes none of them young. In my mind, I consider the Twins, Yankees, and Red Sox young teams. And it’s likely the Twins continue to be young for awhile because they are going to add more prospects this season.
  8. Why wouldn't anyone think of the Red Sox as young? I sure do. Like you said, they have five regulars 26 or younger. It causes me a lot of pain to see how young the BoSox and Yankees have become over the past couple of years. When Polanco and Sano return, the Twins will have the same number of guys 26 or younger in the lineup.
  9. Look at the scores of those games. If the offense is clicking, they add a couple more wins and are REALLY rolling as a team. The pitching has been *very* good more often than not. Here are the runs scored in those four losses: 5 4 1 0 The offense has stumbled quite often this season. You expect to see that from pretty much any offense over 162 but if the Twins were consistently posting 3+ runs (not exactly a lofty bar to reach), they'd be one of the best teams in the league in the month of May.
  10. Huh. Berrios is back out after a long inning. Didn't expect that.
  11. Honest question: with Buxton on third, do you play with the infield in? I don't think I do.
  12. Rosario would have slid into the dugout there.
  13. He's super young though and he was leaving a ton of balls down the middle of the plate. Those hits weren't lucky or an accident.
  14. And Rosario was going to try for an extra 180 feet on that hit. Sigh.
  15. Yep, and I typed that post before the hit. He laid off two bad pitches to start the at-bat. Also, Escobar!
  16. Day game tomorrow. It's Wilson either tonight or tomorrow, pick your poison.
  17. I really like this new (old) version of Rosario that doesn't swing at garbage pitches.
  18. It shouldn’t be that surprising, really. Buxton was out and Escobar played short for awhile. It’s hurt the team defensively to lose Polanco and then Buxton.
  19. I liked the attempted steal. It was a breaking ball in the dirt. Dozier saw it going into the dirt and challenged the catcher. It took a good throw to beat him. That’s a risk I want to see a baserunner take every time, it just didn’t work out.
  20. I mean, I'm not bashing Richards. He has velocity and could be a decent pitcher... but he's no ace. Never has been considered one, never will be unless he magically turns the corner at age 30. Kyle Gibson ranked higher on top 100 prospect lists if you need a frame of reference for Richards.
  21. And now Garrett Richards "is finally becoming the ace they wanted him to be." ... Garrett Richards? Ace? *turns on oven*
  22. The FS1 pregame crew makes me want to stick my head in the oven. "He's swinging at 35% of pitches outside the zone, which means he's swinging at 65% of pitches in the zone." No, that's not what that means. Not even a little bit.
  23. Fangraphs had Polanco’s defense around average last year while Escobar was below average. As for offense, it’s not really fair to compare them but they were pretty close last season... but Escobar didn’t have a death in the family that skewered his numbers for a couple of months. On the other hand, Escobar is a beast this season and we have no idea how Polanco would be hitting if he was on the field.
×
×
  • Create New...