Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Fellow Twins Fans, I'm Begging You ... Make Tom Pohlad Earn It


Twins Video

I really enjoy the fan opinion polls that Twins Daily offers on a regular basis. But this result is alarming:

image.png.fc76a8f568a7faf25629129c3397e966.png

I don't have access to the trends over time (or do I? - there's a ton of functionality on TD that I probably know nothing about), but I sense that this reflects is a significant improvement since the start of the year. I guess that's just the natural result of team that smashed expectations and is leading the AL Central heading into September.

Oh, wait.

Well, I guess it just the reflects fan enthusiasm over the team's incredible surge after buying a few relievers at the trade deadline.

Oh, wait.

Well maybe it's just the result of fans being appreciative that Tom was willing to push for very tough decisions in the offseason, but now those elite prospects the Twins received in trade look like they're ready to contribute in 2027 or 2028. It was sad to lose Ryan, Lopez and Buxton, but they're predictably hobbled during their new team's respective pennant drives. 

Oh, wait.

Honestly, I can't explain this. An approval rating in the 40s?! Fans realize that Tom Pohlad had nothing to do with drafting or developing Walker Jenkins, right? That adding Kremer, Minter and Hoffman were the kind of bare-minimum additions the team certainly could have made in the offseason, all without losing prospects, including a few with high-end potential?

The only explanation I can think of is this: Minnesota Twins fans are nice. As in, too nice. As in, too forgiving.

"Sure, those Pohlads tried to eliminate the entire team a few years back, and yes, they cut the legs out of our last playoff contender, but that Tom kid was willing to answer some questions back in Spring Training and at least the beers are cheaper at the ballpark."

I also realize that there's a large section of the remaining fanbase that likes that Tom pushed to hold on to Ryan and Lopez. He even phrased all this as benevolence - "we owe it to the fans." As though having a player fulfill a contract here were some sort of favor. As though preserving a roster that went 70-92, and losing remarkable potential prospect value, was even in the team's long-term best interests.

If you like Tom Pohlad, fine. He's got a square jaw and nothing suggests he's a particularly detestable menace to society. But if you think he and his family pulled the team off the market because they suddenly fell in love with baseball and because they can't wait to build a winner here in Minnesota, then I've got a few vacant office buildings I could sell you. Cheap. Great view.

Twins fans, Tom Pohlad has talked a very big game. Right now, that has led to a team that is still one of the ten worst in baseball. Set your standards a little higher and, even if you want to turn the page on past frustrations and welcome Tom into the fold, you really, really ought to make him earn it first.

31 Comments


Recommended Comments



Richie the Rally Goat

Posted

20 hours ago, bean5302 said:

"I hate the entire Pohlad family, even their distant relatives, and I am committed to any conspiracy theory I can form to continue hating all of them."

Fixed that for you.

Hate’s a strong word, but I do agree with the OP that the Pohlad family played a switcheroo on which figurehead does what, but at the end of the day, it’s the same family owning and running their entire suite of businesses and until things actually change with how they run the Twins, we should hold that family accountable.

I was a season ticket holder until 2025, and I will be a season ticket holder again, but they need to show me. Thus far, it’s lip service and trivial salary

bean5302

Posted

I don't think the Pohlad family played switcheroo at all. I think Tom's the guy. I like most of what he's said. I like most of what he's done including absolutely loving how quickly he canned Falvey's ***. From running around delivering hot dogs and $20s to Trevor Plouffe to the happy hours on Fri/Sat to convincing the actual financial owners to open the checkbook at the trade deadline. Tom seems committed to doing what he can to get fans interested and to delivering an overall ball park and game day experience which is improved.

Tom Pohlad is the controlling owner. He does not have full control over money. That's Jim, Bob and Bill, who are the REAL owners. That said, ownership feels different to me. I got my Royce Lewis jersey this year. I was unable to get my Correa jersey as a season ticket holder with club level seats a couple years ago. Those kinds of things make an impact. Maybe it has more to do with a weaker fan base? It doesn't matter because the experience was awesome. Killer jersey too.

The game day experience is BETTER this year than last, even with lousy attendance, the game is better.

NYCTK

Posted

23 hours ago, bean5302 said:

I think Tom's the guy. I like most of what he's said. I like most of what he's done

Clarification, by "I think Tom's the guy" do you mean 'tom is the guy in charge' or 'Tom is the guy that will get this organization turned around'? Because either is a valid reading of that first sentence but one is obviously much more hard to swallow than the other. 

As for what he's said, it's as valuable as the dirt on the bottom of my shoe.

And as for what's he's done, he stepped in and halted a rebuild in the middle of the process which helped the Twins be slightly better in 2026, but damaged their future prospects so I don't know why we're supposed to be a fan of that. 

NYCTK

Posted

On 9/6/2026 at 11:46 AM, bean5302 said:

"I hate the entire Pohlad family, even their distant relatives, and I am committed to any conspiracy theory I can form to continue hating all of them."

Fixed that for you.

Holding executives responsible for the deeds of their organization SHOULD be the bare minimum, not a conspiracy theory. 

Why are you constantly trying to launder the reputations of the Pohlads here? Are you an employee? Is this one of those things, like if you're a cop you gotta say it, otherwise it's entrapment?

Woof Bronzer

Posted

22 hours ago, NYCTK said:

Clarification, by "I think Tom's the guy" do you mean 'tom is the guy in charge' or 'Tom is the guy that will get this organization turned around'? Because either is a valid reading of that first sentence but one is obviously much more hard to swallow than the other. 

As for what he's said, it's as valuable as the dirt on the bottom of my shoe.

And as for what's he's done, he stepped in and halted a rebuild in the middle of the process which helped the Twins be slightly better in 2026, but damaged their future prospects so I don't know why we're supposed to be a fan of that. 

I think he means "Tom's da man" though he also has made it clear he believes the CEO has absolutely no responsibility for anything the organization does so I'm lost too.  

Honestly though as much as I want to rip the "I like what he's done" when what the sum total of what he's done is run a $100m payroll (about $40m less than the Kansas City Royals) with the team projected to come in under their preseason projection of 78 wins in a historically bad AL - I can't do it.  This year in particular has shown me that there are just a lot of fans who like going out to TF on a nice summer day.  That's who the Twins are for them, a nice way to spend an evening.  Minnesota men's sports fans have been emotionally punished so much that we have quietly and collectively come to the realization that we cannot and will never ever win anything meaningful, so it's not worth getting all worked up about winning.  Just enjoy the game, the crack of the bat, the smell of the grass, the ballpark experience.

And I can't argue with it, even if I'm a different kind of fan.  It's actually probably a healthy reaction, even if the Pohlads take advantage of it and as a result we are stuck in an endless loop of mediocrity.   

HarmonK03

Posted

On 9/5/2026 at 5:12 PM, LastOnePicked said:

Okay, I gotta ask: how is the house cleaned? What has changed?

If you mean Falvey's departure, it certainly seems like he quit. Tom was ready to start the season, but then Falvey likely asked about the payroll direction because he rightfully realized that they either needed to spend some money OR they needed to recoup future value. When Tom told him to do neither, Falvey probably figured he'd seen enough here. Why drown on sinking ship when you're not the captain?

And I didn't love having Falvey here, but I don't blame him if that's why he left. Standing pat last offseason and not finishing the rebuild was the worst of all possible choices.

Falvey left because Tom split up the Operations and Business duties like it has always been done.  Falvey didn't want to give up the business duties and wanted to continue to do both.


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...