Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    When It Comes to Joe Ryan, Twins Have Four MLB Trade Deadline Options

    Minnesota's ace has become one of the most talked-about names ahead of the MLB trade deadline, leaving the front office with a franchise-defining decision.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Jordan Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The next 16 games may determine the direction of the Minnesota Twins for years to come. The 2026 MLB Trade Deadline has become a franchise-altering moment for an organization that wasn't expected to contend this season. Minnesota has surged into a tie for the final American League Wild Card spot thanks to an impressive stretch leading into the All-Star Break, putting the club on the verge of climbing back to .500.

    That unexpected success has complicated what once looked like an obvious selling period at the deadline. While the Twins have exceeded expectations, they're still trying to balance a surprising postseason push against the long-term outlook of a roster that may not yet be ready to seriously challenge for a World Series title. No player embodies that dilemma more than Joe Ryan.

    Diamond Centric recently ranked Ryan as the No. 2 player with a chance to be traded before the deadline, citing his combination of durability, swing-and-miss stuff, and remaining club control as attributes that make him one of the most desirable starters available. The rankings noted that Ryan continues to miss bats at an elite level despite not overpowering hitters with velocity, relying instead on multiple fastball shapes, a deep mix of breaking pitches, and an occasional splitter that neutralizes left-handed hitters. He's also continued to pair high strikeout totals with excellent command while significantly reducing the home run issues that occasionally plagued him earlier in his career. With Ryan coming off a second consecutive All-Star appearance, his value may never be higher.

    That leaves Minnesota with four realistic options.

    Option 1: Trade Ryan at the Peak of His Value

    If maximizing organizational value is the goal, this is likely the strongest argument. Starting pitchers carry enormous value at the deadline—especially frontline arms with another full season of team control remaining. Ryan isn't a rental. Any acquiring club would have him through the 2027 season, allowing Minnesota to command one of the biggest prospect packages available this summer.

    Pitchers are also notoriously unpredictable. Ryan has established himself as one of the American League's better starters, but there are no guarantees that continues. He's faded somewhat during the second half in recent seasons, and every pitcher carries injury risk. The Twins have already experienced that harsh reality this year after Pablo López suffered an elbow injury during spring training that ultimately required Tommy John surgery.

    Trading Ryan would undoubtedly hurt the 2026 club. It would also signal that the organization isn't prioritizing this year's playoff chase. However, if the Twins believe they're still a year or two away from legitimate championship contention, adding another premium group of prospects to one of baseball's highest-ranked farm systems could accelerate the next competitive window. It would be difficult for fans to accept, but championship organizations often make uncomfortable decisions before they become obvious ones.

    Option 2: Hold Ryan and Trade Him This Winter

    The middle ground may be waiting. Ryan remains under team control through the 2027 season, meaning Minnesota wouldn't lose much leverage by waiting until the offseason. In fact, there is a blueprint for that approach.

    The Milwaukee Brewers, another small-market organization that has consistently developed high-end starting pitching, have frequently traded pitchers with roughly one season of control remaining. More often than not, those deals have come during the winter rather than at the deadline, allowing Milwaukee to better evaluate its roster before making a franchise-changing move.

    The Twins could take a similar path. Waiting would also allow them to see whether this surprising second-half push develops into a legitimate postseason run. If Minnesota reaches October, Ryan would be central to those hopes.

    Still, there are risks. The possibility of a looming lockout following the season could create an abbreviated offseason with a much smaller trade window than normal. If negotiations between MLB owners and the Players Association disrupt the calendar, the Twins may not have the luxury of patiently shopping Ryan throughout the winter. Instead of maximizing leverage, they could find themselves trying to complete a blockbuster under an accelerated timeline.

    Option 3: Keep Ryan Into 2027 and Reevaluate at Next Year's Trade Deadline

    The Twins also have the option of delaying the decision for another full year. If Minnesota believes its young core is capable of taking another step in 2027, Ryan could remain at the front of the rotation and help lead another postseason push. Should the Twins find themselves back in contention, keeping him would be an easy decision.

    However, if the season unfolds differently and the club falls out of the playoff race, Ryan could become one of the premier names available at the 2027 MLB Trade Deadline.

    The return likely wouldn't match what Minnesota could receive this summer. At that point, Ryan would be a true rental with only a few months remaining before free agency, limiting the number of years of team control that acquiring clubs value so highly. Even so, frontline starting pitching is always in demand at the deadline, and recent history has shown that contenders are willing to pay significant prospect capital for impact arms, even on expiring contracts.

    The downside is obvious. By waiting another year, the Twins would assume another full season of injury risk and the possibility that Ryan's performance declines. They would also lose the leverage that comes with offering an additional season of team control.

    Still, if the organization believes it can compete in 2027, keeping Ryan for another season while preserving the option to move him next July could provide the best balance between trying to win now and recouping value later. It wouldn't maximize his trade return, but it would give the Twins one more opportunity to contend before making a franchise-changing decision.

    Option 4: Keep Ryan Through Free Agency

    The simplest option may also be the riskiest. Minnesota could simply keep Ryan through the remainder of his arbitration years and allow him to anchor the rotation through the end of the 2027 season. If he departs in free agency, the Twins could extend him a qualifying offer and potentially receive draft pick compensation if he signs elsewhere.

    That strategy would allow the current core to compete while providing some long-term value if Ryan eventually leaves. But there are significant unknowns.

    The current Collective Bargaining Agreement expires after the 2026 season, meaning there's no guarantee the qualifying offer system even exists by the time Ryan reaches free agency. Banking on draft compensation that may disappear would be a considerable gamble.

    Even if the qualifying offer remains intact, injuries can dramatically change a player's value overnight. López's season-ending elbow injury served as another reminder that pitchers represent one of baseball's most volatile assets. Waiting always introduces the possibility that circumstances change before the Twins have another opportunity to capitalize on Ryan's value.

    A Defining Decision

    There isn't a wrong answer. Trading Ryan now likely maximizes his value and could further strengthen an already impressive farm system. Waiting until the winter gives the Twins more time to evaluate whether this season is the beginning of something larger while still preserving much of his trade value. Keeping him through 2027 prioritizes winning at the major league level but exposes the organization to significant financial, injury, and collective bargaining risks.

    What makes the decision so fascinating is that all four paths are defensible. The Twins weren't expected to be here. Their resurgence has forced the front office to weigh the excitement of an unexpected playoff chase against the discipline required to build the next championship-caliber roster. Whatever direction they choose with Ryan won't simply shape the remainder of 2026—it could define the organization's trajectory for years to come.


    What is the best option for the Twins? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Kaelen Culpepper

    St. Paul Saints - AAA, SS
    Culpepper was one of four Saints batters with three hits on Tuesday night in the team's 15-5 win over Louisville. He was 3-for-4 with a walk and his second triple.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    14 hours ago, DocBauer said:

    I am amazed at obtuse thinking. 

    Ryan has never said he wanted to be traded. He only stated last season that it was "interesting" to hear his name in a BS report about being traded.

    He's throwing as well as he ever has.

    The trade BS should just go away. He's a Twin for 2027 PERIOD.

    The FO is going to have to make a decision between extending Lopez or Ryan.  But that's a few months away.

    I think the "Joe Ryan wants to leave" stuff comes from the same place as the "Sonny Gray wants to leave" stuff did. 

    They are competitive athletes. They sometimes have a bad day. When they do, they are angry at themselves, and their body language sometimes shows it. They are confident in their abilities, so they are (appropriately) disappointed that they got taken out of the game, because they want to see themselves through it. They are interviewed after a game and in the heat of the moment make a comment like, "I wanted to go after the next guy," which gets taken out of context and magnified on the internet. And then, if something happens a second time, it gets mushroomed even more.

    Meanwhile, in more settled times, we see Gray make comments about how much he liked being in Minnesota. And recently an article in The Athletic talked about how much Ryan has bought into the team and what it's doing. But because those comments don't happen in the heat of the moment (or on television during a game), people don't pay attention. 

    I'm not sure I'd go as far as you in saying he's a Twin in 2027 PERIOD (though I hope he is, and think it very likely), but when you consider that all the noise about 2026 has come from the outside (looking at you, Bowden and others), I definitely think he's here past August 4.

    21 hours ago, amjgt said:

    Maybe he's been brought up in this thread and it was just a post I skimmed over, but an extension for Pablo seems way more likely that Joe. 

    Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have them both beyond 2027, anchoring the rotation, with some combination of Taj, Abel, Prielipp, and Zebby filling it out. You pair that with a lineup that is good now (with a little smoke and mirrors) but looks to be building towards a young, fun 2027/28 and you've got a team that you don't have to squint to see having good sustainable success.

    But I just don't see both Pablo and Joe both being around past 2027. And based on the AAV and years that it might take, I view Pablo as a more likely, lower cost, lower risk extension candidate. 

    I'd love to see them extend Ryan, but I think you are right. Lopez goes into next season with a lot of weight on his needing to have a full injury-free season in order to get a multi-year deal. A one-year extension to guarantee 2028 and give him more time to re-establish himself makes gobs of sense on both sides. 

     

    21 hours ago, Stew said:

    An extension could be an option. But will his agent ask for a lot more? Will they have to give a qualifying offer . There is a lot to look over.you have other contracts to deal with. Lopez has one more year . It would make since to hold on Ryan and negotiate an extension. Then see if lopez is pitching well. If he is good he could be on the trading block. He is paid eight million more than ryan next year. And the twins have stated they may not trade jeffers. I don't see us keeping all three.

    Ryan's $13M for next year is a mutual option. I think it's been years since a mutual option was taken by both sides. With the year he is having, Ryan will easily decline his end. With the amount Skubal got as an S3 player, Ryan will be paid significantly above $13M. 

    2 hours ago, soyouresayingtheresachance said:

    Absolutely. Especially if theyre able to get a little creative with it. He is 100% a 30M+ pitcher right now. He doesnt rely on being upper 90s to be effective. He's a solid pitcher and not just a high speed thrower. I believe he'll adapt and still perform well as he ages. 

    It would be nice to see the contract a little front loaded to account for possible decline, but I feel he has earned a contract in that range. 

    I have no doubt he can get that money; my concern is the Twins being the ones to pay it. He relies on his fastball spin making his fastball do abnormal things. The second that is gone Joe Ryan will start to really struggle. I don't want the Twins paying 30 million to him for years after that point.

    I have no problem with people wanting to extend Joe. I just think it turns into many of the same people complaining that his contract is ruining their ability to build out the rest of the roster. We haven't even gotten into pitcher injuries and the likelihood of that happening. It's a giant risk to pay any pitcher into their mid- to late-thirties. Giant.

    1 hour ago, chpettit19 said:

    I have no doubt he can get that money; my concern is the Twins being the ones to pay it. He relies on his fastball spin making his fastball do abnormal things. The second that is gone Joe Ryan will start to really struggle. I don't want the Twins paying 30 million to him for years after that point.

    I have no problem with people wanting to extend Joe. I just think it turns into many of the same people complaining that his contract is ruining their ability to build out the rest of the roster. We haven't even gotten into pitcher injuries and the likelihood of that happening. It's a giant risk to pay any pitcher into their mid- to late-thirties. Giant.

    I've never really thought of "spin" as something that declines with age. Maybe it does. No idea. I'd love to see some data on that.

    38 minutes ago, amjgt said:

    I've never really thought of "spin" as something that declines with age. Maybe it does. No idea. I'd love to see some data on that.

    I guess I shouldn't claim to know that for 100%, but spin is a large part of what makes a pitcher's "stuff" so good, right? On a basic level, its spin and velocity. And their stuff always declines with age. My assumption would be that the decline isn't 100% velocity driven.

    25 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    I guess I shouldn't claim to know that for 100%, but spin is a large part of what makes a pitcher's "stuff" so good, right? On a basic level, its spin and velocity. And their stuff always declines with age. My assumption would be that the decline isn't 100% velocity driven.

    My (perhaps flawed) assumption has been that velocity declines with age because it’s largely strength-based, although I think more recently perhaps we’ve seen that mechanics play a bigger role than previously though. 

    But when it comes to spin, I’ve always thought of that as more technique driven, or at the very least driven by much less powerful muscles/tendons, so not nearly as affected by age deterioration. 

    That could be 100% be a flawed way to think about it though. 

    8 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    I have no doubt he can get that money; my concern is the Twins being the ones to pay it. He relies on his fastball spin making his fastball do abnormal things. The second that is gone Joe Ryan will start to really struggle. I don't want the Twins paying 30 million to him for years after that point.

    I have no problem with people wanting to extend Joe. I just think it turns into many of the same people complaining that his contract is ruining their ability to build out the rest of the roster. We haven't even gotten into pitcher injuries and the likelihood of that happening. It's a giant risk to pay any pitcher into their mid- to late-thirties. Giant.

    Of course its a risk. Signing any player is a risk. Which is why my preference would be to front load that contract to try and offset that decline. IF, big if, Pohlad is serious about being a perennial contender, its the kind of signings that will need to happen. If we dont keep Joe, we will still need to sign an Ace or #2 starter. Someone is going to have to get paid by the Twins to be a playoff pitcher. 

    8 hours ago, soyouresayingtheresachance said:

    Of course its a risk. Signing any player is a risk. Which is why my preference would be to front load that contract to try and offset that decline. IF, big if, Pohlad is serious about being a perennial contender, its the kind of signings that will need to happen. If we dont keep Joe, we will still need to sign an Ace or #2 starter. Someone is going to have to get paid by the Twins to be a playoff pitcher. 

    Show me a massively front loaded contract. 

    On 7/15/2026 at 6:13 PM, Mike Sixel said:

    What's your plan after next year? 

    Spend what you have to to keep Ryan and Lopez. Ryan. Lopez. Bradley and whoever emerges from the rest of the lot would be an ok starting 5. If you are a serious owner, wanting to win, that's what we need to do. If not, live with mediocrity or less year after year. We can't keep going dumpster diving year after year to fill out a rotation, esp after we finally have 60% set. 

    On 7/16/2026 at 11:48 PM, soyouresayingtheresachance said:

    Of course its a risk. Signing any player is a risk. Which is why my preference would be to front load that contract to try and offset that decline. IF, big if, Pohlad is serious about being a perennial contender, its the kind of signings that will need to happen. If we dont keep Joe, we will still need to sign an Ace or #2 starter. Someone is going to have to get paid by the Twins to be a playoff pitcher. 

    I couldn't agree more! See my post above, and I wrote that before reading yours. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...