Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Minnesota Twins Pitching Pipeline: Fact, Fiction, and the Future

    The Twins entered 2025 with hope that their pitching development was finally turning the corner. Where does it stand heading into 2026?

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of Rob Thompson, St. Paul Saints

    Twins Video

    When Derek Falvey was hired away from Cleveland, the expectation was clear: bring that organization's steady stream of arms to Minnesota. In Cleveland, pitching prospects seem to appear out of thin air, whether it’s a starter stepping in to cover a rotation spot or a reliever throwing 98 mph with a wipeout slider. Nearly a decade later, fans are still waiting to see if the same can happen in Minneapolis.

    A Different Path to Development
    Minnesota hasn’t replicated Cleveland’s high draft pedigree or international pitching dominance. Instead, the front office has adopted a unique approach: identifying unheralded college arms in the mid-to-late rounds, refining their mechanics, expanding their pitch mix, and emphasizing velocity gains.

    It’s how Bailey Ober, David Festa, and Zebby Matthews all forced their way onto prospect lists and into major-league roles. But 2025 served as a harsh reminder of the risks. All three dealt with injuries this summer, and while velocity gains can elevate a pitcher’s ceiling, they also push arms closer to breaking down. The pipeline looked stocked in February. By September, it looked more fragile than fans had hoped.

    The Current Rotation Picture
    The Twins’ top three (Pablo López, Joe Ryan, and Ober) were supposed to be the bedrock of the 2025 staff. Instead, injuries and inconsistency have raised questions about all three, with trade rumors swirling as the front office reassesses roster priorities. López and Ryan are set to be two of the highest-paid players on next year’s roster, and that could mean shopping them this winter in an attempt to further reduce payroll and amass even more young talent. 

    Festa was one of the organization’s brightest pitching hopes, but a thoracic outlet syndrome diagnosis casts a long shadow over his career path. Initial reports are positive, in that it is the less devastating form of TOC, but it is still one of the worst diagnoses for a pitcher. Simeon Woods Richardson and Matthews both had chances, but were unable to seize rotation spots. They showed flashes, but flashes don’t win a division.

    Other Reinforcements
    At the trade deadline, the Twins went shopping for arms to fortify the future. Mick Abel and Taj Bradley both come with pedigree as former top-100 prospects, while Kendry Rojas offers intriguing upside. The Twins have talked very highly of him since he was acquired. 

    Minnesota had other prospects who were expected to break through in the minors this year, but that did not happen. Andrew Morris, though slowed by injury, showed promise late in the season. Marco Raya flashed his potential, while Cory Lewis endured a season to forget. There is hope that these three can have a healthy winter and return in 2026 with something to prove. 

    These young arms highlight a familiar theme: the Twins are still searching for their “pipeline identity.” Cleveland can rely on a constant churn of major-league-ready pitchers. Minnesota has to piece theirs together through trades, tweaks, and patience.

    The 2026 Pitching Pipeline: Tiers of Hope
    Instead of a single clear pipeline, Minnesota’s future appears more like a layered system of possibilities.

    Projected Opening Day Options

    • López, Ryan, Ober – All three could anchor the rotation if healthy and not traded, but each carries questions about durability or performance.
    • Bradley, Woods Richardson – The former trade acquisitions will push for full-time roles, especially with their big-league experience over the last two seasons. Bradley has frontline upside if he clicks, while Woods Richardson needs to sharpen his command.

    Next Wave of Starters

    • Abel, Matthews – Both showed flashes in 2025, but need consistency. Each could profile as a back-end starter or a dominant relief option.
    • Raya, Morris, and Rojas – Young arms with enough stuff to break through in 2026. If the frontline group falters, these pitchers may get opportunities.

    Wild Cards

    • Festa – Everything hinges on how he recovers from thoracic outlet syndrome. If he avoids surgery and bounces back, he could still be a long-term piece.
    • Lewis – After a rough year, he’ll need a strong rebound to reestablish himself in the pipeline.
    • Connor Prielipp – He was one of the top-performing starters in the system this season. Does it make sense for him to shift to a bullpen role, or to stay in the rotation?

    This tiered structure highlights the Twins’ reality: plenty of options, but few certainties. And given how many bullpen spots are up for grabs after the trade deadline selloff, some of these names (particularly the “next wave” and “wild cards”) may be asked to shift into relief roles. That could accelerate their path to the big leagues, while also giving the Twins a chance to stabilize a bullpen in flux.

    When Falvey arrived, the vision of a self-sustaining pitching pipeline was one of the biggest selling points. In 2025, the promise remains only partially fulfilled. Minnesota has discovered hidden gems, taken calculated risks on projects, and acquired talent through trades. But until the Twins can count on consistent, reliable production from their pipeline, both in the rotation and bullpen, fans will keep wondering when the “Cleveland magic” is finally going to show up at Target Field.

    Next season could be the year it finally starts to become a reality—or it could be another reminder that Minnesota’s pipeline still leaks.


    How do you feel about the pitching pipeline heading into 2026? Leave a comment and start the discussion. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I thought in 2023 that this team's pipeline was about to start humming and that the true measure of this FO would be proven - one way or the other - at that point.

    But it didn't come to fruition.  We just spent a deadline offloading half the roster and our primary target was starting pitching.  If we had actually built the pipeline we would've been dealing arms for (desperately) needed offensive help.  Instead.....we had to focus on adding more pitching.

    The pipeline failed.  It really is time for this front office to go.

    17 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    You are twisting to fit a narrative that suits you.  I said you can't lose something you would never have had.  However, if you wish to compare alternatives that did exist, the Twins spent money that could hat is reasonable to compare alternatives that did exist.  They spent the money that would have gone to Berrios on Lopez which is a better contract and they got SWR/Martin as a bonus.  They can't possibly lose this trade at this point but it has the potential to be of significant benefit to the team going forward.

    I am not saying it was a bad trade, just found it interesting that the Twins traded Berrios in 2021, and signed Lopez to an extension prior to the 23 and that is worth comparing and I am twisting the narrative? but you didn't mention in 2022 they paid Gray 10 million, Archer 3.5, and Bundy 5 (more than Berrios was paid), then after that sh!t show, traded for Lopez, and didn't resign Gray after 23 (not complaining about this) after 23 (who ended up making about 20 million more in those three years)

    Just not how sure you can say the money they saved by not signing Berrios translated in Lopez, it feel more like the Twins thought they could use that money on multiple pitchers which didn't work, traded Arraez for Lopez and signed him to an extension. 

    If anything can be compared it should be Berrios to the money the Twins spent, the players that were traded and pitchers they got. The Twins will have paid Gray 25 million, Lopez 73 million, Bundy 5, Archer 3.5, SWR <1, traded Petty and Arraez. Got two years of Gray, 4 of Lopez, one of Bundy, 1 or Archer, and YTD of years of Martin and SWR. Chase Petty and Arrez. Still looks like a win. But lets not pretend it came cheap. 

    On 10/2/2025 at 7:11 AM, jmlease1 said:

    Berrios wouldn't have stabilized anything in 2022; he was bad. Would he have been useful in 2023 & 2024? Sure, but then we wouldn't have had Pablo Lopez because to give Berrios the contract he demanded would have meant there wouldn't have been money for Lopez. In this case it wasn't a pure salary dump, because they actually reinvested the resources, and SWR has done a lot already to replace Berrios' production in the last 2 seasons. And if we hadn't given Berrios the deal, he would have been gone by 2023 and we wouldn't have Berrios or SWR.

    You seem bound and determined not to acknowledge SWR's contributions. It's weird.

    A team with proper ownership would have easily kept Berrios with Lopez, and more.

    The Twins are a mediocre at best team because they have cheap owners.  

    On 10/1/2025 at 6:41 PM, Riverbrian said:

    In my opinion it matters greatly. The young pitcher will be back next year. Bundy will not. They can take what they learned and apply it the next year to the benefit of the Twins. In the case of Bundy... if he learned anything with those 140 innings that he ate... He applied what he learned to the benefit of the Syracuse Mets the following year. Tarik Skubal started out Bundy like... he got better. I'm watching Bello pitch against the Yankees. He started out Bundy like... he got better. I will take 79 Innings of 5.56 from Zebby Matthews over 140 innings of 4.89 from Dylan Bundy every single time. Same with Festa, SWR, Bradley and Abel. 

    Ok, show me the Tarik Skubal clone this org has produced. We don't even need to set the bar that high. In 9 years this vaunted "pipeline," has spit out one (singular) SP who has provided any level of production above what Dylan Bundy gave the Twins. Right now it's Matthews, Festa, SWR, Bradly, and Abel. Before it was Winder, Enlow, Canterino, Varland, Thorpe, ect....

    The tl;dr here is that I wouldn't celebrate the lack of Dylan Bundy-esque FA signings until this team can actually, with any sort of consistency, do better than Bundy-esque production at the back end of the rotation. 

    I would rather have a good pitching staff rather than worry too much about the method used to acquire said pitchers. However being good at drafting and developing pitchers is an important piece because you don’t have to give up trade assets to acquire them. 

    On 10/1/2025 at 11:45 AM, LyleCole said:

    Because it isn't in doubt.  Jose Berrios had one bad season in Toronto (2023) otherwise he has been a more than average pitcher for them.  Simeon Woods Richardson has been average at best for two partial seasons with teh Twins.  

    This trade, even giving benefit of doubt to Twins was a bad trade.  

    The bias that some of you writers/ reports have is absolutely ridiculous. The amount of disrespect Simeon gets from you guys is just absurd. It’s like you guys don’t factor him into anything that has to do with the Twins rotation. Statistically this year he was in the top two or three in every category. He can do the exact same thing or have performed better than another pitcher and the other guy gets all the praise. It’s crazy. Youngest on the staff but gets the most critique and criticism. We all understand Minnesota has its guys and people that they like in the organization. They should’ve never brought him to Minnesota if they didn’t want him because he could be doing something for a whole different organization and actually getting the respect that he deserves. 

    On 10/3/2025 at 3:19 PM, KirbyDome89 said:

    Ok, show me the Tarik Skubal clone this org has produced. We don't even need to set the bar that high. In 9 years this vaunted "pipeline," has spit out one (singular) SP who has provided any level of production above what Dylan Bundy gave the Twins. Right now it's Matthews, Festa, SWR, Bradly, and Abel. Before it was Winder, Enlow, Canterino, Varland, Thorpe, ect....

    The tl;dr here is that I wouldn't celebrate the lack of Dylan Bundy-esque FA signings until this team can actually, with any sort of consistency, do better than Bundy-esque production at the back end of the rotation. 

    Ok, show me the Tarik Skubal clone? 

    That's your lead? 

    No... I don't think I will

    I'll post my original post that you responded to that led to you asking me to show the Tarki Skubal Clone? 

    On 10/1/2025 at 6:12 AM, Riverbrian said:

    You can call it whatever. A pipeline or ham sandwich. You can all debate effective or ineffective. 

    I'll just point out that we haven't had to sign Dylan Bundy types in awhile and that's good. If the pipeline or ham sandwich is effective enough to make Dylan Bundy unnecessary... That's good start.  On the offensive side of the ledger... we are trying to survive off of Dylan Bundy types. 

    Duran, Jax, Varland are from this pipeline or whatever it is and they brought back 3 starting pitchers which keeps you further from Dylan Bundy. 

    Plus they acquired a highly ranked young catcher in Tait and a decently ranked outfielder who are now products of this whatever you want to call it. 

    On the other hand... this pipeline or whatever you want to call doesn't seem to be near the Cleveland (trade Beiber, Sewald at the trade deadline... lose Clase to suspension and get better afterwards) level. 

    This pipeline doesn't seem to be near the Brewers (trade Corbin Burnes and get better after) level either.

     

    Notice the recognition that we don't seem to be near Cleveland or Milwaukee. 

    Let me know if I need to keep looking for a Tarik Skubal Clone? 

    Can't do better than Dylan Bundy if you keep signing Dylan Bundy.

    I'll celebrate the removal of that innings eating obstacle. 

    6 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

    Ok, show me the Tarik Skubal clone? 

    That's your lead? 

    No... I don't think I will

    I'll post my original post that you responded to that led to you asking me to show the Tarki Skubal Clone? 

    Notice the recognition that we don't seem to be near Cleveland or Milwaukee. 

    Let me know if I need to keep looking for a Tarik Skubal Clone? 

    Can't do better than Dylan Bundy if you keep signing Dylan Bundy.

    I'll celebrate the removal of that innings eating obstacle. 

    Oof Idk why you're bristling at the mention of Skubal, you brought up the Bundy-esque beginning to his career as a "I'm not saying I'm just saying..." type example, but yeah, totally unfair of me to point out that this FO hasn't come anywhere close to developing an arm of that caliber and Skubal doesn't belong in the conversation. Oh, and if we're revisiting old posts, I did also immediately clarify that Skubal isn't the bar to clear. Maybe that was lost. 

    Don't let me stop you from celebrating a new coat of paint on the same flawed house. 

    51 minutes ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    Oof Idk why you're bristling at the mention of Skubal, you brought up the Bundy-esque beginning to his career as a "I'm not saying I'm just saying..." type example, but yeah, totally unfair of me to point out that this FO hasn't come anywhere close to developing an arm of that caliber and Skubal doesn't belong in the conversation. Oh, and if we're revisiting old posts, I did also immediately clarify that Skubal isn't the bar to clear. Maybe that was lost. 

    Don't let me stop you from celebrating a new coat of paint on the same flawed house. 

    Skubal is merely an example of a pitcher that didn't have the smoothest beginning.

    He was mentioned to serve as an example of why it's better to have a young returning pitcher produce Bundy-Esque numbers compared to Dylan Bundy producing Bundy-Esque numbers and then followed by the next Dylan Bundy esque one year contract.  

    In no way was I implying that Tarik Skubal is sitting in our current room of arms. Skubal is a pretty amazing talent. 

    So Yeah... I bristled at that..

    The main issue in our discussion was my mistake. I take full responsibility. 

    I know that any time I mention a specific player as an example for the larger point I'm making. The player immediately becomes the focus of the discussion. I know better... I've told myself to stop doing that and yet I did it.

    So It's on me.    

     

     

    17 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    Skubal is merely an example of a pitcher that didn't have the smoothest beginning.

    He was mentioned to serve as an example of why it's better to have a young returning pitcher produce Bundy-Esque numbers compared to Dylan Bundy producing Bundy-Esque numbers and then followed by the next Dylan Bundy esque one year contract.  

    In no way was I implying that Tarik Skubal is sitting in our current room of arms. Skubal is a pretty amazing talent. 

    So Yeah... I bristled at that..

    The main issue in our discussion was my mistake. I take full responsibility. 

    I know that any time I mention a specific player as an example for the larger point I'm making. The player immediately becomes the focus of the discussion. I know better... I've told myself to stop doing that and yet I did it.

    So It's on me.    

     

     

    Ah, must've drawn that name from a hat. Crazy...




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...