Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Twins Throw Curveball With Draft Strategy


    Nick Nelson

    At the end of the MLB Draft's first day, most Minnesota Twins fans found themselves in a state of confusion.

    The team surprisingly chose Royce Lewis first overall, seemingly with the intention of saving bonus money for a later splash, but neither of their next two picks qualified as such. Brent Rooker and Landon Leach, selected at 35 and 37, did not stand out as the kinds of players requiring an aggressive over-slot bid to sign.

    As it turns out, the true key to their strategy wouldn't become apparent until the first pick of day two. With their top selection in the third round, 76th overall, the Twins selected Blayne Enlow, a prep righty from Louisiana.

    Image courtesy of The Prospect Pipeline

    Twins Video

    The interest in Enlow does not come as a surprise, at least not for those who've been following our coverage. In his 10-round Twins mock, Jeremy Nygaard had Minnesota taking the prep right-hander with their second pick at No. 35. They ended up taking him 41 spots later, and then immediately agreed to terms on a bonus of $2 million. That's a bit higher than the slot value at 35 and 37, and nearly three times the set figure at 76 ($755K).

    The Twins paid Enlow like a first-round talent, and they're hardly the only ones who viewed him as one. The righty had been ranked as the 29th-best player in the draft by MLB, and 33rd by Baseball America. Either because he slid on other boards, or because he already had a deal in place with the Twins, Enlow went undrafted through the first 75 picks, allowing Minnesota to land him after already adding three other prospects they coveted.

    Putting all the pieces together, it looks like Enlow was the key target for Derek Falvey's front office all along. And when we take a closer look at the pitcher's defining traits, there's really only one way to spin this story.

    The Unteachable Skill

    Last week, Parker Hageman wrote here about one of the main hold-ups with Hunter Greene: his trouble with the curve. In short, while the fireballing phenom makes headlines for his hellacious heater, his breaking balls are lagging behind due to insufficient spin.

    There is a growing body of evidence that a great curveball cannot really be taught. After a certain age, a fairly early one, your ability to spin the ball kind of is what it is. You either have it, or you don't. The subject gained national steam when spotlighted by Tom Verducci in a recent feature for Sports Illustrated:

    So inscrutable is the magic of a curveball that it is accepted wisdom in the game that, while pitchers can learn to sink a baseball (with a two-seamer) and cut it (with a cutter or slider), they generally cannot learn how to throw a great curve. It is not a projectable pitch. Organizations have learned that if someone does not show an aptitude to spin the baseball as an amateur, it’s foolish to expect him to acquire the skill.

    As it happens, this is Enlow's speciality. Twins scouting director Sean Johnson told reporters after the draft, "He may have I think the best curveball in the high school group ... He can spin the ball, which is hard to teach."

    The Twins aren't alone in that assessment. MLB.com draft guru Jim Callis had named Enlow's as the best curveball in this class, describing it as "a 12-to-6 hammer in the low 80s." We see him break off quite a few here, and here:

    In the recipe for a big-league starter, Enlow might already bring the most important ingredient.

    Following the Leaders

    I wrote earlier this week that Minnesota took a page out of the Houston Astros playbook from 2012 with their approach at No. 1 overall this year. But not until I looked closer did I realize the nearly identical blueprints.

    Five years ago, Houston passed on a high school star widely heralded as a generational talent, favoring a prep shortstop with a lesser profile. They used the savings from that under-slot signing to lure a an underdrafted teenage pitcher away from his college commitment.

    That pitcher? Lance McCullers. And wouldn't you know, he also happens to be known for his curve. In fact, he was one of the focal points of Verducci's aforementioned SI piece, which included this nugget from the Houston righty:

    “I don’t view my curveball as complementary stuff. Whereas old school was more like, ‘No, establish the fastball, pound the heater and wait until they prove they can hit it.’ Well, what if I have two guys on and I’m trying to establish my heater, and he hits it out of the ballpark? You saw it in the postseason: Now it’s about pitchers challenging guys with their best pitch, and that means a lot of curveballs.”

    By going against convention, the Astros ended up with one of the most successful draft outcomes in recent memory, reeling in McCullers and Carlos Correa who are now both key contributors for the best team in baseball.

    The Big Picture

    In essence, it looks like the pitching-needy Twins decided to bet on Enlow's curveball rather than Greene's fastball. As you might expect with this analytical new front office leadership, there is plenty of data to back up that mindset. Evidence tells us an 18-year-old kid like Enlow can add velocity and learn sink after joining the pro ranks, but Greene may struggle to round out his repertoire. There's also a case to be made that the latter carries more injury risk.

    By making Enlow rather than Greene the featured prep arm in their draft class, the Twins also managed to net a potential star in Lewis with their top pick. It's a bold strategy, to be sure, and one that will open this organization up to a great deal of hindsight criticism if it flounders.

    Then again, if the Astros worried about such things a half-decade ago, they might still be spinning their wheels instead of dominating the league.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Thursday night, his third straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Three games later, he is hitting .296/.359/.437 (.796).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The more I read and see of Enlow, the more I like him over Hunter Greene. Enlow's curveball is filthy. Obviously Greene has all the potential in the world if he can figure out how to throw breaking pitches, but that's a big if with high schoolers.

     

    With how quickly he signed, I'm beginning to wonder if Enlow and the Twins did in fact have a deal in place before he was picked.

     

    Just spitballing this quick after the draft, but we basically agree:

     

    1. Nick Gordon

    2. Royce Lewis

    3. Fernando Romero

    4. Stephen Gonsalves

    5. Alex Kirilloff

    6. Wander Javier

    7. Tyler Jay

    8. Blayne Enlow

    9. Lewin Diaz

    10. Brent Rooker

     

    There's also a lot of talent after those names...

     

    I can't put an injured RP that high. No way Jay is in the top 10 for me anymore. Sigh, bummer.

     

    I think Lewis and Gordon will be about equal, on most sites. Both 55ish players.

    You'd gotta think that Enlow immediately cracks the Twins top 10 prospects.  A 1-5 group of Lewis, Gordon, Romero, Gonsalves, Kiriloff (not necessarily in that order) followed by 6-10 of Enlow, Jay, Díaz, Mejía, and your favorite of of Stewart/Blankenhorn/Wade (again not in that order) really improves this top 10.  

     

    I'd also think Rooker would fit in the 10-15 range (something like Palka's floor, more ceiling).  De La Torre, Bechtold, and Barnes are probably in the 20-35 range, too. 

     

    That sounds like a good strategy to me!

     

    Lewis will be top two and I actually think Enlow and Rooker both end up top 10 on most boards

    I can't put an injured RP that high. No way Jay is in the top 10 for me anymore. Sigh, bummer.

     

    I think Lewis and Gordon will be about equal, on most sites. Both 55ish players.

     

    A point was brought up on the Gleeman and the Geek podcast for Lewis over Gordon that is pretty valid, if Lewis plays like Gordon is in a few years we will all be really disappointed. I would probably give Lewis the nod over Gordon just because we all expect him to be a better player when it's all said and done

     

    A point was brought up on the Gleeman and the Geek podcast for Lewis over Gordon that is pretty valid, if Lewis plays like Gordon is in a few years we will all be really disappointed. I would probably give Lewis the nod over Gordon just because we all expect him to be a better player when it's all said and done

     

    by "we all", you don't mean "we", btw. I don't have any such expectation right now, as he has yet to play one minor league game. I expect Gordon to be a slightly above average SS for 8 or more years. If Lewis is an above average SS or CF for 8+ years, I won't be disappointed in Lewis (though I may be disappointed they didn't draft someone else).

    Edited by Mike Sixel

     

    by "we all", you don't mean "we", btw. I don't have any such expectation right now, as he has yet to play one minor league game. I expect Gordon to be a slightly above average SS for 8 or more years. If Lewis is an above average SS or CF for 8+ years, I won't be disappointed in Lewis (though I may be disappointed they didn't draft someone else).

     

    I agree that "we all" doesn't include me.

     

    It has nothing to do with my expectations for Lewis though, and everything to do with the fact that Nick Gordon is tearing it up and might be the best position player in AA right now. If that's what Lewis is in a few years, that seems pretty awesome to me.

     

    Nick Gordon might really surprise us with how high he finds himself on mid-season prospect rankings. He's hitting better than J.P. Crawford and Gleyber Torres ever have and he should be about two minutes away from joining them at the AAA level.

     

    And personally, I had never thought too highly of Gordon, even when drafted. He's starting to look like a find now

     

    I agree that "we all" doesn't include me.

     

    It has nothing to do with my expectations for Lewis though, and everything to do with the fact that Nick Gordon is tearing it up and might be the best position player in AA right now. If that's what Lewis is in a few years, that seems pretty awesome to me.

     

    Agreed, i should have been more clear, I really, really, really like Gordon right now. It's why I would be unhappy with a trade of him for some mediocre pitcher under control for 1.5 years or so....

    by "we all", you don't mean "we", btw. I don't have any such expectation right now, as he has yet to play one minor league game. I expect Gordon to be a slightly above average SS for 8 or more years. If Lewis is an above average SS or CF for 8+ years, I won't be disappointed in Lewis (though I may be disappointed they didn't draft someone else).

    Fair point, I guess I expect his bat to be better than Gordon's and his power profile is more than Gordon's ever will be. But if he's an above average SS for 8+ years than yes, it will be a success. My disappointment will hinge on exactly how well the other top guys perform (Greene, Gore, McKay, and Wright because they were the only other guys considered). If they all fizzle out or are marginal than it will be really hard to be disappointed. For sure we will all be following those 4 as well as Carlson for years to come and their development as opposed to our pick's will determine a lot of the success (or percieved success) of this draft

     

    I agree that "we all" doesn't include me.

     

    It has nothing to do with my expectations for Lewis though, and everything to do with the fact that Nick Gordon is tearing it up and might be the best position player in AA right now. If that's what Lewis is in a few years, that seems pretty awesome to me.

     

    Nick Gordon might really surprise us with how high he finds himself on mid-season prospect rankings. He's hitting better than J.P. Crawford and Gleyber Torres ever have and he should be about two minutes away from joining them at the AAA level.

     

    And personally, I had never thought too highly of Gordon, even when drafted. He's starting to look like a find now

     

    Yeah what Gordon is doing at his age in AA is very impressive.  His power seems to be coming on as well.  I think the Scouts might have to rethink this one.  I think he is going to exceed initial projections.  Time will tell.

    A point was brought up on the Gleeman and the Geek podcast for Lewis over Gordon that is pretty valid, if Lewis plays like Gordon is in a few years we will all be really disappointed. I would probably give Lewis the nod over Gordon just because we all expect him to be a better player when it's all said and done

    We'd be disappointed if he played like 2016 Gordon, sure.

     

    2017 Gordon? I'd be thrilled with that. Nick's OPS is over .850 as a 21 year old in AA. What more can you expect than that? If Gordon continues rolling all season, he'll be a top 30 prospect in baseball.

     

    Go back and look at the twins drafts for the past decade. Even in the years where we had several early picks we still didn't draft a ton of overall talent, it was usually one or two guys with a bunch of "safe" guys or relievers sprinkled in (i.e. Eades, Boer, Berdi, Cederoth, Bard, Bashore, Cody, etc). This year we have 6 guys who made at least one publication's top 100 list (Lewis, Rooker, Leach, Enlow, Bechtold, and De La Torres) and one who was dang close in Barnes. I can't remember the last year we brought in that much talent with upside

    Actually, Barnes made the fangraphs guys list at #96.

     

    http://www.fangraphs.com/scoutboard.aspx

     

    We have 2 ultra reliable starters. Foolish to spent 100-150M on an ace. Time to start thinking about signing Sano, Buxton, etc. to long term contracts. 

     I agree that big free agent pitching is not the way to go per se....but thou must obtain good pitching somewhere and help is a long way off in this draft.... I assume you are counting Berrios as #2..... I hope and think this to be correct but would like to see a full half season of consistent play first

    We'd be disappointed if he played like 2016 Gordon, sure.

     

    2017 Gordon? I'd be thrilled with that. Nick's OPS is over .850 as a 21 year old in AA. What more can you expect than that? If Gordon continues rolling all season, he'll be a top 30 prospect in baseball.

    Well that's pretty darn good for sure but I think being the #1 pick we want Lewis to be a Correa/Lindor/Machado type. While a different player than those guys all 3 were in the majors at 21 and posted similar lines or better at a younger age in AA and a guy like Brenden Rodgers is mashing as a 20 year old in A+ ball. Maybe I'm expecting too much but at least his profile and bat right now is rated higher than Gordon's was when he was drafted, at the time of his drafting Gordon's future Hit/Power grades were around 55/40-50, and from most of the reports I've read on Lewis it seems to be more like 60/50-55

     

    Well that's pretty darn good for sure but I think being the #1 pick we want Lewis to be a Correa/Lindor/Machado type.

    While that'd be great, it's an unreasonable expectation from any draft pick, particularly one in a draft where no clear 1-1 pick was available.

     

    If you can get an above average MLB starter from any pick, you did okay for yourself.

     

    We'd be disappointed if he played like 2016 Gordon, sure.

    2017 Gordon? I'd be thrilled with that. Nick's OPS is over .850 as a 21 year old in AA. What more can you expect than that? If Gordon continues rolling all season, he'll be a top 30 prospect in baseball.

     

    Have we forgotten just how good 2016 Gordon was through August of last year?  He tailed off at the end of the season but maintained an OPS over .800  for most of it... in a league tough on hitters.  I think we tend to look a bit too closely at his season stats and not recognize that he was really good for all but the last month or so of the year.  To me, that's a kid wearing down, not necessarily a demerit on his performance.

     

    Have we forgotten just how good 2016 Gordon was through August of last year?  He tailed off at the end of the season but maintained an OPS over .800  for most of it... in a league tough on hitters.  I think we tend to look a bit too closely at his season stats and not recognize that he was really good for all but the last month or so of the year.  To me, that's a kid wearing down, not necessarily a demerit on his performance.

    True. He was also playing in the FSL, a notorious pitching league.

     

    Change "2016 Gordon" to "2015 Gordon" and the point makes more sense.

     

    Well that's pretty darn good for sure but I think being the #1 pick we want Lewis to be a Correa/Lindor/Machado type. While a different player than those guys all 3 were in the majors at 21 and posted similar lines or better at a younger age in AA and a guy like Brenden Rodgers is mashing as a 20 year old in A+ ball. Maybe I'm expecting too much but at least his profile and bat right now is rated higher than Gordon's was when he was drafted, at the time of his drafting Gordon's future Hit/Power grades were around 55/40-50, and from most of the reports I've read on Lewis it seems to be more like 60/50-55

     

    Gordon is hitting better in AA than Machado or Lindor did and by a wide margin. He's hitting better than those two did at any level in fact. He might also be looking at a call up right now if the team wasn't getting competent SS play from three capable players in Escobar, Polanco and Adrianza.

     

    I'm not saying Gordon or Lewis will be in their tier of shortstop, but it's far from a foregone conclusion that they won't.

     

    Also, of those guys, only Correa was a #1 pick. The odds of any #1 pick actually turning into an All-Star let alone a Super Star are low and always are.

     

    Have we forgotten just how good 2016 Gordon was through August of last year?  He tailed off at the end of the season but maintained an OPS over .800  for most of it... in a league tough on hitters.  I think we tend to look a bit too closely at his season stats and not recognize that he was really good for all but the last month or so of the year.  To me, that's a kid wearing down, not necessarily a demerit on his performance.

     

    Then he went and tore up the Arizona Fall League, too...

     

    Fair point, I guess I expect his bat to be better than Gordon's and his power profile is more than Gordon's ever will be. But if he's an above average SS for 8+ years than yes, it will be a success. My disappointment will hinge on exactly how well the other top guys perform (Greene, Gore, McKay, and Wright because they were the only other guys considered). If they all fizzle out or are marginal than it will be really hard to be disappointed. For sure we will all be following those 4 as well as Carlson for years to come and their development as opposed to our pick's will determine a lot of the success (or percieved success) of this draft

     

     

    I hope people remember that, regardless of who your own #1 was, the chances are excellent that 1 or 2 of the 4 guys you passed up will eventually be regarded as better players than your guy. But that doesn't make you a bad judge. Just a bad person.

     

    Have we forgotten just how good 2016 Gordon was through August of last year?  He tailed off at the end of the season but maintained an OPS over .800  for most of it... in a league tough on hitters.  I think we tend to look a bit too closely at his season stats and not recognize that he was really good for all but the last month or so of the year.  To me, that's a kid wearing down, not necessarily a demerit on his performance.

    That's technically not true. He had an OPS over .800 in April, but by the end of May it was at .756 and hovered around .750 until the end of July. Also, Gordon's overall stat line is a little bit of a mirage right now. He has a .397 BABIP and a 22% strikeout rate. That was even more extreme in the AFL, where he had a .488 BABIP and a 25% K%.

     

    But don't get me wrong, I'm still a big Gordon fan. I was arguing a couple days ago that I thought Gordon, if he had gone to college and was did what he is doing now, would have been the #1 overall pick this year. And I think he is the no-doubt #1 prospect in the Twins system. And that he is probably a top-30 prospect in all of baseball. I'm a fan. I just don't want optimism to outpace reality.

    That's technically not true. He had an OPS over .800 in April, but by the end of May it was at .756 and hovered around .750 until the end of July. Also, Gordon's overall stat line is a little bit of a mirage right now. He has a .397 BABIP and a 22% strikeout rate. That was even more extreme in the AFL, where he had a .488 BABIP and a 25% K%.

     

    But don't get me wrong, I'm still a big Gordon fan. I was arguing a couple days ago that I thought Gordon, if he had gone to college and was did what he is doing now, would have been the #1 overall pick this year. And I think he is the no-doubt #1 prospect in the Twins system. And that he is probably a top-30 prospect in all of baseball. I'm a fan. I just don't want optimism to outpace reality.

    You beat me to it markos. His stats right now are much higher than they will be in MLB as you stated because of his BABIP and k-rate but also his slugging is somewhat inflated by his 6 triples. As a 50 runner he won't be legging out many triples due to his speed and the fielding is good enough that he won't be gifted many due to the defense either. I'd have to do the math but I'd be surprised if he was a >.800 OPS player once his BABIP and triples normalize. That is still a good player but I just want our expectations to be reasonable.

    The one thing I like about this draft is there seemed to be a plan. Not just based on scouting or analytics but the combination. Twins drafts have always seemed to be behind the times and purely based on scouting. That's fine but the analytics will find you guys that have the upside you're looking for I think. Love Enlow. His stuff is electric and he has lots of room to grow. Very good pick.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...