Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Inevitable Split of Derek Falvey and the Minnesota Twins

    Why the partnership between Derek Falvey and the Twins finally reached its breaking point.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    For months, the idea lingered quietly in the background. It showed up in subtle ways through roster decisions that felt restrained rather than ambitious and through an organizational structure that seemed increasingly muddled. On Friday, it became official when the Minnesota Twins announced that Derek Falvey and the organization were mutually parting ways. While the timing may have surprised some with spring training just around the corner, the reality is that this relationship has been drifting toward a breakup for quite some time.

    When the Twins finally won their first playoff series in decades during the 2023 season, the organization looked like a franchise that had turned a meaningful corner. Payroll sat around $160 million, and ownership had committed to building around cornerstone players. Carlos Correa was locked into a long-term deal. Pablo Lopez was acquired and extended to anchor the rotation. The message was clear. The Twins were done treading water and intended to push their competitive window well into the next decade.

    That momentum never carried forward. Payroll has steadily dropped since that high point and now sits just over $100 million projected for the 2026 season. The drop has been stark not only in numbers but in perception. Instead of supplementing a playoff core, the front office was forced into cost-cutting moves that chipped away at depth and flexibility. Two disappointing finishes in 2024 and 2025 followed, and the sense of progress evaporated. At times, the Twins looked less like a team building on success and more like one trying to stay afloat.

    Nothing symbolized the disconnect more clearly than the Carlos Correa situation. The Twins are paying him $10 million per season to play for the Houston Astros for the next three years, an outcome that would have been unthinkable when the deal was signed. That decision reflected a franchise that had lost its direction and a front office operating within tighter constraints than ever before.

    The strange handling of Falvey’s role only added to the confusion. His promotion from President of Baseball Operations to President of Business and Baseball Operations was framed as a massive vote of confidence, especially following a disappointing season. Across Major League Baseball, only a handful of executives hold that level of power, overseeing both sides of the organization. Yet it never truly felt like Falvey was running the business side. Dave St. Peter shifted into an advisor role roughly a year ago but remained highly visible around the team throughout last season. While St. Peter was expected to focus on facilitating the sale of the franchise, the process dragged on, and Falvey never appeared to fully take control of the broader operation.

    Instead of clarity, the Twins operated in a gray area where authority felt shared, but accountability did not. That kind of structure rarely lasts, especially when on-field results are slipping, and financial commitment is shrinking.

    Ownership change only accelerated the inevitable. Tom Pohlad officially took over the ownership role from Joe Pohlad earlier this winter, and Falvey’s departure may be the first major domino tied to that transition. Tom brings a strong business background from running other family enterprises, and it seems increasingly clear that his vision did not align with Falvey’s. Whether it was philosophy, spending priorities, or long-term strategy, the two sides were no longer moving in the same direction.

    From Falvey’s perspective, the calculus is understandable. There are only so many top front office jobs across Major League Baseball, but what incentive did he really have to stay? Early in his tenure, payroll growth made it easier to envision sustained competitiveness in the AL Central. Lately, the opposite has been true. The current ownership group appears more likely to hold the club until a new CBA is approved before exploring a sale at a price they find acceptable. That limbo offers little appeal to a baseball executive tasked with building a winner.

    Leaving now is far from ideal with spring training on the horizon, but staying was starting to make even less sense. The reasons that once made Minnesota an attractive long-term project were steadily disappearing. By this winter, the writing was no longer subtle. The breakup had been coming, and this offseason finally brought it to a head.

    What are your thoughts on Falvey leaving? Has this been coming for some time? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    19 minutes ago, David Maro said:

    If Joe is gone and Tom is in why not make changes. And just maybe Tom didn't like the manager choice and the last couple of moves made. I mean signing another veteran catcher and a marginal 1st baseman when the BP is a empty cupboard. And the signing of T Rogers is a head scratcher. His brother is the one who still has something left in the tank not him. And all the talk about the payroll is getting old. With the CBA coming up I believe baseball understands a cap is needed. It has been and always will be baseball the last one making changes.

    Tom signed off on the Caratini and Rogers deals. What are you talking about? Tom is the one pushing for them to "go big" and "be competitive in 2026." I'd go read some articles about Tom from the last 24 hours before you get too excited about him. He thinks this team is good. Like legitimately. As in "playing meaningful September baseball" were 4 words that came out of his mouth in that exact order just yesterday. By every report out there, Falvey was happy to go because Tom is/was forcing him to make those sorts of moves to be competitive in 2026 and Falvey knew there was no way that was actually going to work and he was just going to get canned during or after the season anyway.

    Tom Pohlad wants us to judge the 2026 season on wins and losses because he thinks this team is good. That is the Pohlad in charge right now. That is the type of baseball knowledge we have running the show. Falvey had run his course. It was time for a shakeup. But we didn't get new blood. They aren't searching for an outside replacement. We just got the guy Falvey trained and we have a Pohlad who expects this collection of players to be playing "meaningful September baseball" leading him. Yesterday's news didn't help the Minnesota Twins in any way.

    4 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    I think you meant it would be interesting to see how Tampa Bay would do with the Twins payroll.

    The last time the Twins were relevant, 2023, the Rays had less than half the payroll of the Minnesota Twins, but won 12 more games than the Twins.

    I wish all teams spent the same amount on player payroll but that won't happen in my lifetime. 

    Are there big fans of the Pohlad way of running the Twins? I would like to hear if there are voices for the owner's positions. That issue should not be confused by a lack of skill by the Twins front office. The teams that should receive your sympathy are the Rays, Brewers, Guardians, etc. 

    Those teams all have set plans that they operate from.  The Twins plan is a moving budgetary target.  Falvey starts operating one way then gets a bigger budget and.then the budget gets slashed and slashed again and ...The Guardians and Tampa and Brewers don't have near the variance.  The Twins tried splashy moves to increase fan interest too.  It wasn't just for baseball but for marketing too and it didn't work.  I don't think we should be the outlierest team to succeed either.  

    It isn't the split that fascinates me it's the timing. Like the Trump administration they chose a Friday afternoon, and so did the Vikings, to make this dramatic statement and change. Outside the new side the news cycle and over a weekend when people are distracted. 

    On 1/30/2026 at 11:20 PM, chpettit19 said:

    Really? Almost every quote I see from Tom is him talking about them being competitive in 2026. He's giving very Monfort (Rockies owners) vibes of being so out of touch with the talent on the roster he refuses to trade his players because he constantly thinks they can win when they have 3 good players and a bunch of replacement level, or worse, players.

    From Gleeman's article on The Athletic today:

    “Yes, our payroll is down from last year,” Tom Pohlad said. “I think there are still some investments to be made between now and Opening Day. I’d also say, at some point, I’d love to get off this payroll thing for a second. Let’s judge the success of this year on wins and losses, and on whether we’re playing meaningful baseball in September.”

    “We have to have a good season in 2026,” Pohlad said last week. “Just because I say we’re trying to build a team that can play a string of October seasons, that doesn’t mean we’re not all in on 2026. Frankly, for us to be able to build a team and build a business that can invest in a team, we have to have a strong 2026.”

    I think you have it backwards and Tom is the one pushing for them to try to compete this season because he falsely believes its going to drive revenue. That first quote, about judging the season on wins and losses and meaningful September baseball, is from his press conference today. Tom Pohlad expects the Minnesota Twins to be competitive on the field in 2026. Right now. Today. That is his expectation. 

    If you are correct, and I think your assertions are very reasonable, we are screwed!  It sure looks like this is driven by delusion and desperation.  The "we have to have a good season in 2026" quote is really telling.  Never mind reality of the relative strength of the roster, and never mind we are unwilling to spend, "we have to have a good season in 2026" so let's bury our heads in the sand and insist we have a roster to contend.  I think we went from bad to worse. 

    I am always reluctant to speculate about something like the separation with Falvey because we have limited insight.  However, with what we do know, I am a lot more inclined to think Falvey was going down the path of what he thought would be a relatively quick rebuild given the number of near ready players and what he anticipated getting from Ryan / Lopez, and perhaps even Buxton.  Joe shows up and insists we do a 180 and we do it without investing.  This is beyond idiotic and it's pretty easy to believe Falvey told him as much.  There is your clash and who is going to take that job if this is what really happened.  The only person taking it is someone willing to follow Joe's lead no matter how ill-conceived.  I think things just got a lot worse.  I think you hit this one on the head and we are screwed until the Pohlad's are out.  They have gone from no help to a major impediment.

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    If you are correct, and I think your assertions are very reasonable, we are screwed!  It sure looks like this is driven by delusion and desperation.  The "we have to have a good season in 2026" quote is really telling.  Never mind reality of the relative strength of the roster, and never mind we are unwilling to spend, "we have to have a good season in 2026" so let's bury our heads in the sand and insist we have a roster to contend.  I think we went from bad to worse. 

    I am always reluctant to speculate about something like the separation with Falvey because we have limited insight.  However, with what we do know, I am a lot more inclined to think Falvey was going down the path of what he thought would be a relatively quick rebuild given the number of near ready players and what he anticipated getting from Ryan / Lopez, and perhaps even Buxton.  Joe shows up and insists we do a 180 and we do it without investing.  This is beyond idiotic and it's pretty easy to believe Falvey told him as much.  There is your clash and who is going to take that job if this is what really happened.  The only person taking it is someone willing to follow Joe's lead no matter how ill-conceived.  I think things just got a lot worse.  I think you hit this one on the head and we are screwed until the Pohlad's are out.  They have gone from no help to a major impediment.

    FYI, Tom is the new Pohlad in charge, Joe was the little brother he replaced. But your overall point is well taken and agreed to. I was fully on board with the "Falvey must go, he's lost his mind and switching from rebuild at the deadline to half-assed trying to compete in the offseason is total incompetence." Don't get me wrong, I'm still on board with Falvey going. It's been 9 years and you don't get a shot at a rebuild after 9 years when you never showed top end team building skills. That isn't my fight here. But Tom Pohlad appears to be completely out of touch with reality and setting us up for even further damage to be done to this organization.

    My biggest fear is that even if (when) this team struggles in the first half he still doesn't dive back into the rebuild. He holds Lopez and Ryan. Maybe even the expiring Jeffers contract. It's hard to imagine things getting worse at the top. I thought Tom actually came in sounding like an upgrade. He at least wasn't saying completely ridiculous things and being a PR nightmare right from the jump. Made it 3 press conferences in before he appears to have said "hold my beer..."

    11 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    FYI, Tom is the new Pohlad in charge, Joe was the little brother he replaced. But your overall point is well taken and agreed to. I was fully on board with the "Falvey must go, he's lost his mind and switching from rebuild at the deadline to half-assed trying to compete in the offseason is total incompetence." Don't get me wrong, I'm still on board with Falvey going. It's been 9 years and you don't get a shot at a rebuild after 9 years when you never showed top end team building skills. That isn't my fight here. But Tom Pohlad appears to be completely out of touch with reality and setting us up for even further damage to be done to this organization.

    My biggest fear is that even if (when) this team struggles in the first half he still doesn't dive back into the rebuild. He holds Lopez and Ryan. Maybe even the expiring Jeffers contract. It's hard to imagine things getting worse at the top. I thought Tom actually came in sounding like an upgrade. He at least wasn't saying completely ridiculous things and being a PR nightmare right from the jump. Made it 3 press conferences in before he appears to have said "hold my beer..."

    Tom Pohlad didn't take over until mid December. If Falvey wanted to trade any or all of Ryan, Lopez, Jeffers or Buxton he had from July until then to do so.

    I think not doing so was Falvey's plan, not Tom Pohlad's

     

    50 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    Tom Pohlad didn't take over until mid December. If Falvey wanted to trade any or all of Ryan, Lopez, Jeffers or Buxton he had from July until then to do so.

    I think not doing so was Falvey's plan, not Tom Pohlad's

     

    It was pretty widely reported that the front office wasn't even given payroll numbers or directions until Tom Pohlad took over. It was all framed around the minority ownership stuff. It's now being pretty widely reported that Joe Pohlad and Falvey had 1 plan and Tom Pohlad has a different one and Falvey and Tom didn't see eye to eye on things.

    3 hours ago, USAFChief said:

    Tom Pohlad didn't take over until mid December. If Falvey wanted to trade any or all of Ryan, Lopez, Jeffers or Buxton he had from July until then to do so.

    I think not doing so was Falvey's plan, not Tom Pohlad's

     

    Trades for players like Ryan and Lopez don't happen in November.  Peralta was not traded until 1/21 and Gore on 1/22.  So, to say he had months to make this type of trade just does not reflect a realistic scenario.

    On 1/30/2026 at 9:20 PM, chpettit19 said:

    From Gleeman's article on The Athletic today:

    I want to add another snippet from Falvey's remarks in the article, because it hits hard for me.

    Quote

    “We had that [2023 playoff] series against Toronto and I’ll never forget the way the fans made me feel,” Falvey said. “Just the fact everyone could experience that in this ballpark. It was absolutely on fire. I’ll never forget that. I wish we were able to carry that forward. I wish that momentum had continued.”

    My two grown sons and I flew in from our respective corners of the continent to attend that series. I can only echo Derek's description. It was electric for us.  A Twins memory I'll take to the grave. Derek says he'll never forget that; why weren't the Pohlads similarly moved?

    It absolves Falvey or Rocco of nothing, to say that ownership punted it all away when they right-sized.

    On 2/1/2026 at 9:47 AM, USAFChief said:

    Tom Pohlad didn't take over until mid December. If Falvey wanted to trade any or all of Ryan, Lopez, Jeffers or Buxton he had from July until then to do so.

    I think not doing so was Falvey's plan, not Tom Pohlad's

     

    I don't think it's as clean as Tom vs Derek.  

    I think Joe was spend spend spend until until the end of 2023 and then he got cold feet. Falvey was on a path of building and was coaxing him along through the collapse in 2024 and the tepid start to 2025, but by the deadline in 2025 Joe made him burn it down.  

    I think Tom came in when the huge debt made the team unsellable. I can't speak to who dug that hole, but it pre-dates the end of the RSN contract and there's never been a Padres-like run for the title so it had to be a business-side stripping of resources. Regardless, he stepped into the baseball side after the season and started saying We Can Win out loud but wouldn't commit to a budget increase.  

    I think Falvey has a long term, very Cleveland-like plan to build the franchise. It starts with getting the pitching development going via draft and trades, and then he's got a pile of position players on the verge that look pretty good too although there hasn't been as much in the way of player development on that side of things. The other half of winning is to spending what he can to augment major league roster to fill in around the development organization he's built. Looking at the team at the end of 2025 they were regularly playing Jeffers, Lewis, Lee, Keaschall, Wallner, Buxton and Larnach, all of whom they drafted. I wish there was a real 1B to be had, and Bader had to take over a bunch of OF playing time because the corners were pretty weak against LH pitching, but the bones were there to field average guys around the field and replace them with better when possible. The pitching was good, sourced from whereever, with a bunch more youth on the way.

    Going into 2026 Tom felt a need to win to sell tickets and streaming subs, but Falvey mostly  felt a giant pain in his bullpen area. If you have good pitching, both rotation and a deep bullpen, you can mark time waiting for the next set of youth to mature. But cutting the bullpen loose meant that they'd have to outscore the other teams to win, and that can't happen with this group. Tom keeps talking big because he needs them to win to make some money, and Derek knew it can't happen right now, so they split. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...