Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Draft Coverage

    Should Twins Draft Vahn Lackey? Examining the Pros and Cons of Minnesota’s Potential Pick at No. 3

    Georgia Tech catcher Vahn Lackey has emerged as one of the fastest-rising stars in college baseball, but selecting a catcher third overall comes with both significant upside and considerable risk.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Ken Ruinard / USA Today Network South Carolina / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The 2026 MLB Draft is quickly approaching, and the Minnesota Twins find themselves in unfamiliar territory. After securing the third overall selection, Minnesota holds its highest draft pick since taking Royce Lewis with the first overall pick in 2017. With the draft board beginning to take shape, much of the industry expects shortstops Grady Emerson and Roch Cholowsky to come off the board with the first two selections, though there remains debate about which player will ultimately go first overall. That uncertainty could leave the Twins with a fascinating decision at No. 3.

    According to the Pioneer Press, Charley Walters wrote that “there is little doubt” the Twins are set on selecting Georgia Tech catcher Vahn Lackey. Some evaluators believe Lackey is not only the top catcher in the class, but the best college player available. If the Twins are indeed zeroing in on the Yellow Jacket’s star, the decision would represent both a tremendous opportunity and a calculated gamble.

    The Case for Drafting Lackey
    Few players in this draft can match Lackey's combination of production, athleticism, and developmental trajectory. The Georgia Tech junior has dominated college baseball this season, hitting .412 with 20 home runs, 78 RBIs, and an OPS north of 1.300 while leading the Yellow Jackets to one of the best records in the country. His offensive profile checks nearly every box teams look for in a premium position player.

    Lackey controls the strike zone exceptionally well and consistently puts the ball in play. He has cleaned up a swing that was considered somewhat busy, and he rarely gets beaten by velocity while using the entire field effectively. Scouts believe there is enough raw power in his bat to support annual 20-plus home run production at the professional level, and his increasing ability to elevate the baseball has unlocked another level of offensive impact this season.

    What makes his profile especially intriguing is that he remains relatively new to his current level of physical development. Lackey was a classic late bloomer in high school. He received little recruiting attention until his senior season and was largely overlooked by scouts because he rarely attended showcase events.

    As a freshman, Lackey struggled against ACC competition and posted a .174 batting average in conference play. Yet, Georgia Tech remained committed to his long-term development. That patience has paid off in a major way. Each season has brought significant improvement, culminating in one of the most impressive campaigns in college baseball this spring.

    For organizations that prioritize player development and growth potential, Lackey's story is particularly appealing. He has already shown an ability to identify weaknesses, make adjustments, and maximize his natural tools.

    The Defensive Value
    The offensive production alone would make Lackey a top draft prospect, but his defense behind the plate elevates his overall profile. Lackey was named ACC Defensive Player of the Year and has developed into one of the nation's premier defensive catchers. His athleticism stands out immediately. At 6-foot-2 and 215 pounds, he moves exceptionally well for a catcher and displays the agility needed to handle the position at a high level.

    His arm strength is another significant weapon. Last season, he threw out 14 of 29 attempted base stealers, a remarkable success rate that showcases both arm strength and accuracy. This season, he has thrown out 7 of 31 runners. He also posted a .985 fielding percentage while continuing to refine his receiving skills.

    Perhaps most importantly, his athleticism provides a potential fallback option if catching ever becomes too demanding. He played 13 errorless games at third base in 2025, giving teams confidence that his bat could remain valuable elsewhere on the diamond if necessary. For a Twins organization that values versatility and defensive flexibility, that added layer of security could be attractive.

    The Concerns About Taking a Catcher Third Overall
    As impressive as Lackey's resume may be, there are legitimate reasons for caution. The first concern is positional risk. Catchers carry some of the highest attrition rates in professional baseball. The physical demands of the position often slow offensive development, and even elite amateur catchers can struggle to handle the workload required at the major-league level.

    Recent draft history provides examples of highly regarded catching prospects who required significant developmental time before reaching their ceilings. Pittsburgh took Henry Davis with the first overall pick in 2021, and he’s accumulated -1.7 rWAR. Adley Rutschman looked like a slam-dunk pick at number one for the Orioles in 2019, but injuries derailed his rapid ascent toward superstardom. Though it looks like he'll stop the trend this year, he's posted fewer wins above replacement (WAR) in each of his big-league seasons than in the one before it.

    There are also some questions about Lackey's offensive profile. While his power is undeniable, scouts have noted that his swing can produce too many ground balls. Although he has made meaningful improvements in that area this season, professional pitchers may challenge him differently than collegiate competition.

    Defensively, while his tools are excellent, evaluators still point to occasional lapses in focus and consistency. Those issues are common among young catchers, but they will require continued development.

    Another factor is organizational fit. The Twins have invested heavily in catching talent in recent years. While drafting for need is rarely advisable at the top of the draft, Minnesota must determine whether Lackey's upside clearly exceeds that of other available options, particularly if a premium shortstop or another impact position player remains on the board.

    Why the Twins Might Ultimately Be Sold
    The strongest argument in favor of Lackey may be that his best baseball could still be ahead of him. Most top-three picks arrive with years of national attention and showcase experience. Lackey's path has been different. He entered college as an under-the-radar recruit and has improved dramatically every season since arriving at Georgia Tech.

    That developmental curve suggests there may still be additional upside. Organizations are constantly searching for players who have not yet reached their ceiling. Lackey's combination of athleticism, intelligence, work ethic, and year-over-year growth makes him one of the more compelling bets in the class.

    His profile also aligns with traits the Twins have traditionally valued. Minnesota has often targeted players with strong baseball instincts, defensive versatility, and a demonstrated ability to improve. Lackey checks all of those boxes.

    For the Twins, the decision may come down to a simple question: Do they believe Lackey's future is still ascending? If the answer is yes, Minnesota could be looking at a franchise cornerstone capable of impacting the game on both sides of the ball for years to come. If his development continues on its current trajectory, the Twins may not simply be drafting the best catcher in the class. They may be drafting one of the best players in baseball's next generation. Of course, it could also be a decision that's made for them, if the Chicago White Sox or Tampa Bay Rays take Lackey first. A month and a half out from the draft, it's just beginning to be time to assess choices like this one, as the options come slowly into focus.


    Will Lackey be Minnesota’s selection at number three? Leave a comment and start the discussion.


    Check out our 2026 mock draft board, updated regularly, and with detailed player write-ups!

    View The Mock Draft Board

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Eduardo Tait

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, C
    The 19-year-old backstop went 3-for-5 with a double, a homer, and six RBI. In his past four games, he is 9-for-23 with a double, four homers, and 13 RBI.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Not a fan of taking Lackey.  I'd rather take the best pitcher or maybe even Jacob Lombard, who is supposed to be better than his brother (a top ten overall prospect) was at the same stage.

    Georgia Tech catchers have been overrated for years.  Also, I know it's a super small sample, but if you're worthy of the #3 pick in the draft, you probably don't go 3 for 25 in the Cape Cod League.  You can disregard it, but really most college players' real value comes out in the CCBL.  Lackey struck out 6 of 26 PA.  For comparison, Cholowsky played there a full year younger and struck out 7 times in 65 PA.

    Georgia Tech is a hitters' paradise.  Numbers are inflated big time, and it's only really behind Tennesse for big-time schools (a major reason I didn't like Billy Amick).  You can't ignore this by hoping it's untrue or thinking this doesn't apply to a hitter you like or want.  I would pass on Vahn Lackey and take Lombard or a top pitcher if both Cholowsky and Emerson are gone.

    And by the way, TB is flush in catching prospects, namely Nathan Flewelling, who is very likely better than Lackey.  They're flush in shortstop prospects, too, though play them elsewhere, who cares.  The biggest thing the Twins can hope for is that the Rays take the best pitcher and leave Roch or Grady for the Twins.

    I personally hope Emerson falls.  I doubt Cholowsky does.  Wouldn't mind Lackey but I think I'd prefer Flora.  The Twins have done a decent job developing lower tiered arms.  I'd like to see what they can do with someone that has the arm talent he does

    I really liked Teal as a college catcher & IMO, Lackey is better. I see him making it to the MLB fairly soon & Tait is no sure thing to make it at all. It's not bad to pick according to need especially when he'll be the best player at #3. Finding a primary catcher is like finding a dinosaur, if Lackey doesn't become one especially in the beginning, that's ok. Hope the Twins find someone who can further his development.

    Picking 3rd in a draft with 3 prospects that have separated themselves.  Much like the Walker Jenkins draft take whomever is left and hope they live up to the hype.

    I will be very excited if they end up with him but I would prefer one of the SS.

    Catcher to me is not a position I want to ideally spend a top pick on, Mauer/ Posey are the unicorns but they are so rare.  Catching prospects are limited in durability and development time.

    All things considered I would much rather have a SS or CF that has the real defensive chops and can hit than a catcher in the same situation.  There is just so much more value in the speed and utility that can bring.

    A great SS/ CF is a franchise cornerstone, a great catcher is a champagne cornerstone.

     

    1 hour ago, DasBat said:

    I personally hope Emerson falls.  I doubt Cholowsky does.  Wouldn't mind Lackey but I think I'd prefer Flora.  The Twins have done a decent job developing lower tiered arms.  I'd like to see what they can do with someone that has the arm talent he does

    I would love to see them draft a starter.  This front office has so rarely done it with a top of the draft pick.

    The bats seem to be 1-3 but I would not hate them drafting Flora all things considered.

    10 hours ago, Twins_Fan_in_NJ said:

    If recent history has shown us anything, we'll fret and hem & haw about Lackey at #3 for the next 3 weeks only to watch him go at #2 and go onto have a HOF career while the Twins reach for an economically responsible pick (aka HS short-stop) who doesn't sniff the majors until 2032.

     

    Or ever… cavaco

    1 hour ago, RaoulDuke said:

    I would love to see them draft a starter.  This front office has so rarely done it with a top of the draft pick.

    The bats seem to be 1-3 but I would not hate them drafting Flora all things considered.

    I'm easy to please.  All they have to do is guess right!

    Catchers have over inflated value. If you don't develop them... you have to over pay to get them. I'd rather be on the good side of this position scarcity to take advantage of the market... rather than the market taking advantage of you. If we have a pile of catchers that are major league talent. That's good... you can trade some of the pile at higher rates.  

    When it comes to the draft. I refrain from personal opinions. It doesn't matter the sport. I will read the articles out of curiosity or for pure fun but... I simply refuse to let what I read influence my opinion so I simply don't have an opinion on individual players... I won't yell at the front office for taking a guy that someone else writing an article wasn't as sure about. 

    With that said. It'll be the third pick overall so we need to be successful. If there are such things as tiebreakers between prospects with the front office and I assume there are.

    I'd be perfectly comfortable with the team considering inflated catcher value as a tie breaker... if they are choosing between two.

    I know very little about Vahn Lackey. But... taking the best catcher in the draft sounds like a good idea to me. Jeffers is the only catcher we have produced in a long time and he is going away. It's time to quit failing at the catcher position.   

    On 6/1/2026 at 8:42 AM, HrbieFan said:

    He will be there and if the Twins don't take him, he might not go top 10. I am in favor of this pick, only if we have agreed in principal to a below slot contract 

    Huh??   Why would the consensus #3 player in the draft take under slot for going 3rd?  If we don't pick him, he goes 4th, dude.  What a weird take.....

     

    6 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

    Catchers have over inflated value. 

    In other contexts you have said that you are fine with cobbling together a catching tandem from the scrapheap rather than overpay.  You and I are in general agreement that the nature of the position makes it a different beast to prioritize than the other 7 position player spots; in particular, not even the best catchers play the position every day so then you have a roster problem trying to DH him on a part-time basis yet on a regular schedule.  

    So, is investing the #3 overall pick in a catcher any less of an overpay?  Historically 6 of the top 7 #3 picks have been shortstops or third basemen when drafted.  Those guys play every day and the best ones rack up yearly value like crazy.

    It's great to have a HOFer like Mauer as your catcher, or even "just" an all-star, but my own view is that top tier catching is a rich team's territory, unless you luck into one.

    I very much liked taking Jeffers as a second round pick.  Standout catcher Cal Raleigh was a third rounder. Daulton Varsho was also a second rounder, although by now he's been moved off the position.  Sean Murphy was very good for a while and he was a third rounder.  I looked mostly in that era, because we have a handle on how the guys have turned out, but more recently Dillon Dingler, a second rounder, looks like he's panning out.

    More second and third round catchers, please!  Johnny Bench was picked by the Reds in the second round and Gary Carter lasted into the third.  😁

    7 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    So, is investing the #3 overall pick in a catcher any less of an overpay?

    Big Picture.

    Yeah... it would be the same thing. 

    It would also be an overpay. 

    My desire to take the catching position more seriously come draft time and then the subsequent develop time got the best of me and I ran ahead of myself. 

    You are correct. It would also be an overpay in the same vein. 

     

    14 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    Big Picture.

    Yeah... it would be the same thing. 

    It would also be an overpay. 

    My desire to take the catching position more seriously come draft time and then the subsequent develop time got the best of me and I ran ahead of myself. 

    You are correct. It would also be an overpay in the same vein. 

     

    Just for balance, since we're aligned, I'll play devil's advocate and acknowledge that my philosophy as stated would have caused me to miss out on our 21st century hall of famer.  In the post I was replying to, you also stated, "With that said. It'll be the third pick overall so we need to be successful."  That's the most important thing. 

    There are no absolutes.  You were looking at tie-breakers - I view it as a tie-breaker in the opposite direction than you proposed.

    I just hope that our FO has the wisdom to identify the low-hanging fruit*, the diamond just sitting there in the sand, because at #3 it will be there.  If the brain trust is looking at the next Joe Mauer, and are certain he has the bat, he has the glove, he has the durability, and most importantly he has the makeup, then they have to take him, "overpay" be damned.

    * Sometimes that can be a metaphor for a mistake, or for the obvious,, but I don't mean it that way.  Low hanging fruit can be the sweetest, and it goes fast.

    6 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    We are aligned. 

    But now you got 162 game Bopper in my head with the third pick.

    Is Aaron Judge available this draft?

    That's who I want now. 

    Manny Machado went #3 sixteen years ago.

    He'd do.

    Just now, ashbury said:

    Manny Machado went #3 sixteen years ago.

    He'd do.

    Perfect... Aaron Judge went 32nd overall so he's probably gone by the time our 2nd round pick comes around and if he does slide to 42. You and I are probably grabbing Luis Campusano in that spot. 

    The top college players are finished with their seasons. My guess is that Jackson Flora was the player who displayed the most talent this season among the college guys. 

    I have not seen any of the top high school players play so my pick ( a month early) is Flora.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...