These things are going to be fun to read while this topic is still hot, but that one seems to take two huge leaps of logic, and that's aside from the giant coincidence that two separate groups did the framing independently. 1st, that theory basically assumes the cops planted the blood, the key and due to the assumption of Avery's innocence, the bullet, all to cover up for the fact that the brother and boyfriend were trespassing. Judging by the evidence that was allowed in both trials, there's no way the judge would have thrown out any evidence just because two civilians trespassed and found the car, probably not even if they were law enforcement. Also, there would have been no reason for the cops to take the key, it should have remained in the ignition. 2nd, how did the two boys contact Colborn? As mentioned in the article calling dispatch would have gotten their call recorded, so they would have somehow had to know that A ) Colborn would help them cover their tracks, and B ) know his personal phone number. It's a fun read, but I my warning lights start flashing when some nobody calls their own article, "This Is The Most Credible 'Making A Murderer' Theory I've Seen So Far" and says they saw it on Youtube.