Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    25,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. I know lots of us had high hopes for him, but at this point, Enlow seems likely to be one of those guys who will end up getting claimed and DFA’d multiple times.
  2. I'm not sure if I agree that Boras' side would put this out there. They walked away from the Giants ASAP, now for a month there's been radio silence about the Mets deal. In most cases, it would be obvious Boras' team leaked it, but Correa was a luxury add for the Mets; they didn't really NEED him. And speaking of luxury, the Mets would be making a mockery of the luxury tax penalties which rubbed everyone the wrong way when this prospective deal was first announced. I think Boras would be foolish to goad the Mets, wouldn't they be just as likely to say, "Eh, go ahead, find a different home, this isn't worth it"?
  3. I know MLB owners NEVER dabble in collusion, but I still can't help but feel that the other major market owners are telling Cohen not to do this or they'll all risk greater, if not complete, revenue sharing, and that's the real reason for the hold up.
  4. Of all the questionable decisions the team made last year, never promoting Julian to AAA was among the most puzzling. If he keeps pitching well, hopefully the Twins do follow the aggressive path with Festa though. Having Varland going from A ball to the majors in a season at least shows they have a blueprint to work that angle.
  5. Oh yeah, I’ve really been singing the front office’s praises. That post was full of them and not completely the opposite. Have you seen Wacha’s stats prior to last year? Who’d trust this guy? Velocity, pitch selection, spin rate, nothing changed for the better with him, last year was a total fluke. If Wacha reverts back to his pre 2022 self, which is THE most likely scenario, this team is once again going to be pushing out another Bundy/Archer for 20-25 games this year. Terrible move. We can put your Ervin Santana and Michael Pineda against my Nolasco, Prelfrey, Perez, Bailey, Happ, Schoemacher, Bundy and Archer. We can even call Phil Hughes a draw. These kinds of pitchers are almost always a sucker bet. Run away.
  6. This team regularly changes what didn't work the year before, so I wouldn't be surprised to see the starters go longer, maybe even too long. I know that no one is happy with the front office, but the one thing they do that the last front office didn't was try new things. But on what planet is Michael Wacha the team's best pitcher? He was awful for three years running then had one outlier year. This guy looks like Dylan Bundy in 2019. If any other team believed in him, he'd have already gotten a deal like Walker, Taillon and Eovaldi got. No one has because it's clearly a smoke-and-mirrors situation. Having this guy take innings from the young players would be the dumbest thing this team has done all off season, and that's saying a lot.
  7. Uh, no. Where did any of us say that? I've pretty much copied/pasted my feelings about every free agent starter other than Rodon over and over again all off season. Also, they aren't even close to the same pitcher. Both look like bad investments, but Wacha has been nearly unusable for the three seasons prior to last year. At lease Eovaldi has been decent when healthy.
  8. Most 30-year-old pitchers don't suddenly find a career turnaround after 3 DFA worthy seasons. Especially ones who saw their velocity decrease. I think 2022 was more likely the outlier than 2019, 2020 and 2021 were.
  9. Gross. Ober, Varland, SWR, Winder. All better options. A groundball pitcher with this infield defense? Why? Not to mention he lost a MPH off of his fastball last year. Top of the rotation arms or AAAA break-glass-in-case-of-emergency starters that can roost in St. Paul. That's it. Zero reason to pay these zero upside vets to take a rotation spot away from the young players except that they want to look like they're actually spending money. It's too late, the good players are all gone. Don't make the team worse trying to window dress the mistakes you made earlier this year.
  10. One Kyle Farmer is enough for me, I'd not trade assets for a second.
  11. Would a rebuilding team have any interest in Kepler? I'm also fairly turned off by the trade calculator. After all, why trade Kepler when they could just trade Thielbar, who's got twice his value, instead?
  12. But the team doctors should have still been aware of the issue right? And the Twins offer should have already been with this issue squarely in mind?
  13. If they do it at a discount, they’d have to fire their team doctors right? They’d basically be saying that last year the Twins doctors were incapable of detecting what the Giants and Mets doctors did.
  14. ***Disclaimer- nutty conspiracy theory post alert**** Is it possible, the other big market clubs with entrenched owners reached out to Cohen and said he had to knock this crap off? That they all had a good thing going and his actions may end up provoking unwanted changes? Like greater broadcast revenue sharing?
  15. Everyone treated the deal like a one year deal, but it was three. And with the new injury concern news, those two extra years for 70M made the deal more of a reality than we thought.
  16. You're talking about the wealthy correct? Tax payer funded stadiums, obscene tax breaks and getting everything hand delivered to their doorstep on a silver platter? Or are you saying the entitlement and handouts should ONLY be reserved for the wealthy?
  17. The only double standard I see is in your post. I can't imagine anyone here who doesn't want Bauer, would want Watson on their team either. There's a Vikings thread in "Other Sports" forum. Go search through that and see how Watson was thought of around here. And perhaps you conveniently missed them, but the Browns fans have held protests regarding Watson all season long.
  18. Yeah, good for him, it was looking like he'd probably miss out on his big free agent deal. I thought he'd get a year, maybe two if he took a discount or made it a team option.
  19. Agree, aside from the starting pitchers, the vets being proposed as trades, would also be proposed as trades on a team that won the World Series the year prior.
  20. I wouldn't trade Polanco or Gray. Polanco because I think you'd be selling low and you can get more for him later. Also, he's still fairly young. I wouldn't trade Gray because he's likely to be worth a QO in the off season and SWR is the only other starting option after the players listed. I like the Ryan/Ober/Varland/Winder/SWR group, but that's basically it. With Mahle that's six and six isn't enough. The team doesn't have quite enough young bullets to waste shooting off Gray right now. But otherwise, I'm on board trading the rest and I wouldn't even call it a rebuild. The young guys are already just as good if not better than the guys being traded away.
  21. Yeah, it does seem that a preferred destination or geographic region ends up getting leaked for some players at the very top of the free agent market. This year it was Rodon (New York) and Trae Turner (East Coast). It seems exceedingly rare that when those locations get leaked, that a guy doesn't ultimately end up somewhere in that vicinity.
  22. No one is trying to get points but you. *****Moderator Note***** No more of this nonsense. If you want Bauer, say you want Bauer and leave it at that. Shaming people who don't want him for the obvious reasons is not going to be tolerated here.
  23. I’m not defending the roster build, but the Twins DO NOT need to add to their roster. If you can get top end talent, sure do that obviously. But they don’t need to add players just to add players. They have enough young guys ready to serve and they’re better than most of these guys. And I hate “putting the band back together”. If they add, get new blood.
  24. Why would you trade multiple assets for two players who would only be part time players, if the team isn't supposed to be very good in 2023?
×
×
  • Create New...