Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

MN_ExPat

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,403

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by MN_ExPat

  1. MN_ExPat
    Dude, that’s a wee bit unfair.
  2. MN_ExPat
    Maybe the team could put The opposing pitcher in Time Out while he thinks about what he did, and he can come out when he’s ready to apologize. Plus no dessert after dinner.
  3. MN_ExPat
    You know... they could sign Kimbrel after the draft. Yes, an excellent plan Smithers! I'm glad I thought of it!
  4. MN_ExPat
    It’s baseball. Getting that ramped up about this will only lead to a Heart attack or mild stroke. Plus it’s an unfair assessment of the player and team.
  5. MN_ExPat
    Congratulations to Perez and his family by the way. If it's a boy, hopefully they name him Harmon or Joe
  6. MN_ExPat
    Pretty good point, but I have a feeling though that it lines up more with where they (Stewart and Little) are in the rotation and their rest cycle than anything else.
  7. MN_ExPat
    A hit is a hit in the end. Doesn't matter how it happens … Also major kudos to Gibby. He really looked comfortable out there today.
  8. MN_ExPat
    Great take Thieres. Thanks for the write up.
  9. MN_ExPat
    Awesome write up Jeremy. Appreciate the time and effort on a topic that causes a fair bit of confusion for most of us.
  10. MN_ExPat
    I think a potent Houston lineup might disagree with you on the last part.
  11. MN_ExPat
    You could always hit the mute, and turn on the radio broadcast... just saying.
  12. MN_ExPat
    1, one, o + 1. As in One appearance. Vasquez may or may not be ready to fully contribute at the MLB level yet, but we simply cannot make that call after just one appearance.
  13. MN_ExPat
    Have you watched any other games/teams this year thus far? Twins BP usage is pretty much on par. So, I’ll have to disagree on the smoke and mirrors part.
  14. MN_ExPat
    Well, great job and a mighty "Huzzah!!" to Jax and Ober. Go Get em' tomorrow boys.
  15. MN_ExPat
    You know what y'all? It's baseball, it happens. Yeah, they had their chances but came up short. It's baseball. Philly looks to be a pretty good team this year and the Twins showed well overall. It was a good, close game and I enjoyed watching it. Sucks that they lost, but now we move on to the next contest. Man, I love this game
  16. MN_ExPat
    Agree to disagree. Spring Training is just that... Spring Training. His results thus far in his professional career would argue a different story. He had a poor start, he'll be fine.
  17. MN_ExPat
    4... 4 games. There’s is no but.
  18. MN_ExPat
    It’s a fair question, but the biggest reason is simply because the Twins were up 9-3 w/2 outs. There’s no reason to make that throw and chance an error that allows a run (or 2) to score without giving your defense or the pitcher a chance to make a play. Thus the defensive indifference on the runners. The odds are always in the defense’s favor. Even if the batter does everything correct, statistically speaking he will “fail” (or get out) at least 70% of the time. Teams will take those odds more often than not.
  19. MN_ExPat
    Concur. Great write up Steve. LOVE the minors reports.
  20. MN_ExPat
    Fair enough
  21. MN_ExPat
    The comment was not really a matter of “right” or “wrong”. Just poking a little fun for the vitriolic nature of the original comment since Spring has only just now Sprung .
  22. MN_ExPat
    Snark much?
  23. MN_ExPat
    Fuhren Sie den Teig aus, der die Hoffnungen und Traume der degnerischen Speiler zerstort!
  24. MN_ExPat
    Agents
  25. MN_ExPat
    Yes, technology is fallible. There are however a number of factors that can influence the reading that the device gives you. Just for discussion purposes. One of the more common devices that teams/scouts/etc. use, is made by Stalker (and Stalker is also one of the more common brands used by law enforcement agencies as well ). Stalker is also pretty good quality for the most part. That being said, some of the biggest factors that influence the reading that the radar gives you are wind interference, other objects in the way or traveling along with the object, and probably one of the greatest culprits is how far off the center of path of travel the device is from the object being tracked (the greater the degree of separation from path of travel and the device, the larger the deviation from the actual speed). Also, we tend to not often take into account maintenance. If the device is not maintained or stored properly, heat, humidity, bumping or jarring can take their toll and cause the device to read improperly. Given the cost of most of these, you can guess that they are used as long as possible. The most common hand held Stalker for example runs between $400 and $600 per unit, while I believe Rapsodo and Trackman (?) run about $3500+ per unit.
×
×
  • Create New...