Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Was 2024 the Most Disappointing Season in Minnesota Twins History?


    Cody Christie

    The 2024 Twins season will be remembered for all the wrong reasons. How does it stack up with other disappointing seasons in team history?

     

    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett, Jerry Lai, Richard Mackson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    After a Twins season that failed to live up to expectations, many fans have a sour taste in their mouths. Minnesota sports fans have become accustomed to watching their favorite teams fall short in critical moments. The Twins have had several seasons that did so, leaving fans disappointed. Here are a few of the most notable, starting with the most recent:

    2024 Season
    Expectation: The Twins entered the season as the clear favorites in the AL Central. Minnesota’s expectations were high, following the team’s first playoff series win in two decades. Other AL Central teams seemed to be in various stages of disrepair or transition, so it looked like it was the Twins’ division to lose.

    Disappointment: Cleveland got off to a tremendous start and ran away with the division title. Kansas City added pieces over the winter and at the trade deadline to bolster their roster. Detroit sat below .500 at the trade deadline and became sellers, but went on an unbelievable run to end the year and win a Wild Card spot. Minnesota had playoff odds over 90% entering August and collapsed down the stretch. Three AL Central teams made the playoffs, and the Twins were left on the outside looking in.

    2022 Season
    Expectation: The Twins surprised the baseball world by signing Carlos Correa to a massive free-agent deal coming out of the lockout. Earlier in the winter, Minnesota had traded for veteran starter Sonny Gray. It was a clear message to the AL Central that the Twins were going to contend, and put the horrible 2021 season in the rearview mirror. 

    Disappointment: On Aug. 6, the Twins were in first place by two games and stood seven games above .500. There was a 62.3% chance for the team to make the playoffs. Injuries plagued the team in the second half, and their playoff odds evaporated. Minnesota finished in third place (14 games back), with a record below .500. Adding to the disappointment, Correa was headed back to free agency and seemed likely to sign elsewhere.

    2011 Season
    Expectation: Coming off division titles in 2009 and 2010, the Twins were expected to dominate again. They had a strong core of Joe Mauer, Justin Morneau, and Michael Cuddyer. Jim Thome re-signed with the club, after a renaissance season during his first year in a Twins uniform. Minnesota also signed Tsuyoshi Nishioka, whom they hoped would be the next great Japanese player. Also, Target Field was still buzzing with excitement in its second year. 

    Disappointment: Instead, the team fell apart, finishing 63-99, their worst record since 1982. Injuries to key players like Mauer and Morneau and a collapse from the pitching staff made this season particularly frustrating. The ageless Thome suddenly aged very rapidly, and Nishioka struggled to transition to the MLB level (40 OPS+). Warning signs became evident during the team’s midsummer cave-in: Minnesota was heading into a dark decade, with the team struggling to be relevant. Eventually, the baseball operations department needed to be overhauled, and the team moved on from two different managers. 

    2001 Season
    Expectation: Minnesota entered the 2001 season with the eyes of the baseball world on it. During the offseason, MLB discussed plans to contract the Twins, but the plan was blocked by a court injunction that forced the team to honor their lease at the Metrodome, and by challenges from the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA). This large cloud looming over the team put pressure on young players to perform. With players like Torii Hunter, Doug Mientkiewicz, and Brad Radke leading the way, the Twins burst out of the gates, holding first place for much of the year and looking like a playoff contender.

    Disappointment: A midseason collapse saw the Twins fall out of contention. They finished with an 85-77 record, missing the postseason. This season stung, because it seemed like the team was finally ready to compete again after a decade of rebuilding. It was the first step in what would become a decade dominated by the Twins in the AL Central. Minnesota won the division five times from 2002 to 2009, including making the ALCS in 2002. One must wonder what could have happened if the team had more playoff experience during the 2001 campaign. 

    1992 Season
    Expectation: The Twins were coming off a World Series win in 1991, and expectations were that the club would be in contention for another title. They had a strong core of Kirby Puckett, Kent Hrbek, Shane Mack, and Scott Erickson. Minnesota entered play on Aug. 4 in a three-way tie atop the American League with Oakland and Toronto. The Twins were in position to become the first back-to-back World Series winner since the Yankees in the late 1970s.

    Disappointment: Instead of building on their success, the Twins faltered down the stretch, finishing 27-29 after that day in early August. Minnesota finished six games behind Oakland in the West division and missed the playoffs. To add insult to injury, 1991 World Series hero Jack Morris signed with Toronto and helped them win the pennant. Despite having personnel similar to their 1991 championship team, they ran out of gas in the second half, leading to one of the most disappointing post-title letdowns in franchise history. It was just the start of a downward slide, too.


    These seasons were painful for fans, as they all followed periods of high expectations or early success. How would you rank the seasons described above? Should other seasons make the list? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Brandon Winokur

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS/CF
    Winokur has had multi-hit games in five of his past six games. In that stretch, he is 13-for-23 (.565) with two doubles. He homered in the 8th inning to give the Kernels the lead. Had 4 hits on Saturday.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    My feeling is, yes. 

    1993-2001 - Feels a lot like the same kind of ownership as we've seen since the end of last year. "Can't compete on the big budgets, etc." Fan apathy just set in. Hatred of greedy sports owners in Minnesota (Carl Pohlad, Norm Green, etc.). 

    2002-2009 After miser Carl Pohlad blinked when Radke held his feet to the fire extending the ace in mid 2000, and the failure of the contraction effort in 2001, it was a new age for the Twins. Fans were energized by false cries of financial woe eventually giving way to the rusty hinges of Pohlad's wallet opening and the success of the Twins in 2001.

    2010 Fans were excited with the opening of Target Field, Jim Pohlad's promise of expanding payrolls, and the unprecedented (for the Twins) recent extensions of their top players like Joe Mauer, Justin Morneau, Michael Cuddyer, and Joe Nathan. 

    2011 - It seemed like a convergence of unexpected performances, and bad luck caused the collapse. Liriano completely cratered, Baker had a great season but missed a huge chunk, Pavano declined. "Bilateral leg weakness" and the training staff handling it poorly crippled Joe Mauer. Injuries devastated the team with only 2 players qualifying (Valencia, who was a huge disappointment and Cuddyer who had a great season).

    2012 - The realization the Twins just weren't that good, but the terrible 2011 softened the blow a lot. The Twins went out and picked up Willingham so there was at least some effort, I suppose. Plus, Bill Smith was shown the door after the brutal 2011 campaign which meant somebody was held accountable.

    2013-2014 - The rebuild was underway. The team wasn't expected to be good.

    2015-2016 - The signs of life showed up with a surprise playoff appearance in 2015, followed by a let down in the 2016 campaign, but the Twins young core showed enormous promise.

    2017-2023 - The Falvey era hope. Regardless of which side you were on, the doors opened up and the dingy basement of Twins analytics was rapidly aired out, expanded and enhanced. Falvey brought the team into the modern age of scouting and analytics driven development. After 20 years of ineptitude, the Twins were finally a team to be reckoned with. A playoff series win. A young core with truly impressive potential. Analytics in place. An ownership group with a younger and interested voice who were willing to spend money and compete. 2024 was the year. You could just feel it.

    Yeah, from the end of 2023 to now, ownership took the fan base out back and put it down in a way which is almost incomprehensible. It was almost like a strategic plan to kill the fan base. I'm not sure they could have done any more damage to skip by hope and anger and go straight to apathy.

    Most of the 70's & 80's were bad but I expected that. But looking at '24 starting the offseason, our '23 core was still intact, with healthy veteran leadership Buxton, Polanco & Correa, with promising Lewis, Miranda & Kiriloff to start the season & together with promising rookies. Our main hole was Gray, my hope was to trade for a stud but with rising Ryan & Ober, I'd still be satisfied with a mid-rotation inning eater to take the pressure off the rotation & BP & put us in a position to win the Division & advance in the postseason. This hole was not filled at all but instead money was spent on frivolous salaries handcuffing us financially from having money to spend on more important opportunities. Trade opportunities were not taken advantage of during the offseason & deadline. So I wasn't surprised at all by the outcome, nevertheless, I was very disappointed because I thought we had a shot at taking home the whole thing.

    This was not the most disappointing season, and really on the list the 2022 and 2011 were only really disappointment seasons. I would say 2011 was as we had are core team, had been winning for several years, and thought that would continue, and the season was just terrible.  2022 was also an issue as we had the big signing of CC and trade for Grey, but we still had some holes. 

    The other seasons listed, the team did not finish far off from where they were expected going into the season.  In 2001 they were not expected to compete at all, just because they faded down stretch does not mean they were a disappointment.  In 1992 they were just a few wins off the prior year, yes they had hopes of repeating, but back then even getting into playoffs on back to back years were hard enough.  We lost one of our top starters from 1991.  

    This year we did terrible down the stretch, but did not finish too far off of what many expected in total wins.  It was disappointing, and not a fun last month really, but I would not say the most disappointing. 

    21 minutes ago, Florida Flash said:

    Agree. Very obvious the team quit on Rocco. I still cannot understand ALL the injuries. I dont remember the Twins of old, Killebrew, Allison, Versalles, Rollins, etc, being hurt all the time. Granted Tony wrecked his knee on an outfield sprinkler, but seemed to always play.

    Also, it seems everyone is swinging for the fence every at bat and every situation. I guess that is where the money is. A 210 hitter with 24 homeruns makes a lot more money than a 310 hitter with 4 home runs.

    Yeah.  I don't get it either.  How much of it is REALLY legit?  You have to ask yourself that.  I looked at the Royals lineup and EVERY one of their starters went at least 100 games (except their DH).  5 players went 130+.

    C - Salvador Prez 158 games

    1B - Vinnie Pasquantino (10-day IL) 131 games

    2B - Michael Massey 100 games

    SS - Bobby Witt Jr. 161 games (wow)

    3B - Maikel Garcia 157 games (wow again)

    LF - MJ Melendez 135 games

    CF - Kyle Isbel 136 games

    RF - Hunter Renfroe 120 games

    DH - Nelson Velazquez (40 man) 64 games

    I've heard a frequent phrase used by a few players....

     

    "Ran out of gas". Or  "running on fumes"

    Where the Mighty Marlins running on fumes as they traveled to Minnesota to take 2 of 3? 

    Every team plays 162 games, last time I checked. 

    "Running out of gas" is just an excuse..

     

     

     

    1 hour ago, laloesch said:

    EVERY one of their starters went at least 100 games (except their DH).  5 players went 130+.

    C - Salvador Prez 158 games

    1B - Vinnie Pasquantino (10-day IL) 131 games

    2B - Michael Massey 100 games

    SS - Bobby Witt Jr. 161 games (wow)

    3B - Maikel Garcia 157 games (wow again)

    LF - MJ Melendez 135 games

    CF - Kyle Isbel 136 games

    RF - Hunter Renfroe 120 games

    DH - Nelson Velazquez (40 man) 64 games

    Yep....and none of them are :

     

    "Running out of gas"

     

    Maybe Joe needs to put in a filling station in the clubhouse. 

    For those that think that believe that nobody should talk negatively about the Twins, read the link below from Aaron Gleeman's interview of Twins' president Joe Pohlad, 

    Aaron Gleeman Puts Minnesota Twins Owner on Trial in Epic Back-and-Forth (msn.com)

     

    This is the most disappointing finish to a season I've had - the Twins usually finish strong with steady it's-a-marathon-not-a-sprint mentality by Gardenhire or Rocco.  After being reminded of 2011, I have to say that was the more disappointing season because we had the players and new stadium to support keeping that team together and then the injuries and the huge whiff that was Nishioka and 99 losses.  That wasn't just a surprisingly not good year, it was the end of an opportunity.  It may be that this is that also, but as of now, it is just a disappointing end to a promising season.  I am worried though about the brand of baseball that was played: putting too much stock in maximizing OPS and righty-lefty matchups resulting in players playing out of position leading to poor situational hitting results, bad defense and throw in awful baserunning and then pulling your best pitcher who happens to be your starter with fewer than 90 pitches thrown to bring in a mediocre reliever who may or may not have good stuff that night.  Even Gardy's disappointing (or for that matter bad) teams were fundamentally sound.

    3 hours ago, laloesch said:

    Yeah.  I don't get it either.  How much of it is REALLY legit?  You have to ask yourself that.  I looked at the Royals lineup and EVERY one of their starters went at least 100 games (except their DH).  5 players went 130+.

    C - Salvador Prez 158 games

    1B - Vinnie Pasquantino (10-day IL) 131 games

    2B - Michael Massey 100 games

    SS - Bobby Witt Jr. 161 games (wow)

    3B - Maikel Garcia 157 games (wow again)

    LF - MJ Melendez 135 games

    CF - Kyle Isbel 136 games

    RF - Hunter Renfroe 120 games

    DH - Nelson Velazquez (40 man) 64 games

    It seems to be a management/FO theme. I truly think some of it goes back to how they go about spring training and some of it goes by what the manager puts in their head. 

    2 hours ago, S Bart said:

    For those that think that believe that nobody should talk negatively about the Twins, read the link below from Aaron Gleeman's interview of Twins' president Joe Pohlad, 

    Aaron Gleeman Puts Minnesota Twins Owner on Trial in Epic Back-and-Forth (msn.com)

     

    Is anyone saying that?

    35 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Is anyone saying that?

    For the most part no, but there have been past postings that have pushed that concept. Sorry, I have been a fan since 1965 and am now a "downtrodden senior citizen" who has cheered them for so many years. I am just so sad at their leadership especially Joe Pohlad who I feel has no reality of the setting. He keeps mentioning business, but this 42-year-old does not seem to have a concept of how to run an operation like the Twins. It's also a community service, and dedication is part of the package. 

    In the words of Field of Dreams, "If you build, they will come." 

    This wasn't the most disappointing, that distinction in my lifetime goes to the 2011 Twins. I knew this club stanked, even if most were fooled by the record for the vast majority of the season. In all reality if the Twinz of this year didn't get blessed to play the ChiSox 13 times (where the Twinz went 12-1), they were a 9 games below .500 team, which met my eye test.

    17 hours ago, S Bart said:

    For those that think that believe that nobody should talk negatively about the Twins, read the link below from Aaron Gleeman's interview of Twins' president Joe Pohlad, 

    Aaron Gleeman Puts Minnesota Twins Owner on Trial in Epic Back-and-Forth (msn.com)

     

    I think Joe was quite defensive in his exchange with Aaron and he didn't really answer any of Gleeman's question just created word salad with no substance.  Not promising.  

    2 hours ago, laloesch said:

    I think Joe was quite defensive in his exchange with Aaron and he didn't really answer any of Gleeman's question just created word salad with no substance.  Not promising.  

    Well, he is not a very astute businessman. Skor North podcast from September 30 gives a fact-based background of Joe Pohlad's lack of success (I fact checked it for accuracy) with the past Pohlad businesses. It is pretty, pretty scary having this person on charge of the Twins operation. ...no wonder he is defensive! It is interesting that they did this " selected media event" on Sunday. Also, the media invited were handpicked. Gleeman is astute and the team probably regrets selecting him.

    I'd have to say Yes.... I don't have a real memory of 1984, so since then, I think 2011 was previously the most disappointing. I just kept thinking that at some point "reality" would set in and the team would start playing better, and it never happened. More injuries and it just got worse. Uggh! 

    It's just hard to know how much to say expectations are altered by injury or other facts. 

    In 1992, they had a better regular season record than 1991, so I don't see that as disappointing at all. And, 2001, I don't think the expectations were there. They were such a surprise in the first half that I think most assumed there would be a return the center. 

    Well the 'fire Hyde' rumblings in Baltimore getting real loud. When you fail (badly) in post season, your job is always in jeopardy. Twins didn't get to post season and should have. O's won 101 and 91 last 2 seasons and couldn't win a game in post season. This is the stuff that gets managers fired.

    Detroit and KC came on to steal the the last 2 wild cards....and looky here...they both swept their opponents, good opponents, in the first round.

    No matter what anyone in either organization is saying right now, I have to believe both managers are on serious thin ice.

    10 hours ago, insagt1 said:

    Well the 'fire Hyde' rumblings in Baltimore getting real loud. When you fail (badly) in post season, your job is always in jeopardy. Twins didn't get to post season and should have. O's won 101 and 91 last 2 seasons and couldn't win a game in post season. This is the stuff that gets managers fired.

    Detroit and KC came on to steal the the last 2 wild cards....and looky here...they both swept their opponents, good opponents, in the first round.

    No matter what anyone in either organization is saying right now, I have to believe both managers are on serious thin ice.

    I'm rooting for both Detroit and KC.  Good for them!  Really, good for them.  Both those franchises came out of no-where so to speak and won wild card slots and knocked off favorites in the wild card round (Orioles and Astros).  I also think the Royals have the pitching to beat the Yankees and Detroit can certainly beat the Guardians.  They (Royals and Tigers) might end up facing each other in the ALCS.  

    Houston and now Milwaukee are out. Two more division champs are on the sidelines. In recent years it has become more obvious that what you did in the regular season doesn't mean much. Teams get hot at the right time and often they are the wild card teams. Interesting to note that despite not being able to score runs, Mets pulled it out in the 9th with a wild win over Milwaukee. Their key guys came through, unlike the O's key guys who simply went down with a whimper.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...