Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Kenta Maeda Is The Impact Pitcher You Were Waiting For


    John  Bonnes

    The Twins stated offseason goal of adding impact pitching this offseason took form Thursday morning as Kenta Maeda introduced himself to Twins Territory at Twins spring training in Fort Myers. The path to get to that point was a winding one, including a lot of rejection, an enormous pivot, and a six-day trade ordeal. But make no mistake: had you asked the Twins if Maeda fit their definition of impact starting pitching at the beginning of their offseason, they would have quickly agreed.

    Twins Video

    Maeda has been serving as both a reliever and a starter for the Dodgers, but he’s not a swingman. He came to the US as a 27-year-old after winning the Sawamura Award (the Nippon Professional League’s equivalent of MLB’s Cy Young Award) twice. He started in his first year with the Dodgers. For the last three, he has also been a starter who switched to a bullpen role late in the season.

    Twins CBO Derek Falvey addressed this in an interview earlier this week. “I would tell you this: we think he’s a starting pitcher,” said Falvey. “We think he’s a guy who can really impact our rotation.” Falvey saw the switch in roles as a postseason strategy. “My sense is that the way [the Dodgers] used him felt like it worked best for them as they went into their playoff series every year,” continued Falvey. “It had nothing to do with his ability to start and pitch.”

    What’s more, Maeda isn’t a guy who just fills out a rotation. He profiles as top-half-of-the-rotation starter. In 103 starts with the Dodgers, he has a 3.92 ERA, and 9.6 K/9. Last year his ERA was up a bit to 4.14 as a starter, but he became even better against left-handed hitters, holding them to just a .247 BA. He’s always been good against right-handers, who have a .199 BA against him for his career. Read that last sentence again.

    Even though his addition came as spring training began, Falvey claims that the Twins had targeted Maeda early in the offseason, and had engaged the Dodgers during the winter meetings. “We always targeted him as somebody - if the Dodgers would move him - that we would have interest in,” he revealed. When the Dodgers acquired David Price, suddenly, that window opened.

    Twins’ fans’ expectations may have been skewed by the team’s early offseason pursuit of high-impact (and high-dollar) free agent pitchers, and to be fair, Maeda would not have been slotted in the top five of this year's remarkable free agent class. But he would have been a half-step below them, along with Jake Odorizzi and Michael Pineda, which (along with Jose Berrios) makes the top four Twins' starters all formidable.

    He also has something that all other 30 teams would certainly value, and maybe the Twins more than most: a reasonable contract that keeps him under team control for four years at a guaranteed salary of just $3M per year. It is heavily laden with incentives, so if he ends up being an effective starter, he’ll make around $10M, but their budget is protected if something very bad happens. Compare that to the $118 million guaranteed dollars the Phillies gave to Zach Wheeler.

    The Twins are also protected another way. As the Dodgers recognized, Maeda can also be moved to the bullpen. He is not anxious to do so, and seems to be especially interested in starting in the postseason. In fact, that was the first question Japanese media asked Falvey earlier this week.

    But if, for some reason, the Twins do decide to put him in a high-leverage relief role, his history suggests he will thrive. In 42.1 innings of pitching relief, he has struck out 58 batters and walked just eight. In the postseason as a reliever, he pitched two innings or more in all but one appearance. That’s a weapon.

    You would be forgiven if you didn’t recognize all this on Thursday morning. Meada’s interview was a quiet spring training affair. It lacked the pomp and circumstance that Josh Donaldson’s press conference provided last month. Maeda carefully answered the Twins’ media’s questions through a translator, while a dozen Japanese media waited their turn. He talked of being honored to be part of the Twins organization.

    But this was a big deal. Maeda, the Twins and their fans hope that will become apparent in October.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    This whole notion of a number one starter is funny to me. Talking the, say top ten starters in MLB is one thing, that might be an ace. Number one starter could mean the top 30. If that were the case there are many ranking systems and you find Berrios around 24 often, so a low number one. Then you can find Odo, Pineda, Hill and Maeda all in the two range. It could then be argued we have potentially one number one and four number two's. This is overblown, of course, but my point is this is a good staff, people. An improvement over a staff that ranked 3rd by WAR and 4th by FIP in all of MLB last year. If Hill can be pitching by August and we aren't killed by injuries the Twins are formidable and deep. That depth could be used to pace the staff. This team was hollowed out by the time it played the Yankees who had just gotten to full strength. With a little better infield defense Berrios and Odo looked pretty good against the evil empire. Add Donaldson and his defense while allowing Arraez to focus on 2nd base and we could be on to something.

    While it's easy to get sucked into the concept of "impact" and look at the likes of Zack Wheeler (and don't get me wrong, I think he's a better pitcher than Maeda going forward), both Wheeler and Maeda have a career FIP of exactly 3.71.

    I agree with the premise that Maeda makes and impact, but I stop short of any hyperbole he is a potential #1. I think that's ludicrous to even suggest.

     

    He pitched just shy of 180IP and won 16G his first year in LA and has put up consistently good numbers across the board in his 4yrs there, including K's, WHIP, etc. He was very much a part of the rotation in LA. A rotation that ranks as one if the best on one of the best teams in all of MLB. From everything I have read or listened to, the reason he finished the last 3 seasons in the pen was because he was needed there and could really help. And he did.

     

    Berrios is clearly our #1 and the only thing stopping him from being considered an ACE has been some 2nd half faltering. To be fair, in 2019 he rebounded after a rough stretch. Something he really didn't do in 2018.

     

    Oddo is a 5-6IP starter, but so is most of the league these days. And he is borderline dominate for that 5-6 stretch. The Pineda we saw from June 1st last year might have been even better than Oddo.

     

    Without improvement, simply pitching as they did in 2019, I'm not sure I could say which of Odorizzi, Pineda or Maeda would be our #2-3-4. I am also not saying that any of them are necessarily Greinke level. But they are all 3 really good SP.

     

    Rank Berrios how you will. Hopefully, by the end of this year we can ALL agree he's a true #1 and he has a signed extension. But IMO, the Twins follow him up with 3 straight guys who are at worst #3 options who all pitch like a legit #2 some if not most of the time.

     

    If we get half a season of the Hill that he can be, has been, we have a dangerous mound weapon to add in July. (I'm sticking with a July prediction to full health, velocity, control, etc).

     

    "Impact pitching" is/was perhaps a poor choice of words. Semantics. At no point was anything said about adding a $300M pitcher, or sending 4 top 20 prospects to some team for a proposed ACE SP. Nor has any such pitcher been moved this offseason. (Or been made available).

     

    The Twins HAVE made impact moves to their staff. It just may not be the impact player some dream of.

    I choose to be optimistic. Here's our shut-down rotation (in alphabetical order) from August through the end of the season: Balazovic, Berrios, Maeda, Odorizzi, Pineda. No weak links. No true aces (given Balazovic is very young), but nobody wants to face us in a 4-game series. Or a 7-game postseason series. With our batters I'd gladly send any four of these into the postseason against any team in MLB, even the Dodgers.

    Maeda's postseason numbers look promising.  But nothing about his numbers suggest that he is much more of an upgrade than Kyle Gibson, the last few years.  Hopefully his slider and BA against hold up well in a league full of hitters that have limited experience with him.  But I kind of chuckle at the idea that he is the "impact pitcher I have been looking for". I hope and pray to be proven dead wrong.

     

    Berrios threw 88 pitches to get through 4 innings, giving up 8 base runners (one on an error), and 3 runs, 1 earned. Did he embarrass himself? No. Nor did he pitch anything close to "well" if the objective is to beat a team who will be throwing Cole against you.

     

    Yeah, but how many of those pitches were because of the errors?  He wasn't exactly "sharp" that day, but we was still putting NY hitters away with less than his best stuff.  AND you could argue that they pulled him early at 88 pitches.  He might've been fine for another inning.

     

    Yeah, but how many of those pitches were because of the errors?  He wasn't exactly "sharp" that day, but we was still putting NY hitters away with less than his best stuff.  AND you could argue that they pulled him early at 88 pitches.  He might've been fine for another inning.

    The inning in question went single, single, line-out, double, walk, ground-out (error trying to get a double-play), K. So, zero to five extra pitches depending on whether you want to assume a double play on the ground-out. He wasn't good. James Paxton handed his bullpen a shorter game that Berrios did his bullpen. And Berrios won't be matched up against James Paxton the next time the Twins play the Yankees in the post-season.

     

    The inning in question went single, single, line-out, double, walk, ground-out (error trying to get a double-play), K. So, zero to five extra pitches depending on whether you want to assume a double play on the ground-out. He wasn't good. James Paxton handed his bullpen a shorter game that Berrios did his bullpen. And Berrios won't be matched up against James Paxton the next time the Twins play the Yankees in the post-season.

     

    still that inning would've been fine without the error. His other 3 innings:

    K, BB, K, 2B, GO

    K, BB, K, GO

    1-2-3 (foul out, FO, K)

     

    Telling me that he didn't have any more in the tank?  And who cares who he matches up against? The offense has to do their part regardless, which is why they don't figure into ERA.  And don't the 2 unearned runs assume the double play?




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...