Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    5 Things the Twins Absolutely Must Accomplish This Offseason


    Nick Nelson

    A little over one week remains in the 2018 campaign. I think we're all about ready to move on and forget about this one. So let's look ahead to the coming pivotal offseason, with a breakdown of five imperatives lying before the front office.

    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn, USA Today

    Twins Video

    In a little over a month, Twins Daily will be putting out its annual Offseason Handbook. I'm really excited about this edition because the coming winter is as ripe for discussion and dissection as any in memory.

    We'll be featuring plenty of stories here as we build up to the Handbook's release, but today I thought we'd kick things off with a high-level look at some critical priorities. If the Twins don't check all five of these boxes before spring training 2019 gets underway, it's gonna be hard to view their offseason as a real success.

    1. Overpay Byron Buxton in arbitration

    Regardless of your feelings on the matter, there's no doubt about this: The Twins damaged their relationship with Buxton by sending him home after the minor-league season ended. His year was clearly a disaster but Buxton remains a centerpiece of the franchise's vision going forward. Creating ill will with such a player is suboptimal, to say the least.

    General manager Thad Levine acknowledged as much at the time. "From this day forward," he said, "I think we recognize a responsibility to make amends and that we’re going to need to invest in the relationship with Byron Buxton."

    Well, they'll get their chance to start on that almost immediately.

    Although the decision not to recall Buxton pushed his free agency back to 2022, he's still eligible for arbitration this offseason as a "Super 2." For the first time, he and his agent will be able to negotiate his salary. The Twins would be wise to ease up a bit.

    Given his complete lack of output this year (.383 OPS in 94 plate appearances), Minnesota is technically justified in giving Buxton a minimal raise from his $580,000 salary. Doing so would be standard operating procedure. But this might be a time to deviate.

    When the two sides submit numbers, the Twins should make sure theirs is fairly generous, and as long as Buxton's request is within reason, they should quickly accept it. No pushback. He's surely feeling as though they robbed him of millions by delaying his big payday, and while they can't fully make it up to him at this point, they can at least make a showing of good faith.

    It's a first step toward mending what will hopefully still be a tight long-term relationship. And given the relative dollars involved, it's a no-brainer.

    2. Sign or trade for a top three starter in the rotation

    While some other areas of the roster are riddled with uncertainty, Minnesota's starting rotation is looking pretty solid. Jose Berrios, Kyle Gibson, Jake Odorizzi and Michael Pineda are essentially locked in, leaving one vacancy. The Twins could theoretically fill that spot internally, holding a spring competition between the likes of Fernando Romero, Stephen Gonsalves, Kohl Stewart, Zack Littell and others.

    But given the uncertainty surrounding Pineda and his perpetual ailments, the club is probably wise to reserve as much minor-league depth as it can. With their considerable stockpile of both available funds and tradable assets, the Twins should be looking to make a bold move on the pitching market.

    There are some premium names in free agency, as well as some intriguing trade scenarios. You'll find plenty covered in the Handbook. The Twins need to aim high here. It's an opportunity for Levine and Derek Falvey to make a signature splash after smartly bowing out of last year's Darvish Derby.

    3. Extend Jose Berrios

    There is zero reason not to do this. Berrios is the player this organization has long been waiting for: a young, dominant, starter with an amazingly clean bill of health. After thoroughly dominating the minor leagues, he has improved in each of his three turns at the majors, and was named an All-Star at age 24 in July.

    The right-hander has four years of team control remaining, and will be eligible for arbitration next winter. This is the ideal time to strike an extension, leveraging that team control to score a relative bargain on his first years of free agency, and maybe even a team option or two. It's the blueprint Falvey helped execute in Cleveland multiple times.

    Given his age and almost spotless track record, Berrios will be able to command a hefty sum. But I can't see any reason why the Twins would be reluctant to do whatever it takes to lock him up through 2024 or beyond. He is the definition of a building block.

    The longer they wait, the more their leverage dissipates.

    4. Build corner infield depth

    Joe Mauer's contract is up, and he seems likely to retire. Logan Morrison will be a free agent and probably won't return return. Eduardo Escobar was traded in July. Miguel Sano... well, it's gonna be tough to really count on him in any capacity next year.

    The Twins find themselves shallow at the infield corners. Tyler Austin looks like he'll be a factor but outside of him and Sano there won't be any incumbency at first or third on next year's roster. The closest legitimate impact help is Brent Rooker in Double-A.

    Acquiring a starting-caliber corner infielder – whether at first, or at third with Sano going to first or DH – should be a given. The team might even want to think about getting creative to increase its flexibility and options. Max Kepler started 38 games at first base in the minors...

    5. Clear 40-man flotsam

    The decisions coming up in late November, as the Winter Meetings and Rule 5 draft approach, are among the toughest of the year for a front office. They'll have to take a hard look at their 40-man roster and decide who's really worth protecting – who they absolutely can't afford to lose.

    Making room for a new wave of additions, and also hopefully a number of external pickups, will require the Twins to take a hard look at who they need to keep. Some members of the 40-man are already on their way out (Mauer, Chris Gimenez, Logan Forsythe) and others make are fairly obvious cut candidates, but there will be some difficult calls to make.

    Is there room for Aaron Slegers or Adalberto Mejia anymore? Has Matt Magill shown enough to merit keeping around? What about Oliver Drake? Does it really make sense to keep dedicating spots to John Curtiss or Tyler Duffey or Alan Busenitz?

    This year's team appears a long way from where it needs to be. A fairly extensive overhaul would be warranted and I suspect we'll see one.

    Stay tuned for more details on the 2019 Offseason Handbook and, of course, more daily wall-to-wall coverage of your favorite team.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I am tired of the criticism of the Twin FO about how Buxton was treated. He was offered an extension last offseason that he turned down. The extension certainly would have paid him more money for next year and would have eliminated the service time considerations. Buxton made a business decision and turned it down. He got hurt and had a lousy season and now we should INCREASE his raise for next year. That is not how it should work. They should work out the long term extension this year. If he is not interested no extra unearned raise for turning it down.

    We have no idea of the terms of the proposed extension which he turned down -- it may have been, and may remain, a smart business decision on his part. Given that the front office has yet to ink an extension with anyone, perhaps they are not offering fair terms yet? Or they aren't generating much long-term buy-in from the players yet?

     

    (Also, Buxton extension talks are not going to happen this offseason. There isn't really a figure that could satisfy both parties at this point in time. That's not a fault of Buxton or the Twins, it is just a reality of the situation. Teams and players just don't sign "buy low" extensions, at least not at this kind of low.)

    Edited by spycake

    FWIW, due to the nature of the system, Buxton will likely get a raise anyway. He's looking at least ~$1 mil or so for 2019 salary. I think Nick's contention is, if he submits a figure at $1.5 mil or something, then just settle there. The extra year of control has been secured, the message sent, the fire lit or whatever else you want to call it. There is nothing to be gained further by arguing with him over a couple hundred thousand bucks at this point, which might represent 0.2% of our payroll and wouldn't be a disincentive to him signing an extension down the road either.

     

    Consider it like a grievance settlement without the acrimony, or just the MLB pay he could have received after roster expansion in 2018 (while the team still withholds the more important service time).

    Edited by spycake

    Have seen several good points made in this post.  I have a few more to address.

    1.  Cleveland is not that good.  Why punt when you can go for it without hurting us down the road.

    2.  Absolutely sign 2 good relievers this offseason, Twins cannot afford to be throwing out the relievers we have this season.

    3.  Only May, Rogers and Hildenburger should feel they have spots next year, make the rest of the relief staff earn their positions.

    4.  Twins need to trade some of their starter depth before the rule 5 draft, otherwise the closer we get to the rule 5 the more teams just wait and see who the Twins will have to make available.

    5.  Need to find a short term SS and move Polanco to 2nd.  Adrianza may work out, but Escobar would help a lot.

    6.  I agree Twins need to find a big bopper for the middle of the lineup.  Too many rallies are dying with bad AB's by some of the Twins players.

     

    Twins can afford to make the effort to contend next year, while not punting the long term.  Do not know if it will work, but they have the money and the core to give it a try.

     

    Kepler was league median in RF among all teams.....I don't understand why people don't like him as an OF.......Of course, that was largely driven by very good defense, so I understand why people want more hitting......but I'm not sure replacing him with a bad fielder who hits more is a better idea. I'd rather they just let him try to keep hitting.....and he can play CF, just in case Buxton can't hit at all again....

     

    I love Kepler as an OF. I'm not happy about his growth as a hitter. RF is considered to be an offensive position, so if you're not generating offense there, you need to be making up for it elsewhere, and that's harder to do.

     

    I had Kepler pegged as the most likely player to have a breakout season, and the reality is he stood in place. When you need your young players to continue to develop, that's frustrating. In three seasons he may have revealed himself as a slightly below average hitter who plays excellent defense in a non-premium defensive position, with a little positional flexibility. Am I wrong, or doesn't that profile more like a 4th OF than a starter? FanGraphs seems to agree with me. fWAR of 1.2, 1.4, and 2.4 over the last three years with this year needing a BIG leap in his defensive stats to get him to starter status.

     

    I love Max Kepler. I'm rooting for Max Kepler. but if I'm the Twins, I'm worried about RF. (In addition to being worried about 3B)

     

    The twins have options at 1B, 2B, questions at SS, BIG questions at 3B, options at C, settled at LF, questions at CF, questions at RF, and some questions at DH.

     

    Yikes. The lineup is frankly much scarier than the pitching staff right now. We have more established guys in the rotation and in the 'pen than we do in the lineup right now, with internal options that have promise for every questionable area/hole. They're not perfect and there's real risk in not adding outside talent...but I see more holes in the lineup.

     

     

    Have seen several good points made in this post. I have a few more to address.

    1. Cleveland is not that good. Why punt when you can go for it without hurting us down the road.

    2. Absolutely sign 2 good relievers this offseason, Twins cannot afford to be throwing out the relievers we have this season.

    3. Only May, Rogers and Hildenburger should feel they have spots next year, make the rest of the relief staff earn their positions.

    4. Twins need to trade some of their starter depth before the rule 5 draft, otherwise the closer we get to the rule 5 the more teams just wait and see who the Twins will have to make available.

    5. Need to find a short term SS and move Polanco to 2nd. Adrianza may work out, but Escobar would help a lot.

    6. I agree Twins need to find a big bopper for the middle of the lineup. Too many rallies are dying with bad AB's by some of the Twins players.

     

    Twins can afford to make the effort to contend next year, while not punting the long term. Do not know if it will work, but they have the money and the core to give it a try.

    1. Their BULLPEN is not good. Their rotation and lineup are light years better than the Twins. Wanna bet they remedy that this offseason?

     

    2 & 3. More like 4 or 5 good ones are needed.

     

    4. They would be better served finding roles for them. Maybe consider Romero for a relief role and see if he can blossom into a closer in a year or two. Stewart is probably better suited in a middle relief role as is Gonsalves.

     

    5. Escobar isn’t better at ss than Polanco.

     

    6. If Sano doesn’t develop into that guy, nothing else matters. The Twins won’t contend for the next 3-5 years if Sano isn’t a 5-6 bWAR player.

    That's a pretty solid plan / list of action items.

     

    On Buxton, I don't know why he or anyone else at this point should be thinking that you are robbing someone from millions who can't hit major league pitching. Yes, of course he could have an epiphany and become a serviceable as a hitter, let's hope so. Looking back to Opening Day 2017, it seems utterly silly now that Molitor thought he could be a #3 hitter at this level.

     

    On Rotation, agree 100%, Twins are in good shape if they can sign one top tier starter. I would also like to see Mejia in the mix for that #5 spot.

     

    Extend Berrios, this is a no-brainer.

     

    Roster and the corners. I can't be the only one who hopes that Mauer returns on a 2-yr deal. His defense at 1B has been outstanding (no Gold Glove last year was a crime) and is still in the AL Top 25 in hitting and over .400 with RISP. Not as easy to replace as some may think.

     

     

    I would be happy next year having a consistent line-up.  Instead of a mix-match every single game.  I think getting a power hitting 1st and DH would fill most gaps.  We need to let Sano and Buxton improve or fail on a whole year of playing before we let them go.  Infield: Sano, Polanco, Lewis, at least and all star worthy 1st or DH or best both.  OF can be Rosario, Buxton and Kepler.  Starting pitching Berrios, Romero, Gibson, keep Santana, and find 2 more.  I don't think it should be Odorizzi.  Bullpen is hard to determine Rogers is the only memorable pitcher there.  

     

    It has been years since they sent out the same line-up I miss those days. 

     

    I'd say just put Sano at DH and be done with it. Have him work on his hitting and nothing else. He is not here to field ground balls, he is here to hit them over the fence. Less chance for injury, focus on one thing, etc. His best stretch of baseball in his short major league career is when he was DHing anyway. 

    Edited by Battle ur tail off

     

    1. Their BULLPEN is not good. Their rotation and lineup are light years better than the Twins. Wanna bet they remedy that this offseason?

    2 & 3. More like 4 or 5 good ones are needed.

    4. They would be better served finding roles for them. Maybe consider Romero for a relief role and see if he can blossom into a closer in a year or two. Stewart is probably better suited in a middle relief role as is Gonsalves.

    5. Escobar isn’t better at ss than Polanco.

    6. If Sano doesn’t develop into that guy, nothing else matters. The Twins won’t contend for the next 3-5 years if Sano isn’t a 5-6 bWAR player.

    1.  Cleveland does not have unlimited funds, bullpen fix will not be easy and they will be bidding on the same relievers as the Twins.

    2. Twins need to find out how the young starters play out, but I would trade 3 of them for a decent mid range starter (out of Littell, Gonsaleves, Duffey and maybe Stewart or Mejia).  

    3.  Escobar could play 2B with Polonco at SS for next year.  

    4,  Need to figure out where Sano will play.  And he had better hit.

    Because the pitching staff, and pitchers in general, are always unpredictable, I typically find it much easier to project the starting lineup and our bench instead. Although I think it’s pretty obvious that when it comes to ‘absolutes,’ the Twins FO ‘absolutely’ need to bring in a relief ace and other bullpen arms. Other than that, here’s what I hope our opening day roster looks like:

     

    CF- Byron Buxton

    SS- Jorge Polanco

    LF- Eddie Rosario

    DH- Nelson Cruz

    3rd- Miguel Sano

    C- Wilson Ramos

    1st- Brent Rooker

    2nd- Nick Gordon

    RF- Max Kepler

     

    Bench:

    Ehire Adrianza/Josh Harrison

    Lamonte Wade/Jake Cave/Tyler Austin

    Mitch Garver/ Willians Astudillo

    Because the pitching staff, and pitchers in general, are always unpredictable, I find it much easier to project the starting lineup and our bench. Hopefully this roster that the FO puts together because it would promote both Gordon and Rooker, while at the same time include the presence of established veterans like Cruz and Ramos. Although when it comes to ‘absolutes,’ the Twins FO ‘absolutely’ need to bring in a relief ace and other bullpen arms.

     

    CF- Byron Buxton

    SS- Jorge Polanco

    LF- Eddie Rosario

    DH- Nelson Cruz

    3rd- Miguel Sano

    C- Wilson Ramos

    1st- Brent Rooker

    2nd- Nick Gordon

    RF- Max Kepler

     

    Bench:

    Ehire Adrianza

    Lamonte Wade

    Mitch Garver

    What is the reasoning behind signing two veteran hitters (Cruz and Ramos) and then putting two rookies in the lineup, one of whom did very poorly at AAA the other has never even played at AAA? Seems like an inconsistent strategy to me. If you are rebuilding with Rooker and Gordon, what’s the point of signing veterans? If you are trying to contend, wouldn’t it make sense to put more established players in place of Rooker and Gordon?

     

    IMO, neither of those players sniffs the majors until June of next year, and that’s probably optimistic.

    Edited by yarnivek1972

     

    What is the reasoning behind signing two veteran hitters (Cruz and Ramos) and then putting two rookies in the lineup, one of whom did very poorly at AAA the other has never even played at AAA? Seems like an inconsistent strategy to me. If you are rebuilding with Rooker and Gordon, what’s the point of signing veterans? If you are trying to contend, wouldn’t it make sense to put more established players in place of Rooker and Gordon?

    IMO, neither of those players sniffs the majors until June of next year, and that’s probably optimistic.

     

    Because you don't wait until all your ducks are in a row to add talent. Ramos is probably a three year deal....so he's here and good when those young guys are here and good.....Or should they just sit on all the money this year, and next year, until the moon and stars align?

    What is the reasoning behind signing two veteran hitters (Cruz and Ramos) and then putting two rookies in the lineup, one of whom did very poorly at AAA the other has never even played at AAA? Seems like an inconsistent strategy to me. If you are rebuilding with Rooker and Gordon, what’s the point of signing veterans? If you are trying to contend, wouldn’t it make sense to put more established players in place of Rooker and Gordon?

    IMO, neither of those players sniffs the majors until June of next year, and that’s probably optimistic.

    Well, considering the roster decisions the FO has made so far, it’s actually not that crazy if you think about it...

     

    Also, I wouldn’t see as inconsistent (even though it is), I’d see it as attempt in maintaining a ‘safe’ balance between a “rebuild” and “contention.” Where a team can in rebuild mode, yet still able to bring in impact players without crippling the team’s payroll.

     

    And while I could be wrong, I really doubt that both Gordon and Rooker would hit below the Mendoza Line, which is why I think they should be promoted, because they could very easily surprise us like Stewart, Cave, and Astudillo have. Add Cruz, Ramos, and the rest of the core to mix, and the Twins could very easily surprise baseball (again) like the young & talented Braves did, by winning the division.

    Edited by ChrisKnutson

    Well, considering the roster decisions the FO has made so far, it’s actually not that crazy if you think about it...

     

    Also, I wouldn’t see as inconsistent (even though it is), I’d see it as attempt in maintaining a ‘safe’ balance between a “rebuild” and “contention.” Where a team can in rebuild mode, yet still able to bring in impact players without crippling the team’s payroll.

     

    And while I could be wrong, I really doubt that both Gordon and Rooker would hit below the Mendoza Line, which is why I think they should be promoted, because they could very easily surprise us like Stewart, Cave, and Astudillo have. Add Cruz, Ramos, and the rest of the core to mix, and the Twins could very easily surprise baseball (again) like the young & talented Braves did, by winning the division.

    So, you think they should be promoted because you doubt they would hit below the Mendozza line?

     

    I guess I’d rather see them come up when they can actually contribute. As I said, I don’t see that day as being before June. More likely well into July.

    Because you don't wait until all your ducks are in a row to add talent. Ramos is probably a three year deal....so he's here and good when those young guys are here and good.....Or should they just sit on all the money this year, and next year, until the moon and stars align?

    No problem with adding talent. Just don’t see the logic of promoting players that show zero signs that they are remotely close to ready. Although, I don’t personally love the idea of signing a DH only type like Cruz. I’d rather use the DH to rest players. But that’s me.

    No problem with adding talent. Just don’t see the logic of promoting players that show zero signs that they are remotely close to ready. Although, I don’t personally love the idea of signing a DH only type like Cruz. I’d rather use the DH to rest players. But that’s me.

    A DH who hits so well that players sit on the bench during their days off, because their participation would weaken the team if they DH'ed, would be all right with me. Ehire has been in a lineup as DH 4 times in his Twins career and that's 4 times too many.

    So, you think they should be promoted because you doubt they would hit below the Mendozza line?

    I guess I’d rather see them come up when they can actually contribute. As I said, I don’t see that day as being before June. More likely well into July.

    The ‘Mendoza Line’ comment was more of an exaggeration, but even if that was the case, I could live with that just as long as Rooker’s SLG% is above .400 and Gordon’s OBP is above .300.

     

    Also, I think it’s important to understand that most rookies aren’t prepared for the majors anyways, despite all the AAA seasoning in the world; So why not let both Rooker and Gordon take their licks and make adjustments early in the year.

    Edited by ChrisKnutson

    The ‘Mendoza Line’ comment was more of an exaggeration, but even if that was the case, I could live with that just as long as Rooker’s SLG% is above .400 and Gordon’s OBP is above .300.

     

    Also, I think it’s important to understand that most rookies aren’t prepared for the majors anyways, despite all the AAA seasoning in the world; So why not let both Rooker and Gordon take their licks and make adjustments early in the year.

    Why waste the service time?

     

    The Twins are supposed to have people coaching their minor league affiliates that are supposed to prepare players for MLB. Why not let them do their jobs?

     

    Because the pitching staff, and pitchers in general, are always unpredictable, I typically find it much easier to project the starting lineup and our bench instead. Although I think it’s pretty obvious that when it comes to ‘absolutes,’ the Twins FO ‘absolutely’ need to bring in a relief ace and other bullpen arms. Other than that, here’s what I hope our opening day roster looks like:

    CF- Byron Buxton
    SS- Jorge Polanco
    LF- Eddie Rosario
    DH- Nelson Cruz
    3rd- Miguel Sano
    C- Wilson Ramos
    1st- Brent Rooker
    2nd- Nick Gordon
    RF- Max Kepler

    Bench:
    Ehire Adrianza/Josh Harrison
    Lamonte Wade/Jake Cave/Tyler Austin
    Mitch Garver/ Willians Astudillo

     

    Who gets called up to play if Gordon gets hurt? Who plays significantly if both Gordon or Harrison/Adrianaza are on the DL at the same time? 

     

    If Gordon starts in AAA... Gordon could be that guy who comes up and we will need guys who can come up because no team can avoid the injury reaper. 

     

    If you want Cruz, Ramos and Harrison... Do it this way. 

     

    C - Ramos

    1B - Austin

    2B - Escobar

    3B - Somebody with a track record

    SS - Polanco

    LF - Rosario

    CF - Kepler

    RF - Cruz

     

    C - Castro or Garver

    1B/3B - Sano

    2B/SS - Harrison

    OF - Buxton

     

    Rochester/Chattanooga

    C - Astudillo

    1B - Rooker

    2B/SS - Gordon

    OF - Cave and Wade

     

    If you are going to invest in Cruz and Ramos... Don't stop short... Finish the job. 

     

    Who gets called up to play if Gordon gets hurt? Who plays significantly if both Gordon or Harrison/Adrianaza are on the DL at the same time? 

     

    If Gordon starts in AAA... Gordon could be that guy who comes up and we will need guys who can come up because no team can avoid the injury reaper. 

     

    If you want Cruz, Ramos and Harrison... Do it this way. 

     

    C - Ramos

    1B - Austin

    2B - Escobar

    3B - Somebody with a track record

    SS - Polanco

    LF - Rosario

    CF - Kepler

    RF - Cruz

     

    C - Castro or Garver

    1B/3B - Sano

    2B/SS - Harrison

    OF - Buxton

     

    Rochester/Chattanooga

    C - Astudillo

    1B - Rooker

    2B/SS - Gordon

    OF - Cave and Wade

     

    If you are going to invest in Cruz and Ramos... Don't stop short... Finish the job.

     

    Going into offseason with a “finish the job” mentality while we’re still in this purgatory, that’s between “rebuilding” and “contention,” in my opinion is very counterproductive. Especially when taking extensions for Berrios and Rosario into consideration. Now this doesn’t mean I’m afraid of slightly ‘overpaying’ for any of Cruz, Ramos, plus Ottavino, because I’m not, my problem is with ‘overspending.’ Which is why our FO needs make trades as well. And while guys like Starlin Castro, Maikel Franco, J.P. Crawford, and Ketel Marte come to mind, I honestly would be very content with just Cruz and Ramos, not only because of the impact they make on the field and the payroll, but the impact they have in the clubhouse. Just look the all the teams they’ve been on, you can tell by just watching the game, their interviews, and their interactions with teammates that they really set the tone in the clubhouse. And with prospects like Rooker, Gordon, Kirilloff, and Lewis coming up soon, creating a winning environment is very important, in my opinion more important than “finishing the job,” when in actuality; we’ve only begun. And because I understand that the FO may not have the same approach, I’m now sorta warming up to the idea of signing more FA, particularly Galvis, Escobar, Murphy, and Harrison.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...